The news that Gladstone Primary School in Peterborough has become the first school in Britain to have not a single white British child, has clearly revealed the seriousness of the Third World immigration invasion of Britain.
Earlier figures revealed by the NHS showed that white British babies are set to be a minority of live births in Britain by 2030—just 1 years away from now.
The Gladstone primary school has 440 pupils, and not one of them speaks English as a first language, the Daily Mail reported.
“Department for Education figures show that, of the school’s pupils, 358 speak Punjabi Urdu at home, 23 speak Dari, the official language of government in Afghanistan, while there are also 15 Lithuanians and 11 Latvians. Data protection rules prevent the disclosure of the numbers in 16 smaller language groups,” the Mail said, before going on to quite falsely call it the “most multicultural school in Britain.”
In a 2012 census of 1,600 schools, it was found English-speaking children are now in a minority, with the figures particularly startling in the 14 inner London boroughs, where there were 98,000 non-native English speakers compared to 78,000 who could list the language as their number one.
Nationwide, there were 97 schools where the number of pupils speaking English as a mother tongue was fewer than one in 20 of the school population. After London, Birmingham had the highest concentration of ‘foreign’ pupils, followed by Bradford and then Leicester. Punjabi was the most widely-spoken first language.
Even of those whose first language might be English, there is no guarantee that they will be white British, and could easily be children of first or second general non-white colonisers.
The NHS birt rate figures, released in 2010, revealed that of the 652,638 deliveries in 150 NHS Trusts in England during 2009, an average of 62 percent were to mothers who were classed as “white British.”
This means that 38 percent of all live births in 2009 were supposedly of immigrant origin.
This figure contrasts strongly with a 2005 Office for National Statistics report which said that 36 percent of all births in England and Wales were not “white British” (“Birthweight and gestational age by ethnic group, England and Wales 2005: introducing new data on births” by Kath Moser, Office for National Statistics, Kristina M Stanfield and David A Leon, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine).
Given immigration levels since 2004, and natural reproduction rates amongst immigration groups (for example, an August 2008 ONS population report stated that, on average, ‘foreign’ women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women), it is highly unlikely that the number of immigrant births have only climbed two percent in the period 2005 to 2009.
Even if a reproduction increase rate of “only” two percent every four years is maintained for the non-ethnically British segment of the population, they are set to become an outright majority in twenty years’ time.
The immigrant increase will of course be greater than two percent as their numbers are increasing exponentially.
Nonetheless, even taking the unaltered growth projection rate of two percent every four years, the growth pattern appears as follows:
2005 = 36%; 2009 = 38%; 2013 = 40%; 2017 = 42%; 2021 = 44%; 2025 = 46%;
2029 = 48%; 2033 = 51%.
According to the new figures, the number of white British births in Bradford is already down to 34 percent of the total, while in Sandwell and West Birmingham it is 16.5 percent.
In West Hertfordshire the white British birth numbers are only 57.2 percent of the total, while in North West London it is 9.4 percent and in North Middlesex it is 11.1 percent.
The figures are, as outlined above, an underestimation and the demographic swing will in all likelihood happen even faster.
BritishActivism
- Edit
Despite me already knowing how bad things are, it never fails to shock me. It is just so hard to come to terms with. I am signed up and do have some faith in Western Spring, so do not get me wrong, but quite frankly I think we are going to need a miracle or some other kind of divine intervention. The tsunami is not just on the horizon, it is already here, but we have not yet felt the full impact of the swell.
frederickdixon
- Edit
That 2009 figure of 62% is complicated by several factors:-
(a) it reflects the race of the mother and, as we know only too well, not all white British women give birth to white British children.
(b) on the other hand, white women who are not classified as British – because they are Australian, German, Polish, Irish etc. – do give birth to white British children, either because they are themselves of British descent or because the child’s father is white British.
(c) In 11% of births the race of the mother was not recorded, but evidence from 2005 suggests that the birth characteristics of the child indicates that in most cases they are white British.
So all in all, and with a good deal of guesstimation, it’s likely that about 69% of births in 2009 were white British.This, though, is a trivial improvement which in no way takes away from the thrust of the article. It is vital that we do everything in our power – and more – both to protect the racial identity of our people and to save them from falling into minority status in their own country. We must go further, we must have a means in place to ensure that our people can survive the descent into minority status and in time recover the sole possession and inhabitation of our homeland. Max Musson, of this address, is beginning to lay the foundations for these things, so please get behind him.
Steed
- Edit
Important points frederickdixon. However, as we all know, England is the primary target of immigrants. So whilst the statistics mentioned apply as an average across all of the UK, it is important to note that in England alone things are worse.
Furthermore, crux point 1 comes when 50%> of children born are non-indigenous. Crux point 2 arrives when 50%> of those of voting age are non-indigenous. Crux point 3 arrives when 50%> of those of fighting age are non-indigenous. All of these will arrive before 2033.
Crux point 1 will probably be reached within another decade; crux point 2 will not arrive until after 2033; and crux point 3 maybe only slightly before 2033.
Crux point 2 completely dismiss any chance of Democratic salvation (as most of us already know), whilst crux point 3 probably dismisses any chance of violent salvation (which none of us want but may have to accept as last resort).
Max Musson
- Edit
Mr Steed, your concerns are well-founded, but there is much that can be done to buy ourselves more time. Perhaps you should join us in our work?
Steed
- Edit
Perhaps Max! Is there an area on the site where the nature of your work is publicly and explicitly expressed?
Max Musson
- Edit
Not yet, but a fairly good idea of what we are about can be gleaned from my articles, ‘The Great White Hope?’, and ‘The Great White Hope Revisited’.
Alternatively, email your contact details to me, [email protected] and we can arrange to meet.
Having visited your excellent blog, I can see that we are largely of one mind.
Steed
- Edit
Thanks Max. I have read that and the original version of the article, but I did just remind myself of the six prerequisites and thus I must humbly decline your offer. Before I explain why you should know that I absolutely support this website and wish you the best of luck. I do not intend to work against or at arm’s length from political proponents like Western Spring, but I cannot bring myself to actively dedicate my time towards a plan which I fundamentally have no faith in. In short, I don’t believe we can achieve victory within the framework of our standing society for it is so deeply poisoned by centuries of abuse by our enemies. I actually long for a complete collapse and see this as the only hope. It would take an in-depth conversation or series of essays for me to fully express why I believe this, so this relatively brief article at my blog will have to suffice for now, if you’re interested of course: https://eyeofwoden.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/the-beast-that-divides-us.html
Max Musson
- Edit
Thank you for referring me to your blog article. However, we appreciate that the future may play out differently from that inferred in my previous articles and if that is so, our plans are able to be adapted to meet changing circumstances. In fact our plans will prepare us for any eventuality. Therefore we should still explore the possibility of working together.
frederickdixon
- Edit
In reply to Steed, I would make two points:-
1/ There is no reason to suppose that in the aftermath of a societal collapse that we racially aware White Brits (or the remnants of us) would come out on top.
2/ A decline to minority status is far more likely. In this event it is essential that we begin now to think like an ethnic minority, building up our own community structures for our own people.
Steed
- Edit
I agree with both points Frederick. Though surely a societal collapse is the only chance we possibly have of coming out on top, for this path we’re on now favours and empowers the non-indigenous whereas a ‘survival of the fittest’ scenario would undoubtedly favour us. Still – we should aim for secession – whether it be required as an end (a new nation) or a means to an end (a strong base from which to reclaim all of our land).
Steve
- Edit
As this affects Europe & not just us, there might be enough of us to form a state or society somewhere, after a collapse.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
We don’t have to sit around waiting for society to collapse before we can do anything. Mosley always predicted an economic collapse which would propel us into power. His apologists still say that he was right, only half a century too early. Well, “All things come to he who waits”, unfortunately such waiting could take several lifetimes. I wouldn’t be the first person to point out that rather than wait hoping for some sort of Armageddon we must emulate the Jews. They have been beavering away for some four thousand years looking after their own tribal interests. This is what we must do. We must think of ourselves as Aryans, a noble caste of North Europeans, confident in our superiority and fierce in our refusal to mix our blood with other tribes. John Tyndall once said, “My race is my religion”. That’s also my watchword, is it yours?