In the manner of all good farces and melodramas, these passed ten days have seen Prime Minister Theresa May ambush her cabinet at Chequers in the most Machiavellian fashion, cowing them momentarily with threats of short shrift, sackings and mini-cab rides home if they didn’t submit to coercion over the Brexit deal she has planned, only for a series of high drama resignations to follow, and for her to be wrong-footed by an all guns blazing broadside from Donald Trump, ahead of a rather absurd joint press conference at which they both posed as the best of friends and Donald Trump labelled reports of his earlier outbursts, ‘fake news’. It would be difficult to try to make this kind stuff up, but this is what passes for politics in modern Britain!
Whatever Theresa May might claim to the contrary, the ‘Heath Robinson’ Brexit deal she bolted together, which was presented at Chequers and which has since been published as a White Paper is clearly not Brexit, and is instead, ‘BINO’, Brexit in name only. In this day and age cabinet ministers do not tend to resign on principle, even when they have been found abusing under-age choir boys in a children’s home, and so when no less that two cabinet ministers resign in protest at what they see as BINO, we can be sure that BINO is what it actually is.
Two years ago I predicted that remainers within government would delay Brexit as long as they possibly could and would use every conceivable device in their attempts to frustrate the Brexit process, and water down the terms of our exit from the EU, in the hope of killing Brexit entirely in a parliamentary vote of predominantly remainer MPs, or a second referendum having demoralised the voting public, or in the hope of neutering Brexit and delivering BINO instead. It is obvious from recent events that my prediction was spot on, and that remainer, Theresa May, is in the thick of it!
The British public did not vote for Brexit, because we secretly want a ‘soft-Brexit’, any more than a rape victim has ever screamed for help in the hope of securing a ‘gentle rape’. Instead, we voted for Brexit because after forty-years of being forced against our will, we want unfettered national sovereignty and our freedom from the grasping hands and thrusting phallus of the European Union. In short, this is not about the economy — as Boris Johnson recently declared, “fu*k business!” — this is about democracy, identity, national sovereignty and self-determination – the things our forefathers fought and died in blood soaked soil in order to secure for us and our future generations.
The European Union is a bureaucratic tyranny. We only have to witness the lengths to which EU leaders are prepared go to in order to bully the British government and our electorate into submission to see this. The fact that they want Britain to be seen to be punished for leaving the union, in order to deter other member states from thinking of following suit makes this quite plain.
The European Union is a bureaucratic tyranny by virtue of its constitution, modelled as it is on the constitution of the Soviet Union in which unelected bureaucrats hold the real power and the much vaunted European Parliament is a toothless sham.
The European Union is a bureaucratic tyranny by virtue of its attempts to micro-manage each of our lives, subjecting us to a plethora of laws dictating in minute detail how we must live.
Finally, and worst of all, it is a genocidal bureaucratic tyranny, seeking to eradicate any resistance to its plans through the replacement and displacement of the peoples of Europe, promoting miscegenation and deluging our continent with the surplus populations of the Third World.
On Brexit and on immigration, it appears, despite his diplomatic back-peddling at the joint press conference yesterday, that Donald Trump has the interests of the British people at heart and is prepared to speak up and call out the Prime Minister for her failings.
It is a pity however that Trump did not have the courage of his convictions and did not stick to his guns.
Following his frank interview with the Sun newspaper the President appeared to soften his stance in order not to completely humiliate Theresa May. In order to save her embarrassment he is reported to have stated that the reports of his words during an interview with the Sun newspaper were ‘fake news’. However the following transcripts and video clips indicate that on the subjects of Brexit, trade and immigration he was not misquoted and the Sun had reported him correctlt:
Trump on Brexit
“I would have done it much differently. I actually told Theresa May how to do it, but she didn’t agree, she didn’t listen to me.”
What did you say?
“She didn’t listen. No, I told her how to do it, I, that will be up to her to say, but I told her how to do it, she wanted to go a different route.
So you would be prepared to walk away, if they didn’t give you the right terms?
“Oh, absolutely, I think what’s going on is very unfortunate, it’s too long, you know deals that take too long are never good ones. When a deal takes so long, it’s somehow, they never work out very well.
“I did give Theresa, who I like, I did give her my views on what she should do and how she should negotiate, and she didn’t follow those views, I would actually say that she probably went the opposite way. If you really look, she probably went the opposite way, and that’s fine, you know, she should negotiate the best way she knows how, but it’s, it’s too bad what’s going on.”
“Well I think the deal that she’s striking is not what the people voted on, it’s a much different deal than the people voted on, it was not the deal that was in the referendum, you know I’ve just been hearing this over the last three days, I guess you’ve just been hearing about it over the last three days, I know they had a lot a resignations, so a lot of people don’t like it. You know, but it will definitely affect trade with the United States, unfortunately in a negative way.”
Trump on Trade
“Well, if they do a deal like that, it will most likely, because we will be dealing with the, er, European Union instead of dealing with the UK, so it will probably kill the deal with …, if they do that, their trade deal with the US is, will probably not be made, … because we have enough difficulty with the European Union, you know we are, we are cracking down right now on the European Union because they have not treated the United States fairly on trade.
“No, if they do that, I would say that that would probably end a major trade relationship with the United States.”
Trump on Immigration
“ … my father Germany, my mother Scotland, so I have great love for countries in Europe.
“I think what’s happened to Europe is a shame. I think the immigration, allowing the immigration to take place in Europe is a shame, I think it changed the fabric of Europe, and unless you act very quickly, it’s never going to be what it was, and I don’t mean that in a positive way.
“So I think allowing millions and millions of people to come in to Europe is very, very sad. I think you’re losing your culture … “
“You have a mayor who’s done a terrible job in London, has done a terrible job.
“Take a look at the terrorism that’s taking place. Look at what’s going on in London. I think he’s done a terrible job. But I think that all of this immigration has really changed the fabric of Europe.
“Now I speak as an outsider when I say that, but I speak as someone who loves Europe.”
It is to be hoped that the likes of David Davies, Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage will be emboldened by Donald Trumps words and will be galvanised into action to prevent the will of our people being frustrated once again and the interests of our people being further sold down the river.
They have resigned their positions and stepped back from front-line politics, but that is not enough. More is required of them!
The dire state of our nation and the threats that beset us on all sides need bold action and that men and women of good intent should step forward and provide the leadership our nation so sadly lacks at this time.
It will be a dark day for our nation if Theresa May and her lackeys manage to limp on in government and next year lumber us with a deal with the EU that negates the democratic wishes of our people, either by keeping us in or by making us a half-in/half-out vassal state of the European Union. It will be a dark day for our nation if none of the high profile Brexiteers is man enough to challenge Mrs May, but perhaps we need a few more dark days such as these: before as a people, we realise that democracy is effectively dead — that it has been smothered in accordance with covert plans to ruin and emasculate our nation; before we as a nation stiffen our resolve, focus our minds and begin to take the action needed to take political power away from the corrupt and fanatical elite who cold-heartedly plan our destruction, and chart a new course — one in which we will once again have freedom, prosperity and self-determination.
By Max Musson © 2018
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
John Stephens
- Edit
The truth of it, is simply that “deals” were never required. Individual commercial, wider business, and investment in British based companies, are the norm.
The narrative of the drama, was scripted via the global media/banking elites, and no common sense was part of the crafted narrative.
I have had, and have shocked by doing so, many conversations with fence-sitters, and idiot “remainers”. All of whom forget, or never even knew, that Heath was a “false” Conservative.
Then, we have the two main thrusts of my “Brexit big guns” point of view. One: Right at the point of the Biafra starving children campaign, British food growers and producers, were forced to literally throw away surplous foods.
This was termed “mountains”, as millions of gallons/pounds of butter, wine, flour etc, were stacked up, then destroyed via “quotas” policies.
Two: During the Falklands conflict, our so-called “European Allies” and fellow bloc cousins, sold Exocet missiles to our enemy forces, killing and maiming British servicemen.
It goes without saying, that any other arguments for remaining, go quietly out of the window. There is nothing like a couple of “truth bombs” to dull an even duller, unthinking mind.
Stephen Ambartzakis
- Edit
Careful John, the guidance system was built and supplied from Birmingham
Albert
- Edit
The way this Country has been bullied by Brussels, In the past Britain has gone to War for a lot less.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
Should Teresa May’s proposals be accepted, the UK would still be bound by the jurisdiction of the European Court, and also be constrained by a customs union. Free movement would officially end but arrangements would be in place to allow people to enter the country on various pretexts.
It is quite clear from the above that there will not emerge a clean separation from the EU; the terms soft and hard Brexit are contrivances to cause confusion and to suggest that leaving the EU can be achieved by degrees. When people voted to leave the EU in the Referendum held in June 2016, it was clearly with the intention that a clean separation sould occur.
Mrs May’s proposals,unsatisfactory though they are will probably be further modified by the European Commission. Even had we left the EU in any meaningful sense, it would not have addressed the adverse consequences of mass immigration from the Third World. Separate measures would have to be taken to halt and reverse such immigration.
However the EU is a supra national body devoted to the ending of independent nation states, which would instead be subject to edicts emanating from a centralised body such as the European Commission.The EU is an organisation which promulgates the globalist/ internationalist agenda, such as open border policies and a willingness to accept and then impose on member states, hordes of migrants culturally incompatible with European values and heritage.
The UK voting to leave was a severe shock to the Globalists who have since taken every measure and opportunity to
prevent a meaningful separation.
As the Visegrad countries are resolute in refusing Muslim migrants quotas for resettlement, and countries of Southern Europe are in financial difficulties, perhaps the very existence of the EU is imperiled. The demise of the EU would be a severe reversal for the Globalists but a welcome development for patriots, nationalists and traditionalists.
Keith Thomas
- Edit
“as Boris Johnson recently declared, “fu*k business!” ”
But he was not prepared to say “fu*k the Irish!”, yet it’s the Irish imbroglio that underlies May’s compromise. There is much talk of principles, of economics, about the jurisdiction of the European courts. But all this is just making the best of a bad job with duct tape, prayer and forced smiles: Theresa May’s premiership is dependant on the DUP and we have the DUP, the Good Friday Agreement and the Irish government mitigating against our ability to treat our border with Ireland in the same way as we treat our border with France.
If May was not hanging on to power with the DUP thread she might have given us a better deal. For all the bluster from Johnson, and the seeming forthrightness of Rees-Mogg, until they spell out a solution to the Irish problem, we are like motorists driving through thick fog.
Meanwhile, those who want to undermine Brexit and push on with the “united states of Europe” are rejoicing in our situation. If we accept May’s proposals, we will be beholden to EU governance with no opportunity to influence that governance. We will be weaker than before Brexit – an outcome that suits those whose vision for Europe is one in which the UK is emasculated.
Fyrdman
- Edit
Whether Britain is in, or out, of the EU, no nation is really free and sovereign unless it controls its own money and issues its own credit.
Max Musson
- Edit
And has the capacity to feed and provide got its people.
Keith Thomas
- Edit
The UK is, at present, heavily dependant on food imports. The official statistics say we import 40% of our food, but in fact the total is closer to 60%. That’s because the official statistics are measured in units of money, not units of food. Using the official measures, the export of £20 of Scotch Whiskey would be balanced by the import of £20 of rice, bananas or cooking oils.
Furthermore, the official statistics ignore imports of stockfeed – particularly important for poultry feed (meat and eggs).
A further factor is that our population data is flawed and there are many more people (food eaters) than are used to calculate the 40% figure. At the same time the amount of land devoted to food production is declining.
It is unclear whether pelagic fish catches are counted in the calculations (including small fish used to feed farmed salmon, convert to fertiliser etc.)
Note, too, that imported food used by pets (especially fish for cats and seed for birds – a surprisingly large amount) is not counted.
panadechi
- Edit
A nation is formed by race, culture, language, ancestral customs.
Trade and diplomacy are added factors only ..
John Stephens
- Edit
Stephen Ambartzakis…. that makes my point even more solid.
Treachery is also from within. A fully
functioning, healthy nationalistic society, racially sentient, would have meant none of the suffering above.