National Action – Day of Action

27 thoughts on “National Action – Day of Action”

1. Shaun

   8th June 2014 at 2:57 pm - Edit

   Great! These types of demonstrations need to take place on a regular, regular basis. Also, it is good that they are targeting the right types of people! Demonstrating outside mosques is pathetic. You need to make your message clear: you are against the System!

   I believe that demonstrations should take place outside local councils, radio stations. TV stations, schools, universities, courts — all with the same core messages (memes): no to White genocide, no to the NWO, no to the EU, no to the anti-White media — that kind of thing!

   These guys are a real inspiration.

2. Fionn Westron

   8th June 2014 at 3:07 pm - Edit

   It is great to see indigenous Britons making a stand and defending themselves.National Action have to praised and supported for their efforts, it is easy to knock and ridicule other people, but salient advice or opinion should be given an airing.

   Was National Action set up with the same goals as Germany’s immortals? The immortals have a strong group who created new banners, symbols and platforms that could attract from all sectors of society and seems to be doing so.

   It seems that once you become known as a neo-nazi group, you attract a certain percentage of followers but then you hit a glass ceiling. Marxists have had 70 years of brainwashing the masses, they have had the advantage of painting themselves as the glorious saviours of humanity against an evil “nazi” monster. Despite this, because they are an ideology that is extreme (or perceived to be), they have only ever managed to get a certain percentage of the mainstream support and the rest being fringe lunatics, they never get above that certain percentage.

   How much more so is this the case for the monsters – the NSDAP or groups clearly identifying themselves as such and groups painted as neo-nazis. Golden Dawn works in Greece because Greeks are rock bottom economically and Golden Dawn are providing real help and defence against immigrant attacks. Golden Dawn will not work anywhere else until conditions are the same as Greece, because then the people are broken from the mainstream lies and spells and see reality and truth. But we in the rest of Europe are not there. However a slight fine tuning of a Golden Dawn type group does have a better chance of success. All you have to do is drop the overt stuff, outright blatant neo-nazi references.

   As soon as you give a roman salute, display neo-nazi paraphernalia, you attract a certain amount of people and then that is it, any mainstream who would be open to anti-immigration and anti multi-cult, stay away from such a group. Our countries are too small, the populace too convoluted to invite the hassle, stress, ostracisation this would involve. One can say those are the people we do not need, but then you will always be on the margins, on the fringes.

   Moreover a lot of the people who do get drawn to such groups, are those who have bought the Hollywood narrative and fake image of what “nazism” is. The image of the murderous, psycho, sadistic killer monsters. Apart from the minority and rare, capable and on-form stalwarts, the only others it attracts are the inadequate fringe, margin-of-society types. These types need a sense of power, they are drawn to the Hollywood stereo-type “nazi” groups. These types are low quality cannon fodder who do not have any self-sacrificial bone or effort to contribute, rather, they become part of a hate-fest venting group whose actions further alienate public support or any sort of sympathy and support we might get. They are effective fish-scarers. They are selfish people who join such groups for their own deficient and dysfunctional needs. These needs are to satiate their own day to day egotistical manoeuvrings, angers, petty jealousies and spiteful eruptions, in order to feel more power and feed those power-trip hungers in their own life. They are without a care or thought to the damage their own actions have on the cause of White survival in the greater scheme of things and larger picture. Their need is to feel part of a group who they feel gives them a sense of power. Such people melt away in the face of any sign of stronger opposition, they are not the “300” who will stand in the face of higher numbers. They are the type who would turn-coat and become part of the anti-fascists if and when it dawns on them, that they can just as easily feed their need to feel powerful on the numerically higher side, with less risk to themselves because of those higher numbers.

   For White Natinionalist groups such as National Action, adopting new motifs, banners, heraldry would possibly be the wiser and faster path to attracting larger numbers of quality members. National Action have every right and opportunity to express themselves in a White nationalist manner that is non compromising and bold. This should be possible without a need of any symbolism of different times, former eras. Maybe they are right, maybe they should just say what they want, in a purist outright manner, perhaps that will strike a chord with the masses, perhaps the times are right for this. I do not know, I don’t think times will every be right for it, unless it is all out war, which I do not think is going to happen, we are in a slowly boiling pot scenario, where the people being boiled never jump out of the pot because they never realise they are being boiled or are too afraid to act, they are deers in the headlights. Telling them the truth, will not change that, they want permission to change, to act, we have to take them by the hand and do it in a way that gives them permission to follow. All I do know is, it has been done many many times before, each time ending the same way. I thought National Action were Britain’s answer to the more sophisticated continental and Scandinavian versions, with new and appealing symbolism, whilst still boldly stating their opposition to immigration and multi-cult, and calling it out as invasion etc.

   Again praise must be given to these people for simply acting, but it has to the stage where acting is not enough, if we are to act, we must use our Aryan intelligence to inform our actions, to be a force multiplier and out-chess our enemies, this is what terrifies them and the precise reason they are multi-culting us out of existence in the first place. We must act in a certain manner and present ourselves in a certain way. Our actions must have an impact far above their weight division. It is no longer acceptable to merely act in a way that is a wild lash out. All good for release for our personal frustration, but does our action set us back 2 more steps. Are we trading personal short term release of stress for long term further tightening of the knot of invasion and multi-cult stranglehold on our race, with any or every action we take? Our actions must be clever, considered and strike a blow which truly releases the knot with act. It is my conclusion roman salutes and other 1930’s era outright symbolism tightens the knot. One step forward, personal short term gratification, but 2 steps back and long term tightening of the knot. We must recognise the long term implications, one battle won may in fact lose you the war, we must think stragetically and act tactically. We must engage our Aryan chess intelligence. But again, National Action have done great noteworthy acts and they must be praised for such. I think they only need some fine tuning in the above regard. Remember outright reference to 1930’s symbolism does not mean no swastika-like symoblism at all, for example use of some British indigenous swastika-like symbol would be very effective and still state boldly the truth of the matter and their unashamed stance against the bullsh!t of the establishment, evoking a real radical yet sophisticated platform that all classes could relate to – the bloodright of the ancient indigenous Britons.

   I think it was Adolf Hitler who commented that we should not hark back to former times, when fighting for the present. While it was nice to look back at the vikings and knights, he found it outlandish that any party members would dress up as such, except in festivals expressely celebrating such ancestors. But for the here and now, he would have advocated using what works, what is practical to get your fight won, according to the times, era and culture you live in. Any harking back to what the NSDAP used has quickly seen that group suicided with the speed of a kamikazi. It is as much use as telling the already petrified sheep to move to the part of the field where they have been told the wolf is waiting to devour them. We already know the reaction to this, time to use other tactics and present ourselves in the manner that attracts, only then can you win converts who will be zealous adherents of the facts. Others have compromised too much, others not enough, there is a nice balance, many have not got. We do not have to be like UKIP or others who have compromised far too much, nor should we, but a little bit more tinkering and fine tuning of the presentation and way we put our message across is all the difference, it is the difference in genes between the races, a tiny amount makes all the difference. Once you have attracted, it is only a matter of time before those who been drawn to you, become the racially aware warriors of tomorrow.

   1. PharmaPhil

      9th June 2014 at 11:34 am - Edit

      I was watching “37 Days” about the events leading up WW1 & the Foreign Office was shown & in the close ups, you could see that it was a Victorian building (VR) & there were also swastikas in the decoration of the building.
      It seems this building was in fact Belfast City Hall but again it shows that the Swastika was in use here long before Hitler was born.

   2. Shaun

      9th June 2014 at 2:33 pm - Edit

      Great analysis and I agree with many of your central points!

      I have a few of my own:

      1.The Basics.

      If you’re a demonstration group you should make yourself a cut above the rest! Do you remember why I told you why I used to mix with negroes? I mixed with them because I wanted to be seen as one of the tough guys — not like your average, weak White person.

      Demonstration groups should train together and be hard, tough, muscular, fearsome men! Create a standard and let selection take over. Weaker, less masculine Whites will train hard to get into the groups (trust me). Women will show interest. You need to go through experiences that binds you together as a group. Pure determination. Pure strength. Pure White power….

      2. Strategy.

      let’s face it, the Zio-media is never going to give any display of White resistance any form of positive coverage. You need to find a way of working these creeps against themselves and then, using social media, attract the right types of members — scumbags wouldn’t want to do 30-miles walks in the Scottish Highlands, for instance. Let the media quiver at the site of you. Don’t try to be nice; but act with more dignity than them.

      3. Demonstration venues.

      As I said in previous posts, don’t protest outside mosques like the dubmbarse BNP. Protest outside the social services, the BBC, the Tavistock Institute — use your imagination, protest against the system….

      4. Imagery and Presentation.

      You need, of course, a certain style of clothing but don’t go down the lowlife hooligan route — place yourself above. I’m not the type of guy who understands fashion, but there must be way of dressing that gets the point across — we’re Aryans, right? We can think of something! I don’t believe the neo-Nazi route is worth the effort. Be original; create your own symbols; don’t live in the past. Also, you must remember, that we need self-actualize as a part of our activism. There must be tests, challenges, struggles…. We must do all this together….

3. ConnalOakesHolt

   8th June 2014 at 4:53 pm - Edit

   Well done National Action.
   Since the calculated dismantling of British manufacturing post WWII , Liverpool , once a busy port city , exporting British manufactured goods worldwide , has , like much of the uk suffered economic hardship , interspersed with brief periods meagre economic recovery.
   This kind of economic situation has been exploited by Marxists and other leftwing groups who have used their message of Solidarity to hoodwink and blindside the downtrodden British worker , rallying him to their ranks only to stab him in the back.
   As the British worker now must compete against workers from other countries , who have been granted permission to enter our country by a class of traitorous politicians , he now finds his wages frozen or his pickings getting slimmer as he joins the dole queue.
   The toxic results of the Marxist idea that the workers of the world should unite have infact not created unity, but divided our people further.
   That National Action chose the weekend of the D-day celebrations is I think poignant.

   Well done to the British Movement some of whose members , I am told were also present.

4. Ryan

   8th June 2014 at 10:41 pm - Edit

   Support given were support is due. The media make a lot of noise but in the real world, just like the marxists they are very lazy

5. Michael Woodbridge

   9th June 2014 at 1:45 am - Edit

   As someone who proudly supported the National Action demonstration in Liverpool on Saturday I would like to thank Fion Westron for her long, thoughtful and constructive criticism.
   Fortunately in order to distinguish between the mindless extremism of the “Hollywood Nazi” variety and our own principled hard line racial socialism we have to do no more than distinguish between honourable and dishonourable behaviour.
   John Tyndall once posed the question, “Is the problem with the present generation due to their lacking any sense of honour?”
   Well National Action is instilling that lost sense of honour once again into our youth.
   Honour implies telling the truth, wherever possible, and showing due respect even when we don’t altogether agree with or particularly approve of another person. For instance one of the things we were demonstrating against on Saturday were “loan sharks”; those agents, such as the ‘Wonga’ organisation, which exploits the public’s gullibility and weakness.
   We could just say, as the Tories do, that if people are stupid enough to borrow beyond their means they deserve to be exploited. But, as a group that honours the British folk National Action see it as their duty to protect the weaker members of our racial community. As a community we are only as strong as our weakest link.

   Another form of.dishonourable behaviour would be to lie to the British public by pretending that we believe in a universal panacea such as ” liberal democracy” for example. Geert Wilders of the Dutch Freedom Party tries to soften his apparent hard line opposition to Islamic immigration by making an alliance with Jews and homosexuals under the guise of liberalism. Ironically the homosexual lobby would be insignificant as a voting block if homosexuality were not promoted as a kind of shibboleth by those hostile to White survival.. Therefore, in the end his Party ends up serving an American/Zionist hegemony rather than the Dutch people.
   As Shakespeare wrote in Hamlet,..
   “And this above all: to thine own self be true, And it must follow, as the night the day, Thou canst not then be false to any man.”
   The whole experience of the post-War world is that compromise doesn’t work but only leads to further weakness. National Socialism will only be out of date,once there is something even more suited to the heroic task which awaits us. Whatever the future brings it wont be for the faint-hearted who want to dress up our ideology with coy populist imagery. Of course we need to insinuate ourselves into society through subtlety and intelligence. But,.It’s organisations such as National Action which will keep that clarity of vision and lead the way.

   1. Fionn Westron

      9th June 2014 at 1:28 pm - Edit

      @Michael Woodbridge

      Certainly well done is in order for taking an active stand. That is to be applauded and supported, no question. I would not give any time to people who are definitely knocking you. National Action have done some great actions.

      I understand your points about being honourable and telling the truth. Hopefully the qualifying mark of honour and integrity would weed out the fish-scarers. I am somewhat pessimistic on that score.

      Do not get me wrong. I made the point of not making compromise nor having to, but indeed standing your ground and standing for truth and reality. However it is a matter of how it is presented, that is all. A small adoption of not roman saluting or 1930’s German National Socialist flag, would pretty much be it in a nutshell. Instead of harking back to some of the 1930’s symbolism, I would forget the roman salute, create a new symbol that is inherently British and has shades of Aryanism, so some sort of swastika-like British symbol.

      As for the message, sure talk about who the oppressors are, the banksters and who they are, who it is who owns us and most importantly….HOW.

      Talk about your pride in your race, your rights to exist as an ethnic group and as such your right to protect your ethnic group and your ethnic home, just as every ethnicity has that right. In fact I would state what the public have not heard – the meaning of “racism” as laid out in my first article on Western Spring, how “racism” was is natural and merely is an expression of evey ethnic people to protect and look after themselves and what is in their best interests, and thus the right to secure their ethnic territory. This is what racism is, a natural, good and healthy thing, it is a NON-HATEFUL thing, it does not imply you hate other races. It has been twisted to mean that it does, but only when Whites express their desire to protect and ensure their existence, every other ethnic group is supported in their aims to protect their ethnic group and ethnic home.

      Thus racism is a con-word used to aid White genocide.

      The “loan-shark” message is par for the course and is part of defending the vulnerable, that is a natural positive for your group.

      Dutch freedom party is also not the model to adopt. As stated in my reply, too many have compromised too much. There is no reason as stated above not to name the Jewish supremacists who control both austerity and immigration. Just make sure you show how. Tell the people of the consequences, the Jewish supremacists are the ones who are the elites, the 1%, the future world rulers.

      I think the way the Swedish Nationalists and Swedish Nordfront present, is what I had in mind in my reply. I had thought National Action were along the same lines, drawing in all classes and sections of society. It struck me from your website and such that you had indeed cracked that path, no compromise racially, but had moved on in a much more sophisticated and intelligent way with creating your own unique British brand and way of delivering what needs to be said, that would indeed draw and appeal to a wider section of society. (again I am not advocating that you have to be like some commercial entity and “appeal” to people). It is just on seeing the roman salutes and such that it contradicted that idea I thought National Action was about.

      In the end even though we are not in the business of mass consumerism, you do have to appeal and attract on some level or that your ambition is to grow to a point where you have real traction and momentum that your ideas at the very least then make society want to change etc. or are pressured to. It does say you want people to join, and my concerns were, a reversion to certain imagery does, no matter what one says, relegates the group as toxic to any potential members from the wider pool of society who were interested. Time will tell, I suppose.

      Best of luck in this endeavour. Nobody can fault you for trying where others have not.

      F

   2. Shaun

      9th June 2014 at 3:39 pm - Edit

      We also need to be intelligent, my friend! As you know, the so-called law is against us so we have to find weak links within their law System that doesn’t put our people in jail. Also, my friend, I have to say one thing: have you ever thought of creating a code of ethics with your organisation (use numbers)? The reason: we need a core group of our kinsmen to separate themselves from the putriedm disgusting culture that our enemy has created around us.

      Rather than having piss ups, what about a branch-v-branch punch up in the outer reaches of Ireland (or something) during winter. Use boxing gloves, put it on You Tube, make our people see you are ten levels above the White anti-White scum.

      As for what you say — fuck them! Golden Dawn have got it right: just speak the truth. Boldness, toughness, and non-sheepleness will become appealing to the beaten down White masses. Obviously, don’t become a group of Hollywood Nazis. But, if you know something about WW2 say it. Then say you’re against White genocide.

      We can’t, at this stage, let the pathetic attempts of the NF, the BNP and the rest set a president. We need to use our brains….. It’s our country. We have to make the bastards who hate us see that we are serious, but let’s use their System against them. No more fucking about!

   3. Corky341

      13th June 2014 at 7:13 pm - Edit

      Very well said Michael. If only we could garner a ‘Michael’ in EVERY college and university across the land we’d be in with a fighting chance. 14w

6. PharmaPhil

   9th June 2014 at 11:19 am - Edit

   Trafalgar Square was full of Sikhs the other day, I thought they had a homeland to go to.
   If there are a lot of these “National Action” days then the authorities will get very worried.
   No doubt they will look to ban them if that happens but flash mobbing could still be done.
   No problem when non whites have mass political demonstrations, such is the double standard in this country.
   I have also seen a pretty repellent moslem parade in Park Lane where they beat themselves over some martyr who has no connection to this country whatsoever.

7. PharmaPhil

   9th June 2014 at 11:24 am - Edit

   My Mother was talking about these jihadists who come back from Syria & saying they should be done as traitors.
   I explained to her they are not traitors as they are not British in any true sense, they are in fact faithful to their culture & as such have no place here.
   They have been wilfully imported probably in the full knowledge of how they would behave.
   If this wasn’t known then the ignorant people who did this should be fired, if they did know then they are the traitors & should be prosecuted, along with the death penalty being reintroduced.

8. Rerevisionist

   9th June 2014 at 11:52 am - Edit

   The national-action.info website is very impressive. It has head-on material on race and Jews and e.g. the hugely rich ‘Frankfurt School’. It has detailed and sound material on Ukraine which I don’t want to judge but is clearly-written and assessible (I mean open to assessment – not a deluge of verbiage). It has good material on demonstrations: Boers, South Africa, and Mandela, for example, and flash leafletting, including universities.
   .
   The only reservation i have is that they don’t seem to have anything on the paper money/ Fed/ world banks issue which is at the root of so much disaster and corruption. This may be because of their WordPress layout; I’m not a fan of these sites, because it’s so difficult to locate material. Though I seem to be about the only person concerned about this.

9. Rerevisionist

   9th June 2014 at 11:57 am - Edit

   I just searched for ‘Federal Reserve’ and ‘Bank of England’ and found nothing; I hope national-action.info isn’t yet another fake.

10. Fionn Westron

    9th June 2014 at 12:26 pm - Edit

    @MichaelWoodbridge

    Just to point out to you, Fionn is a Celtic/ male name.

    Fionn is a masculine given name in Irish and Scottish Gaelic. It is derived from a byname meaning “white” or “fair-haired”. The Scottish Gaelic name is sometimes Anglicised to Fingal.

    It is not the female version of the same name which the English might know as “Fiona”.

    Fionn is pronounced: fee-yoenn with a strong “nn” sound at the end.

    It is also the name of one of the Celtic Gaelic heroes of legend.
    Fionn mac Cumhaill (/ˈfɪn məˈkuːl/ fin mə-KOOL; Irish pronunciation: [ˈfʲin̪ˠ mˠakˠ ˈkuːw̃əlːʲ];[1] Old Irish: Find mac Cumail or Umaill), transcribed in English as Finn McCool or Finn MacCoul, was a mythical hunter-warrior of Irish mythology, occurring also in the mythologies of Scotland and the Isle of Man. The stories of Fionn and his followers the Fianna, form the Fenian Cycle (or Fiannaidheacht), much of it purported to be narrated by Fionn’s son, the poet Oisín.

    Fionn is a derivative of Fin, in north Dublin there is the area called Fingal, which translates as fair haired foreigners (Fin in Irish meaning fair haired or white and gall meaning foreigner), relating to the Norse, Vikings and Danes who settled there. Yet the Scandinavians are genetically related to the Celts and Germanic tribes, so we are all more like different family members of the same race rather than foreigners.

    1. Max Musson

       9th June 2014 at 1:09 pm - Edit

       I was somewhat amused by Mike’s mistake, but I thought I’d leave it to you, Fionn, to put him right. 😀

11. AAA

    9th June 2014 at 1:11 pm - Edit

    As I understood it, National Action –while having many members with different ideological tendencies[1])– nevertheless stood under the banner of “Social Nationalists”. Indeed, they fly the flag of the Strasserite Black Front (the red sword and hammer crossed on a blag flag; Otto and Gregor Starsser’s more Socialist tenancy of National Socialism, i.e. Social Nationalism). This flag is seen at many of National Action’s activities.
    .
    While not engaging in pedantry, there are however significant differences between Social Nationalism and National Socialism.[2]
    .
    Ideology is to some not of much concern. But ideology –the science of ideas– is the very basis upon which the essence of politics is built. I commend National Action generally and in particular for their focus on many diverse issues that other groups simply ignore. I especially like their anti-reactionary position. Well done to out youth.
    .
    .
    [1] See how the, dare I say, Socialist essence of this article https://national-action.info/2014/01/19/nationalism-is-social-idealism/ seems in contradistinction with this https://national-action.info/2014/01/27/nationalism-is-for-stormtroopers-not-for-plebs/
    .
    [2] Social-Nationalism & the Strasser Brothers By Troy Southgate.
    .
    Further reading:
    .
    The Social-Nationalist: https://socialnationalist.wordpress.com
    Sword and Hammer: https://swordandhammer.tumblr.com/
    Synthesis: https://web.archive.org/web/20011210123418/https://obsidian-blade.com/synthesis/articles.htm

    1. Max Musson

       9th June 2014 at 1:16 pm - Edit

       Good to hear from you again AAA, however National Action don’t seem to share your distinction, describing themselves both as ‘social nationalist’ and ‘national socialist’ in their literature.

    2. AAA

       9th June 2014 at 1:21 pm - Edit

       The reference to point [2] https://strasserism-online.blogspot.co.uk/2008/08/social-nationalism-strasser-brothers.html

12. Michael Woodbridge

    10th June 2014 at 10:48 am - Edit

    @Fionn Westron. Now my illusions have been doubly dashed! I imagined Fionn to be a glamorous intellectual lady, the sort who are in such short supply. I also imagined a redhead such as little Fiona who lived at the back of my garden as a child and had hair of the deepest copper.
    I couldn’t agree more about our need to adopt the word “Racist” as a positive thing. Our opponents who control the media will never accept subtle distinctions between love for our own folk, “Racialism”, and hatred for others, “Racism”. By adopting the word “Racism” we detoxify it.
    Whether or not one hates other races is a matter of personal choice. I don’t hate other races, as it happens, and I consider that my good fortune, because hatred can be debilitating. On the other hand there should be no such thing as “Hate Crime” which like “Thought Crime” is an Orwellian concept.
    As far as using historical imagery is concerned, we have to steer a steady course between using it to shock the public out of its stupor and behaving like an undisciplined rabble. We might ask which organisation we would prefer, the swearing drunken hordes of an EDL demo, or the immaculately presented National Socialist imagery of National Action..? We don’t necessarily want to display swastika banners or throw our arms about in Roman Salutes. On the other hand, we shouldn’t be afraid of such things if that is the only way to wake the British people up. Subtle cunning hasn’t saved us in near on 70 years, perhaps it’s time to copy the enemy and give audacity a chance.
    German National Socialism failed in the 1940’s because the old world of Finance Capitalism threw everything against it. If we as modern, British Racial Socialists, are to save the day for the White Aryan Race it will be because we can out chutzpah the toxic swamp of cultural Marxism and Capitalist greed unleashed upon us.

    1. Shaun

       10th June 2014 at 6:26 pm - Edit

       My friend, the word racist is still a hard one to deal with. I think, if we want to succeed, the best way to defeat this hate-filled word (and the industry built around it) is Bob Whitiker’s mantra —- anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

       Surely?

       Some people who have read too many books think that you can give the masses a history lesson. Tell them the truth: the word racist was a invented by a Marxist pervert (he invented the word transvestite) called Magnus Hirchfield as a tool to destroy the White race…..

       In an ideal world, where the average IQ of our people wasn’t 100, we could give them these types of lessons — you could create an intellectual culture out of the etymological background of the most despicable, anti-White word that has ever been created: racist!

       Fine … but there is a problem: the masses won’t be able to understand why someone would do that and they won’t be able to understand the concepts involved….Social pressure may be the biggest factor in this, but the masses will only adopt something if OTHER PEOPLE DO.

       Stick to the Mantra, bro.

       Learn it.

       Learn the arguments and how to defeat them and all that.

       As for how you behave? Well … I think, working with the Mantra as a discourse-weapon, you must do be extreme. You need to attract every tough, ethnocentric male in the country and use an socialization-educational program to get them to conform to the central aim of your task: saving our people. Of course, don’t be like the EDL — find a way of creating the right image…. You can do it — I can sense you are a true Aryan!

    2. Fionn Westron

       10th June 2014 at 9:51 pm - Edit

       @Michael

       Yes it does seem that intellectual female White nationalists are few on the ground. It is a pity. France has Marine Le Pen and for all her modernising, it is working for them. They made one or two tweaks in dropping the holocaust issue while being upfront about being anti immigration and France for the French, attacking the banksters and EU. Having personalities who can bloody talk well with passion, flow and fire in public is a large factor in gaining attraction. But it is certainly working for the French they are drawing from all sections, all classes of society.

       Of course there is no reason why our women should not take on leadership roles, throughout our history, we have had strong matriarchs, who defended and fought for their respective ethnicities. France had it’s Joan of Arc, Britain it’s Boudiccea, Ireland had it’s Queen Maeve and even our greatest Irish warrior of legend Cú Chulainn was trained in the art of combat by a woman.

       “Racism”
       As stated in the “What is Racism” article it is not even a matter of adopting or re-owning the word racism. The very word itself describes the natural process of an ethnic people protecting their ethnicity and ethnic territory – all ethnicities, since the beginning of time and today do it. All ethnicities have done it as a natural part of living, it is an ongoing constant part of daily life, like breathing. You look out for your own, if they had not done so, they would not exist today, some other ethnicity would have conquered them and taken their territory, or by pressure, forced them into decline as the dominant ethnicity takes over.

       Today is no different, we have the right to protect our ethnicity and ethnic territory. We have that right simply because we exist and because it is part of our welfare and well being, because it is a part of our ancestral heritage. It forms a part of our psychological well-being, without that right, we are denied a part of what makes us, us.

       Also, to deny us this is part of the definition of genocide of a people, it is deliberate limitation of that ethnic group. Psychological well-being is fundamental to a thriving existence.

       So “racism” is merely carrying on what has been carried on in a daily way by each and every ethnic group in existence. Racism does not inherently mean hate of any other ethnic group, no more than not housing people who are not in your family, means you hate non-family members. In such a case, we might say one is being family-ist: expressing a preference toward your family members that you do not express toward non-family members.

       This is the key point about the word “racism”. Yes expressing your preference toward your own ethnic group, IS “racism”, this is the whole point. It is normal and natural to look after your ethnic indigenous native British people.

       If Britain was being invaded in a more obvious form, by an invasion force who declared their intent to conquer you, whose means of invasion was through use of overt physical weaponry, we would have no hesitation or problem in defending Britain and fighting to protect the British ethnic group and ethnic territory of Britain. (immigration invasion IS an invasion, the results are no different, but it is done in a manner which denies the natives the right to declare an open official declaration of defence – if you do, you are slapped with a sin label or made to wear the psychological placard stating you are what is termed a hater, but since when did protecting your ethnicity come to mean you hate other people? The misappropriated term the emotional blackmailers use to name this category of hate is called….racism. But the definition of racist does not include within it, any reference to hating other people. A racist by definition is not a person who hates other races merely because they are a different race.

       Because they flooded the country with non British, they have swiped the word and distorted it to mean something it does not. It is conflated to mean that not looking after others who are not British both in terms of earlier 1950’s etc. immigration and modern mass immigration means that you are excluding such people as not being British and that looking after your British ethnicity, of which they are not members, means you are excluding them and showing a perference for native ethnic British people over and above them. Thus now you are showing hate because you are excluding these people. “racism” which under these conditions has been warped to mean – hate. Yet the natural phenomenon of wanting to protect your own British ethnicity and ethnic territory, is still valid, merely because such a thing as the British ethnicity EXISTS, and they have had an ancient historical ethnic territory.

       So what was a natural thing and non hating thing, has now been turned into a hate issue. Racism means loving your race or ethnicity (this is a preference which occurs naturally, arising on looking out for and doing what is in the best interests of your ethnic group or race, it does not based on a hate toward those who are not. It naturally means protecting, nurturing, defending and thus it’s territory) it does not mean hate of other people.

       On a separate matter, the detail about whether one hates another race or ethnicity, is a matter of personal taste and has nothing to actually do with racism. A person can be a racist without one jot of hateful feeling toward any other race.

       On the matter of waking people up. The problem is, one doesn’t wake people up by exposing the people to the exact Pavlovian stimuli they have been conditioned to run away from. I think the establishment want vigorous groups to express certain stimuli the masses have been conditioned to run away from. Contrary to waking up, there is a certain vibe, look and feel that sends the sheep away from the sheppard and towards the wolf (wolves of wall st). What we need to do is de-condition the sheep, de-construct their programming, so that they learn we are not the wolf – the establishment, or rather the forces behind the establishment are. This will not be done by normal messaging alone, as stated in my 2nd article of how multicult is a religion, it is done by a combination of laying the philosphical foundations and infrastructure, which underpin and are the basis of all action, then self-sacrifice, service, hard work, facts, humour, and other emotion, deconstructing the emotionally lodged glass from the heart of the masses, by careful and considerate and at times, spontaneous, vigourous, courageous words and actions. But they must be the right ingredients, a few of the wrong ones and my own worry is we see a repeat of the same recipe all over again.

       It is amazing how in the 70’s the NF seemed to have quite a large following then withered away, what happened? If back then they had such a large following when the multicult was not really a force and it still died off, then is such a path now even more unlikely?

       Maybe the timing is better now, conditions different and all that, but looking at the lessons of history, observations of the people and their psychological state, where they are, I think certain ingredients will not take or may even repulse. Again, I am not advocating the stealth way nor the nazi-costume idea, I think there is a way that might be described as cleverly blatant, which is honourable as well as practical and doing what works, while dealing with issues that need to be addressed, banking, immigration, islam, your British ethnicity and territory and so on. Very best of luck, we do have a hand in making our own.

13. Michael Woodbridge

    11th June 2014 at 12:02 am - Edit

    Thank you Fionn for your unambiguous endorsement of Racism. All too often we hear the words, “I’m not racist but…” By denying the validity of Racism as an intellectual concept and reducing it to petty personal likes and dislikes we allow our enemies to morally disarm us.There can be only one strategy for success and that is to tell the truth without fear or favour.
    None of us came to our present ideological position because we preferred intellectual compromise to reality. The Flemish SS had a motto that translates as, “My truth is my honour”. Why should we expect to convert anyone worthwhile to our Aryan cause through temporizing and half-truths?
    Fionn asks the crucial question as to why after making a promising start did the NF of the 70’s decline so badly. One answer is human frailty, which isn’t surprising when one considers the enormous task before us, the task of changing the course of human history. Without a new hero with the vision and integrity of Adolf Hitler there is not much we can do through a purely political movement.
    However, a solution to our problem might lie in another direction. If instead of pouring all our efforts into expensive and misleading election campaigns we were to build up our resources with a view to the long term welfare of our folk, by investing in our own property, media outlets, educational and charitable institutions we could lay the foundation for something that would sustain us into the future. This would be akin to what the Freemasons have been doing for 300 years. It would also work in much the
    same way as the Jewish community works. The difference is that it would represent our British European racial community in a way that our government no longer does.

14. PharmaPhil

    12th June 2014 at 9:07 am - Edit

    If our younger generation don’t pick up the cause then all is lost anyway.
    Hopefully this is the beginning of something.

15. Crazy Englishman

    12th June 2014 at 11:16 pm - Edit

    Racially aware is the term I tend to adopt when talking to people and not aware of their personal stance on the issue, I have as yet not been pulled on this and find it useful when in situations that being proved that I am a Nazi in this eyes of the anti racist, racist could cause me to lose my job.
    Recently a group of parents at a local school were outraged when their children left school reciting a blessing from the koran, amazingly, approx. 20 of them grouped together and approached the head teacher where they received an apology and the programme finished with immediate effect, I advised one of the parents with the term racially aware and was used several times without an eyebrow raised, maybe some liberals have taken their indoctrination to literally and find the term confusing.
    I think the most inspiring thing to come out of this was the collective white conscious,
    unfortunately there isn’t a Western Spring in our village to give oxygen this passion.

    1. Fionn Westron

       13th June 2014 at 12:29 pm - Edit

       Christians can also object on the grounds it goes against their faith to have blessings of any other religion put onto them or anything to do with them. Allah or any other god is a blasphemy to Christianity, remember islam rejects the main tenet of Christianity – that Christ is the Son of God, God made man. Atheists and pagans can object for the same reasons. Same can be said for halal.

16. Michael Woodbridge

    13th June 2014 at 11:33 pm - Edit

    I particularly liked Crazy Englishman’s successful use of the term “Racially Aware”. It has the same ambiguity as the word “Racist” but is more easily switched to mean something positive.

Comments are closed.