The Path To Power

By Max Musson:

For more than a century, British nationalists have believed themselves to be the vanguard of a resurgent national spirit that had somehow become dulled and dormant through comfort and complacency, but which remained latent, still potent, and ready to be revived once the clarion call was sounded, heralding a new ‘golden age’.

During the early part of the last century there was cause to believe that this self-image was correct and it allowed the folly of the ‘brothers wars’ to take place in which White nations pitted themselves against their racial brothers in two shamefully bloody episodes of mutual destruction. We were fooled into thinking that we had time to give ‘Johnny foreigner’ a bloody nose and still get back to the business of sorting our own people out before it was too late.

The reality however was that our internal enemies had been burrowing into every organ of the body politic, both here and in all other European countries for centuries before we even noticed anything was wrong, and following the blood letting of the two World Wars, our nations were too weak and our traditional leadership class were unable to prevent their eclipse by a new breed of overseer.

During the early post-war period, great ‘hurrahs’ swept across the nation as the common people, weary of war and grateful for peace, were willingly duped into believing that mankind had taken a giant step forward, ridding ourselves of the menace of ‘alien domination’. What that generation failed to appreciate however, was that our nations were no longer fleet of foot and athletic in making progress, but like condemned prisoners, shuffling painfully forwards on our knees towards our impending annihilation.

The ‘Fifties’, passed into the ‘Sixties’, the ‘Seventies’ and the ‘Eighties’, and by the ‘Nineties’, when the true scope and extent of the racial obliteration that was planned for us became clear to all, many nationalists still clung to the belief that all we need do was to get our message out to an eager British public and the old patriotism of the war years would re-assert itself once more.

We threw ourselves into electioneering and despite the withering hail of denigration and abuse that was hurled at us by the media, despite the open discrimination practiced against us by those in authority, despite the state sponsored gangs of thugs and the disruptive campaigns of the secret police and the gerrymandering of elections, we still believed that if only we worked hard enough, and made sufficient personal sacrifices, it was still possible that one day we might win a general election, and ‘good as gold’ the existing political establishment would hand us the keys to Number 10, and let us form a nationalist government. But we were deluding ourselves.

Firstly, we must realise that at every level and within every facet of national life, the socio-political environment has been thoroughly poisoned against nationalism and the values that underpin nationalism and every public institution is now charged with the duty to actively root out every last vestige of racial consciousness found in our people.

This has not happened naturally and it has not happened by accident, but it has happened as a result of a carefully and painstakingly constructed totalitarian regime that exists not just in this country, but across most of the White Western World, across most of the nations designated by the global New World Order for eradication.

So hostile is Western society to our aims, beliefs and values, that while the scope still theoretically exists for a nationalist political party to win power through electioneering, any realistic possibility of that happening currently no longer exists. The balance between providing a semblance of ‘democracy’ while ensuring a rate of attrition within the ranks nationalist political parties, through establishment hostility, social opprobrium and dirty tricks, such that nationalist parties are unable to make lasting progress, is so finely tuned that electioneering as the primary means by which we might hope to achieve power is now a forlorn hope.

If by some miracle of circumstances a nationalist party found itself making great electoral advances and at the end of a bitterly contested general election campaign looked likely to win, it is probable that the political establishment would take extra-ordinary steps to prevent a nationalist government from taking office.

During such a closely run election campaign there would be claims by ethnic minority communities that they have been subjected to racist violence and intimidation. They would call for elections in closely contested constituencies to be declared null and void pending investigation by United Nations observers, and there would be rioting and violence perpetrated by ethnic minority gangs in the hope that by inciting retaliation from the indigenous British, they could provide the pretext for military ‘peace-keeping’ intervention by United Nations forces and the effective military occupation of Britain.

The secret police in this country would similarly claim that they have evidence of involvement by senior members of the nationalist party in acts of terrorism and in planning the genocide of ethnic minorities following a transfer of power and they would intervene, using anti-terrorist legislation to arrest and detain without trial, large numbers of the activists, candidates and officers of the nationalist party.

On the morning following such a general election fiasco, the pre-existing LibLabCon government would remain in power. They would declare a state of emergency and declare that the general election result ostensibly showing a nationalist majority is null and void. Furthermore during the aftermath there would be a security clampdown on all known nationalist activists, following which, fresh elections would be held, which the LibLabCon would win, because most of the nationalist candidates and activists would be held in detention and their party organisation completely disrupted.

Why do I believe this scenario would take place?

Because the leaders of our political establishment have not just inadvertently presided over a calamitous decline in our nation’s fortunes and the flooding of our country by alien peoples, this destruction of our nation and this disregard for the well-being and survival of our people and our culture has been planned by them.

They are not unwitting participants in an act of national folly, they are the devious and determined planners of treason against their own people and they know that if we ever regain control of our own country, they will face not just personal disgrace, but after due legal process, long prison sentences and in some cases the hangman’s rope.

The leaders of our current political establishment are therefore not going to readily agree to a transfer of political power and will use every means at their disposal to prevent it – constitutional or otherwise – unless they have no other option and it is forced upon them.

Are we at Western Spring therefore planning a violent revolution in which we hope to come to power through the force of arms?

No, we are not. But what a realisation of the above means is that our rise to power will be a long and difficult journey that will involve much planning, much manoeuvring and great determination and while we will always seek to achieve our aims by legitimate and constitutional means – employing the ballot box as the principle means – we must from the very outset employ extra-parliamentary strategies and tactics in the pursuit of our goal, so that when the time comes, we will have more than just boxes full of ballot papers with which to force the issue and press home our case.

In further articles I will demonstrate why the Six Prerequisites that I have spoken of before are so very vital to our success and I will describe the mechanism by which political power can be achieved if all good nationalists will but rally to our cause.

By Max Musson © 2013

# # # #

29 thoughts on “The Path To Power

  1. Yes they can’t afford for us to get to power, the consequences would be dire, they would lose everything.
    I wonder how they’ll stage manage the latest revelations about corruption in high places, if it was that bad in the 1980’s, imagine what it’s like now.

    1. They are going to lose everything when Prime Minister Mohammed gets into power and chops off all of the heads off of the rosy cheeked, cigar puffing fat white men of Westminster who let them get into power anyway.

      Tony Bastard Blair did this, and we let him do it.

    1. It depends on what theory you believe in to explain that one, is it a stitch up by global Bilderberger types to deliver us into corporate slavery.
      Is it the destruction of the white race & culture for the benefit of another group & their control?

  2. The System is designed to keep itself in power. Almost all of the public sector are manipulated into voting for the mainstream parties, and the rest, as we can see through the rise of UKIP, will only vote for a non-mainstream party if the mass media gives them ”permission”. I have only read a handful of reviews of Arthur Kemp’s Nova Europa, but I believe Kemp is right when he says in the book that the democractic option is over….

    We need to be thinking about growing a super-structure that doesn’t play the System at its own games. The 6 prerequisites at Western Spring is the best nationalist stratergy out there — the BNL, the NF, the EDL failed because they coudn’t adpat to a new set of circumstances….

    1. Have you noticed how, since the little scare UKIP gave the major parties they have suddenly become invisible on TV. Trashing them didn’t work so now they are being disappeared.

      1. The performance of UKIP in the recent EU parliamentary elections was I am sure a reflection of the desire in our people to regain our national independence, but I’m not of the opinion that UKIP as anti-establishment as you infer. While they want to get us out of the EU, they do not want us to withdraw from a whole morass of international trade treaties and we will therefore remain subject to the influence of the globalism. Furthermore, while they wish to ‘control’ immigration, that does not mean they will halt further immigration and they have no intention of repatriating the ethnic minority communities already here.
        See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDYSQKciM34

          1. That video of the black BNP member makes them look ridiculous.
            NG talks a good talk but I think that’s about it.
            Correct about UKIP.

      2. Yes, the publicity machine does seem to have been ‘switched-off’ for UKIP rather suddenly. I suspect this has a great deal to do with the fact the Tory ‘newspapers’ don’t want this joke of a party to eat too deeply into normally Tory support during the crucial run-up period (which we are in now) to the next general election in just nine month’s time.

        Make no mistake though, that same Tory press will also give them mostly good publicity when we have the next European elections. You would think the British electorate would have recognised by now how they are being blatantly manipulated into supporting UKIP and into thinking UKIP are the only anti-EU party which has never been the case.

      3. I think it was more of a case of building them up to take the BNP vote. As other nationalists have pointed out , now that the elections are done and dusted for the next year, there is no need to build them up anymore. So now the Farage Mirage will be allowed to disapate.

  3. I do not believe that the leaders of the Lib Lab Cons would do away with the rights to a speedy and public trial in the event of a large nationalist vote. That would destroy their mirage and usher in civil unrest that they would not have the resources to control. Its one thing to lock up a half dozen activists on trumped up charges in a nation like Greece where dictatorships have reigned recently. Its a horse of another color entirely to disappear a couple of thousand activists in a nation that its people believe is a democracy. with rights to speedy and public trials. They cannot afford to shatter that illusion. because the loss of confidence in the system would have the same cataclysmic public response that birthed the Labor party a century ago.

    1. Johnb, I think you would be surprised just how much the public would be prepared to accept as long it is presented to them correctly.
      .
      These would be how the news would be presented: “The Security services and police forces across the country moved today to prevent a terrorist coup. Several hundred far-right extremists known to be plotting the violent overthrow of the government, were today arrested and huge stockpiles of weapons were discovered a several locations … blah, … blah, …blah”

      1. Well max they tried that with Golden Dawn but so far their inability to find any of those weapons has much of the public out of sympathy. Same here if they showed the weapons they would have to prove to people like Griffin got them and stockpiled them that kind of evidence is hard to manufacture.
        Look at the power structures very careful multi million dollar well prepared world trade center demolition. it has come back to haunt them because it has radicalized a huge section of the engineering and scientific community the videos exposing the fraud have millions of hits, and more importantly, the people who have been radicalized are not some dope smoking hippies but the very people whose technical expertise is required to make the nation run
        . same in the UK The smart people aren’t voting BNP because they see the organization as too rag tag to win. Griffin said it last month we have to up our game get more sophisticated to capture the middle class. Right Now they are with UKIP and the Farage mirage. But Nigel has to produce and when he can’t the mirage disappears
        What I am saying is organize local cellular political structures gather members educate them and fight local elections. By the way I am somewhat surprised that you have not exploded the 9/11 myth yourself on you site.

        1. It would be very easy for the security services to plant weapons and claim they were stockpiled by nationalists.
          .
          I’m pleased to see that you now accept what I’ve said all along that most voters don’t vote BNP because they don’t think the BNP can win, and that this is because the BNP and all other nationalist micro-parties are run on a shoe-string, i.e. appear “rag-bag”.

  4. Whilst I agree with almost everything said on here the voting intentions of immigrants will grow exponentially within the next 5 years.Many of our people are crying out for an organized Nationalist party to vote for.Whilst we organize they breed.

    1. Unfortunately, Diane, not enough of our people are at present crying out for such a party, most of them have been cowed into believing that a nationalist party cannot win and until we can change that perception by acquiring the Six Prerequisites, they will continue to vote for the least worst of the establishment parties, and any effort that we put into organising a nationalist party for people to vote for will be wasted.

  5. I look to Western Spring (MONS) as the leading and inspiring website / organisation that can deliver the leadership and direction required to unify the leading lights in the British resistance at this time. I attended the Sunwheel festival organised by the British Movement, in attendance where rep’s from BM, NF, NPF, BNP, WIN, BDP, National Action and European Rep’s. I was not informed and i did not ask, but was reassured that good discussion was had and cooperation agreed for the remainder of the year. I believe Max & MONS to be the one’s to unify all the org’s in Britain by proposing and signing up each serious organisation to work towards acquiring the Six Prerequisites. Any org who does not sign up should be publicly named and shamed to answer to the membership. A good platform to put forward the Six Prerequisites is the Heritage & Destiny memorial in October, also an interview with Voice of Albion on Rampage Broadcasting would reach a wide audience.

    1. Thank you for your support uilleam, but as I’m sure you have deduced, while most of the organisations you have named are good nationalists, tactically and strategically they are still living in the 1970s and a public recognition of the Six Prerequisites would in their minds be tantamount to a negation of all they have worked for over the last four decades. We do already have some friends among the organisations you named however and as time goes by we will win more, but it may take a while.

      1. You wouldn’t believe the arguments I’ve had with the ”old-school” nationlalits. They still believe we have the same political environment as the nationalist aprties had in the 1920s — what they DON’T understand is that period was far different than today. Take 1920s Germany for an example: did you know that the majority of the children were belivers in a Greater Germany, the superiority of the German people, and in the need to tackle the interntaional banking system? Why? They learnt it from their teachers….

        Combined with a poltical culture, combined with a mass media that offered a diverse spetrum of opinions, the NS rose to power on the back of a cultural milue where it was ALWAYS GOING TO HAPPEN. The whole System was nationalistic in its outlook, so the Weimer Republic, with its anti-German undercurrents, was ALWAYS GOING TO BE OVERTHROWN.

        A mass movement amongst our people is near impossible. Their racial identity is almost non-existent, and they have been bullied by the Cultural Marxist System to only vote for the government — sorry, the mainstream parties….. The masses may feel peturbed by the sight of all these non-Whites in thier country, but they know, if they rebel, they will have no back-up from their racial kinsmen; and, more than likely, they will lose their jobs, ”reputation”, and god knows what else…..

        You can’t ask the average person to go against his instincts for self-preservation. As David Hume expained in his brilliant works in the 18th century, man’s thinking is driven by intense, tryanical passions and he will twist his ”thoughts” to satisfy them. People have an intense need to conform; that is why the masses’ ”thoughts” pertaining to the present state of the White race are so moronic.

        In short, we DO need the 6 prerequisites! We also, however, need to somehow attract a better quality of person into the movement. At the moment, only marginal charcters with nothing to lose even bother. One more thing: we need to scientifically (this is why we need more people with high IQs) unify the ethnocentric section of our race, and acquire living space, so these people, in that environment, will practice endogamy and create the social-biological conditions for a new race to emerge. This is the last thing I’ll say: many of the weak seed Whites NEED to be lost from our gene pool because they lack the genetic material needed to cope with Zio-globalism. Non-ethnocentric, hyper-ethnophillic Whites are our BIGGEST enemy — and, as John “Ted” Kaczynski said, political perspectives do have a STRONG genetic bases.

  6. Politics is not the answer. Never has been. Never will be.

    The only hope for our people is a racial and spiritual awakening. God has promised that if we on a national basis repent of our transgressions and turn back to Him, He will cleanse our lands–and we will help Him (Obadiah 1:18)

    Until then, our societies, our lives, will continue to deteriorate, and our countries will grow darker and darker.

    1. Very true………Elections in a single political party system which in essence is what we enjoy (ENJOY? who said that) the Liblabcon, it is pointless to vote for the lesser of Three Evils because your choice is still evil.

  7. “political establishment would take extra-ordinary steps to prevent a nationalist government from taking office.”

    Wot like the Greek government with much external pressure to ban Golden Dawn?.

  8. Much of the opprobrium that nationalists parties receive is due to the excessive importance they give to the question of race, while failing to comprehend the broader picture of a complex phenomenon that goes under the title ‘globalization’. Race is one small factor in the plans to subvert national sovereignty and herd the world into three trading blocks with a common currency and a Chinese style of government. It is true that white nations have been targeted for eradication, but this is not because of an anti white agenda by the elite, but rather because white nations happen to be the most economically advanced and their nationalism is the main impediment to the amalgamation of Europe, North America and the Pacific rim into the three big trading blocks planned by the elite. Once the public understand that the plans for equalization of incomes throughout the world involve leveling down as well as leveling up, I think that they would be more receptive to the message of nationalists. The working class would be especially receptive to their message because they have the least to gain, and the most to lose from globalization. They have experienced the loss of employment opportunities in manufacturing and their neighborhood flooded with Third World and East European immigrants, so it just needs someone to articulate these experiences to make them see where their true interests lie. If you could focus more on the ultimately calamitous consequences of de-industrialisation in the 80s and talk less about race and immigration I think you would offer hope for preserving the welfare state and the achievements of social democracy as well as preserving living standards. The nationalists would then be perceived as progressives rather than reactionaries who want to return to mythical golden age when Britain was a proud manufacturing nation and race had not reared it’s ugly head.
    break
    However, the main impediment to nationalism going mainstream is the lingering allegiance that many nationalists have for National Socialism. This is the elephant in the room that accounts for why “Western society is hostile to our aims, beliefs and values” as Max puts it. Surely the fact that Britain went to war with a National Socialist regime that was aggressive and predatory in it’s relations with other countries is enough to explain the public’s indifference to suppression of nationalism by the state, as well as the hostility of much of the public.

    1. I can understand why you write what you have Maurice, but nationalism is not going to go mainstream whatever we say until the establishment mass media begin to crumble as Britain becomes progressively a ‘Third World’ state and we develop our own media capable of challenging and becoming the dominant voice. The National Front, the British National Party, The British Democratic Party etc., have in the past all presented the public with a full slate of economic and social policies, all of which have been ignored by the media. The media has presented those parties as ‘single issue’ anti-immigration parties and they have been consistently attacked and denigrated on that basis and they have all failed.
      .
      We have been doing this for long enough to know that the electoral route only works for a party that has the largest and most vocal mass media and the side that has the most effective support infrastructure. Furthermore, if we were making electoral headway on the basis of economic policy ‘A’ for example, then one of the establishment parties would adopt it in order to negate its effectiveness as a support winner for us.
      .
      Our race policy, striving to secure the survival and self-determination of our people, is the one policy that the establishment parties cannot and will not adopt as their own, because it is anathema to them and of fundamental importance to our cause, being the ‘foundation stone’ of our ideology and our world-view.
      .
      Initially, we need to attract the hard-core of racial nationalists who are fully on-board with our approach to race. Economic and social policies are secondary and will all flow from and complement that racial nationalist foundation and the needs of the racially conscious White communities that we will build.

Comments are closed.