If we were to believe the hogwash currently being spouted about the so called ‘Windrush Generation’, we might think that in the aftermath of World War 2, Britain was in a parlous state, lacking both the funds and the manpower to recover from the damage inflicted by the bombing raids of the Luftwaffe. The commonly held belief is that Britain was bankrupted by our involvement in World War II and that so many of our men had been killed or severely injured in the fighting that we lacked the manpower to rebuild, and were forced to call upon the assistance of immigrants from the West Indies.
The truth is that as a country we were effectively bankrupted by our involvement in World War 2 and relied upon credit in the form of Lease-Lend provided by the United States in order to sustain the war effort until Germany was defeated. It is a lie however to suggest that so many of our men were killed or disabled that we British needed to resort to mass immigration from the Caribbean, or anywhere else in order to rebuild.
In the aftermath of World War II approximately four-million British servicemen were demobilised and in addition to these figures approximately 400,000 British servicemen were killed during that war and a similar figure had been seriously injured.
During the last year of the war therefore, the British economy had been functioning with almost five million men absent, either serving in the armed forces, injured or dead. Despite this, we were able to maintain our economic output and maintain the war effort because large numbers of women had stepped up and had been performing the work that the absent men had previously performed.
In the aftermath of the war, approximately 4 million men returned to their normal civilian duties however, and so the situation after the war was far less critical than had existed during the war.
In the aftermath of the war, we were at the most only 800,000 men down, instead of nearly 5 million and with so many newly experienced and highly proficient female workers the effort needed to serve the interests of industry and agriculture should have been easily achieved.
While manpower levels would have been 800,000 down compared with pre-war figures, in the post war era there would have been no requirement to maintain the additional war-time production of weapons and armaments, and what vacancies existed could easily have been filled by skilled women who had learned their trade maintaining that wartime output of munitions during the years of conflict.
Today, we hear spokespeople for the so-called ‘Windrush Generation’ claiming that West Indian immigrants came to Britain and played an essential role in rebuilding our country, and yet, terrible though the Blitz obviously was for those who fell victim to the bombing, the bomb damage inflicted on Britain by the Luftwaffe was insignificant compared to the bomb damage experienced on the continent in places where battles were actually fought to gain control of towns and cities. It is a fact that a greater tonnage of high explosive and incendiary munitions fell on Berlin alone during just the last two weeks of World War II than fell on the whole of Britain during the entirety of that war!
It is also a fact that construction standards in the West Indies have historically been little better than those that prevail across most of Africa and it is laughable to suggest that we British needed to call upon West Indians to help rebuild those localised areas of British towns and cities that suffered bomb damage when there was a vast supply of builders, experienced in modern Western building methods pouring into mainland Britain from Ireland. If any ethnic group deserves credit for helping to rebuild Britain after World War II it is the Irish, many of whom, having served in our armed forces during the war, settled in England and who, being of kindred racial stock, have fully integrated, such that they are not considered and do not consider themselves an ethnic group different to or separate from the other indigenous British.
In localised areas such the central parts of London, Birmingham, Coventry and the south-coast sea ports etc., the Blitz had done much damage, but let no-one kid us that there were vast areas of devastation in Britain comparable with that inflicted on the industrial areas of Germany, Poland or Russia and we had at our disposal easily enough manpower to rebuild without resorting to mass immigration from the Third World.
The defeat of Germany during World War II was a watershed moment in the history of the world. In which the dominant motivating paradigm ceased to be one which celebrated ‘Higher man’ and the expansion of White civilisation across the globe and which celebrated the achievements of the White race in pushing forward the frontiers of science, art, medicine and culture, and became instead one in which the interests of ‘lower man’ were to be substituted and given priority in all things. It was a watershed moment signifying the end of the upward evolution of mankind and the beginning of a slow, yet gradually quickening descent into darkness, corruption, barbarism and decay.
Today, the town and city centres that were hastily rebuilt after the war, are now the victims of a new, gradual and insidious devastation, as building fabrics decay through neglect and cultural artefacts are replaced, such that these places now resemble parts of Kingston, and Delhi more than their glorious, quintessentially British, pre-war manifestations.
Nowadays, government and the mass media celebrate the arrival of the Empire Windrush with its not-needed and unwanted human cargo. For the indigenous British however the arrival of that ship is no cause for celebration, for it sounded the death knell of the Britain our fathers had fought to protect. Today therefore, let the perverse celebrations of the nation-wreckers spur us to greater effort in our people’s cause. Join Western Spring and play your part in the renaissance of our people!
By Max Musson © 2018
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
Albert
- Edit
The Media paint this picture of the Windrush generation, They really have short memories, Like Black youth mugging old people in the 70s & 80s, Riots and looting over Three decades, Drug dealing since they came over, Broken families, high unemployment with young black men,
When I hear the word Windrush, I think of a catastrophe that has been inflicted on Britain,
Windrush was the begining of our own Genocide.
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
On 30 April 1945, William Joyce said this: “Britain’s victories are barren; they leave her poor, and they leave her people hungry; they leave her bereft of the markets and the wealth that she possessed six years ago. But above all, they leave her with an immensely greater problem than she had then. We are nearing the end of one phase of Europe’s history, but the next will be no happier. It will be grimmer, harder, and perhaps bloodier. And now I ask you earnestly, can Britain survive?”. His foresight was remarkable, but with an insight borne of standing on the side of Truth and Beauty. How his question will be answered will likely be determined within a generation.
Stefan
- Edit
“Windrush” as an expression is misleading, probably deliberately so, as it refers to more than the people on that ship who numbered a few hundred.
It seems to actually mean all West Indian immigrants for many years.
Jock Lewes
- Edit
Right, Stefan. And “the Windrush generation” is a term that has become popular only recently as the label for a new victim lobby whose existence is supposed to remind the white British how badly they treated every body else. “The Windrush generation” is now a collective identity that can be used to demand compensation and compensatory privileges.
Can we expect The Mirpur Generation” to emerge soon with tales broadcast on the BBC of their noble sacrifices and, to follow shortly thereafter, demands for compensation and special privileges?
Let us not forget that at the same time migrants were arriving from the West Indies, the “Ten Pound Poms” were migrating to Australia and New Zealand.
Dan E
- Edit
Windrush was only part of the Cuckoo being placed in the nest, our past over tolerance allowed the Cuckoo into the nest by the industrialists who did it to undercut our own people.
Not only that we had a surplus of unemployed men back from the war who found it hard to get jobs after the war, no inscentive were given to them to move to other parts of Britan to do the jobs that these people were brought in to do.
Since that time they have run this country and our industries down and into the ground. Where I live in the North East our Ship-building and Coal mines were hastily closed and filled in so they could not be resurrected.
Of course if you point that out it’s a Conspiracy theory which is meant to be laughed at.
Fyrdman
- Edit
Originally, the ship Empire Windrush, was the former Santa Rosa, a German National Socialist ‘Strength Through Joy’ cruise liner, later as a Wehrmacht troopship. Taken as war booty in 1945, it initially started the first wave of non-white immigration into Britain. Those in power who organised this must of seen the symbolism of it. I do, and I think they were deliberately ‘taking the proverbial’.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
Well written article, Max, which challenges the conventional account that after the war Britain was facing a Labour shortage and subjects of the Empire were invited from the the West Indies and later the Indian Sub continent to fill that shortage.This is not to dismiss the important contributions made by many individuals from those countries, many of whom were decent, dignified and hard working people, but non European immigration has had a largely negative effect and has caused much resentment and alienation among the host community. We see the consequences today of a fragmented society divided on racial and ethnic lines and how most of the big cities have been transformed beyond recognition, the inner city areas containing few native Britons.
After the war there were many displaced people from Eastern and Central Europe who would have been more than willing to fill any genuine labour shortage in Britain, and who are both culturally and racially compatible with the indigenous population.
The sheer numerical impact of the growing non-white population is a concern in itself with their large families financed through generous welfare payments and continuing immigration. But this process is enabled and encouraged by those who wish to reject all our traditions, culture and heritage and transform Western Society and Europe into a multi-cultural and multi-racial inferno.Those Liberals or Progressives, who encourage mass immigration have rejected traditional values which have served society for millennia and endeavour to impose a new agenda which is underpinned by the false doctrine of egalitarianism; that is we are all equal and it is only privilege and discrimination which prevents an equality of outcomes.This fiction is maintained despite vast sums being spent for example in the USA and where the attainment of “Afro-Americans” remains deplorably low.
The 70th anniversary of the start of the Great Betrayal should motivate all nationalists, identitarians and traditionalists to renew their passion and challenge the official narrative of the “Windrush Generation” and its alleged benefits.
j.r.bell
- Edit
Excellent Max.
panadechi
- Edit
It was the beginning of the Zionist globalism in Europe, the war was won by the Zionists, not the allies.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
At the moment many of our people will be distracted by the World Cup and will be indulging in a “false patriotism” of flying the flag of St George and cheering for England despite the team comprising of at the most only half of those of English Stock. I recall England’s victory in 1966, comprising entirely of a team of English working class, and the team which lost to West Germany in 1970 was also of the same.
I still would want England to succeed but feel a certain ambivalence which would not have existed previously.I notice that in general the majority who display the Flag of St George are van drivers, and who are from the working class. Although recognising the limitations of a false patriotism, I am displaying two car flags. It is a subliminal signal to encourage other to show their pride in their heritage and identity, despite others trying to claim them.
Meanwhile despite defeat today, I would be delighted should Russia advance further in the competition and perhaps win the cup. It would be a ringing endorsement of our racial pride and a setback for the cause of multi racialism.
Brian W
- Edit
If indeed there was a labour shortage, why did the UK governments after 1945 encourage over one million British to emigrate to Australia and New Zealand ?
LJP
- Edit
Russia, Iceland, Poland, Croatia, Serbia, that’s your lot as far as European teams are concerned. The French football team had only one European left on the field at the final whistle of their last match. Switzerland had at least four players from deepest part of the dark continent in their squad. As far as England are concerned I feel no sense of patriotism, not even ambivalence. I look all the English football fans singing the national anthem and their euphoric reaction when ‘one of us’ scores a goal and feel a sense of shock.
I also that notice our future King is in Israel today. Apparently this is the first official Royal visit to the country. Must be a reason why that was the case? Anyone explain the change of policy?
Alec Suchi
- Edit
Argentina remains a team whose players are all of noticeable European ancestry. It is said that a majority of the population are of an Italian and Spanish ancestry, with some German and Welsh too in Patagonia.It is reassuring that should Europe fall, hope remains elsewhere.
LJP
- Edit
Hi Alec,
I remember an an Argentine international footballer of yesteryear with the wonderful name of Carlos Alberto Babington.
As for Diego Maradonna, I think he should stick to supporting the Argentine rugby team. His infectious enthusiasm during the last rugby world cup gained him unexpected popularity even amongst English supporters. Football it seems brings out the worst in him.
tony l
- Edit
When talking of the Windrush, never forget Enoch Powell who recruited them onto the ship. Mere involvement with the system is infectious