Humpback Whales & White Humans

By H. Millard:

This is about White humans. Please bear with me, and I’ll get there pretty quickly.

Humpback Whale 1 A genetic study of Humpback Whales shows that subtle color differences and skin markings are visible indications that there is not one uniform species of Humpback whales, but that there are at least three subspecies and that they are on different evolutionary trajectories.

And, just as a reminder, remember that a subspecies is an organism that has diverged from the main trunk of the species and is on its way to full specieshood if certain conditions occur. Among these conditions–some more important than others–are a lack of gene flow caused either by geographic isolation or reproductive isolation, differential selection pressures, and mutations that will naturally arise in the isolated population.

And, the same principles that we see at work in Humpback whales–color differences and other easily seen morphological characteristics–apply to humans even though the ignorant one world blenders among us want to deny it as they try to get Whites to let down our guards and miscegenate ourselves out of existence via bedroom genocide.

The blenders want unawakened and easily manipulated Whites to think all humans are the same so these Whites will mate with non-Whites and produce non-White children instead of White children. The result of this is more non-White children and fewer White children. It is White genocide that the blenders are playing at. It takes two White parents to produce a White child. A White and any non-White cannot produce a truly White child. It is simply not possible, because a truly White child requires 46 “white” chromosomes–23 from his or her father and 23 from his or her mother.

The truth of nature is this: The present so-called human “races”–Whites, Blacks, Browns, Yellows, Reds–as generally recognized today, are really subspecies* of Homo sapiens and these subspecies are then further divided by nature into more subtle races that often correspond with ancient traditional tribes and nations.

Black & White 2In other words, the currently accepted taxonomy of man is flawed. Whites are more than a race. We are a subspecies. And to ensure our survival, our expansion and our continuation on our evolutionary track, we need to breed only with our own White subspecies and we must not breed with the other human subspecies.

At the same time, we must not, under current conditions, put too fine a point on our taxonomy such that we do not breed with other Whites who do correspond to our ancient traditional tribes and nations. To do so could lead to us breeding far too few of the White kind. In other words, we should not try to just breed Irish with Irish, French with French, Germans with Germans, etc. but to see all non-Jewish Whites as part of the White subspecies–the White biomass. Should we ever have a completely White world, we might then reasonably start further defining ourselves.

Nature is the tireless and never sleeping backyard engineer constantly causing the divergence of life as it never stops tinkering with organisms to allow life to not only fill every niche that can supply energy for life processes, but so that the organisms that flow into every niche are comfortable in those niches and have the tools to prosper and compete with other organisms for dominance.** In this regard, one can say that all is change and all is in flux. And, nature doesn’t play favorites but tinkers with all organisms all the time, so the struggle to be and to be more is also never ending and the competition is constant. It’s just a natural part of cosmic evolution.

If we understand this, we can get in the game and not aimlessly drift through life, but we can live consciously and with purpose. And, because of our brains and our consciousness we White ones can start taking a hand in our own evolution along the path that is best for us alone. In fact, I say we White ones are at the point in our evolutionary development where, for our own benefit as the unique people that we are–White people–that we must consciously do this or we risk blending back in with the non-White masses and disappearing.

This is not a call for eugenics, as the term is normally used. I reject eugenics as being counterproductive to our evolution and I reject the notion of an aristocratic type among us that we should try to breed, as this often leads to fewer of us being born, and it keeps some of the so-called, and self-designated aristocrats from breeding at all. So, some of these so-called aristocrats write some books about philosophy and then they die and turn to dust. They are then extinct, as is their DNA code. What was the purpose of their lives? There was none–at least not as cosmic time is measured. It would have been better if they had written fewer books and jumped in bed more. Then, they would still exist in their DNA codes that they passed on. But, of course, it would have been better still if they had written all their books and also jumped in bed more. The two things are not mutually exclusive.

I say that we Whites should breed to our maximum–but only with other Whites and never with non-Whites. I have faith in our unique DNA code that makes us White people and I believe it has defaults that will allow nature to sort it out for us as we consciously evolve along the exclusively White path so long as we provide enough fleshly material for nature to work with–this means we need to teem like maggots on garbage. We need every White to breed to his or her maximum according to what his or her body can produce.

And, further, I believe many of us do have the so-called desirable “racist gene,” which is more than likely a complex of genes and DNA factors that not only gives us a heightened sens of who is us and who is not us–a beneficial survival mechanism–but that this “racist gene” also gives us the ability to transform ourselves (through the natural and fundamental processes of evolution) into a new species incapable of breeding with other types of humans (this is a good thing, this not being able to breed with them) when we have enough of us.

We must understand that organisms that can’t adapt and compete are replaced. We White humans can understand these things that so-called lower organisms can’t understand, and in understanding we must act. Understanding is both a gift and a responsibility. Our primary responsibility is to breed White and to breed often–to let the armies and civilizations that exist as sperm and eggs within our bodies emerge into the world to fix with is broken and to make it a better place.

The ways of existence, including life and evolution, are all around us and right in our back yards. We just have to live consciously, open our eyes, and use our reason to see and understand the truth and the basic underlying forces that shape everything from viruses, to whales to humans. Life is life. Get in the game. Multiply, evolve. Expand always and contract never. It is the way.

By H. Millard © 2014


*I accept, here, the term “subspecies” as a convention, but I believe that in reality we Whites are actually a different species of man, and that the definition of species which largely rests on whether or not organisms can interbreed is incorrect and needs to be changed.

**Dominance = the best seats in the house.

# # # #



This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.



12 thoughts on “Humpback Whales & White Humans

  1. Race and sub-species mean the same thing, essentially, but with humans there is less purity than the term “sub-species” would lead us to think, because scientists now consider that all the non-White races have had European genetics introduced to them at some point and an increasing number of Whites have some admixture from other races. Eugenics is the means we would use to increase racial purity. It will not happen any other way for the White race.

  2. Yet another great argument by H. Millard. As for the eugenics argument, however, I disgaree with him — I think the White race needs a very HEAVY program of eugenics that places a premise on IQ, physical strength, and mental health —- also, we need to breed more rebels, more anti-conformists.

    If we are stuck with non-Whites we need to have a critical mass of people who are ”racist” enough to will our evolution. There are too many weak seed Whites in our collective gene pool —- multicracialism is making sure they die out through miscegnation, so, in a way, nature is fullfilling a eugenic process for us.

    Can you imagine a White person with an IQ of 135 being happy to cohabitate with a Negro with an IQ of 95? That 40-point difference would make their ”relationship” absurd: the White cries when they listen to Mozart, the Negro thinks it’s some dross they play in the background to a gangster movie. As Frank Salter has explained in his interview on Red Ice Radio: when people cross-breed, it is because they have more in common than the average person within their race.

    For a while, I truely believe it is propitious for us to lose our trash through misceginatiion — my girlfriend, whose childhood IQ was 140, wouldn’t dream of dating a Negro. Why? In her opinion they’re dumb — then again, she shouldn’t dream of dating the type of person who would date a Negro. Why? They’re dumb.

    Once the White race liberates themselves (that will have to happen someday), we will have a fresher, better, more ethnocentric race! I agree with H. Millard, though, about the self-created aristocrats —- a eugeneics program is subjective. I’d like to breed a race of dark-haired, pale-skinned beauties with …

    You get the picture.

    1. I agree entirely. Being someone of high intelligence I have developed a feeling that the rest of mankind is an “other” (high functioning autism is likely to blame) I find it hard to see those of normal intelligence as the same species of me, even white folk.
      It’s hard not to see yourself as the explorer on a world of space aliens, whose language is similar to your own yet different. Indeed it sometimes feels like I am the white explorer surrounded by primitive natives.
      I imagine it wouldn’t feel so if mankind showed an ounce of awareness and interest in the world around them. They seem, for the most part entirely self-interested. When you have several hundred ideas and theories swimming around your head on any given day, regarding history, world politics, the nature of the universe, it is hard to consider people whose thought centres solely about football or pop music as being remotely the same as you.

      Max, why are the articles in such a funny order.

      1. By the sound of things SS, you are not ‘an alien from another planet’, you are just someone who has greater clarity of thought than most, and such a gift carries with it an awful responsibility, that we must use it to uplift mankind.
        Autism means that you will find it harder to empathise with other people, but over time you will acquire that skill and when you do it will enable you to influence the way other people around you think and act and you will find life more fulfilling. Trust me.
        The articles appear to be in an unfamiliar order because the first two articles at the top of the page have been made ‘sticky’. They will for the foreseeable future remain at the top of the list because they are two of the most important articles I have written and I want all newcomers to this site to read them first.

        1. Max, you’re right about people of higher ability using their gifts to uplift those around them.

          As was pointed out in the most controversial book of the twentieth century: soictey will go downhill if the leaders are bad, and uphill if the leaders are good. Once nationalist comes to the center of European politics, we will see this actulaised on the real world. As you know, Max, the possibilities of our people are stunted by all this petty nonsence the nationalists are going to have to deal with —- this is the test we need to fullfil the prophicies of Arman.

  3. rodney coleman

    - Edit

    Great Article, just one question so excuse my ignorance but can anyone tell me who invented the light bulb, or more precisely, the filament please?…

    The question is so I get some direction of your thinking, cheers

    1. Hi Rodney, I’m not quite sure what you are asking for here or why?
      Are you asking for the person who first created a glowing filament powered by electricity, or the person who first created a glowing filament, powered by electricity, within a glass bulb?
      Perhaps you would explain the significance of your question and the answer?

        1. Hi Rodney, since you have not clarified your question, my answer is that Alessandro Volta appears to have been first credited with creating a glowing wire filament in 1800, although this was not set in a glass light bulb. Humphry Davy then created his Arc lamp in 1809, which created light between two carbon rods, but this again was not set in a glass light bulb and did not technically use a continuous filament.
          In 1841 Frederick de Moleyns was given the first patent for his incandescent lamp, which used powdered charcoal. He heated this material between two platinum wires in a vacuum bulb. However while this lamp employed a glass light bulb, like Davy’s Arc lamp it did not have a filament as such.
          In 1878 Joseph Wilson Swan received a British patent for a light bulb using a carbon paper filament. It would appear therefore that Swan invented the first actual filament for use in a glass light bulb, although several other people had experimented with naked carbon filaments before this.

  4. Sorry to ruin your fun fellas. But about whites surviving and the Negro getting wiped out is all ass. Due to climate change and all of you are getting killed off naturally down to natures rejecting you, =no melanin hence why black people can create white babies straight hair blue eyes other wise known as albinos thats where you come from incase you wondered your ancestors were neanderthals in caves.

    while blacks flourished for millions of years

    thats why you gotta walk around with your suncream. negros on the other hand can addapt to any climate and thats one of the reasons why whites wanted to kill them off but that did not work either.
    this sound stupid but if all white people cared about there race so much as they say wouldn’t the government have stopped people having mixed babies
    and divided people but no

    this has happend in the past but it was all a plan from the begining to now just slave the blacks off there mix with them and then inherit there place in the genes tree which is the oldest and purest .. and btw everyone in the future will be dark skinned fact your being outbred fast sorry chaps!

Comments are closed.