According to the mass media we should regard the actions of Thomas Mair, in his murder of Labour MP Jo Cox, as the manifestation of neo-Nazi terrorism. It is not enough they claim, for Jo Cox’s killing to be regarded as murder, or even politically motivated murder, it must in their view be regarded as ‘terrorism’, and the reason for this is clearly to provide a pretext for the demonization and persecution of patriots and White nationalist political activists.
Numerous articles reporting the murder of Jo Cox have made reference to the importance of understanding the ‘terrorist’ nature of Mair’s actions in light of the Brexit vote earlier this year, the election in America of Donald Trump, and the rise of ‘far-right’ political parties on the continent. The inference being that the kind of people who voted for Brexit, elected Donald Trump and who support ‘far-right’ political parties, are likely to engage in political violence and acts of terrorism. This of course is nonsense and an insult to the seventeen-million people who voted for Brexit and the large numbers of people who support Donald Trump and continental politicians such as FN Leader, Marine in France. It is iniquitous to conflate patriotism, and a reasoned opposition to mass immigration with terrorism, but there again, iniquity is what large sections of our mass media are all about.
It is wrong to compare the activities of patriotic and white nationalist political groups in this country with terrorism and with the actions of Muslim extremists such as al Qaida and ISIL, because there are obviously no terrorist groups within the nationalist community in Britain in the way that there are active Muslim terrorist groups. This is why MI5 do not waste their time raiding the houses of patriotic and nationalist activists, they know there is nothing to find.
It is clear that Thomas Mair’s murder of Jo Cox was not simply murder, the evidence produced during his trial demonstrates that it was indeed politically motivated, but there is a distinction between politically motivated murder and terrorism – a very important distinction.
Terrorism by definition seeks to cause terror in the hearts and minds of others. It seeks to influence the behaviour of others through the fear of violent acts that will be perpetrated as a consequence of not complying with the demands of the terrorist.
Prior to her murder, Thomas Mair did not, as far as is known, make Jo Cox aware that her life would be in danger if she continued to behave in the way she did. He did not attempt to coerce her through fear of the consequences of her actions. Furthermore, he did not publish a statement following her murder threatening to visit similar violence upon anyone else. How could he credibly present such a threat? He acted alone and made little or no attempt to evade subsequent capture by the police.
It is clear from the police investigation, that despite Mair’s penchant for white nationalist and Nazi focused literature to which he evidently subscribed, he was not a member of any political organisation and in murdering Jo Cox did not commit that act in the furtherance of the aims of any specific organisation. Thomas Mair does not appear to have explained his motivations during his period in custody nor during his trial, and his circumstances indicate only that he deliberately targeted Jo Cox because she was his local MP and because of his hatred of her politics.
It is evident that Thomas Mair regarded his urge to kill Joe Cox as a manifestation within him of mental illness. Indeed in what would appear to be a vain attempt to avert the consequences of his internal frustrations he sought professional help just the day before he eventually murdered the Labour MP. Clearly, Mair was no terrorist!
Thomas Mair was a loner, and a sad loner at that, who may well have committed the brutal murder of Jo Cox simply because he felt he had no other lawful or legitimate way of effectively expressing his opposition to her and her political aims. Had he been a member of a white nationalist political party or campaign group, and had he found expression through the activities of such a group, he may well have felt otherwise, and therefore if the political establishment in this country were to cease their demonization and persecution of those deemed ‘right-wing political extremists’, the potential for politically motivated murder by sad loners might be avoided.
If we compare the lone actions of Thomas Mair with the activities of groups like ISIL and Al Qaida, the stark difference is that these extremist Muslim groups are organisations that attempt to coerce others through the fear of violent repercussions. They attempt through the issue of edicts and fatwas prior to the event to strike fear in the hearts of their enemies, and following their violence, they claim responsibility so that others will be aware of the dangers of continuing to defy them. These groups are therefore, by definition ‘terrorist organisations’, employing fear in order to achieve their political aims.
Had Thomas Mair written to Jo Cox threatening her prior to her murder if she did not desist from her political activities, and had he issued a proclamation after the event, claiming responsibility in the name of some political organisation or cause, then he could rightly have been described as a ‘terrorist’, but he did neither of these things and did not make any attempt to gain political notoriety from his trial. He pleaded not guilty and refused to speak in answer to questions. Throughout his trial, he did the opposite of what a terrorist would have done.
The irony is that the people who seek to portray Thomas Mair as a ‘terrorist’ do so in the hope of branding all people who feel aggrieved at British membership of the European Union, or who feel aggrieved by mass immigration into our country, as potential terrorists – as the kind of dangerous political extremists that should be targeted by police action under the governments proposed counter extremism measures. They are the kind of people who wish to stifle the freedom expression of those with whom they disagree, by needlessly and unjustly criminalising the beliefs of patriots and White nationalists.
They are the kind of people who if successful will create the oppressive conditions in which more people who hold beliefs similar to Thomas Mair will come to feel isolated and desperate, and regrettably in extreme cases where mental illness plays a part, may cause them to react in the same way Thomas Mair did.
When more than seventeen million people demonstrate their wish for Britain to be free of domination by the European Union, and it is acknowledged that most of them were motivated by opposition to mass immigration into this country, this is a time for government to give legitimate political expression to the wishes of our people, not to consider ways of suppressing them.
By Max Musson © 2016
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
John
- Edit
I was amazed at the way the polls swung following this murder. Unless that was just media hype, I feel that few people had bothered to do any research or reading (unforgivable in this day and age of the internet) and were changing their ideas simply doing it out of sympathy for this woman. In other words letting their hearts rule their heads, which is never a good thing when it comes to politics. I believe that was the one and only time, throughout the whole campaign when I thought we might lose.
However, I have to deplore the fact that her husband then used her death, right up to the referendum, as a political weapon. I really felt that was the lowest of the low.
Going back to my point of hearts ruling heads. When Edward Heath gave us a referendum on The Common Market, I can recall my parents – both Conservative voters – saying that he wasn’t telling the truth, and the whole aspect of this was evil. I was a young soldier and I had seen, first hand, Germanys ‘Economic Miracle’ following the devastation of the country during the war. I had experienced the high standard of German goods, the availability of loans for a car and so on back in the late 60s, when in UK we still had to crawl on hands and knees into the ‘Mainwarring’ type of bank managers office to even go overdrawn. I really felt that free trade was a great thing, and hadn’t our own Prime Minister – who being a gentleman would NEVER lie to the electorate (amazing how we gain experience over the years which changes our views so completely. There are probably only half a dozen politicians I would trust or expect not to lie these days) – told us that it really was ONLY for trade. Clearly my parents were elderly, misguided and their judgement had been twisted by the war years. But they were right, although at the time they admitted they were not sure why they felt that way. I now feel that just their life’s experience had made them think like that. They never expected a ‘free lunch’.
I still believe we should trade freely with, not just our European neighbours, but with the whole world. But people like Trump and Branson didn’t make money by sticking to one customer or supplier. They embraced all, whether they liked them or not, provided the deal was to their advantage or at least equal. We must do the same.
Our immediate concern is to get our slothful Prime Minister moving and put her in a position where she has to trigger Article 50 sooner rather than later. Currently I am beginning to think that for all her fine words about ‘Brexit is Brexit’ and ‘…the will of the majority…’ are flannel. She was, and probably still is a Remainer, and I ask myself each day – is she delaying, hoping that someone will throw a big enough spanner in the works to prevent Brexit, but she can state that it was not her fault. She has yet to back up ANY of her words on ANY subject with actual action. She has yet to stand up to any of the EUSSR Commissaries who still think they can diktate to the UK. Is this why she is so against an honest man like Nigel Farage being admitted to her inner circle? Without doubt he would blow any whistle available.
Or am I just being my old cynical self?
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Like John, I thought at one time that Mr. Mair, by his brutal action, had lost the Brexit vote for us. As it is I believe the margin in favour of Brexit would have been much higher, possibly closer to a 60% 40% ratio. If the murder was politically motivated it must be clear to any patriot with half a brain that the action was entirely counter productive. It did not take a political genius to see that the despicably biased BBC and other Left-wing media would milk the event for all it was worth. The miracle is that Brexit won at all. Perhaps the gods are truly on our side and the last 70 years of betrayal has only been a testing to toughen up our resolution.
Frederick Dixon
- Edit
Professor Ian Curtice, the well known psephologist interviewed a day or two after the murder, said that the effect on the referendum would probably be “approximately zero” because the people most emotionally affected were already likely to be remainers. I’m not so sure; some of the polls immediately before the event were moving strongly towards Brexit and then seemed to stall or reverse. But there were also polls showing little movement either way. In the event the local authority area containing Cox’s constituency voted Leave by a comfortable margin, so maybe Curtice was right. But it was a nail biting time!
Shaun
- Edit
The British people still voted for Brexhit despite the murder of Joe Cox. The MSM, however, will use every bit of political capital they can out of Joe Cox’s death — count on it to be almost on the level of Stephen Lawrance’s murder for the next few years; if they can get away with it.
But this is a fact: the British people still voted Brexit despite the propaganda surrounding the death of Joe Cox! Another fact: Trump got in despite huge efforts by our friends in the media to demonise him. It’s happening; a critical mass of White people no longer listen to the nonsense spewed out by the Mind Benders who control the media.
As for Mr. Mair, I can understand where he’s coming from. He’s seen, all his life, Muslim grooming gangs attack our children, our politicians betray us in their totality, our cities become overrun with non-Whites to the point where White are a minority all over the country, and other ethnic gangs commit the worst crimes against his own people.
He was mentally ill.
No one cared.
He lost it against a woman who supported the ruination of his beloved country,
It was sad he killed her because he will spend his life in prison and he could’ve been more effective promoting our cause with a pen rather than a knife and a gun.
Think I’m being harsh? Showing no empathy?
Well, I was in the car with a very close family member and I said I understood why the guy did the crime: the same reasons I’ve just explained! She called me evil, a lowlife, a racist — blah blah blah,
I asked this creature if she had any sympathy with the victims of these Muslim pedophile gangs as Joe Cox was pro-Muslim immigration?
This creature wouldn’t even answer me. No reply! No concern!
The left are no moral authority, but they can turn on their fake emotions at a second’s notice. Thank God a critical mass of our people are waking up to the MSM when they use our good nature against us.
I will say one more thing: I am sorry for Joe Cox’s children.
C.B
- Edit
It is sad an unfortunate for somebody to be killed in this way. We don’t have to agree with the killer for us to understand his reasons for doing it – which, I also heard extend to more than the EU, and into how he feared eviction from his lifelong home because migrants were more needy of it than he was.
Liberals are hypocrites. The people making so much noise about this woman, whether right or wrong, are the same kinds of people who were calling for Donald Trump, Nigel Farage and (before that) Nick Griffin to be assassinated. When John Tyndall died, when Maggie Thatcher died, when Enoch Powell died, they were singing songs like “Ding Dong the Witch Is dead” and so on and so forth.
Much in the same way as they are cold and indifferent to the deaths of people whose politics they did not agree with, I am a bit cold and indifferent to the death of Jo Cox. I didn’t know her, much like I did not know Princess Diana and thus did not wail obsessively about her death either.
Yasmin Alibhai Brown was being interviewed about it, on the BBC, during the day of the trial ruling. Naturally she was playing up the fear of a rebirth of fascism and racism and “intolerance”, citing that it was ‘terrorism’. Of course, she then started with the platitudes of how “the community has come together” and that it will “make them even stronger, together, to fight hate and bigotry”.
I am willing to bet that, in four or five years time, the situation on the ground will be as polarised and unharmonious as it ever was. They tell themselves, to comfort themselves, that it will be the catalyst to more integration and so on and so forth…..but I don’t think life on the ground will reflect this in the short term, never mind the long term. The churning gears of change are relentlessly turning. The outcome of it will not be any different.
The media was explaining that political extremist ideologies were a danger and that perhaps more should be done to prevent extreme political views taking hold. Last week, the Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist Leninist) held a rally with banners of hammer and sickles and banners with the faces of Marx and Lenin on them, through the streets of England.
Communism is responsible for 100 Million deaths – but there did not seem to be any TV coverage disapproving of an extremist political ideology marching through the streets of this country, especially in light of the murder of Jo Cox. I guess that “extremist” only applies to people who want to secure a future for white people in their own homeland.
IRONKRAFT
- Edit
I have a queezy feeling, that Cox was a sacrifice, a slaughtered lamb for the ritual of World Governance. Brexit was won, if not yet actually legalised as such, through natural instincts, and the masses not particularly being interested in general news and politics.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
I would correct John that it was Mr Wilson who gave us a referendum of whether to remain in the EU in 1975 following our admission without the consent of the British people in 1973 under the government of Mr Heath. Mr Mair’s action was counter productive and ill considered but nobody knows of what they are capable under extreme duress. Apparently in addition to his delicate mental state,, Mr Mair was facing eviction from his council house where he had resided for nearly 20 years and to be placed in a flat.Apparently the Council were seeking to re-allocate his family sized house to a family. We can thus imagine some of the difficulties confronting this unfortunate man. The sentencing was also significant, as he has been give a life sentence to mean life unless decided differently by the Home Secretary.In other words sinister political motives have been ascribed to the murder of Joe Cox and will be used as a convenient pretext to punish future actions by patriots deemed a threat to the establishment.
Dylan
- Edit
We’ll never know of course but I said to some friends as soon as the referendum was announced that there would be a “false flag” incident probably a week before the voting date. It’s somewhat an amazing coincidence that this murder happened when it did. It had been 205 years since the murder of an MP and it had to happen exactly 7 days before 23rd June. Campaigning was then postponed for three days the Friday, Saturday and Sunday. Cameron and Corbyn etc milked it for all it was worth and more. We had a “Vote Leave” stall organised for Friday and Saturday in my town and it had to be cancelled. Was this all a false flag incident organised by the Establishment to disrupt campaigning on the last weekend and swing votes over to Remain or just an amazing coincidence ? Certainly up there with David Kelly and Princess Dianna.
rerevisionist
- Edit
It’s always worthwhile googling ‘false flag jo cox’ (or any other media hyped event). You never know what’s out there… I’d say the Cox thing was a complete fraud
https://www.big-lies.org/jews/articles-on-jews.html#cox
and, of course, as you say the reaction to the non-event is all planned and scripted. And acted — there are several websites of companies that supply ‘crisis actors’, and supply trucks with facilities for catering and costume changes!
Julie Lake
- Edit
I was working from home on the day of the news of her death. I was running several pages at the time and that’s how i knew, that nationalist Orgs led the way at expressing their horror and condolences. In the BNP, we immediately suspended campaigning for Brexit for 48 hours, but in fact, i suspended my teams out in South Gloucestershire for a week. As a woman, i was horrified at the level of violence. Yet, once Brendan Cox made his public announcement just one hour after he was informed of his wife’s death, i also knew, as a woman, that, Jo Cox, the woman, the mother, the daughter, the sister, was gone. in her place, was Jo Cox the golden egg handed to the remain camp. Brendan Cox stated ‘ we must fight the hatred that killed her’ just one hour after she died and when police could not possibly have spoken to the suspect nor witness’s. Subsequent donations for Jo Cox by the public were shared between the White Helmets and Hope not Hate.
When my teams resumed street canvassing, i expected a little hostility if i were honest, but it actually left me surprised that people from all walks of life, that we engaged with, were equally put out, that the blame was being dished before a word of evidence had been heard. It endorsed my belief that the British public, are not the fools, our politicians take them for.
Equally, when i was in Batley and Spen for the last week of campaigning, i spoke to many voters who stated that it was their democratic right to have a choice of candidates, given that almost 30,000 of eligible voters did not vote for Jo Cox in 2015.
Random attacks by mentally ill are on the increase. Last year, there were 20 lightening attacks, the name given to the mentally ill, attacking a stranger, completely at random. One such case was, Christina Edkins, a 16 year old schoolgirl, who was stabbed to death on a bus on her way to school, by a stranger with mental issue’s. This young girl did not receive an iota of the attention and outpouring of fake grief, we have seen for Jo Cox.
Any person who can slice up a 16 year old child on her way to school is mentally deranged. Likewise, a man who could blast a young mother in the head.
There are many factors that contributed to the killing of Jo Cox. If anyone seriously suggests that the Far Right can be so influential that they can inspire a sane, rational human being to blast a young woman in the head, frankly, needs sectioning themselves. However, if mentally ill, those loners can be more susceptible, but susceptible by their very own paranoia that see’s them go searching for something, anything to identify with. What Jo Cox’s killer looked for on the internet, had nothing to do with British nationalism, but everything to do with past history.
Loners who carry out lightening attacks have been failed. Where is the ‘ care in the community’ for vulnerable people with health issue’s that Labour promised in 2009? With every lightening attack, the attacker will have a history of mental health issue’s that are recorded with GP’s and hospitals. It makes Jo Cox’s killer, just as much as a victim as she was.
The ensuing clamour to insist Jo Cox’s murder was political, was not seen in any of the years, previous 20 killings. Yes, she was an MP. Yes, she was a Remain campaigner. Yet, the facts are, she was just another victim of a lightening attack from a mentally disturbed man, who was failed by the NHS.
Jo Cox, received death and rape threats for months before her murder. Apparently, she went to Labour Party HQ with her concerns and following her death, other female MP’s also stated they too, had approached HQ regarding death threats, Jo Cox was killed in the most vulnerable arena of all for an MP. At surgeries, where any member of the public can approach them. Knowing his wife had received months of threats and was frightened, her husband, according to tabloids, was on his laptop at home, baiting Nigel Farage on Twitter, as his wife lay dying in the street,
If Jo Cox was not an MP, she would be just another statistic of lightening attacks. She is only afforded the revolting spectacle of grief, because it had a political agenda, and that political agenda was not from the far right.
It was from her very own people.
Folkvar
- Edit
One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.
I will take issue with this point in the article:
‘Had he been a member of a white nationalist political party or campaign group, and had he found expression through the activities of such a group, he may well have felt otherwise’
Probably not because nationalists organisations have achieved nothing whatsoever (let’s not sugar coat it) so desperation takes over. There’ll likely be more like this man in future as the situation continues to get worse, although probably not many more as most have already conceded defeat.