By Nick Grifford:
The 2006 film entitled 300 was the brainchild of graphic novelist Frank Miller and director, Zackery “Zack” Snyder. The story charts the military exploits of a small Spartan army (the eponymous 300) during the campaign against Persian invasion, circa 480 BC.
The film is suitably emotive and clearly provides an allusion to invasive Muslim incursions into Europe during the the past few decades, which, in itself, is not unwelcome. However, being Hollywood, there appears to be a thinly obscured and invidious message simmering just below the surface.
Apart from the enemy hordes, the principle antagonist is Xerxes I, who, we are frequently enlightened, believes himself to be a god. During one exchange (of a number) between the aforementioned “god king” and Leonidas (the Spartan king), for example, Xerxes announces: “But I am a generous god. I can make you rich beyond all measure. I will make you warlord of all Greece. You will carry my battle standard to the heart of Europa. Your Athenian rivals will kneel at your feet if you will but kneel at mine”.
History records that Xerxes did in fact forcibly enter Athens and triumphantly despoiled the admirable Acropolis. We know this from an inscription left by Xerxes himself: “There was a place in which devils were formerly worshipped. There, by the help of Ahura Mazda, I demolished that lair of devils and I issued an edict, ‘You shall not worship devils’. And in the very place in which devils had once been worshipped, I piously and with Righteousness worshipped Ahura Mazda.”
Those not familiar with Ahura Mazda may be interested to note that the dominant religion of Persia at the time of Xerxes I was Zoroastrianism, a ditheistic theology from which Christianity is a derivative. Zoroastrianism permits only the worship of one god (Ahura Mazda), much like the Christian God, while his antithesis, Angra Mainyu, is shunned and reviled, much like Satan. It would be blasphemous, therefore, for Xerxes to consider himself a god and, being an extremely devout individual (again, we know this because his conquests where in fact “Wars of Religion” – Zoroastrianism being an intolerant “jihadist” faith) would not have ventured to insult his celestial god in this manner.
Another noteworthy historical anomaly presented in 300 is the racial characteristic of Xerxes himself. Clearly this big-screen Xerxes is of mixed racial ancestry while his chronicled counterpart was an Aryan, as were the majority of Persian aristocrats of the era, and continued to be so until the Muslim (Arab) invasion of Persia (Iran) in the seventh century AD. Xerxes I was the son of Darius and a descendent of Cyrus the Great, who overthrow the Median confederation and dutifully described his people as the Parsa, after their original Aryan tribal name Parsua.
Thermopoylae was then, in fact, a war between Aryan people; on the one side the Hellenic Greeks resisting brutal occupation, and on the other, upon the world. It was not, as the film proposes, an hubristic personal conquest, nor was it instigated by non-Aryans. The reason these points are important are twofold:
1) The “quiet” European Muslim invasion of the present era has, quite patently, a crucial racial motif. This dovetails neatly with the ethnological falsehood perpetrated in 300.
2) The Jihad is not, as most modern dictionaries will inform the reader, unique to Muslims. Religious wars have dogged humanity for millennia – though we should really only be concerned with Aryan history – and since evinced by Zoroaster several centuries before the conception of Christianity.
What Hollywood, which is controlled by Jews, has attempted is a unctuous piece of propaganda. And, by tinkering with antiquity, it has successfully stirred the waters in our time. That is not to say that the Islamic/Arab foray into the Occident is acceptable, because it is not, but what is really developing is the inscrutable efforts of Jewish supremacists to decouple the advance of Muslim supremacists; the Jewish supremacistsfor themselves and they are shrewd enough to enlist the services of the Goyim in order to aid them as collateral fodder, just as they succeeded in doing during the second fratricidal European war; in Iraq, Afghanistan, et al.
This flexing of reality works equally as well in the modern political arena. Patriotic White people are granted just enough “nationalism,” be that flag-waving, rousing anthems, or otiose statements relating to the “safeguarding our cultural heritage” or “getting us out of Europe,” to induce them to support nominally nationalistic democratic groups. The fact that organisations such France’s Front National, the Dutch Party for Freedom, and Britain’s own United Kingdom Independence Party, flagrantly welcome racial assimilation and are supportive of Jewish and Zionist interests, is indicative of the effete state of contemporary nationalists, whose intercontinental hymn must by now be Bonny Tyler’s pining, “Holding Out for a Hero.”
The “useful idiots” phrase generally attributed to the delusional Vladimir Lenin (who married and surrounded himself by Jews) certainly finds a convenient home in today’s new variant nationalism. Additionally, the notion that nationalists can accept democracy per se is troubling when considering the supposed adherence to the truth that no one man is congenitally equal to another, irrespective of race, nor does he possess the unlimited aptitude to achieve “equality.” The emanation of these mimetic idiosyncrasies can be traced back to our malfunctioning Aryan Morality and our unique and atavistic ability (if not tendency) to suspend belief in the actual so as to investigate the fictitious, illogical, or audaciously unusual – such as the traditional cultures and customs of other races; irreconcilable curiosities with which we appear unnaturally preoccupied.
The stupefaction of nationalists* is incredible enough, but when presented with the unsavoury fact that we, as a racial collective, are on the verge of extinction, it is breathtakingly unsettling. This situation is becoming increasingly problematic and requires either extensive corrective inculcation, or else they (nationalists*) – and it (nationalism*) – must be abandoned. Groups, such the English Defence League (EDL), were established for the sole purpose of exciting local enmity against Muslims, while disregarding the racial dynamic and exonerating Jews and Zionism.
The fact that homosexuals were cordially empowered within the EDL because “Muslims don’t like ’em” is symptomatic of our failure to grapple with the task at hand and our tribal capacity to retard our own rationality. The “intellectuals” of the Right who condescendingly snigger at the “yobbos” of the EDL et al, will, at some point, be compelled to question their own allegiances and superstitions (whether these manifest themselves as mild forms of cultural jingoism or the tortuous theoretical torrents of Alain de Benoist and Alexandr Dugin) before they are tossed into the monstrous Moloch just as Ukrainian nationalists were following their witless pact* with the devil.
By Nick Grifford © 2014
# # # #
* Editor’s note: Nick Grifford appears to be attacking nationalism as a whole here and what he has written has the potential to offend some people. My understanding of his ideological position however, is that our concept of ‘our nation’ should extend to encompass all those of our race, i.e. we should expound White nationalism (racialism) instead of other narrower forms of nationalism that often impose petty ethnic divisions between those of our race and create the potential for us to be divided against each other in ‘brothers wars’ and misdirected as ‘useful idiots’ by the Zionist media – as the EDL were, and as Pravy Sektor still are – against those, either racial brother or racial foe, who might threaten the economic and political hegemony of organised Jewry.
# # # #
katana
- Edit
Well, this is a Nick Grifford article that, after a bit of necessary re-reading to get through the not so plain writing style (sorry there Nick), I think I like.
When you put it all together the title of the article and its content come together well, that is: “Useful” Nationalists and “Useful” Idiots. In other words, Nationalist parties being or ending up as controlled opposition.
“The stupefaction of nationalists* is incredible enough, but when presented with the unsavoury fact that we, as a racial collective, are on the verge of extinction, it is breathtakingly unsettling. This situation is becoming increasingly problematic and requires either extensive corrective inculcation, or else they (nationalists*) – and it (nationalism*) – must be abandoned. Groups, such the English Defence League (EDL), were established for the sole purpose of exciting local enmity against Muslims, while disregarding the racial dynamic and exonerating Jews and Zionism.”
So true.
But abandoned for what?
Whether it is a reformed existing “movement” or not, it must be one based on plain spoken truth.
For me, that is that the wars, the horrors of the 20th and 21st centuries are the result of organized Jewry. Recognizing that they are clearly the architects of our racial destruction.
And reacting appropriately.
Kenny Bryant
- Edit
With regards to the “not so plain writing style”: Andrew Brons has recently published a text riddled with lingo like it, and I have to say, both texts are masterpieces. Indicative of fine minds capable of uniting content and the superior English language with a high degree of style and panache.
Same as you though, had to read ’em a couple of three times!
PharmaPhil
- Edit
Surely what we need is more calling a spade, a spade not a manually manipulated earth inverting implement.
This is why Farage wins his debates with verbose cliche ridden politicians spouting mantras.
The common man likes that.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
There has also been a lot of criticism of the follow up film & its historical accuracy.
Must admit “300” didn’t do much for me, “Watchmen” was more interesting though.
Steed
- Edit
300 is a funny one. On one hand, I agree that there is a subtext – probably the one identified here by Nick Grifford; but on the other hand, the novel/film glorifies the Aryan idealism, bravery and sacrifice so exemplified by the Spartans (who, I may add, Hitler was a big admirer of). There is also a strong message about ‘the enemy within the gates’, with corruption and bribery taking place. So overall I think those who would be inspired by the warrior-ethos of the film, and who would take heed of the message about ‘the enemy within the gates’ are going to probably bypass any dangerous subtext.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
I think a lot of the so called right such as the EDL or UKIP are controlled opposition used as safety valves to vent the pressure that is building up & that the BNP was subverted.
The NF probably are genuine but are very much on the margins of everything, never really breaking through.
When they were seen as more of a threat, there was a well organised campaign against them but now they are ignored.
Corky341
- Edit
I agree entirely with your post’s points PP. I know groups like the BNP have been saying the same about both EDL and UKIP for years now.
I also agree with your summary of the NF. (From a very good position in 2008 the BNP imploded too). Sadly, and not for want of trying, British Nationalist groups never get very far. Very much a case of ‘the enemy within’.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Nick Grifford’s article exemplifies the key role that ‘Western Spring’ can play in educating racial-patriots to the truth of our current situation. That the ‘globalist’ hegemony were willing to pump five billion dollars into the pro-National Socialist Pravy Sektor as a means of destroying Yanukovych and so undermining Putin, further illustrates the utter ruthlessness of our enemies.
Never again will we be able to obtain comfort or sustenance from the limited success of so called ‘right-wing’ organisations such as ‘UKIP’ or Gert Wilders ‘Dutch Freedom Party’. Admittedly anything that helps break up the status quo should be welcomed but to borrow Nick Grifford’s phrase, they should become OUR “useful nationalists”, not organised Jewry’s “useful nationalists” By fearlessly identifying the enemy we lay the foundation stones for a Movement of National Salvation.
Max Musson
- Edit
I doubt that the entire $5 billion was given to Pravy Sektor, but was distributed between them and the three political parties that were in alliance against Yanukovych’s Party of the Regions. Essentially however, what you say Mike, is true.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Yes Max, I’m guilty of painting with rather too broad a brush. The idea of Pravy Sektor receiving 5 billion dollars from the global-Zionists is clearly ridiculous. What I should have written is that Victoria Nuland, a Jewish diplomat at the American Embassy in Kiev, boasted that the Americans had invested 5 billion dollars to destabilise Yanukovich. In so doing they were making allies with Pravy Sektor which controlled the streets at the time. Miss Nuland was also photographed handing out cakes to the Pravy Sector street
protesters.