The way forward for British nationalism in the 21st Century is for us to begin acting as ‘nation-builders’ and pioneers rather than politicians. Ours must be an organic and social movement for the foreseeable future and not a primarily political movement. Nationalist electioneers, political campaigners and street demonstrators must turn instead to community activism, and direct their efforts towards the establishment and building of enclaves; towards bringing racially conscious White families together to form racially conscious communities; and eventually mould these into the new nation that is the object of all our dreams.
This process of rebuilding may turn out to be a long process and take longer than many of us would like, possibly much longer, but it is the only way that we will be able to achieve our goal without falling into the trap of making our progress dependent upon the capricious support of a largely disillusioned and disoriented electorate under the sway and influence of a hostile and decadent media and a corrupt and malign political establishment.
We must begin rebuilding our nation starting with units that are the smallest constituent building blocks of a nation. We must begin with clusters of racially conscious White individuals and White families and find ways to attract more White families and more racially conscious White individuals who can swell our ranks and in turn produce lots of racially conscious White children. Our racially awakened members must live in localised communities where we will exist in such dense concentrations that we can dominate and thereby determine the character of those communities, and so that we can insulate ourselves against the corrosive effect of the decadent society that surrounds us.
All of the above I have stated before, but what in practical terms is involved? What does it mean to be a ‘community activist’, a ‘pioneer’ or a ‘nation builder’ in our own homeland, and what does an ‘organic’ or ‘social’ movement look like?
Firstly, it does not involve anything that is illegal and it does not involve retreating into remote ‘reservations’ where we will live like crazy hillbillies. We must simply recognise the reality that we White nationalists are currently political dissidents, branded extremists, and that if we live in denial, constantly engaging in acts of public defiance in the face of authority, we will achieve nothing except to make ourselves targets for persecution, thereby making our lives more difficult, more miserable and unhappy than they otherwise could be.
Our first task must be to make our lives as dissident White nationalists tolerable, and once tolerable to make our lives enjoyable, rich and productive, and this requires us to create social structures that support people who share our beliefs, and which enable us to succeed in life by any objective measure.
Traditional political campaigning currently has the opposite effect. Those who in the past joined traditional nationalist political parties like the National Front or the British National Party, or who are currently active in organisations such as Britain First, UKIP or For Britain, by their actions make themselves targets for media generated hostility and this creates scope for our enemies to persecute such people with impunity.
Activism within a traditional nationalist political party or campaign group routinely results in a situation of stress between our activists and their close friends, colleagues and families. It is not surprising therefore that many seasoned nationalist campaigners are young single people who struggle to find a partner in life, or they are typically middle aged men and women, either in low income employment or unemployed, with broken marriages and estranged wives and children. Many activists sacrifice decades of their lives to our cause only to find that the pressure of unrelenting social opprobrium eventually causes them to ‘burn-out’ and drop out of political activism, disillusioned. Worse still some experience a form of mental breakdown and with their spirits broken like a whipped animal, they turn to the likes of Hope-Not-Hate for solace and we later see their sad stories published in the media in which they declare some newly discovered but spurious Jewish ancestry and say how relieved they are that for them the struggle is finally over.
It is for these reasons that we must turn away from traditional electoral campaigning and away from street protests and demonstrations and set about securing a future for our kind that is rich, wholesome and fulfilling, and this begins with multiplying our numbers biologically and maximising our security geographically. By this I mean that we must contrive circumstances in which: committed nationalists live in close proximity with other committed nationalists; in which young male nationalists can meet, fall in love and marry young female nationalists and produce lots of racially aware White nationalist babies; in which our people have secure employment and secure housing for them and their families; and in which older nationalists can experience financial security and the joy of playing granny and granddad to a bourgeoning brood of happy, healthy nationalist children.
I want the experience of joining a nationalist community to feel like ‘coming home’ from the foreign country that much of our homeland has become – to feel like being reborn. And I believe that this rebirth will be a source of renewed drive, determination and energy in our people such that the areas we inhabit will be seen by others as desirable places to live and our numbers will swell and the newcomers will live by our example.
We must establish areas of this country that we dominate. This does not mean that the areas must be exclusively occupied by nationalists, simply that we must exist within the areas in question in such numbers that we become the dominant group, racially, culturally and politically.
This will involve creating a masonic community because success will depend upon our growth in strength and our activities being camouflaged and not broadcast in such a way as to attract the unwanted attention of our enemies.
Step one will be to create a residents association within the chosen location and all overt campaigning should be done initially under the auspices of that residents association. Anyone with an interest in maintaining the traditional character of the area will be free to join the residents association and this association will provide a great forum within which individuals can be assessed with a view to them eventually joining an ‘inner circle’. This ‘inner circle’ will be the racially aware, pro-nationalist masonic group that will ultimately dominate the residents association and the residents association will provide the cloak behind which the masonic group can operate unseen.
As our strength grows we must resist the temptation to form a local nationalist group and to campaign openly in elections. Although we might initially succeed in getting some local councillors elected their election would alert our enemies and it would not be long before our area would become the focus of concerted ‘anti-fascist’ activity and the focus of targeted immigrant dispersal on the part of the authorities. Instead we should practice entryism, and the members of the masonic society should all join whichever of the establishment parties has traditionally been dominant in that local area.
Having joined the establishment party in question, the masonic society must work to establish their credentials and to manoeuvre themselves into positions of influence within the local constituency party such that we are able to determine who can become a candidate in future elections. Our task thereafter will be to select members of the masonic group as local council candidates and to get them elected. They will nominally represent the establishment political party in question and their election will not cause alarm. They will pay lip service to the policies of the establishment party, but in their actions they will protect and advance the interests of the masonic group in particular and of the White people of the area in general.
We will buy houses and rent houses, we will buy land and rent land, we will buy shops and we will rent shops, we will come to dominate the board of governors of the local schools, we will come to dominate the parish councils and we will control the civic amenities. Through this strategy, we will if we work with resolute determination achieve a self-regenerating, bottom-up, revolutionary, racial nationalism that will be unstoppable.
This strategy will lead us to success. No longer will we be increasingly depleted ranks of ‘Red Coats’ marching slowly forward in battle formation with bearskin helmets, brocade and flags aflutter in the breeze, being cut down by an enemy armed with machine guns and snipers rifles, we will be heavily camouflaged special forces advancing by stealth, constantly gaining ground from an enemy that does not see us coming and doesn’t know what hit them.
First we will control isolated villages and housing estates, but in time if we hold our nerve and exercise discipline, we will control local councils, and constituencies and have an increasingly powerful voice in council chambers across the country as well as in parliament. Eventually the time will come when our silent revolution will be fulfilled and we will come to hold the levers of sovereign political power. There will be much rejoicing across the land — our hearts will sing – and those who have for so long conspired to dispossess and destroy our people will pay the price for their treachery.
By Max Musson © 2018
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
Frederick Dixon
- Edit
Excellent Max. On the formation of White enclaves we need to bear in mind two things:-
1/ No nationalist organisation has any money.
2/ People need jobs and will therefore have to move to where the jobs are.
Given those facts, the formation of White enclaves will have to be a private enterprise endeavour – people will have to find their own jobs and buy or rent their own homes. Nationalism’s role in enclave formation should be to identify overwhelmingly White areas, ideally with some recent history of nationalist activity, and where there is employment available. Those of our people who are looking to move home could be directed to those areas where they could link up with existing nationalists and begin the process of enclave formation. Even in London such areas exist and it is important to be in London because it generates wealth and jobs on such a colossal scale.
There is a precedent for enclave formation – I see it as being rather like the process of “church planting” where activists from thriving parishes are dispatched to moribund churches and begin to gather a new congregation.
One area where I do not altogether agree with you is on the need for a low profile. How are our enclaves to grow and attract new people if they do not advertise their presence? We should be a highly visible organisation which is openly patriotic/traditionalist/socially conservative, and campaigns accordingly – but without party political affiliation. That will attract notice and will bring patriots into our ranks and, as you say, such patriots can in due course be admitted to the ideological “inner circle” if suitable.
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Frederick, One nationalist organisation has money, although sadly not yet a bottomless pit, and that is Western Spring, and so there is scope for us to assist in enclave formation, albeit not to the extent that some might wish.
Our task is to identify overwhelmingly White areas and to direct nationalist migration to those areas, and it will be a process akin to ‘church planting’, however this cannot be done in such a way as to broadcast to our enemies the precise locations of the areas concerned. We should attract support and stimulate interest among nationalists through the articles published on this website. This is our ‘shop window’ and the only part of our embryonic movement that should be visible to our enemies.
Most of the work involved in attracting new people must be done under the guise of the residents associations that will be the front organisations for our masonic community groups. Anyone interested in preserving the traditional character of their home area can join the residents associations and we will select members from among them to join the masonic ‘inner circle’ by invitation only.
We must not be highly visible, as that would be to fall into the trap of re-enacting the role of ’18th Century Infantry Redcoat’ in the age of the ‘machine gun’. We must at all times remain camouflaged until we are strong enough to challenge our currently superior enemy head-on and withstand the otherwise withering hail of lies, smears, denigration, oppressive police harassment and left-wing physical attack that currently dogs overt nationalist activism.
Frederick Dixon
- Edit
Max – there are millions of patriots in this country who might be attracted to local organisations IF they do not try to hide their patriotism and traditionalism – note that I am not saying that such organisations should be overtly racialist because that would certainly be counter productive, but they do need to advertise their existence as something more than just a “residents association”. Most areas already have a residents association, and very worthy they no doubt are, but they are nothing to do with us. Our groups must have a USP, and patriotism is it.
I note what you say about this web site being our “shop window” but how many of those millions of patriots out there actually look in this shop window? Surely if our new nation is to have a viable existence lasting for generations then it needs to gather members quickly – I suggest that we should be thinking in terms of at least several thousand within a few years of its launch. So the handful of individuals who initiate a local group will therefore need to attract attention and new members and that will take more than a website.
Of course they will attract some unfavourable attention, but attacks on patriotic and traditionalist organisations for being patriotic and traditionalist should attract favourable attention too! What is more, trying to hide our little groups will fail because the Left will sniff them out sooner or later and secretiveness will simply confirm suspicions that we’re trying to hide something nasty.
Anyway, this is a secondary point – important but secondary. What matters is that we are now thinking in concrete terms about establishing local communities for our people. There is little time to waste. With immigration proceeding almost unabated yet public concern dwindling, with a politically correct Prime Minister whose big thing (after Brexit) is “race inequality”, with the very real prospect of Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister reopening the flood gates to third world immigration (while teaching our children about the evils things that their recent ancestors did to saintly blacks), we really do need to get on with it.
Max Musson
- Edit
Fred, you are assuming that a residents association cannot be patriotic or traditionalist. My expectation is that the millions of patriots in this country will be attracted to residents associations that form with the aim of preserving the traditional character of their neighbourhoods.
Frederick Dixon
- Edit
Let us hope that you are right.
Max Musson
- Edit
The point here is that observers will assume that any organisation, patriotic and traditionalist or otherwise, has been formed for a reason. If they see an organisation overtly campaigning to attract support for patriotic and traditionalist causes, i.e. whose raison d’etre is to spread nationalist ideology, then that organisation will attract the active opposition of our enemies, who will view it as a proto-political party.
If however they see a group of residents, who have formed a residents association or some-such-like, ostensibly with the intention of preserving the culture and traditions of their area, they may view the character of the organisation as not to their taste, but their perception will be that the organisation is community based and will not immediately be alarmed that it is a nascent and very partisan political force.
The work of the residents association will also provide a legitimate reason for the individual members concerned to meet and engage in activity without their activities being regarded as a political threat. In this way, we will stand a greater chance of being left alone to go about our business, with plausible deniability if any investigative organisations suspect there is more to our existence than we might overtly suggest.
There will of course be isolated instances in which some individuals become suspicious of our motives and begin to ask questions and scrutinise our activities, but there are thousands of residents associations all over our country and they will provide ample scope for us to establish a nationwide organisation if other nationalists adopt our strategy of advancing by stealth and work with us.
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
The Marxists have been extremely successful through stealth, whilst racial nationalists has been extremely unsuccessful through ‘campaigning’, marching, leafleting, demonstrating, electioneering, etc., etc. Racial nationalists need to withdraw from that field altogether and develop their strength organically, as Max suggests, and with the absolute minimum of visibility. The opposite has led to Red violence and intimidation, Special Branch / MI5 surveillance and infiltration, prosecution, conviction and and individual ruin. These are new times and conditions. It’s not business as usual. The old methods and organisations no longer fit. They failed abjectly. If anything, we should be considering this as a very early guerrilla phase, building strength where it belongs naturally and organically, within our communities, developing alternative social structures and independence from the Occupation State.
rerevisionist
- Edit
Jews haven’t been successful through ‘stealth’, but through concealed money in vast amounts.
Max Musson
- Edit
I think you will find that WotS was referring to ‘Marxists’, not specifically Jews, and that in any event, ‘concealment’ and ‘stealth’ mean pretty much the same thing.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
The development of White enclaves require both discretion viz a viz the authorities who would not hesitate to legislate against such a contingency, and some form of active promotion to encourage recruits to come and settle.These white enclaves would invariably be situated on the outskirts of main cities and also in small traditional rural and semi rural societies and would provide much needed respite from the poison of cultural Marxism and its visible manifestations of multiculturalism and multi-racialism.
These centres will in time provide the opportunity for a much needed cultural, ethnic and racial revival, culminating in a much heralded and hoped for national revival.
Let the process commence with small but definite steps.
John Beattie
- Edit
Sounds like a plan !
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Tactically Max Musson can’t be faulted in his advocacy of a ‘grassroots’ strategy whereby we take our country back through community building as a counter to the alien invasion of our land. All conquering armies in history proceed to secure strongholds by building castles and citadels from whence they can spread outwards. In the past even traditional churches have resembled fortresses as they’ve spread the Christian message.
However, in order to conquer hearts and minds we need more than intelligent tactics, we need to occupy the moral high ground and the only way to do that is by our own example of moral courage. We need to instil a crusader spirit in a new generation of youth who are proud and willing to sacrifice their self-interest by openly defying the poison being pumped by the enemy into our cultural bloodstream.
rerevisionist
- Edit
You seem not to have worked out that the ‘Christian’ message is Jewish and has no part in any white country. The idea that outposts of churches might form a workable analogy is entirely wrong, because they werein fact funded from outside in the hoe of becoming successful parasites after invasion. If anyone’s interested
https://www.big-lies.org/general/early-christianity-bible.html tries to cover the issues.
Max Musson
- Edit
Mike wasn’t arguing that the spread of the Christian message was in principle a good thing, simply that early Christians used the strategy of siting churches to create ‘strongholds’, as a means of spreading their message. It was the principle of creating strongholds that Mike was explaining.
Furthermore, I know you mean well Rerevisionist, but your arguments would be so much more persuasive if you made them rather more measured and rather less rabid in your denunciations of all things as Jewish. We are all aware that because of the social dynamics of a multiracial and/or multicultural society organised minorities are inevitably induced into furthering their interests at the expense of the host population and that over the millennia Jews in diaspora have been no exception to this, and that many Jews throughout history have been particularly active in ‘feathering the multicultural nest’ in order to suit their interests and not ours, but we must retain a measured perspective if we are to avoid appearing to our target audience as ranting fanatics. Some Jews are bad people, but not all Jews are bad and not all bad things are Jewish in origin.
I was tempted, as I have done in the past, to omit from your comments the links you make to your website, but I have decided on this occasion to leave the link there so that others can see clearly an example of how not to present your argument if you want the general public to be receptive to it.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
I’m pleased to note that Max and I are singing from the same hymn sheet.
John Stephens
- Edit
At last, a cognitive “wire”, that electrifies two outposts, as it were. Most of the thesis of Max’s latest offering, is not only logical, but a racial requirement for the future of our folk.
I do though, fear we will before mid century, suffer a loss of some 50% of current White Britons, through the old “Protocols” planned destruction.
The Jews, most Moslems, and even a number of Afro-centric communities, are superior in racial profiling, and act in a far more natural, racially sentient way than us, to accomplish such an inroad.
I have the nagging feeling, (through years of experience also), that most Whites are naturally bent towards liberalism, and the old “live and let live” attributes, that have loaded the enemy weapons, with much anmunition.
Max, secrecy is key, as you say. Also, money is required whereby we ensure cash is king within our “nation within a nation”. Ironically, a five mile tract of land; is currently on the market in the Midland region…. price, £32,500,000.
This is inclusive of several farms, three pubs, and a thriving community, including hundreds of houses, and several industrial manufacturing estates.
Presumably, such a “one size fits all” tract of land, with ready-made, traditional White folks, established in long-held, working “mini-nation”, is too early and expensive? However, the above, along with Max’s agenda, is exactly what is required.
Ultimately, regardless of financial constraints, or otherwise, are we capable? Will we keep it together, unlike our former political factional pasts? Can such a project, be fruitful, without the destructive “Sayanim” and weak-minded traitors, amongst a future White community, where some members may not even be aware of the reasons we are also there?
Max Musson
- Edit
I’m glad you feel ‘electrified’ by these ideas John, I look forward to your enthusiastic and energetic contributions towards making the ideas bear fruit.
At present around 25% of the population of the UK is over age 65 and so within 30 years we would expect around 50% of Britons currently alive to have died irrespective of any ‘planned destruction’, but those that die will be replaced to some extent by new generations and to quite what extent that will be rests in the hands of those White people currently of child bearing age. We have just over thirteen years left to make children who will be 18 years old or over by 2050.
LJP
- Edit
As an aside I’m sure you have seen the articles about the Mayor of the village of Asotthalom, Laszlo Toroczkai, seeking to do something similar. Of course In Hungary, you can be more forthright in you political views and intentions. Anyone speak Hungarian?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-38881349
Max Musson
- Edit
The idea of creating exclusive White enclaves is not a new idea but sadly it has in the main been proposed unsuccessfully in the past by people who do not understand social dynamics.
It is all very well and good finding a distant location with inexpensive housing and proposing it as a ‘White Zion’, but that kind of project will only attract people who have no extended family ties or who are prepared to abandon extended family members to whatever fate may befall them, in order to make a ‘clean break’ and migrate to a distant land. I can well understand that someone such as Nick Griffin, who has ‘burned his boats’ with the rest of the nationalist community here in Britain, will find such a project attractive and may well have set up a business to earn commission on the sales of properties to Westerners in Asotthalom, but for the average family man or woman, who has adult children and grandchildren living nearby in the UK, or for younger people with aged and infirm parents needing support, it would need a very hard heart indeed to leave our loved ones behind.
It is noticeable also that the crux of the matter as far as Laslo Toroczkai is concerned is religion and his desire to preserve the Christian culture of his village. Most Britons are not now practicing Christians and among nationalists, I suspect that Pagans and Cosmotheists now outnumber Christians and so Laslo might want to think again unless his desire to keep his village White outweighs his desire to keep it Christian.
It is better to remain in the UK and to migrate just a few short miles to somewhere where nationalists are concentrating our numbers. In this way we will all remain within easy reach of extended family and need not abandon long established friends and relatives to the vagaries of whatever conflict eventually engulfs Western Europe. There are parts of the British Isles that are just as White as Hungary and we simply need to encourage the people who live there to actively resist the alien encroachment and to demonstrate greater solidarity with their White neighbours than they show obedience to our corrupt authorities.
Those of us who were raised on the tales of Robin Hood understand completely the mind-set we must adopt, as ‘peasants’ in the face of institutional corruption and illegitimate government and while we would not want to become ‘outlaws’, much can be achieved through civil disobedience and community activism; through unorthodox tactics and thinking ‘outside the box’.
LJP
- Edit
Hi Max – my post referring to this Mayor and his village was not veiled scepticism of the idea of white community building, although I think much thought has to be given to employment, the nature of the inhabitants relocating ( frankly my opinion of ‘white flighters’ is not positive) and the ever-present threat of action(legal or illegal) from the agents of one of the most expression restricting, propaganda spewing, undemocratic of states in Europe.
Ironically, after posting, I read another article that could have been included on people fleeing Germany and France for Hungary for various reasons.
As you say the idea of white community enclaves/ethnostates has been floated for sometimes, the Northwest Front, Ozarks, and even the resurrection of some form of Confederacy in the southern states of America. I’ve also read of ‘National-Socialist’ villages in Germany, however true that may be.
If I was sure that I was moving to a community of ‘kindred spirits’ then I would have no hesitation in relocating and helping other ‘ kindred spirits’ in need. But frankly, apart from the posters on this site and on similar others, I find these people short on the ground. The idea of living amongst liberals on the run (even if they are natives) I find abhorrent.