It is now more than two weeks since Donald Trump was elected to become the next President of the United States and during that period there has understandably been much rejoicing among nationalist, traditionalist conservative and radical right-wing circles. If he is to be believed, Donald Trump does show great promise and his presidency may well represent a watershed moment in the history of our people.
A notable feature of Trump’s period as President-elect, apart from the predictable wailing and gnashing of teeth on the part of the liberal-left, has been statements made by the Trump camp ostensibly to reassure the out-going president and others who may have been alarmed by the changing tide of politics, that there is no need to be fearful and that all will be well.
Donald Trump began by expressing magnanimity towards Hillary Clinton, stating in his victory speech on 9th November that, “Hillary has worked very long and very hard over a long period of time, and we owe her a major debt of gratitude for her service to our country”. This is the woman that just hours beforehand Trump had described as the most corrupt person ever to contest a presidential election and who is so corrupt, he pledged to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate her with the aim of putting her in jail.
In his victory speech Trump went on, “Now it is time for America to bind the wounds of division, have to get together. To all Republicans and Democrats and independents across this nation, I say it is time for us to come together as one united people.
“It is time. I pledge to every citizen of our land that I will be President for all of Americans, and this is so important to me … ours was not a campaign but rather an incredible and great movement, … a movement comprised of Americans from all races, religions, backgrounds, and beliefs, who want and expect our government to serve the people …”
These statements may be simply high-blown but meaningless platitudes of the kind routinely uttered by all career politicians, but they are not the words of someone who is steeped in and understands the demands of identity politics, and if they are meaningless platitudes, then this departure from the plain speaking that Trump has been applauded for throughout his campaign, is something not to be welcomed.
While am genuinely pleased to witness Trump’s election and while I do believe his campaign, like the Brexit campaign before it, represents a significant change in which White voters are beginning to realise that we can effect political change, and that it may still possible to assert our ethnic interests electorally, I have counselled nationalists not to allow ourselves to become too prematurely jubilant, because Trump has still to prove himself in the arena that counts, in the legislative arena where laws are made and real change effected.
There has been an understandable tendency for memes to be produced lionising Trump and portraying him as a new Caesar or a new Napoleon – the ‘God Emperor’ as one meme I have seen describes him — and like everyone else of our persuasion, I have light-heartedly enjoyed sharing some of these with my friends on social media. However, we must not allow ourselves to prematurely raise our hopes too high until the proof of the pudding is evident. For all his promise, Trump is not a White nationalist and he may yet turn out to be a damp squib from our point of view – he may yet back-peddle on many or all of his campaign promises.
Like Brexit, the Trump revolution is still an unfulfilled promise and all of the institutions of liberal-left hegemony remain in place and will be working overtime to reverse their apparent recent setbacks; to negate the impact of these recent developments; and to deny our nationalist political hopes.
Trump has secured election to the presidency without having previously served in any elected post whatsoever. He may be a very experienced entrepreneur, but he has not served his time as a grass roots political activist, he has not ever demonstrated in the streets nor experienced face-to-face the naked, fanatical hatred of our ruthless enemies.
Throughout his presidential campaign, Donald Trump has been on a steep learning curve, discovering for example, that elements within the Clinton campaign recruited mentally unstable people and fanatical left-wing activists to attend his rallies with the express intention of posing as his supporters and causing violence that could later be used by the media to discredit him. Now that he is President-elect, Trump will be on a steeper learning curve as he engages with other elements of a political establishment that will, if he is the man we hope he is, bitterly resent his presence and his incursions into the sacred citadels of power.
If he is the man we hope he is, many of the people Trump encounters over the next few months will want to see him fail and will do everything in their power to obstruct him and to sabotage his presidency – and some will want to see him dead. It troubles me that Trump has publicly thanked the American secret service for the protection they have afforded him and his family. If he is the man we hope he is, he cannot afford to entrust his physical safety to the hands of people appointed and trained by the existing political establishment. Just think how easy it would be for secret service agents to look the other way at just the precise moment a drug addled schizophrenic (primed by them?) steps forward from the crowd to empty the contents of his Saturday night special into an unsuspecting Trump?
In an earlier article I described the Trump presidency as “the biggest political upset in that country since Lee Harvey Oswald unleashed a bullet from the fifth floor window of the School Book Depository in Dallas, Texas, fifty-three years ago, this month”. We all remember the assassination of JFK, we all remember the subsequent convenient assassinations of Lee Harvey Oswald and Bobby Kennedy to cover the tracks of the malfeasants and to ensure the Kennedy legacy was not revived, and so my cautionary advice here is not unwarranted.
If I were Donald Trump, I would have hired my own private security team many months ago; I would sleep with a loaded pistol under my pillow; and I would not allow the current secret service, or the FBI know my precise whereabouts in advance. Donald Trump needs to rely on his own private security team until such time as he has been able to thoroughly vet the entire secret service and replace any politically suspect individuals who might want to see him dead.
If Donald Trump does not see the need to take these precautions, it should sound warning bells as far as we are concerned, because it will indicate that he is possibly not the man we hope he is.
I have entitled this article, ‘American Pie & The Proof of the Pudding’, and to continue the cookery analogy we can imagine that we are judges in ‘The Great British Bake-off’ and the contestants have been tasked with baking ‘American Pie’.
There are three stages to the competition: the devising of a recipe; the gathering and measuring of the ingredients; and finally the baking of the pie.
So far we have seen many candidates present their recipes and following this the candidates were reduced in number down to a short-list of two. The two final candidates proffered their recipes and one recipe was chosen by our audience as the one they want, and on the basis of that recipe the winner has been decided. However we don’t yet have a pie – we simply have a recipe and a promise that the pie will be baked according to that recipe.
It is right at this stage that we should be excited about the prospect of the forthcoming pie, because the winning recipe would appear to indicate a delicious finished product, but as one of my old bosses used to say, “there’s many a slip twixt cup and lip”, and we must wait while the ingredients are weighed and assembled, and for the cook to finish baking before we make a firm judgement of the kind of politician Donald Trump is.
What worries me at this stage is that while Trump has presented a most enticing recipe and one, the popular vote in support of which, indicates that a majority of Americans still yearn for a decent and wholesome America, the ‘ingredients’ that Trump is assembling following his election do not seem to wholly concur with his stated recipe.
The pledge to prosecute ‘crooked Hillary’ seems to have been forgotten; the much vaunted wall along the border with Mexico and the register of Muslims seem to have been put on the back-burner; and some of the people appointed by Trump to serve within his administration seem to be people who to some extent at least, have previously served the existing corrupt American establishment well in the past, and have paid lip service to the prevailing liberal/multicultural zeitgeist, albeit somewhat unenthusiastically.
Following Trump’s scheduled fifteen-minute meeting with outgoing President Obama, which eventually lasted for over an hour and a half, Trump appeared anxious. One observer, a psychologist, concluded that Trump looked like someone who had just received some very sobering news, and since then Obama has been touring the world reassuring world leaders regarding the forthcoming Trump presidency, and for example stated at a recent Asia-Pacific summit:
“Don’t assume the worst.
“I think it will be important for everybody around the world not to make immediate judgements, but to give this new president-elect a chance, to put their team together, to examine the issues, to determine what their policies will be.
“How you campaign is not always how you govern”.
There is no way of knowing what passed between the President-elect and the out-going President, but this of course brings me back to the caution that I have previously issued, that “it is not what a politician says that is important, it is what a politician does once in power that matters”.
As I have said before, I am old enough to remember the excitement that surrounded the elections of both Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan and I remember the conservative values espoused by both men, yet the way they governed turned out to be rather different from the way they campaigned. They talked the talk, but subsequently failed to walk the walk.
While we can take heart from the election of Donald Trump for the reasons I have explained above — what it tells us about the White electorate in America, we must not become too prematurely celebratory and we must not out of a sense of euphoria sit back on our laurels and neglect the serious work that we are currently engaged in. The proof of the pudding will be in the eating and only time will tell whether the Trump presidency is truly a cause for jubilation.
By Max Musson © 2015
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
Shaun
- Edit
Is Trump the real deal?
I would say yes: but he is a Trumpian.
What do I mean? Well, I think he understands heritage, culture and tradition and how they’re the binding realities for a stable nation. He is, however, the President of a multiracial empire much the same as the Mesopotamian, Hellenic, and Roman Empire of the past. Trump might not like it, but that’s the reality he faces; that’s why he was much more ”ethnocentric” when describing the needs of the ”inner cities” and all the rest of the codewords he used during his presidency.
Is Trump aware, and more importantly, does he care that Whites are facing genocide across the whole world? — Yes. I believe he is aware and he wants to do something about it; I also believe Reegan, Nixon and Eisenhower were in the same position. Time will tell.
All that we can do is support his Presidency in the cultural sphere.
As for Trump’s security? He is no dummy and he has the resources both personal and through the state to keep any wolves from the door, so to speak. Killing someone is a lot more difficult than people think too. Did you know there were Mafia bosses who survived 19 assaination attempts? Dr. Duke has lived with death threats and actual murder attempts for years. Fuck them.
Let’s pray that Trump and the cultural shift that is happening all around the world can bring our people to salvation. I mean pray! Athiests wont get us out of this.
Christabel
- Edit
“….the biggest political upset in that country since Lee Harvey Oswald unleashed a bullet from the fifth floor window of the School Book Depository in Dallas.” ????????
No. Lee Harvey Oswald couldn’t have been on the sixth (not fifth) floor according to the testimony of Victoria Adams who worked in that building. But Mac (Malcolm) Wallace was. He was President Lyndon Johnson’s personal hit man; and there was a fingerprint match. Other shots came from the Grassy Knoll, the Dal-Tax building and from under the drain when the driver, William Greer came to a halt on the instructions of Secret Service Agent Kellerman. A triangulation. Lee Harvey Oswald was exactly what he said he was. A patsy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSTBYUjJ1kw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svtaINWid1o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TU-qNDVRu78
https://jamesfetzer.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/six-jfk-shooters-including-three-tied.html
https://nodisinfo.com/second-assassin-detected-jfk-limo-kellerman/
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Christabel, in the USA, the ground floor of a building is regarded as the first floor and therefore all higher floors are labelled one number higher than they would be in the UK. I am well aware of the various conspiracy theories relating to JFK’s murder, and I have deliberately opted to ignore these for the purposes of this article. The important aspect to focus on is the widespread suspicion among many people that the security services may have been involved in arranging and covering up the murder.
.
My statement that Kennedy was killed by a bullet fired from the fifth floor window, and my warning regarding the untrustworthiness of the security services, therefore remain valid.
Christabel
- Edit
I just found it strange that you would say ‘Oswald fired the shot’. That is all. Especially as you claim to be familiar with the theories. Actually there were three shots fired from the School Book Depository but Oswald could not have fired any of them. Impossible to do in 6 seconds, as has been proved in simulations from expert marksmen.
I urge you to watch this, all 12 segments, I think everyone will find it interesting:-
Max Musson
- Edit
Because it is the generally accepted narrative that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK and none of the conspiracy theories contradicting this can be proven. The shooting happened so many years ago and ‘so much water has passed under the bridge’ that it is futile wasting time arguing the case one way or the other.
.
The rifle allegedly used by Oswald had a bolt action and had a six round magazine. I don’t believe it would be impossible for a skilled marksman to fire three rounds in a period of six seconds. The first round would already be in the breach and after the first shot, Oswald would have had three seconds to operate the bolt action and fire again and a further three seconds to fire a third time.
.
JFK was killed by Oswald or by men including Oswald, who were put up to it by sinister forces that may or may not include the CIA, the Mafia or just plain crazy people, who cares? The important lesson to learn here is that even a US president needs to take personal responsibility for his personal security, especially if he has powerful enemies.
Christabel
- Edit
‘Who cares’? Well you should care. You owe your life to him, as do your grandchildren. JFK averted WWIII by keeping a cool head during the Cuban missile Crisis. Khrushchev turned back his cargo ships and removed his missiles. He appeared to flounder while JFK stood firm.
What’s more, had he lived America would no longer be beholden to the Federal Reserve as JFK had already signed Executive Order 11110. Which LBJ overturned.
You may not believe it impossible for a skilled marksman to fire three rounds in six seconds but you are not a skilled marksman. I would rather believe one who has tried it. You can watch Jesse Ventura, who IS an expert marksman talk about how it couldn’t be done here:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSTBYUjJ1kw
Also, and more to the point, paraffin tests taken while he was in police custody proved that Lee Oswald had not fired a rifle on the day of the assassination.
rerevisionist
- Edit
Christabel, the ‘Cuba missile crisis’ was a Jewish hoax. Castro was a Marrano Jew of Spanish Jew descent. For evidence that ‘nuclear weapons’ are a fraud, see e.g. https://www.nukelies.org — it needs a lot of reading. However, you appear to be right on the Federal Reserve – the only one of the ‘conspiracies’ which turns out to be true.
Max Musson
- Edit
When I say, “who cares?”, I don’t mean literally that I don’t care at all, simply that I don’t care enough, fifty-three years later, to try to make sense of the myriad number of claims and counter claims made by all the various people who have voiced their own little conspiracy theory based around this event. Long ago I realised that the murder of JFK has been so deluged in conflicting conspiracy theories, all based on opinion and inconclusive information, that the truth will probably never be known as to who precisely it was that fired the fatal bullets, and who it was who ordered the killing.
.
All we can know for sure about JFK’s assassination is that lots of bad people wanted JFK dead, and one or more of them got lucky and managed to have him shot and the evidence of their responsibility for that murder, obscured and buried, probably for ever.
.
You will notice how people with a penchant for convoluted conspiracy theories thrive on this kind of fruitless debate. Already we have another commenter, rerevisionist, introducing another two of his pet theories, the allegation that Castro was a secret Jew, and the nuclear weapons hoax? If we keep this conversation going, before the end of the week there will be people talking about the ‘Twin Towers Hoax’, the ‘Moon Landing Hoax’, the Turin Shroud, and God knows what else. None of this however will advance the cause of White racial interest.
.
The plethora of conspiracy theories that have manifest in recent decades exist solely to obscure and discredit the real conspiracies that are taking place, which are far more mundane in nature, but which have relevance to what we do, today and in the future.
.
In comparison with the dire plight of the British people and White people the world over, who killed JFK and why rank at about 996 on my list of the 1,000 most important things to think about. That should put things in perspective for you.
John Murray
- Edit
“who killed JFK and why rank at about 996 on my list of the 1,000 most important things to think about.”
Interesting, Max. If you turn those two 9’s upside down you have “666” which obviously means you’re part of some deep conspiracy now 😉
Sorry, I couldn’t resist that one, Max 😉
In all seriousness though, I agree completely that there are (thanks to the Internet) a plethora of ‘batshit’ conspiracies out there now which do nothing but distract from the task at hand.
It always depresses me just how many of my fellow Nationalists buy in to them and despite many debates with some of them they never seem to learn.
I would suggest that everyone becomes a regular listener of my favourite TRS podcast “The Darwin Digest” which specialises in demolishing a lot of these “beliefs”.
Below are links to three of their recent shows which deal with Cancer, Alternative Medicine and Vaccines:
This week on the Darwin Digest we discuss vaccines and dispel some common myths.
https://radio.therightstuff.biz/2016/10/24/the-darwin-digest-episode-34-vaccines/
This week on the Darwin Digest we have a more relaxed show and we laugh at alternative medicine.
https://radio.therightstuff.biz/2016/11/07/the-darwin-digest-episode-36-alternative-medicine/
This week on the Darwin Digest we cover cancer, what it is, what some of the causes are and some of the pseudoscience of some fake cancer cures.
https://radio.therightstuff.biz/2016/11/28/the-darwin-digest-episode-38-cancer/
Enjoy 😀
John
Christabel
- Edit
Perhaps your message would be better heard by those around you who have always been more concerned with WWII than what is happening today.
I don’t think you have familiarised yourself with theories concerning JFK at all, otherwise you wouldn’t be making statements that they are ‘all’ based on opinion and inconclusive evidence or that ‘Oswald did it’. Certainly the Warren Commission based their findings on this basis. They perpetrated the biggest hoax of the 20th century on the American people and the world. Fortunately the USA House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1979 reversed its earlier report “that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy” and that in terms of scientific evidence, they acknowledged that the existence of a second shooter was supported by acoustic analysis.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Who killed Cock Robin?
“I” said the Sparrow “with my bow and arrow, I killed Cock Robin”!
John Beattie
- Edit
Trump gives us a few months to get ourselves in shape ?
janet mills
- Edit
Chelsea Clinton has been at work for months trying to snooker Ivanka Trump but we know the apple does not fall far from the tree. Lately she is reported to have been campaigning Ivanka to get her daddy not to pursue sending the Clintons to jail. Donald seems to have a soft spot for Chelsea but I am wondering if he has a soft spot in his head for being suckered in and trying to make nice with the wrong people. Here is an example of the Clintons’ buddies and what a bunch of lunatics they are:
https://operationhydrant.com/
Alec Suchi
- Edit
I am not concerned that Mr Trump gave a magnanimous acceptance speech and as he hasn’t been inaugurated yet and thus does not hold the levers of power, it makes sense to speak and act diplomatically.It is unrealistic to expect the bastions of cultural Marxism to fold overnight and a counteroffensive can be expected. Mr Trump has outlined some of his policies during the campaign, and if even 25% are honoured it would represent a significant advancement in the cause. Mr Musson is correct to urge caution and only in tine will we see how matters transpire.But meanwhile let us enjoy the discomfort and moral indignation of the Liberal Left.
Wayne
- Edit
Recent posts from two observers who correctly forecasted Brexit and Trump.
https://philosophyofmetrics.com/the-risk-of-genocide-against-the-liberal-left-freepom/
https://alt-market.com/articles/3067-order-out-of-chaos-the-defeat-of-the-left-comes-with-a-cost
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
We need a clearly identified ideological movement of the “Right” to ensure Trump delivers on his promises. He is only one man in a hostile political environment. Trump can only enact what is politically possible with and within the human material available to him.
The “Alt-Right” had gone somewhere in providing such an ideological powerhouse to drive the political machine forward, but suffered a severe attack of the collywobbles when about five enthusiasts, including the son of a Japanese porn star, applauded Richard Spencer’s speech with a well deserved Roman salute.
Of course the ideological movement to which I refer must steer clear of psychopaths, such as Thomas Mair, who bring any movement into justified disrepute, but it should equally refuse to acquiesce in the lies fed to us over the last 70 years by the mass-media.
RichardJames
- Edit
@John Murray.
Gnothi Seautõn. I’d suggest starting with Jungs work on archetypes but you might find it “batshit”, then again John, there are things that we know and there are things that we don’t know and then, there are the things that we dont know, that we don’t know.
John Murray
- Edit
Hi Richard,
You are correct with your reference to “batshit” 😉
Jung’s teacher was Sigmund Freud!
Also, Jung believed in astrology, spiritualism, telepathy, telekinesis, clairvoyance and ESP. In addition to believing in a number of occult and paranormal notions…..
Obviously I don’t need to look any futher than that 😀
John
RichardJames
- Edit
Hi John,
“Jung’s teacher was Sigmund Freud!”
Irrelevent.
If we are to use the “guilt by association” method as a way to qualify or nullify the work of C.G.Jung then by association the work of Wolfgang Pauli, who also held some strange personal beliefs, is then also “batshit” (your reference not mine.)
To know of something is not the same as to know something.
John Murray
- Edit
Richard, I think the difference here is that Freud was Jung’s “teacher,” which is somewhat different to his “association” with Wolfgang Pauli.
Either way, it was a good chat last night and will speak soon 😉
John
Folkvar
- Edit
Trump is picking up the most poisoned chalice in world history. The world is unofficially bankrupt. The central banks are keeping financial markets alive, they’re the biggest player in town, without them BOOM – the biggest financial collapse in world history.
Trump is a lot like Herbert Hoover who was president during the Great Depression. Hoover had no elected office experience, he was fundamentally a business man, and like Trump, a republican. The damage to the economy was not on Hoover’s watch yet when the financial collapse happened he got the blame by the ignorant masses. He only got one term in office. The republicans were in the political wilderness for decades after. People have no concept of the past, anything that goes wrong must have been caused right then and there by whomever is in control – they’re to blame. Decades of corruption and criminality simply never occurred according to the masses, they occupy cloud cuckoo land in their thinking. This will likely happen with Trump. Even as a businessman I doubt he quite understood how bad the situation really is, few do outside of those of us really paying attention to the financial world.
Trump has appointed a second generation Goldman Sachs Zionists as Treasury Secretary. Either Trump is establishment, wants to keep the Jewish money power on side, is naive, or wants to keep his enemies close. I really don’t know which but they will stand in his way with the financial markets if he doesn’t play ball.
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Folkvar, Many nationalists have elevated their expectations of Trump to a level that cannot be justified. Sure, he has said many things that resonate with us and he has been criticised by all the right people, but he is not an experienced nationalist politician and we would be unwise to view him that way.
.
He has as you say, appointed to high office within his administration many people of dubious provenance and this does not bode well for the future. In fact it is almost certain now that Trump will as an individual politician turn out to be something of a disappointment, because as you say, these people will eventually be in conflict with him and will compromise his administration.
.
The good thing about Trump is that he appears to have embarked on his political career with good intentions and in doing so has dragged the ‘Overton Window’ in our direction, making discussion of identity politics once again respectable, and in this respect his presidency will enable us to advance our cause over the next few years. Not directly because of support from Trump, but because of the socio-political milieu that his election has created, temporarily at least.
.
The key for us is not to be deluded into thinking that Trump personifies our struggle and for us not to sit back and bask in misplaced glory, but to take advantage of the more favourable condition that exist presently and for the foreseeable future, and to win over as many new people to our movement during that period.