Immigration, Religion

Who Is or Isn’t a Member of a Particular Race?

201 Views 30

By H. Millard:

As we Whites face an on-going genocide against us, it is important for us to know who is us and who is not us so that we may breed us and not breed not us.

We must not become the baby makers of not us and we must purify our kind in order to evolve higher and finally become a new species–by all definitions of the term*–that is incapable of bearing children with those who are not our kind.

We are not here to improve mankind, or to serve the needs of those who are not us, but to peacefully, lawfully, non-violently and naturally–via the fundamental processes of evolution, which includes natural selection–replace it with a new model of mankind–we Whites are that new model of mankind once we evolve just a little bit more. We are here to fix a broken planet and make it a place where we can live peaceful, happy, righteous, just, and free lives as we see fit. We are here to spread the love of all that is good and just and alive and to bring light to a dark world that is falling ever more into evil and But to evolve that little bit more, we need to think right and live right. False thoughts, about mankind, about race, about existence itself, are holding us back from our evolution and can eventually doom us.

Our highest destiny is not pre-ordained and it is not guaranteed. It is not yet written. We have to write it. We have the potential. It is in our DNA code. We were born with it.

Those who want to consciously take the evolutionary path higher need to fully understand that race is real. Race is to human as breed is to dog as variety is to rose. They also have to understand some basics about evolution and DNA–and I’ve written about those basics in other columns, essays and books.

Just as a quick summary of some of these basics, here are two quotations from two important people that succinctly state truths that I’ve written hundreds of pages about:

ABOUT HUMANS–
“[T]he varieties of mankind are so different that similar differences found in any other animals would warrant their classification in different species, if not in different genera.” –Charles Darwin

AND HERE’S WHAT ALL LIVING ORGANISMS (INCLUDING HUMANS) MUST DO–
“Living organisms must necessarily compete, for food, for mates and for living space, especially with other members of their own species [i.e. those they can breed with]. They must avoid predators and other dangers. For all these various reasons, some will leave more offspring than others, and it is the genetic characteristics of such preferred replicators which will be passed on preferentially to succeeding generations. This is the essence of natural selection.” — Francis Crick (Nobel laureate and co-discoverer of the shape of DNA).

Most distinct peoples over the centuries have, as a natural product of their attempts at survival as they are, and for self-identification, for self-determination and for self-sovereignty, defined who is one of them by who they are descended from. The bottom line is that one’s DNA code matters. In fact, it matters more than anything else as to who we truly are.

Here are some of the ways various groups of humans have used to determine who is like them and who isn’t.

Orthodox Jews say a person with a Jewish mother is a Jew.

The Nazis, with the Nuremberg Law of 1935, said that a person with four White German grandparents was of German blood.

The SS standard–You had to prove that all direct ancestors born since 1750 were not Jewish.

Native American tribes today generally use Blood quantum laws or lineal descent rules, or a combination of both, to determine who is a tribal member. Under the Blood quantum laws, different tribes use different percentages to determine who is a member of a particular tribe. Some use 1/2 which means if one of your parents was a member of the tribe you are also considered a member. Others use 1/4 which means one grandparent was a member of the tribe, so you are also a member. Others use 1/8, which means if you had one great grandparent who was a member of the tribe, you are in; 1/16 means one gg grandparent, and you are in; 1/32 means one ggg grandparent and you are in.

Native Hawaiians are defined in U.S. law Title 45 CFR Part 1336.62 as “an individual any of whose ancestors were natives of the area which consists of the Hawaiian Islands prior to 1778. However, there is a movement among more full blooded Native Hawaiians today to recreate their people with more Hawaiian blood than defined under this law, since under this law one would only need to have had one pure Hawaiian ancestor who was born prior to 1778 and then could have every other ancestor since then not be a native Hawaiian. Clearly this could lead to blond, blue eyed Hawaiians–which are not really Hawaiians at all.

1865 Florida Law stated that one-eighth Black blood (= one great grandparent) means that you are Black (or “colored” in the preferred word for that day).

There were also laws at various times and places that stated that one-sixteenth Black blood (=one gg grandparent) and one-thirty second (=one ggg grandparent) means you are Black.

ONE DROP RULE–Any known ancestry makes you Black. This covers invisible Blackness, i.e. Blacks who can pass as White are still Black under this rule.

While the Nuremberg Law of 1935, shown above, may have a surface attraction for awakened Whites, one must remember that the Germans back then weren’t really that concerned about Blacks and Browns in Germany, because there so few of them. The Germans were more concerned about the real and present threat to their purity as Aryans presented by Jews who could sometimes pass as Aryans and who could insert Jewish genes into the Aryan blood of the country.

Today, to be truly White–call if pure White–or Aryan–one must understand that while all White miscegenation is bad for White survival, some miscegenation is inherently more harmful than others. Whites mating with Blacks is the most harmful to our White DNA code as it takes us genetically back to Africa, is more disruptive of our DNA code than other mixes, and takes longer to “distill” out the Black genes than it does to distill out Jewish, Yellow, Red or Brown genes.

However, keep in mind that given the sheer number of Han Chinese and other Yellows in the world, miscegenation with them, if done on a large scale, could turn the whole planet Yellow in just a few generations.

Remember, gene frequency is important in the human population. As I’ve written before, and as nature has been very accommodating in giving us natural color coding for the major races, one might think of the various major races as different colors of paint and one might also think of those colors of paint as “wanting” to paint the whole world with their color and no other colors.

The race with the greatest quantity of paint that keeps increasing its percentages is the most probable winner in the long view of existence. However, the race with the most paint today (meaning, of course, the most populous) today, may not be the most populous tomorrow. There are any number of events–diseases, natural disasters, wars. miscegenation–that can reduce groups or even eliminate them.

We Whites should be aiming to become the most populous color. Some have said that we can’t outbreed other peoples. Maybe that’s true or maybe it’s not. I do know that the more Whites there are, the better is the chance for our individual and group survival and evolution. Some also argue that we Whites should breed for quality not quantity. This is nonsense. We Whites have the quality within our genes. We need to let all those potential Whites we carry around in our germ cells (sperm and eggs) out to do their thing in the world. Quality will come with quantity and it has ever been so that some of our greatest Whites were born of very mediocre White parents.

Nature screams out to all organisms: “GO AND MAKE MORE LIKE YOURSELF. THAT IS YOUR PURPOSE.” Are you listening and acting on this, Whitey? If not, you’d better start. Just do it.

By H. Millard © 2015

# # # #

*Some of us believe Whites are already a different species from all non-Whites and would be considered as such by mainstream science but for the fact that we can still (unfortunately) bear viable children with non-Whites.

# # # #

JOIN WESTERN SPRING

Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:

# # # #

30 thoughts on “Who Is or Isn’t a Member of a Particular Race?”

  1. ahoppy

    - Edit

    Where do you draw the line in terms of being part of the white race? What if someone has a great great grandfather that was a non practicing Jew?

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      This is a question that can only ever be answered on a case-by-case basis. Some people who only have one great-great-grandfather who was Jewish, will be completely unaware of that fact and will to all intents and purposes be indistinguishable in terms of physical appearance, behaviour and self-identity from any other White person. In such a case, that minority Jewish ancestry would not be an issue and the individual concerned should be considered White.
      .
      Alternatively, someone might have one great-great-grandmother who was Jewish and who, despite this person being genetically no more Jewish than the person in the first example, could if the line of descent is through the female line be considered Halakically Jewish, and would be considered Jewish by organised Jewry. If such a person, upon learning this, decided to self-identify as Jewish, then they should in my opinion be regarded as Jewish.
      .
      Jewishness is not a matter of race, as Jews are not a racial group. There is a racial aspect to Jewishness however, in that most Jews have a mixture of European and non-European genetic inheritance — usually, Semitic, Turkic or Hamitic. There is a further genetic aspect to Jewishness as well in that as a result of their traditional practice of endogamy, i.e. not marrying out, there are common Mitochondrial DNA lineages that are identifiably Jewish and there are a number of genetically transmitted diseases that are almost exclusively Jewish.
      .
      Needless to say, Jewishness is also not simply a matter of religion, as many self-identifying Jews and people who are recognised as Jews by organised Jewry, are not practicing Jews and may in fact practice different religion while still being regarded as members of the wider Jewish community.
      .
      Jewry are not a race or a religion, they are a matrilineal, hereditary, masonic community and much depends upon how they individually self-identify. I’m sorry if this is more complicated answer than you would have liked.

      1. frederickdixon

        - Edit

        I believe that under the Nuremberg laws persons who were not of the Jewish faith but were one eighth Jewish by descent were regarded as non-Jewish for all purposes (except, presumably, membership of the SS). Persons who were between one eighth and one half (typically one quarter) Jewish by descent were classified as “mischlings” and were subject to a very interesting restriction on their right to marry, namely they could marry anyone they chose EXCEPT Jews or mischlings.

        1. Max Musson

          - Edit

          I am not particularly familiar with the Nuremburg Laws, but the restriction placed upon mischlings, if you have interpreted it correctly, would appear to be a measure designed to progressively ‘dilute’ the residual Jewish component within the national gene pool until it was no longer recognisable or remembered. This would concur with my assertion that Jewry are not so much a race as a matrilineal, hereditary, masonic community, and the important issue was not to expunge ‘Jewish genes’ from the gene pool, but to expunge all memory or trace of Jewishness from the progeny of those whose family lineage had any Jewish component.

          1. frederickdixon

            - Edit

            You’re quite right. It was the express intention of those who framed the laws that all traces of Jewish ancestry should be dissolved away as quickly as possible.

          2. ahoppy

            - Edit

            Max,

            I am curious about your comment in reference to a previous poster’s interpretation of the Nuremburg Laws and Jews where you stated “the important issue was not to expunge ‘Jewish genes’ from the gene pool, but to expunge all memory or trace of Jewishness from the progeny of those whose family lineage had any Jewish component.”
            Did you mean that the genetic component of Jews was not an issue–even though the SS did believed it was? But rather, the Jewish identity was considered the real threat to the white population at the time, and even in current times? As you also mentioned the Jewish hereditary masonic community, it seems that the issue is cultural and identity rather than genetics. Could you clarify? I think many people are confused about Jews- genetics vs culture and identity. In Nazi Germany being even partially Jewish genetically would have been an issue, but is this no longer an issue if one does not self-identify as Jewish and looks white?

      2. frederickdixon

        - Edit

        The ancestry of Ashkenazi Jews derives, as one would expect, mainly from the Near East i.e. Palestine and its neighbours but there is a substantial input of ordinary European descent which is mainly on female lines. This probably dates back to the earliest days of Jewish settlement in Rome when, as in all migrations, the original immigrants were mostly young men without women.

        The lack of women was easily remedied because Jews were the principal slave traders of the time (and for long afterwards). Girls would be brought in from outer Europe and reared in the Jewish faith to provide wives for Jewish men and to become the mothers of the next generation of Jews – all without breaking the laws against marrying out or tracing Jewishness solely through the maternal line.

        1. Max Musson

          - Edit

          I believe that in historic times Jewishness was transmitted through the paternal line, as was the custom with most other peoples. It is only in relatively recent times that this switched to the maternal line, when Jews were liberated from the ghettos and were allowed to live cheek by jowl with their Gentile neighbours and there was the possibility of claims, fraudulent or otherwise, by outsiders to have been fathered by wealthy Jewish men and presumably therefore have some claim over their fortunes. Matrilineal transmission of Jewishness eliminated any possibility of fraudulent claims of this kind, because a mother would always know who her progeny were and would have no ‘wild oats’ scattered among the Gentiles.
          .
          Within the last few decades, with the discovery of DNA and the natural history of the mitochondrion, the matrilineal transmission of Jewishness is aligned with the most common and convenient scientific method of tracing ancestry and so it would appear that this practice of matrilineal transmission has been adopted for the long-term.

  2. Michael Woodbridge

    - Edit

    A most thought provoking article which goes to the heart of what we’re about. However, there seems to be an important contradiction in what H Millard says.
    On the one hand he writes,
    ” Some also argue that we Whites should breed for quality not quantity. This is nonsense. We Whites have the quality within our genes. We need to let all those potential Whites we carry around in our germ cells (sperm and eggs) out to do their thing in the world. Quality will come with quantity and it has ever been so that some of our greatest Whites were born of very mediocre White parents.”
    Yet on the other hand he states,
    “We Whites are that new model of mankind once we evolve just a little bit more.”
    It would seem obvious to me that although in theory it’s true that some great men and women could be born of mediocre parents, such parents could only be mediocre because of the vagaries of their family history not because of their genetic make up. One thinks of Hans Anderson’s ‘Ugly Duckling’ who was born a swan but as such went unrecognised at first. The old saying, that “You can’t make a silk purse out of a sow ear” applies.
    We must ask, what would be the point of breeding for quantity if we didn’t also select for quality? Each one of us is only a tiny measure in the long chain of evolution. By becoming a separate species, as H.Millard proposes, it doesn’t matter what eventually becomes of the masses that history leaves behind..

    1. Jane

      - Edit

      My comment praising the message of quantity being so important was written before Michael’s comment was published. To clarify how I see this – of course we do want to upgrade our race but I wouldn’t trust anyone I can think of to arbitrate over the specifics of any eugenic programme.

      What we cannot afford do right now is to diminish the quantity of White people with any suggestion that only “the best” should reproduce. This would crash our numbers fatally. We must not turn anyone away who is genuinely of use to the struggle and it’s very much a case of an emergency where we need “all hands on deck!”.

      Adolf Hitler even commented that if the SS had been deciding who should reproduce then his own mother would have not passed the specifications.

      1. Max Musson

        - Edit

        Eugenics should never be a matter of ‘only the best reproducing’, and nor should it be a matter of stopping those judged as being of ‘poor quality stock’ from reproducing, it is simply a matter of making sure that the best specimens of our race reproduce at a rate greater than anyone else.

        1. Jane

          - Edit

          Yes – that would be a fine achievement, Max. The best should be encouraged and helped to compete with the lower quality Whites – who should not be suppressed as long as they help bolster our numbers enough to protect the race generally.

  3. Jane

    - Edit

    I enjoyed this article – and especially the part where the author stresses quantity over quality.

    Is there any difference between the terms “White” and “Aryan” for the purposes of this article?

    I find that many of our people actually don’t know what they are because although they may call themselves “White” they regard this as just referring to skin colour and so they argue it does not really mean anything important to them. Then the ones out of them that are racially aware tell me the correct SCIENTIFIC term is “the Aryan race” but that it can include Indians – and so does the term “Caucasian”.

    There is so much nonsense in this thinking, and inconsistency, that i feel the people of our race – the White Race – do not really have an idea what they actually are racially and it seems like a slippery bar of soap by their vague attempts to define it.

    In order to be consistent and to know who we are I find it is important to remember that those who are not members of the White Race all know what the White Race is. They do not suffer this confusion. They see us and they hate us. They want to destroy us. The target for them is as clear as crystal.

    If you know they would see you as White, other Whites accept you as White and you identify as White then White is what you are. This is how it is regarded by we Creators. And we shun the term “Aryan” because that term is not needed, obscure, and only adds to the confusion regarding self-identity.

    1. mary

      - Edit

      indian are not arian ,they are mixed people.

      The white race will perish, and the final blow turns your hardest core that already infiltrated promotes radical changes in the acceptance of what it is to be white.

      The fact of the mestizo andrew anglin be well-liked and seen as Aryan, proves that this phenomenon is irreversible.

      The Persian, Hindu and Kurdish cause, for example, are defended by populations that racially has nothing to do with the ancient Persians, Hindus, and Kurds. white sake will have similar fate.

    2. mary

      - Edit

      I believe there are very more whites-italians than “white” Americans .the current “white” Americans are full of indigenous, black, Jewish and Sicilian blood

      The majority of “White” americans have weird facial features as flat head, short and wide skull, wide and flat noses, small eyes ,thick lips ( Look in the negroid lips of the police darren wilson ) , Negroid or Mongoloid dental arcade..

      Many mestizos that are partly white(people like Rob Schneider, Mark-Paul Gosselaar,liv tayler,Cameron Diaz,sarah palin, Ted cruz ,Fergie,Edward Furlong, Wentworth Miller, chad murray , etc etc etc) ALSO prefer if Identify as white .
      even within the WN American There are several mestizos :

      Andrew anglin, Rodney Martin, Kyle Rogers , Andrew Auernheimer , MAt parrot , Gordon Baum and Matthew Heimbach are some examples!

      Many other things indicate nonwhite ancestry, like prognathism, extremely wide noses, the epicanthal fold, flat faces, frizzy, or extremely curly hair, or overly thick and dark straight hair, large negroid-esque lips, thick eyelids, very large cheekbones, and sallow skin, among others.

      Very dark eyes and hair paired with any of these characteristics is also a very good indicator that a person is nonwhite.

      which is why I don’t have faith that the white american populace is 63 percent, the numbers are below 20% in my opinion, they constantly mingle Mongrels with the Real western White american population.

  4. Michael Woodbridge

    - Edit

    As Jane rightly says there can be no strict scientific justification for us to describe ourselves as Aryan. As we know, the term Aryan applies to a language group and only came to describe a race tangentially, Equally, there’s no strict scientific justification for us to describe ourselves as White men and women. Fortunately we all know what is meant by both terms.

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      I always thought the term ‘Aryan’ did apply to people of European racial stock, but was distorted in meaning, to apply only to a language group by philo-Semitic anthropologists of the Franz Boas variety.

  5. Albert

    - Edit

    Is being Jewish a race or region? Many Jews are Atheist, But they are always a Jew first.
    One can’t call them a race as they are mixed up with all sorts.

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      As I have stated, Albert, Jews are not a race, nor a religion. They are a matrilineal, hereditary, masonic, community.

  7. Michael Woodbridge

    - Edit

    If Jews are not a race it would be interesting to know to whom the Jew Disraeli was referring when he wrote, “All is race there is no other truth”.

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      Throughout history people have used the term ‘race’ to mean ‘nation’, tribe or ‘ethnic group’. I wouldn’t let one stray sentence from Disraeli govern our perceptions of race and ethnicity in the modern era.

      1. Jane

        - Edit

        If the Jews are not a race then would hidden Jewish ancestry have no effect on the genetic traits of their offspring if they did not know their ancestry (other than some founder effect diseases)? In this case there was no particular need for Nazis to regard some Jewish blood as contamination then. — I would say the Jews intend to become a separate race in the same way that the author of the article we are commenting on rightly hopes Whites will become – ie not even able to physically breed with other “races”. Over time, segregation always leads to this speciation.

  8. Pured1989

    - Edit

    How much is hyperbole and how much fact?

    Professor Jaeger in his book “Discovery of the Soul”, p. 247, says: “Baptism and interbreeding are of no avail; we remain, even in the hundredth generation, Jews…”

    Revilo Oliver’s ‘Righteous Racism’ (Liberty Bell, Vol. 14 N. 11, July 1987
    https://www.resist.com/libertybell/LB-198707.pdf
    “Dr. Alfred Nossig…reports, not as an hypothesis, but as an ascertained fact: that even ‘a few drops’ of Jewish blood suffice to alter permanently the mental processes of persons of other races. See his ‘Integrales Judentum’ (Vienna, Berlin, New York, 1922).”
    (Oliver refers also to Mourant’s ‘Genetics of Jews’ (1978)).

    More recently there is ‘Legacy’ by OSTRER (2012) tending to a DNA-based conclusion of Jewish racial identity:

    https://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Genetic-History-Jewish-People/dp/0195379616

  9. Tony L

    - Edit

    All very interesting, but nothing definitive can be done without state power.
    .
    With state power, any problems could be cleared up within a couple of years. Large scale repatriation along with a screened DNA check for all us Brits to ostensibly identify disease at the cellular level. Naturally, this can serve more than one purpose and can be used for identifying ‘one drop’ of non European DNA.
    .
    Living in London I can testify to having seen quadroons with blond hair and blue eyes. The only give away was the more than usually broad nose.
    .
    IMO those that look English and self-identify as English but discovered as having black blood should be allowed to remain in the country after having the snip.

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      We are obviously delving into the realms of eugenics here, which is rather different from the issue the author of this article was addressing, i.e. that of choosing a mate and in doing so, identifying who is and who is not one of ‘us’.
      .
      I tend to concur with Jane above, and her Church of the Creator definition, that if you are identified as White by our racial enemies, you are accepted as White by other White people, and you self-identify as White, then you are White. This is the ‘phenotype test’.
      .
      Of course, some people who pass the phenotype test, will be found to have some infusion of non-White genes, they will fail the ‘genotype test’, and in these cases, once we have state power as Tony suggests, these remnant genes can be dealt with as we would deal with genes for cystic fibrosis or any other genetic defect – a eugenic programme can be employed to breed those undesirable genes out of the family bloodlines concerned and out of our gene pool without anyone being obliged to undergo sterilisation or childlessness.
      .
      What we need to remember is that White genes are recessive and therefore for someone to appear White to other White people, especially racially aware white people, they will have inherited very few non-White genes from their, normally remote, non-White ancestor. The genes affecting their external appearance will all be White genes, otherwise they would be visibly of mixed race, and if the genes affecting behaviour and identity are such that a person acts and identifies as White, we will mainly be dealing with remnant genes affecting such things as the shape and function, say, of someone’s pancreas, or one of their other internal organs.
      .
      The phenotype test would therefore appear to be the critical test for us to focus on.

Comments are closed.