By Max Musson:
Writing in the wake of Barack Obama’s re-election as US President, for ‘The Voice’, the black community’s newspaper and online news service, Duton Adebayo shared with his readers part of a telephone conversation he had with a fellow black journalist who asked him, “When will we get our first black leader here in Britain?”
Adebayo’s answer was “2020!” and in the article for The Voice, he went on to express his belief that Ed Miliband will probably lose the next general election and that waiting in the wings, ready to assume the mantel of Labour Party leadership is a young black MP by the name of Chuka Umunna, currently Shadow Business Secretary and MP for Streatham, a man often referred to as ‘the black Blair’ or ‘Labour’s Barack Obama’.
Throughout the rest of Adebayo’s article there is never any mention of Umunna’s views on major or even minor policy issues, as Adebayo apparently assumes that his readers are not interested in such things. Seemingly, their only interest in Mr Umunna appears to be his race and the fact that as a blackman, he can in their view be trusted to advance the interests of black people, and whatever else he might think or do is largely irrelevant.
In one of the closing paragraphs, Adebayo exhorts Umunna, “So Chuka, you better get our skates on. Eight years is barely enough time to get to Number 10, but like I say you should have been preparing for this since you were a toddler. But you have to get the community behind you because right now a lot of people ain’t feeling you. You’ve got the black single mum’s vote, all you need to do now is show the fellas that you’ve got balls – and clubs and parties to go to.”
It would appear that Chuka Umunna is quite a smart fellow, he has a Law degree and an MA, but he’s not a ‘black boy from the wrong side of the tracks’, he comes from a privileged background. The son of a Nigerian father, Umunna’s mother is a solicitor of Irish extraction, Patricia (nee Milmo) the daughter of High Court Judge Sir Helenus Milmo, and it is in this respect, that Umunna is the mixed race son of a White mother, that creates another parallel between him and Barack Obama.
Obama is the child of a Kenyan father and a White mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, and truth be told, Obama is quite a smart fellow too, he has a Law degree from Harvard and this means that both Obama and Umunna have several things in common with Conservative MP, Adam Afriyie.
Afriyie is the Conservative Party’s first mixed race MP and while his degree was not in Law, it was in Agricultural Economics, he has been touted in recent times as the ‘Conservative’s Obama’, as possibly a future ‘first non-White leader’ of the Conservative Party, and possibly Britain’s first ‘black’ prime minister.
Notably, Afriyie also is the son of a White mother and a black father and this is one of the key issues to be considered here.
First however, let us establish that the significance of these three individuals as politicians is largely based upon their race, or their perception in the eyes of the public at large as black men, and the belief among black and other non-White voters that they can be trusted to represent the interests of black people in particular and ethnic minorities in general.
We should turn our attention to another article on ‘The Voice’ website, that of another black journalist, Elizabeth Pears, entitled, “What Britain Must Learn From Obama Victory”.
The crux of Elizabeth Pears article is that the demographic shift in the USA, from a majority White population towards a majority black population has marginalized the Republican Party, forcing them to either court the black vote, or face an eternity in opposition. Pears predicts that a similar state of affairs will come to pass in the UK also, and so the Conservative Party had better take note.
In her article, Pears states in relation to Obama’s re-election in 2012, “What is worth noting, … is that the majority of Obama’s support came from black and Hispanic voters while losing some of the white votes he attracted in 2008.
“It signals a crucial shift in America – not just a shift in demographics, but also the power balance, apparently along racial lines. Figures show 91 per cent of African Americans and 70 per cent of Latinos voted for Obama. Mitt Romney claimed 27 percent, according to a CNN exit poll.”
Drawing a parallel between the US and the situation here in Britain, Pears goes on, “In 2010, the Tories won 36 percent of the national vote, but only 16 percent of the BME vote. Labour attracted 68 per cent, according to a study published by race equality think tank, Runnymede Trust.
“A recent article on Conservative Home website revealed tell-tale signs that some within the party are already worried about its approach and policies that could alienate ethnic minorities.”
Indeed, one of David Cameron’s first policy decisions upon becoming leader of the Conservative Party was to “change the face of the Conservative Party, by changing the faces of the Conservative Party”, i.e. by forcing more black and minority ethnic candidates upon local constituencies.
The primary issue is that White people both here and in the US need to realise that politics and the balance of power is regarded as being decided “along racial lines” by blacks and other ethnic minorities, as Elizabeth Pears goes to some length to point out, and as the following video illustrates.
If we are not to lose out and be reduced to a powerless minority White underclass, we Whites need to begin making our voting choices primarily along racial lines, as black and ethnic minority peoples do, and to choose only those candidates who are prepared to put the interests of White people first.
The secondary issue involved here revolves around the misconception that the obvious intelligence of individual black people like Obama, Umunna and Afriyie, proves that race differences in intelligence do not exist.
However a study by Professor Gillian Turner, the results of which were published in the Lancet in June 1996, indicates intelligent men inherit their brains from their mothers.
Each cell of our body contains 46 chromosomes, 23 inherited from our fathers and 23 inherited from our mothers, the 23 chromosomes from each parent being made up of 22 autosomes and one sex chromosome.
The male sex chromosome is the ‘Y’ chromosome, while the female sex chromosome is the ‘X’ chromosome. A woman has two ‘X’ chromosomes, one inherited from her mother and one from her father, whereas a man has one ‘X’ chromosome inherited from his mother and one ‘Y’ chromosome inherited from his father. It is the presence of the ‘Y’ chromosome that makes an individual male as opposed to female.
The study in the Lancet showed that the genes for general intelligence are located on the X chromosome and the implications of this finding are that intelligent men are the products of intelligent mothers. A son will inherit his mother’s intelligence, whereas a daughter’s intelligence will tend to be determined by a combination of both the mother’s and the father’s intelligence.
Professor Gillian Turner, concludes that if a man wants smart sons his best bet is to marry a smart woman.
It is not surprising therefore that ‘black’ men exhibiting higher than average intelligence tend to be the mixed race sons of black men and White women and this dependence of the passage of high intelligence from one generation to the next, on the genetic contribution from the mother, makes it all the more important that White women of higher than average intelligence should make it their mission to produce as many White babies as possible.
Therefore, ladies, do not waste your lives and your precious genetic cargo pursuing careers as wage slaves for no great purpose, but devote your lives instead to the genetic enrichment of our future generations. There is no more meaningful mission in life.
By Max Musson © 2013
# # # #
jackdaw
- Edit
Spot on again Max.
Steve
- Edit
British Obama?
No thanks, as if the real thing isn’t bad enough!
Mind you I didn’t like Clinton, Raygun or Bush x 2 either.
They’re all puppets of the NWO types.
Franks
- Edit
According to the Telegraph, Chuka Umunna, the Shadow Business Secretary, insisted he had no memory of having edited his own details on the online encyclopaedia, which encourages users to contribute information.
However, internet records disclosed that Mr Umunna’s entry was altered in January 2008 by someone using a computer registered to Rochman Landau, the legal firm which employed him at the time.
After the change, the future MP’s entry included a reference to a newspaper article which suggested that Mr Umunna “may end up as the UK’s Barack Obama”.
A spokesman for Mr Umunna, who was elected MP for Streatham in 2010, said: “This change was made over half a decade ago.
“Chuka has no record or recollection of having a log in for Wikipedia or having edited it, though staff have had to make corrections for racist vandalism of the page in the past.”
See: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9987374/Chuka-Umunnas-Wikipedia-entry-edited-from-computer-at-his-work.html
Anglo-Australian Alliance
- Edit
In light of my previous comment on the Muhammad Ali thread –descrying miscegenation as (bar none) the greatest threat to European peoples– is it interesting to note that all the politicos mentioned in this article are of mixed-race.
.
What can we deduce from this? It is increasing clear that there is –through the a media suborned by the perfect couple of neo-Marxist utopianism and Zionist deconstructionism[1]– a concerted effort to promote miscegenation amongst White women and Black men.
.
Again I state, for the public reading this post, that if race-mixing is natural, why then is it overwhelmingly the undertaking of Black men and White women? Certainly, there are a few White men who are coupled with Black women –but they are clearly evidently the minority –so few as to be the exception that proves the rule.
.
And so we must ask, perhaps on an another article covering the issue, why this massive unbalance (the preponderance of Black men and White women) between those in mixed-race relationships is not of equal footing.
.
On this point I would like to draw your attention to the splendid presentation on “Strategic Insights into Mass-mind Psychology” given at a recent London Forum meeting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_63Blr6QLKg
.
And so we must ask, to the public, an uncomfortable question:
What comes first: the chicken or the egg; the supposedly “natural” desire to court outside of your own kind, or the televisual and media promotion for one to do so?
.
.
,
[1] They are one and the same. The Reds –inadvertently, granted– are doing the work of the Zionists and are therefore funded by them. (A cursory search on the internet will substantiate my claim.)
frederickdixon
- Edit
This excellent article covers several areas which could each do with an article or three of their own:-
First, race mixing – thank you Max, the terrible picture at the top of the article reminds us all of what we face. We need to hammer home wherever we can the message “race mixing is genocide”. If nothing else that message might cause people to stop and think “why?”, and once the open minded start thinking anything can happen.
Second, the “British Obama” – I wonder how many ex “future prime ministers” there are in British politics? Those tipped for the highest office at an early age rarely make it to the top of the slippery pole, perhaps because jealous rivals will make sure that they don’t. I remember Paul Boateng, mixed race First Secretary to the Treasury in Blair’s first ministry, straight into the cabinet, a shoo-in for Britain’s first black Prime Minister… last heard of heading to Ghana as High Commissioner. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Tories’ first non-white leader were not Priti Patel, right wing, right gender, coloured but not too coloured, father a UKIP candidate and therefore Farage friendly – which might be important after the next general election.
Third, changing demographics – yes, Romney would have won the US election if the demographics of the country were still what they were twenty years ago. But Romney would still have won if he’d captured a couple more percentage points from whites who didn’t bother to turn out because they didn’t like his fat-cat image He could have done that by running a campaign which appealed to white interests – cracking down on immigration, abolishing “affirmative action”. A victory for a race-realist Republican candidate might have brought time for white Americans to reverse their imminent displacement (although it probably wouldn’t). “Reaching out” to non-white voters by abandoning the interests of white voters would be fatal, not only to white Americans but to the long term future of the Republican party. Exactly the same applies to British politics.
Fourth – eugenics, yes of course bright white women should have more bright white children, but how do we persuade them to do so?
Steve
- Edit
She can’t be for real surely, it has to be a spoof of the more stupid end of black voters?
It would like me saying I’m voting for Cameron because he’s white & therefore will give me loads of free stuff!
Steve
- Edit
To be honest I think a moslem PM is more likely, suitably polished up of course.
Steve
- Edit
Actually the thing to ask or check out, is has he been invited to any Bilderberg type meetings, if not, he’s going nowhere without their stamp of approval.