Podcast – Right Wing, Left Wing, Whose Wing?

THA Talks is a podcast radio station based in London producing weekly shows as an alternative discussion portal and companion for the “Theo-Humanist Arts” company which is involved in all manner of new thinking, art, music, sacred theater and eco-spirituality.  Shows are hosted by musician and occult/conspiracy researcher Paul Obertelli and David William Parry author, poet, dramaturge and Heathen Godhi.

“Matthew is a journalist for the Western Spring Website, a former BNP member and current political activist. He speaks regularly at public seminars on a wide range of cultural and political issues.

This week we decided to have Matthew on our show to have a good chat about his views on what is seen as the “Right Wing”, and we all talk about the perceptions of right and left wing politics and how it reflects on our ruling governments and society.”

Listen to THA Talk edition 28 – Right Wing Left Wing Whose Wing?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9 thoughts on “Podcast – Right Wing, Left Wing, Whose Wing?

  1. AryanConservationist

    - Edit

    Good stuff, just a shame Matt didn’t get the opportunity to promote the concept of White Racial Intentional Community building. Maybe next time?

  2. Oh this is great news. Matthew Tait is a very smart person, and I look forward to hearing more from him. If any of you people are interested, Mr. Tait has a brilliant talk on You Tube about the nature of mass-thought. It is well worth watching; he has an increible amount of abilty, knowledge and understanding.

  3. I and a few others listened to this podcast last night and very much enjoyed it. It was refreshing to hear sympathetic commentary on our position in the Cause coming from the “Leftist” hosts of the show.
    .
    This outreach to other ideological positions and tendencies therein is a positive step in the right direction. (Another initiative in the Plan B methodology?)
    .
    This outreach into other ideological positions seems to be in favour at the moment. For example, Radio 3Fourteen (anarchist/nationalist) has hosted all manner of persons from different ideological perspectives. From anarchists, libertarians, national-anarchists, nationalists… they all seem to be there.
    .
    Rense Radio –often promoting the work of Don Black and David Duke– has also hosted folk from the UK Column and other anti-Establishment figures. Keith Preston (anarchist) has interviewed nationalists/national-anarchists in his podcasts: https://attackthesystem.com/radio/
    .
    There are many more examples. We all, regardless of our own ideological tendencies, have a mutual enemy –the System– and so I am in favour of forming some kind of tentative unity in that regard.
    .
    There are many “Leftists” sympathetic to the Cause. There are those old-school Labour voters who now feel betrayed by Labour and have changed ideological tract, voting previously for the BNP[1] and recently shifting over to UKIP[2]. These old-school Labour voters –the proto-socialist/non-Maxist socialists– are those who find favour with many of our goals –especially the economic policies of nationalism. (“British jobs for British workers” was the cry of many in the union movement when immigration/scab labour started to become a flood a few years ago. This is a nationalist slogan we have employed for years.)
    .
    For those who want to try something new, for those who are sick of being on the fringe of the fringe, this outreach programme makes a refreshing change. I thank Matt for his efforts in this regard and hope to hear him speak further on this subject.
    .
    .
    [1] https://www.theweek.co.uk/politics/22397/why-working-class-dumped-labour-and-voted-bnp
    .
    [2] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27177864

  4. Is there any way to hear this on YouTube or similar? I’m technologically limited at present.
    He’s a nice young man, I shook hands with him once and he complimented me on my rambling attempt at a speech at one of the big unity meetings in Leicester.

    1. It would seem that Matt’s interview is only available here or on THA Talks website, but you are right, he is a nice, warm hearted young man.

  5. David Yorkshire

    - Edit

    A very interesting talk, I particularly enjoyed it when Matt challenged the host on the left’s ridiculous vision of fundaments of Nature as “social constructs”, which the host duly avoided, but the point was very well-made and got aired.

    A little point on economics: capitalism is not right wing. It comes from Whig classical liberalism, in other words from the old left, as opposed to the newer left of socialism – from a tradition that includes people like John Locke, Joseph Addison, Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, Jeremy Bentham and James Mill. David Ricardo and John Stuart Mill began to synthesise liberalism and socialism to begin the route towards what we now term left-liberalism – a schizoid mixture of conflicting leftist principles.

  6. Left and right wing don’t exist in reality. It comes from the time of the French revolution, when people in a meeting were asked to sit on the right if they wanted things to stay the same, and sit on the left if they wanted change.

    The purpose of this artificial dichotomy is to polarise people into two camps, and stop nuanced, independent thought. People who identify as left wing, for example, will automatically trust policies and ideas that are deemed to be leftist, because they trust that people like themselves would make the right decisions. The same goes for self-identified right wingers. Thus you end up in a situation with navel-gazing lefties who purport to be against suffering, but support things like abortion and race-replacement, while wasting all their time waffling over abstract petty details on overblown subjects. On the other hand you have the right wingers who are more sensible about certain things (ie immigration) and have a slightly higher ability to see the woods for the trees, but they seemingly lack subtlety of intelligence, and irrationally hate anything compassionate even if it’s harmless or beneficial, just because anything compassionate is usually judged by the media to be leftist. The end result is that people compromise coming to the best conclusions because they are subconsciously manipulated into staying within their own side.

    The media decides what should be considered either left or right, liberal or conservative. It isn’t real. I refuse to call myself right-wing or consider nationalism to be right-wing.

Comments are closed.