Well, we did it. A first, indispensable, step has been taken towards the healing of our nation. The generations of the First and Second World Wars gave everything to save Britain from foreign domination and invasion, but the fear that the present generation might throw away their sacrifice has proved unfounded. We should thank God, rejoice and enjoy it for a day or two – and then get down to the arduous, long term business of completing the healing of our grievously wounded country.
There can be no doubt that it was the immigration controversy which won the referendum for Leave, so perhaps we should thank Tony Blair for opening the flood gates and giving us this chance. More directly, and less cynically, credit should be given where it belongs, to Nigel Farage; it was UKIP under his direction that frightened Cameron into granting us a referendum as a way of parking the EU issue in the long grass. Cameron is reported to have told a Euro bigwig back in 2014 that he would win both of his forthcoming referenda – on Scotland and the EU – by two or three to one, crushing both Scottish nationalism and Euroscepticism for a generation. What was that old saying about pride and a fall?
Without the immigration issue not only would the Leave camp never have won the referendum, but there would have been no referendum in the first place. It is essential that whatever happens now the government (headed presumably by Michael Gove and Boris Johnson) delivers something approaching public expectations. The omens are not good. Both of those men have delivered soliloquies to “perhaps the most successful multi-racial, multi-cultural, multi-faith society in the world”, failing to mention that this paradise was achieved against the will and without the consent of the British people. It is also a favourite theme of Cameron, the three men all being politically in the same place save on the single issue of EU membership. Expect some loosening of restrictions on immigration from Asia and Africa (it has been more or less promised throughout the campaign), but not too big a reduction in the numbers coming from the EU. If immigration from Europe IS greatly reduced – if – then those we have already received may come to be seen in the future as a blessing because those who remain here will in time be absorbed by intermarriage, enlarging the White British population without racial damage. But if the numbers settled here go on increasing at the rate we have seen in recent years our very Britishness will become ever more tenuous, our national identity compromised. There may yet be work for UKIP.
It seems likely that had this opportunity not been given to us for a few more years it would have been too late. Those of us who are between 18 and 24 voted by something like three to one for Remain. Is that not extraordinary? Young people are supposed to be anti-elitist rebels against the establishment and in favour of freedom, are they not? Yet here they are voting massively for an anti- democratic, elitist engine of national destruction! Perhaps the clue is in the very fact that it IS an engine of national destruction and too many have been taught to believe that internationalism is good/nationalism bad. Certainly the revulsion from nationalism/patriotism/our country seems very general, with patriotism in any form being regarded as next to Satanism in the catalogue of sin. I have mentioned in another article a survey conducted in 2013 into young peoples’ view of patriotism; in that year 20% described themselves as very patriotic, ten years earlier the proportion was 32%. That collapse in the proportion of the “very patriotic” was ascribed to the rapid expansion of university education in the intervening years, but I suspect that the process of deracination begins much earlier.
It is obvious that we must win enough of the young to our side to ensure a future not only for nationalism but for the nation itself. But how? I may not be the best person to suggest ways of winning over the young as I am not young, and even when I was young I was very far from typical. Nevertheless, here’s a thought to play with: a generational revolt is now long overdue against the attitudes and assumptions of the soft Marxist cultural revolution of the sixties, now half a century ago. Such a revolt may already be underway on the continent and even, perhaps, in the United States, but not here, not yet. How then to harness the natural rebelliousness of youth in the service of our cause and our country? Perhaps by offering something different from the tired slurry of political correctness which passes for politics and culture in today’s universities. I certainly do not recommend yet another revival of the outworn methods and symbolism of the failed nationalisms of the thirties and forties, so fatal to any hopes of a nationalist restoration. On the contrary, I would borrow the idea of “Memory”, the Russian organisation which, with its rediscovery of Russia’s ancestral heritage in the years before the overthrow of communism and the fall of the Soviet Union, helped to prepare the ground for those momentous events. We have our own ancestral heritage in the inspiring history of our country and people, in our traditional culture, in our incomparable heritage of beauty and craftsmanship. Let us use them.
By Frederick Dixon © 2015
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
drquartz
- Edit
Yes, we won. Absolutely great news. But realistically we shouldn’t have been forced into having a referendum. All our ‘political elite’ have been giving this country away, contrary to the Bill of Rights. They have acted illegally.
I think Blair must have realised there might be repercussions, and that is why he repealed the Treason Act. Of course, we all thought that it was because of his lies to invade Iraq (and indeed it may well be), but this fits quite nicely doesn’t it?
Can you imagine every PM (still alive) since Churchill banged up for treason, along with many MPs past and present. Lovely thought in some cases.
But the question must be – where did this rot start? Who were the initial perpetrators?
We have been thrust into quite a number of EU treaties over the years with no referendum, always under the guise of ‘trade’, ‘merely a clarification’ or ‘an adjustment’. All have been illegal according to the Bill of Rights.
Is it a coincidence that the history curriculum for schools dropped learning about the Magna Charta and Bill of Rights etc. in any detail after Heath got the countries ‘approval’ (we know it was on a lie, now) to sign Britain up to the Common Market? Our kids now are merely told that the Magna Charta was signed by King John to hand over most of the power of the throne to the Barons. That doesn’t tell anyone very much. There’s a good deal more to it than that. The Bill of Right, if mentioned at all, is simply glossed over. I recall that we learnt about these things in some depth, and some 60 odd years later I can still recall bits and pieces.
We really do need to sort this out and clear the field. We need to educate the young to understand what centuries of bloodshed (in some cases) and hardship have given to the British people, so that this foolishness can never happen again.
Kirk Headley
- Edit
As an American watching what is happening in Britain, I’m curious about the claims that the “leave” campaign promised that 350 million pounds per week sent to the EU would be redirected to the NHS. Which now seems to have been a misleading advert, angering many people who did vote to exit the EU. I realize that Nigel Farage did not endorse this, however I am reading messages through social media from my friends in the UK that they are upset and do feel that they were misled before their vote. Perhaps they didn’t fully understand what they were voting for?
The immigration issue seems to be yet another issue…. that people are now realizing what was promised is not what it seemed.
Could you address these two issues?
Max Musson
- Edit
It is a fact that £350 million per week is the gross cost of British membership of the EU. From this amount is currently deducted a ‘rebate’ which is a temporary measure that is expected to reduce to zero in the years ahead. Obviously, post Brexit a British government could, and most probably would, choose to spend that money on projects and public services here in the UK, so the claims made during the referendum whilst not entirely accurate, are also not entirely wrong.
.
As far as immigration is concerned, roughly half of all immigration into Britain in recent years has come from within the EU. Within that there are relatively small numbers of immigrants from France and Germany etc., that are not a problem. In essence, immigration from other EU states, the newly admitted Eastern European states, is also not a problem from a racial or cultural perspective, although it has been a problem in terms of the sheer numbers involved. Immigration from Eastern Europe has also been a problem where the Roma are concerned as these people are of non-European origin.
.
As a result of the southern and eastern borders of the EU being permeable, allowing vast numbers of non-Europeans to enter the EU and therefore subsequently gain access to Britain, this is a serious problem, with hoards of non-European immigrants laying siege to Calais in an effort to illegally obtain passage across the English Channel.
.
Brexit will not automatically rectify all of these problems, but it will allow a future British government to control who is eligible to gain access to Britain. There are still large numbers of non-White immigrants currently allowed to enter Britain, which could easily be stopped even now if there was the political will. Until now however, successive governments have used the EU requirement that there should be the free movement of people across borders as an excuse for not tackling direct Third World immigration. Hopefully post-Brexit, they will not be able to use this excuse, but there is much that still needs to be done to secure the future survival and wellbeing of our people and establish a permanent solution to the issue of immigration.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
English Heroic Legends by Kathleen Herbert. In my view a fantastic book with stories told by generations long ago.
https://www.asbooks.co.uk/t%20heroic-legends-english.htm
Albert
- Edit
The Out politicians like Johnson ,Gove and Farage have all said they are for immigration especially None EU immigration…and this is where the majority of immigrants comes from mostly Third World Africa and Pakistan, These people are the most problematic and are impossible to intergrated into European civilisation.
Regarding our youth…Sixty years of a Cultural Maxist education has destroyed their patriotism…
Frederick Dixon
- Edit
I agree. A very careful eye will need to be kept on the new Tory government if we are not to find ourselves with fewer Poles but more Pakistanis. The rumoured appointment of Osborne, an arch cosmopolitan liberal is – if true – not a good sign. But then they are all claiming to be liberals now!
Julie Lake BNP
- Edit
For myself, in a way, i expected little else from the reaction from the Left, but all the same, astonished at the pubescent behaviour of the losers.
In particular, half the country denouncing the other half as racist. It wasn’t so much about immigration. I had teams out across my area, leafleting and we spoke to hundreds of people. Yes, some were concerned about immigration but in the main, concerns were, the one state EU army, the cost, and the loss of our borders and sovereignty.
In many respects, i believe, the ridiculous childish behaviour of the losers, has finally opened up many middle of the road eyes, as to what exactly, the Liberal agenda is.
I don’t blame the young, or the students. They believe that they have been robbed of their future. This is down to the dumbing down of British history in schools, almost to the point, they must be ashamed of Britain’s colonial past. They have not been educated in democracy and so believe, to call for another vote, because they didn’t like the first one, is all perfectly acceptable. Those MP’s such as David Lammy for Tottenham endorse these beliefs. How can we expect much else from the young, when odious men such as him, lead by example in this manner ?
Yet, there’s an enormous irony when it came to Brexit winning and the losers claiming half the country had turned racist.
A few weeks ago, during the elections, i spent many weeks in the north of England where i was an election agent for one our candidates. The town had a large Muslim population as they also had a large Eastern European population. We knocked on over 1,000 doors in six weeks and we were told by Muslims that they were voting Leave to stop the country taking in any more Eastern Europeans, particularly Polish, in order to stop them competing for business with them. All the Polish, told us that they were voting Leave to stop more Muslims and Pakistani’s coming in and competing with them.
One only has to look at major cities where there is an ethnic demographic that puts White British in the minority, and see that, the city result was Leave. That’s because ethnics were also voting Leave.
Unfortunately, our brain challenged Liberal elite, fail to recognise this.
This is the reality, and that is, in their infinite stupidity and blindness, they have indeed created a race war. Only it is not a race war between white British and blacks or Muslims. It is between each other. This is what they have created.