Essential Truths

By Max Musson:

We live at a time of great turmGWH 2oil and widespread disillusionment within the nationalist movement, to such an extent that the so called ‘nationalist movement’ has all but disintegrated and consists of a dozen or so small groups, which can largely be described as micro-parties. I would include in this group the rump of the BNP that remains following the organisational implosion of that party that has taken place since 2009.

The BNP at its zenith consisted of some 14,000 members, but has now been reduced to around 2,500, even counting those people who bought life membership, many of whom now want nothing more to do with the party.  Of the other groups that exist, none has more than a few hundred members and some have as few as a dozen.

This is a deplorable state of affairs and not one that I describe to you with any pleasure, however it is necessary for nationalists to confront this uncomfortable truth if we are to make any headway in promoting our cause and saving the British people from genetic and cultural obliteration.

Furthermore, we must face up to the fact that at this time, the political party structure is not the right vehicle for promoting our cause.

I know that there are many nationalists who feel that time is running out and that we must provide the British people with the opportunity to vote for a nationalist party before it is too late. What such people fail to appreciate however is that despite sporadic and short-lived successes in which largely isolate borough and county councillors have been elected temporarily at various scattered locations across the country, and despite the BNP’s successes in just managing to get three individuals elected at a higher level in elections based upon proportional representation, the truth is that only somewhere between 3% and 10% of the population will vote nationalist with any regularity as things stand at present.

Arno Breker 5My experience is that around 80% of the indigenous British would vote for a British nationalist political party if cultural milieu in which we find ourselves today was at least neutral as far as the values underpinning nationalism are concerned. Unfortunately, the cultural and political environment in which we live is unremittingly hostile to not just nationalist politics, but to the values underpinning nationalism, and to such an extent that few of our people believe we can win. At every level and in every conceivable way, the environment in which we live has been so thorough infiltrated by cultural Marxists and imbued with their creed of political correctness, that it would be true to say our cultural and political environment has been poisoned against us, and our people can see this.

When elections are held, the people who might otherwise vote British nationalist perceive that we cannot win and they deduce that a vote for us will be a ‘wasted vote’ as it will not influence who gets elected. The public therefore vote tactically, for the ‘least worst’ of the establishment parties that do have a chance of winning. Therefore, if we are to ever get people elected to political office in numbers sufficient to grant us real political power, we must first convince the public that we can win. Only when a significant proportion of our people begin to believe this will they start to vote for us in significant numbers.

The ‘Catch 22’ situation in which we find ourselves therefore, is that where electioneering is concerned, people won’t vote for us until they believe we can win, and they won’t believe we can win until large numbers of people begin to vote for us. Somehow we have to break out of this dead-lock and it can only be done if we can control the culture in which we live and can demonstrate that we either have the wherewithal necessary to win or at least have a practical and credible plan through which we can obtain that wherewithal.

If we are to achieve this objective, it is essential that we reject the political party organisational model and for the time being eschew overt electioneering as a means of promoting our cause. It is essential that we do this for the following reasons:

Firstly, obtaining the wherewithal to win elections requires money and lots of it, and if we are to attract large donations from patriotic millionaires, of which there are a much larger number than one might at first think, we must be able to accept those donations without betraying the identity of the donors to our political enemies. If the organisation promoting nationalism is an electioneering political party, this means that whenever a donation of greater than £5,000 is received, under the Political Parties Elections and Referendums Act 2009, it is a legal requirement that the donor’s name and home address is published on the Electoral Commission’s website.

Obviously, even for a millionaire, it will be politically, socially and financially damaging to have their name publicly associated with racial nationalist party whilst living within an environment that is unremittingly hostile to racial nationalism. Therefore, the moment we form a new political party, we are in effect kissing goodbye to any prospect of receiving any donations larger than £5,000 and this is a crippling setback for any organisation that is serious about acquiring the wherewithal necessary to win political power. Indeed, the £5,000 limit and the need to publish the identity of larger political donors, was deliberately designed to deter wealthy people from sponsoring nationalist political parties.

Furthermore, any organisation registered with the Electoral Commission as an electioneering political party must submit annual accounts telling the Commission and therefore our enemies in the political establishment, lots of sensitive information that we should not be telling our political enemies.

The BNP have run into problems in recent years for being late in submitting their accounts to the Electoral Commission, because the accounts submitted must be audited by a Chartered Accountant and the professional body concerned retains its Royal Charter by conforming to certain standards imposed by the government, one of which will be that it has an internal policy of active hostility towards organisations that are considered ‘racist’. The Race Relations Act 2000 places an obligation on all public bodies, NGOs and private organisations wanting to maintain contractual relations with the government, that they have an internal policy of active hostility towards organisations considered ‘racist’. It is hardly surprising therefore that the BNP often found it difficult to secure the services of a firm of Chartered Accountants.

Arno Breker 4Successful electioneering requires the oxygen of publicity and this means that key officials,  key activists and the party’s candidates must all place their names and home addresses in the public domain. There have been some instances of prominent nationalists being attacked at their homes, and while this does not always happen the possibility always exists and the fear of an attack is ever present in the minds of prominent nationalists and others who share their household and this places a strain on the marital and domestic relationships of prominent nationalists.

Furthermore, once we take into account pressures that can be applied to nationalists by their employers and the perception that prominent activism for a nationalist political party will inevitably be damaging to a persons career chances and therefore their income, one can see why there is a heightened incidence of divorce among nationalist activists, their spouses and families not always being keen to share their ‘pariah’ social status. I can recall Nick Griffin the Chairman of the BNP making a jocular aside at a Trafalgar Club dinner a few years back, that the party had virtually become a club for divorcees.

The pressures described above have meant that very often the members of nationalist political parties who would potentially make the best officers and candidates for those parties, those who are members of the professions etc., have shrunk back from putting themselves forward and that disproportionately, it has been people who have nothing to lose, that have taken up key party positions. It is not surprising therefore that there have been a significant number of exposés in the media highlighting the unsuitable nature of various people who have too often been selected as nationalist candidates or party officials.

The pernicious effect of all of these pressures is that nationalist parties: have been chronically under funded and run on a shoe-string; have suffered a high turnover of members, as key people become ‘burned-out’ following marital and relationship issues; have frequently been inefficiently administered by people who are far from ideally suited to the task; and therefore typically go through a cycle of growth followed by internal disputes and eventual implosion. This is a cycle that we have now witnessed, more than 40 times in the last 100 years or so, sufficiently often for us to deduce that organisation as an electioneering political party is a fundamental error that we must avoid in future.

Arno Breker 3I estimate that because of the high turnover of members and the constant attrition as existing members drop out, in order to achieve the 14,000 members the BNP had at its zenith, the party had to recruit approximately 70,000 people. Therefore, even at its zenith the BNP left a trail of 56,000 burned-out, disillusioned and dispirited nationalists in its wake. Far from advancing the cause of nationalism, the BNP has acted as a vast machine, sucking in freshly recruited, idealistic nationalists at the front and spitting out broken-spirited, burned-out and disillusioned nationalists at the back. With membership numbers now down to c. 2,500, there are now some 67,500 nationalists that have been put through the mill, the vast majority of which are now inactive, and we must halt this destructive cycle.

If nationalists are to ever succeed, we must convince the public that we can win and this can only be done by acquiring the wherewithal needed to win a general election and by first demonstrating to the public and to the vast number of currently disillusioned nationalists that we have a credible plan which will enable us to acquire that wherewithal. If we cannot do this, the public will continue to vote for the least worst of the establishment parties and our nation will be doomed

We must adopt new strategies and new tactics in order to avoid the pitfalls described above and we must face up to the reality of the Six Prerequisites that I have described on previous occasions. The six prerequisites that are essential if we are to have any chance of securing political power.  They are:

A minimum of 650 MP quality local leaders and activists, who will potentially be our candidates in an election;

White enclaves, at least one in every constituency across the country, that will provide community powerbases and our core voters and supporters;

A network of friends who will be our 5th column within the existing political establishment;

A nationalist media composed of at least one TV station and a vast interlocking network of internet websites;

A large body of militant street activists; and

A ‘war-chest’ of £100m.

Arno Breker 1In order to acquire these six prerequisites, we need to create an organisation that is not a political party, which does not need to court the oxygen of publicity,  and does not need to conform to the regulations and restrictions that government regulators would impose. An organisation that can employ a policy of stealth in order to grow and extend our influence without experiencing direct hostility.

In order to acquire the Six Prerequisites we need to embark upon a fund raising programme that will generate the funding that I have indicated. Without this level of funding and without the Six Prerequisites, no nationalist organisation of any kind will be able to achieve political power and so we should not waste our time debating the necessity or feasibility of acquiring these six prerequisites, we must simply press on with the task of acquiring these assets with fanatical determination, because the window of opportunity is a narrow one and we have a mountain to climb.

I remain however confident that we will succeed and in a series of future articles I will expand upon each of the six prerequisites, explaining why they are vital to our cause and how I believe they can be acquired and employed.

By Max Musson © 2014

# # # #

See also:

Essential Truths – The First Prerequisite

Essential Truths – The Second Prerequisite

Essential Truths – The Third Prerequisite

Essential Truths – The Fourth Prerequisite

Essential Truths – The Fifth Prerequisite

Essential Truths – The Sixth Prerequisite

Essential Truths – The Ethics of Funding Nationalism

# # # #

JOIN WESTERN SPRING

Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:

# # # #

22 thoughts on “Essential Truths

  1. I suspect already the Whitheshawe by-election is receding fast in the rear view mirror on its way to the political burial grounds of history.

    I haven’t taken much interest in this sideshow other than to note labour coasted to victory without breaking sweat. What did come to mind though was what the ethic mix consisted of in that constituency? Anybody know?

    I think Britain must now be facing or very soon will be, the same problem that is now tipping the balance of voting in America, and that is, as mass immigration grinds inexorably on it will no longer be able to elect an indigenous white majority – no matter how bad things get.

    How far away are we from such a situation? The time frame is shrinking by the day.

    With the best will in the world I cannot foresee any situation where the hegemonic ruling elites, whose hands are firmly clasped on the levers of power ever allow whites to pursue their own interests. They will simply view it as apartheid. It’s as bad as that, end of.

    1. I appreciate the points that you make Observer, but one essential truth that we must now acknowledge and drum into the heads of every nationalist is that placing our trust in the capricious fortunes of an electioneering nationalist political party is a recipe for disaster. If we keep on doing what we have always done, we will keep on getting what we have always got – in this case inevitable failure.
      .
      The second essential truth we need to acknowledge is that the demographic point of no return is not bearing down upon us quite as quickly as our enemies might hope and certainly not as quickly as they would like us to believe. One reason for the periodic articles in the press foretelling of our ‘imminent’ ethnic minority status in our own lands is to demoralise us, to make us think it is already too late and to induce in us an acceptance of the fate they have in store for us. We still have a good 20 years ahead of us however, and we must never give up hope and always maintain the belief in our eventual deliverance from evil.
      .
      The hegemonic elites will not willingly relinquish their grip upon the levers of power no matter what the timing of our resurgence and no matter how legitimately we campaign for the right of sovereignty and self-determination for our people. For this reason, our eventual electoral success must be backed by the potential for us to enforce the decision of the people with physical force if necessary. This is why a last ditch landslide electoral victory by a mere nationalist political party will not suffice, even if we could engineer one today. The political establishment would simply claim spurious evidence of widespread electoral fraud and intimidation of voters, declare a state of emergency and declare the election result invalid. In such a situation, the sight of riot police and armed soldiers on the streets of our large towns and cities would be enough to deter the bulk of our people from rising in protest, but not if we have invested 10 or 20 years in preparing them for that day.
      .
      We must not only be in a position such that we can win a general election, we must be seen to legitimately win it and we must have such a sizeable organised and militant nationalist movement behind us that thoughts of denying us our legitimate right through unconstitutional repression will not hold sway in the minds of our enemies.
      .
      Lastly, I do not care how our enemies view us in moral terms, I care only that they eventually view us as an irresistibly formidable force and that they back away and leave us in peace with the power to determine our own destiny.
      .
      Believe brother, the day of our deliverance will come and you and I will live to see our names carved upon the Victory Monument that we plan to commission, to be built upon the site of the 02 Centre, on the south bank of the Thames. Not a monument to the heroism of the dead, but a monument to the heroism of the living.

      1. I think you have explained the context of the nationalist struggle better than I ever could.

        Of course, people are frightened. That is what you are really saying, right? Well, to deal with a scared people you have to show them that you can deliver them from evil.

        I think a school playground bully who get his arse kicked by the new kid shows human nature. Before the beating, everyone ”likes” the bully; but after the beating, everyone says he got what he deserved.

  2. The BNP got 3% of the 28% who voted in the Sale Wythenshawe by-election. This amounts to a total of 0.0084% of the electorate. It’s unlikely their vote would have improved with a higher turnout as nationalist voters tend to be more motivated. Despite this dismal result we had the familiar pattern of the BNP claiming they were having a fantastic reaction on the street; maybe so but this doesn’t translate into votes as their vote dropped by 0.9%.
    One definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. The only comfort the BNP can take away from this debacle is that at least they beat the Monster Raving Loony Party (who probably didn’t bother campaigning).

    1. A factor that leads to the delusional hopes of electioneering nationalists is that while up to 80% of people canvassed may truthfully say they believe in the policies of British nationalism, when they come to vote, they don’t believe we can win and vote instead for the least worst of the establishment parties.

      1. Yes democracy promotes the duplicity and expediency you’ve noted. At the same time the electorate, or at least those that bother to vote, seem beset by mass delusion in returning the established parties. For the growing number of non-voters, democracy inspires little but indifference, cynicism or disgust.

    2. An apathetic electorate is one of the worst problems a nationalist party in this country faces. Quite simply, the supine and apathetic lazyness of the British people is going to be their death sentence.

      I will take a bet here. Once the ethnics have truely taken over this country and make it into a living hell for white Britons these same kind of people will be amongst the biggest moaners of the situation!

      Are the 72% of the electorate who didn’t vote in Wythenshaw and Sale East really not interested in politics at all? Ok, so many think politics is ‘boring’ but one thing is for sure and that is even if YOU don’t have any interest in politics, POLITICIANS WILL STILL TAKE AN INTEREST IN YOU AND YOUR LIFE!

  3. Mr. Musson Thank you
    I agree wholeheartedly with your first assertion, at least in the near future, Whithenshawe is the proof of that. Even when given the choice of voting for an overt nationalist party they, (voters) spurn to give the BNP their support. That is why I question the demographic make-up, what other than soporific indifference could be in play here? Another all important question is how will the electorate react when they at last see they are losing everything? I’ve always said, we’ve never been here before.
    I wish I could say the same as yourself regarding a window within which to get our act together – 20 years? Personally I think things will come to head before 20 years but heck who knows? If asked, I would estimate the population of our nation is increasing currently at the rate of a million a year and counting, the bulk being of course immigration and its attendant birth-rate. If these current estimates go unchallenged I foresee a complete breakdown of society sooner rather than later, at which point an emergency coalition government could emerge introducing a raft of measures similar to 9/11.
    Everywhere one looks one sees a picture of nothing works anymore, society is (albeit) slowly unravelling – only being held together by the mainstream media. It’s anybody’s guess when it will irretrievably break down. Maybe it’s all intentional and planned, intentionally implode the economy and offer us a new world order, or could it all be unintended consequences of a plan gone disastrously wrong. My pet area of interest is how will they deal with the housing crisis – which is already upon us. Perhaps the political class will cave like the Soviet Union. One could go on and on speculating. Too late! the games afoot and taken on a momentum all of its own, a runaway snowball careering down the hill.. Interesting times

    1. I think you have misinterpreted slightly my last reply to you. I didn’t say that matters would not come to a head within the next twenty years, one can never be sure what course politics will take in the future, but I don’t see the demographic changes reaching a point whereby it will be impossible to elect a pro-White nationalist government within the next 20 years.
      .
      The result of the Whithenshawe by-election does not indicate “soporific indifference”, it is as I have said elsewhere a reflection of the fact that the public do not believe a nationalist party can win and therefore either do not bother to vote or when they do vote, tend to vote tactically for what they perceive as the ‘least worst’ of the establishment parties. In the case of Whithenshawe with what was previously perceived as such a large Labour majority, it is interesting to note that only 15.7% of the electorate did actually vote Labour this time around, c. one in six of the electorate in an election in which only slightly more than one in four of the electorate bothered to vote at all.
      .
      As I stated before, “One reason for the periodic articles in the press foretelling of our ‘imminent’ ethnic minority status in our own lands is to demoralise us, to make us think it is already too late and to induce in us an acceptance of the fate [the hegemonic elite] have in store for us”, and this acceptance of our fate is reflected in the low turn-out.
      .
      Our society is in a state of managed decline as we in the West are being managed down, just as Third World economies are being managed up, and the aim is for a world-wide parity in terms of living standards to be reached at some future date.
      .
      There is only a housing crisis as far as we indigenous British are concerned. Houses are in short supply, they cost astronomical amounts to buy (five times the average first time buyer couple’s joint incomes) and they cost astronomical amounts to rent privately. However, newly arrived immigrants are given social housing with their rents paid for them by the British taxpayer and they are given priority when social housing becomes available. For them there is no housing crisis and the crisis faced by the indigenous British is again ‘managed’ by making just sufficient new houses to prevent too many people becoming disaffected and radicalised.
      .
      Expensive housing for the indigenous population means that we can only afford small families, if at all, while cheap housing, paid for by the taxpayer, means that immigrant families will outstrip us in terms of population growth. We are as we all know being ‘managed’ into extinction.
      .
      What we must do however, despite these sobering realisations, is to remain determined in our belief that the situation can be turned around. The decline in our numbers can be reversed and we can regain our sovereignty and self-determination. Therefore, notions such as ‘the game’ being ‘afoot’ and taking on ‘a momentum all of its own’, should be avoided as they suggest that our destiny is out of our hands and we can do nothing but wait passively for whatever fate becomes us. This is not so however, our fate still lies in our own hands, we simply need to have the courage and the wit to organise and take back control of the situation.
      .
      Let us therefore have no more defeatism.

  4. Yes, on the subject of the housing crisis in relation to the indigenous British, countless numbers of homeowners up and down the length of the UK are in a position to let to fellow-ethnic lodgers where their families have flown the nest.

    I have, over a number of previous years at different times, let to five people.

  5. In relation to my last comment, letting out a room in one’s home could also help a single working person save sufficient funds for a down-payment on an apartment or house of his/her own.

  6. Britain had it’s chance to move to a ‘preferential’ voting system but unfortunately you were tricked out doing so.

    With a preferential voting system (as we have in Australia) people can give their first preference to a nationalist party without any fear that their vote will be ‘wasted’ because if your first preference candidate doesn’t get enough first preference votes to be in the top two in your electorate, then your vote goes to your second preference and so on.

    With such a system people can and do vote for independents, third parties and minor parties all the time without ever worrying that their vote is wasted.

    It makes it much easier for new political parties to rise but crucially is NOT like the European-style proportional system where a permanent ruling elite occupy multiple parties but work out power-sharing deals between themselves AFTER the elections are over.

    If (when?) the time comes that whites in Australia need to explicitly form a party to represent our interests it will be easier to do so.

    The problem in Australia is that we have a proportionally elected upper house (Senate) which ratbag minor parties like the Greens (who are actually Marxists) can use to block the will of the majority. Sooner or later we will have to reform the Senate.

    Of course we also have the same problem as all other white countries – we live in a culture mind-controlled by a media that is owned by an alien group who wish to see us dis-possessed.

    As an Australian who grew up reading Eagle, Look & Learn and other such publications that presented a positive, self-confident expression of a genuine British identity and culture, and who felt part of a shared civilisation with Britain, I can barely put into words the horror I feel at what has been done to the Mother country. I can only imagine what it’s like for the natives.

    1. Thank you for your concern Daniel and for your sound observations regarding the merits of a ‘preferential’ voting system. You state, “If (when?) the time comes that whites in Australia need to explicitly form a party to represent our interests it will be easier to do so”, however I would suggest to you that the time is now, because Australia is already heading down the same road that we in the Mother country have taken, of mass non-White immigration.
      .
      I can remember as a young man in the 1970s warning people that if we did not halt mass non-White immigration at that time, the day would come when immigrants would have the upper hand in our country, and people laughed at me. Please use the example of what has happened here to galvanise White Australians into action. It will be much easier to stop the rot now than it will when immigrants comprise a sizeable proportion of the population. When people laugh and say that, ‘it will never happen here’, tell them that’s what people used to say in England.

      1. I suspect that you’ll find that the non-white population of Australia is already at or about the same level as in the UK – i.e. around 15%, and 25% among under fives. Australia has another, perhaps fatal, flaw i.e. an official policy of encouraging immigration whereas in the UK we have an official policy of discouraging immigration – yes, I know, don’t laugh, but at least our politicians have to pretend, Australian politicians don’t.

  7. Don’t be daunted by the extremely ambitious targets which Max has set out in his plan for our country’s recovery. His analysis of what is needed is correct, but it will not happen in one bound, it will happen as more and more individuals join in to contribute their “widows’ mites” to our resources. If you have not already done so, may I encourage you to join with the rest of us in taking the first step on the long march at the end of which lies the country we all want to live in – contact Max and sign up to his Movement for National Salvation!

  8. Amending my original figures for the BNP proportion of the vote should read 0.84% of the total electorate in Sale Wythenshawe. Still not great but one hundred times better!

  9. I must admit that I believe you have a point. We all know that the system is controlled and we cannot set the rules. We do not own or control the media and we cannot get inside it.

    We cannot sue for racial discrimination because the legal insurance will not fund us.

    We need to think and act OUTSIDE the box. We cannot use the systems that are in place. If we are to sue for racial discrimination me must do it IN PERSON and not use a solicitor because they too are owned.

    How should we deal with white minorities eg EU Citizens. Friend or foe?

    1. How we deal with EU citizens will very much depend upon them. My expectation is that most European immigrants to Britain will side with the indigenous British should the excrement impact upon the revolving blades, and we will probably need all the able bodied white people we can muster.

  10. Looken Ferransers

    - Edit

    Naturally I’ll be accused of “dividing Whites” but I don’t like the E.E.s and want them out as well.
    What’s in this for me?

    1. What we must do LF, is decide where our priorities lie. While it may irk some of us that people from Eastern Europe have taken advantage of the lack of borders within the EU in order to better themselves financially and largely at our expense, those who decide to settle here permanently and assimilate do not pose an existential threat to the future genetic integrity of the our native people.
      .
      Eastern European social, cultural and religious norms are very similar to our own, reflecting the genetic similarity of our peoples and the vast majority of ethnic Poles, Hungarians etc., have taken the trouble to learn to speak English and have acquired a reputation for being hard working. This contrasts dramatically with our experience of migrants from the Third World and with our experience of non-European ethnic groups that have come here via Eastern Europe.
      .
      While we all hope for a peaceful route to salvation and while we would all hope that our native people would have the vigour to produce lots of children with which to sustain our existence, the reality is that we indigenous British are producing woefully few children and the likelihood is that our situation is going to turn rather nasty before it gets better and both we and our future generations are going to need all of the White people we can muster if we are to prevail. It is in our interests therefore to avoid alienating and to embrace people who will constitute our obvious allies should a dystopian future descend into violent civil conflict.

Comments are closed.