Are you one of the lucky ones with a racial nationalist candidate to vote for in the forthcoming general election? No, thought not. As far as I can see none of our parties are putting up candidates, but please let us know if you know differently. It may be that they haven’t got around to it yet, but if so then they will need to get a move on because nomination papers have to be in the hands of returning officers by 4.00 pm on the 14th November. At least we know where we are with the National Front because they have announced on their website that the Front will not be standing candidates.
Perhaps, though, you have one of the soft nationalist groups standing in your area, such as UKIP, For Britain or the English Democrats, although they too seem to be very slow in announcing candidates.
So it seems that uniquely in Europe we British have no party to vote for of the kind which the media like to call “hard right” (if they’re lucky), “extreme right” (if they’re unlucky) or “neo-Nazi” if they’re right out in the cold. We have nothing to compare with the success of the National Rally in France, the AfD in Germany, the Sweden Democrats and similar groups elsewhere, nor with the ultra-conservative patriotic governing parties in Hungary and Poland. People used to say that the reason why “extremist” parties always fail in Britain is because of our moderate temperament, but nowadays it might be thought rather “racist” to suggest that we are somehow better than those temperamental foreigners who so easily fall for the dubious charms of fascists and communists. The truth is more prosaic; it’s the first-past-the-post system which reserves electoral success and its fruits for the old established parties with their deep reserves of money, experience and information and their huge banks of hereditary supporters. On the continent, various proportional representation systems allow new parties to make an impression and to start a snowball rolling; I rather suspect that if we had had a PR system back in the 1970s, the National Front would have had the breakthrough into national politics foreshadowed by its showing in the Greater London Council elections of 1975.
Anyway, be that as it may, it seems likely that few of us, probably none of us, will get the chance to vote for a candidate that we really want to vote for; we will have to make do with the familiar, terminally uninspiring, “least bad” choice. So what is the “least bad” choice? Far be it from me to tell anyone how they should vote, not least because I have no idea yet how I will vote myself – it seems that in my constituency the choice will be the bad old three, an independent pro-Remain Tory and the Brexit Party; perhaps for the first time since I became eligible to vote I will have to abstain!
As anyone will know who has read my previous piece “Choose Your Poison” I tend to judge a political party by its position on immigration, and I’m not going to rehearse all those arguments again in this article. But I must say that it’s interesting that for the first time in a good few years the subject of immigration has barely featured at all, neither in the press nor in the mouths of the politicians. Or that was the case until Friday morning when Boris Johnson announced that he would make it much easier for medical staff to get visas – which had me shouting at the television “why don’t you fund the training of our own people rather than stealing medics from poor countries!” Max Musson penned a very interesting piece some time ago showing how we could have a wholly British NHS, but the politicians would rather go for the quick cheap fix. What struck me as particularly remarkable about Boris’ announcement is that this must be the very first time that a Conservative politician has made MORE immigration, rather than less, part of his pitch to the electorate. And that at a time when, as we have very recently learnt from the Office for National Statistics, our population is set to continue its relentless rise to 70 million and beyond (very heavily concentrated in England) due entirely to immigration and the offspring of immigrants.
As for the non-Conservative parties, the less said about their positions on immigration the better, although Nigel Farage has at least shown recently that he appreciates the enormity of the coming population increase and its consequences; what a pity that his party seems to have nothing to say on the subject other than to copy the Conservatives.
I dare say that the great majority of us are Leavers, so in most constituencies we will have two “least bad” parties to choose from, if we are inclined to vote at all. But not all of us are Leavers; European unity is a respectable ideal which has an honourable nationalist pedigree all the way back to Oswald Mosley. So what are nationalist Remainers to do? It is possible to imagine that in some circumstances a vote for Labour would not be beyond a nationalist Remainer – Labour’s economic policies (whatever you think of their practicality) have a certain populist appeal and some will like their pro-Palestinian position – but Corbyn and those closest to him are not patriots.
So in this election – the very first general election in which people born in the twenty-first century will be able to vote – there is nothing for us. Yet there are millions who yearn for the release of our country from the traps of political correctness and mass immigration; the victory of Leave in the Brexit referendum was itself a response to that yearning and whatever the outcome of this election, it must be heeded and addressed.
By Frederick Dixon © 2019
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]# # # #
Max Musson
- Edit
It is interesting to note that every European country uses a system of proportional representation except France and the UK, and in France they have a Winner-take-all 2 stage electoral process that also helps smaller parties gain electoral support and representation earlier than our First-past-the-post system.
Stefan
- Edit
This is exactly why i have been pushing for PR but at present it’s not on the agenda.
I thought the Brexit Party might get a handful of MPs & now I revise that to pretty much zero.
My seat is is a safe one, so I will not have any choice unless someone like English Democrats stand.
I have no impact at all on this election, so much for democracy, which is why I have had enough of Parliament.
IRONKRAFT
- Edit
A poignant and sad article indeed. However, I have faith in the “others”.
Others, you may ask. Yes, the East Europeans, and the Russians.
At least a dozen reasonably sized countries, are still relatively free, and recently, Nats and Pats have been marching openly… no riots, no screeching, and no ugly clothing.
I once told everyone I met, and at meetings etc, that I would never leave Britain. Even I, a staunch White Nationalist, can only now see misery, serious crime, and a literal, third-world dust bowl of a nation.
☁
frederick dixon
- Edit
I entirely understand where you’re coming from, Ironkraft, but never despair. There are millions of us, properly led and organised those millions could move the country in our direction. It could be said that Ukip has already done just that by frightening the powers that be. If it’s been done once, it can be done again.
frederick dixon
- Edit
Slight correction to the above: now that Nigel Farage has decided that the Brexit party will not stand in Conservative held seats, very many of us – me included – no longer have two “least bad” parties to vote for. As I’m not going to break the habit of a lifetime by voting Tory, most especially Boris’ Tories, I’m spared the trouble of walking down to the polling station in the rain!
Max Musson
- Edit
I agree Frederick, Nigel Farage has at a stroke, removed any motivation for anyone to vote for the Brexit Party and as a consequence the opinion polls have seen their support amongst the electorate fall from 11-12% to 4% with a matter of a day.
Farage has stood down his candidates in 317 Tory held constituencies, thereby demonstrating that he is prepared to allow Johnson to effect a Brexit in name only, rather than go all out for a maximum Brexit Party showing, and this indicates that even if the Brexit Party gain enough seats to hold the balance of power in future, Farage will again ‘blink first’ rather than hand victory to Labour.
Valerian
- Edit
I have always doubted the sincerity of Nigel Farage on the subject of immigration, and lately I have concluded that Farage and the past and present leadership of UKIP represent Eurosceptic business interests, and thus have no real desire to curb immigration. I think that they have always used the public’s concerns about immigration to gather support for Brexit, and once Brexit occurs they will drop the subject from their propaganda. Like Boris Johnson they have tried to con the public with proposals for an Australian points based immigration system, knowing that we already have a points based immigration system that only applies to tier 2 (general) visas which make up a small proportion of total visa applications, while the majority consist of students, intra company transfers and family reunions.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
In many respects Nigel Farage has shown himself to be self-serving and opportunistic as evidenced by the manner he deserted UKIP without relinquishing his MEP seat won under the auspices of the party and had later formed a rival faction financed by major supporters and donations. His new party was comprised not of conventional party members but those donating a minimum of £25.
Gerard Batten who later became UKIP leader had succeeded in stabilising the party with membership rising impressively and improved local election results. However all progress was lost under the Brexit Party juggernaut culminating in all seats being forfeited at the European Elections. But Mr Batten showed far more dignity and integrity and raised issues which had been ignored by UKIP under Mr Farage. Mr Batten revealed concerns consistent with that of a civic nationalist and it is regrettable that he didn’t survive to continue stirring the good ship UKIP. Now we have little to vote for, other than strategic considerations.
Albert
- Edit
50 Years of Cultural Marxism brainwashing in Education, and a Liberal Media has conditioned most people under 55 to be Liberal minded,
All the main stream Political Parties are Liberals,
And Draconian Race Relations laws have shut people up with any Right Wing Nationalists speaking out,
I put stuff on FB and personal friends who have similar thoughts, are even afraid of pressing the like button.
I went to post on FB regarding The Muslim Terrorist and the War Dog, and was warned not to post or get a ban,
This is what Patriots and Nationalist are up against.
Max Musson
- Edit
Some people are even afraid to have politically incorrect memes or statements displayed on their Facebook news feed, and will unfriend anyone posting politically incorrect views rather than risk being identified as someone who has ‘racist friends or acquaintances.
IRONKRAFT
- Edit
As the site map on a town notice board says, when you are looking for a particular building, etc:
You Are Here:
“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, ‘You are mad; you are not like us”.
Albert
- Edit
I often post on here , but my last post has not been posted on this site, Now I do know that you vet post but what I posted was not controversial ..I did break any UK laws,
Now my concern is and disturbing that you are in effect stopping free speech, just like the General Media,
If you do not post my previous post, I will never contribute to this site again.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
Certainly the terms of any future departure from the EU negotiated by the Conservative Party under the premiership of Boris Johnson is far from satisfactory. However even this rather modest offering would be imperiled should Labour gain power, especially if supported by the so-called Scottish Nationalists, who are agitating for the UK to remain, as well as a second Independence referendum.What is more daunting is that many within the Labour Party are seeking to relax the existing immigration controls, lax thought they are at present.
Unfortunately the Conservative Party have proved unreliable as regards controlling immigration and will even relax existing restrictions, but perhaps not as blatantly as the “Peoples” party led by citizen Corbanov.
Regarding Nigel Farage’s decision not to contest 317 seats, such a strategy would have been inexplicable had the Brexit Party had a realistic chance of capturing many seats. However our current system prevents this as evidenced in the general election of 2015, when UKIP polled 3.8 million votes and only won one seat and that was as a result of an earlier defection from the Conservative Party.Mr Farage must have feared that splitting the vote between his party and the Tories would only have benefited citizen Corbanov and thus hasten Labour into power.
The Tories last won my constituency in 1970, and because of a large Muslim block vote it seems unlikely they would win this time. However the Brexit party may have more of a chance to unseat the dreadful Labour incumbent and hence my decision has already been made.
Stephen
- Edit
Standing on the outside looking in (from South Africa) it has become apparent that the British public are prepared to accept almost any bad thing (rape gangs, sexual grooming, female genital mutilation, politicians in parliament who’s loyalty lies not to Britain but to some caliphate somewhere) rather than have a finger pointed at them and to have “racist” shrieked at them. This includes the police forces. It is a disgusting shame coming from a country which was largely responsible for civilising most of the world.