By Katana:
I came across some videos of the Australia First Party Conference 2008 recently, including the following video of a speech given by Dr Jim Saleam.
The whole speech is quite enlightening, but the really interesting part is around the twenty-two minute mark:
Dr Saleam says, “And the enemies we face, … you listened to the speakers this morning, … The enemies you face actually has the intention of taking your country off you. In fact he has already done it. Effectively he’s already done it.
“Now this is an enemy that isn’t mucking around here. He’s actually quite serious. He actually intends to do exactly what it is he is doing.
“Some people here, and we have talked about it in private meetings, and this is now an issue of our theory rather than our sociology.
“If you look at the issue of morality and moral evil here, for a moment. And we ask, ‘What is their ultimate aim?’
“Arthur Caldwell, who was a great protagonist of immigration after the Second World War, albeit White immigration, and also a great rearguard fighter between 1966, seven, until his death, ’74, I think Arthur died.
“He said, that they actually intend to open Australia to re-colonisation. That’s the aim. And he said, ‘Don’t believe them when they talk about, oh, a few qualified people coming here. That’s not the aim.’
“He said, ‘I know them!’
“I know what they plan. I know what they think.
“And there’s the old principle, that Arthur Conan Doyle, who wrote Sherlock Holmes, said: ‘That when you eliminate everything (all other possibilities), whatever is left, regardless of how improbable it looks, must be the truth.
“The enemy in Australia actually intends that the White race will disappear off the Australia continent.
“That’s what the enemy wants!
“That’s the scheme. There’s no other possible scheme that makes any sense in terms of what’s being done and how it’s being operated.
“In other words, and let’s put this back into politics, the people who ‘rule’ you, and the people who attempt to ‘fool’ you, actually intend to genocide you.
“And when you get a group of people who intend to do that, … they’re not exactly reasonable.
“You are not dealing … with reasonable people. They appear to be reasonable, but they are not reasonable.”
I wonder who these people could be?
By Katana © 2014
# # # #
Steed
- Edit
I believe that only a minority of people have the cognitive capability (and courage) to see the truth in this. Surf online newspaper comments sections and the prevailing sentiment is “why do our politicians keep making mistakes”. People don’t want to believe the truth – that there are no mistakes. It is all part of a longstanding and carefully crafted agenda. Politicians want us to think that they’re bumbling fools, because that way they receive our forgiveness and mockery rather than our wrath and hatred. Anyone who refuses to see that is of no use.
.
And the fact that our ‘leaders’ are not the bumbling fools people think they are, let alone reasonable, means that we cannot reason with them through playing the political game. Politics and Democracy requires reason, honesty and chivalry. Why would we play Chess with someone who moves the pieces whenever we’re not looking? Why would we play any game with an opponent who rewrites the rules whenever they start to lose? It is folly!
katana
- Edit
Given how corrupt and rigged the system is, the fact is our people are mired in it. To escape these tar-pits of lies requires us to educate each other and build from there. We are in our current position because of decades, or more, of this. But the task is easier than it looks.
Because, we have been “taught” by the liars, against all commonsense, that 2 + 2 = 5.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
But are Australia First popular with the voters, are they getting this?
What is said appears to be true as policies were changed there to favour non white immigration, I think you can trace it to a particular time & person.
The same happened in the US & in Europe, to me it points to a plan, a conspiracy.
frederickdixon
- Edit
But why? Who gains from the dispossession of the white race from its homelands? There may be some who are so riddled with guilt and shame about the supposed crimes of the white race that they could happily envisage its destruction, there may be some who believe that the dispossession of the white race is necessary in the service of the great god Equality. But it is difficult to believe that such unnatural creatures could ever have had the influence to achieve the self-suicide of an entire society. So how, why and who?
PharmaPhil
- Edit
I think you know the answer to that better than I do!
Kradmelder
- Edit
Who is the enemy? The answer is simple: white people. It wasn’t Blacks, Pakistanis, Chinese, Indians, Muslims etc who invaded British shores and forced the UK to accept them. It was White British people who let them in or invited them in. The same with all western Europe. It wasn’t Black people who took South Africa by force. It was White people who handed it over to them in a Whites Only Referendum. It wasn’t non-whites who took over Australia and ended the White Australia policy; it was white Australians.
The important question is not who is the enemy but why are they behaving this way. Why are white people abdicating their countries that they have built up over 100s of years? White people are not inherently traitors to their race or nation, acting in a manner against their own racial interests and volk. So what drives them? The rubbish they are bombarded with in a constant stream through every media pathway. Lift up that rock and you will find Jews, out of all proportion to their numbers in the nation. Behind the ANC, every strategist was a jew. The military wing was headed by a jew (slovo). The ANC freedom charter wasn’t written by Mandela but by Lipman and Bernstein. Every internal anti-apartheid group, from Black Sash to End Conscription Campaign was headed by jews and aimed at undermining white nationalism and their will to resist. It goes on and on.
In Britain, the Millibands, head of Labour and the other former Secretary of State and Commonwealth Affairs. And the media?
In the USA, well the influence of this tribe is self evident. They in effect act in a way of ‘what is good for the jews’, instead of what is good for the nation in which they reside.
What they manipulate white people into doing is far worse than what they do themselves. So the real enemy is the gullibility of white people, swallowing the liberal nonsense they are bombarded with and not questioning why. If white people were to question the motives and ultimate impact of decisions made by those they choose as leaders, white nations would not so quickly have their nations taken from them
katana
- Edit
Kradmelder: March 13, 2014 at 10:32 am wrote:
Who is the enemy? The answer is simple: white people. It wasn’t Blacks, Pakistanis, Chinese, Indians, Muslims etc who invaded British shores and forced the UK to accept them.
…
So what drives them? The rubbish they are bombarded with in a constant stream through every media pathway. Lift up that rock and you will find Jews, out of all proportion to their numbers in the nation. Behind the ANC, every strategist was a jew.
…
What they manipulate white people into doing is far worse than what they do themselves. So the real enemy is the gullibility of white people, swallowing the liberal nonsense they are bombarded with and not questioning why. If white people were to question the motives and ultimate impact of decisions made by those they choose as leaders, white nations would not so quickly have their nations taken from them
———————
Well said Kradmelder, although alternating between blaming Whites and blaming the jews.
Depending on what level of cause and effect you look at you will see different guilty parties. In a superficial sense Whites have “voted in” politicians who support the third world invasion, and as such deserve what they get.
Yet when you look more deeply you will see that jews (along with their witting and un-whitting White collaborators), through their “money power”, have achieved dominance over all the main opinion forming institutions in our societies. From this perch they have brainwashed Whites to commit racial suicide.
Through non-stop propaganda, they have managed to hypnotize White people (mainly through guilt tripping them) so they can be willingly led to their doom.
Kradmelder
- Edit
I agree Katana, yes Jews have been behind much of the liberal message to whites, a message they don’t apply to themselves or Israel. But whites carry a share of the blame as whites chose to accept this message. By choosing to accept some responsibility, we can start to take remedial action at least amongst white people. For example, race mixing is jammed down children’s throats, on TV, etc. The white girl with the black boy is always the ‘cool’ couple on TV shows aimed at teens. My son asked me what happens if he married a black. I told him your kids will be Coloured. He then asked if they married a white? I said they will still be Coloured for all their generations. You will have taken the European ancestry passed down to you, by generations who fought to maintain an identity, and tossed it away. You alone will be responsible for leaving your descendants as rootless Coloureds, no longer of European stock, and will have forfeited all the sacrifices of your forefathers. By such steps you get the future generation to consider their place in a 10 000 year cycle of white people, and their role in the struggle to ensure the survival of their people. In a way, you give the children a vaccine against jewish propaganda. If every white parent did it, white nations would not be falling like dominos.
I am not prepared to have my childen led to their doom. So I take action against it. I have no final control if they chose to go non-white, but I can light up the right path, appeal to their common sense, and as a last resort cast them out of the family and any inheritance so as not to benefit other races. If I don’t play my part, I will be guilty of allowing my children to suffer the fate many of those single mothers with non-white babies have suffered.
frederickdixon
- Edit
Completely agree.
katana
- Edit
Kradmelder
March 13, 2014 at 4:02 pm
I agree Katana, yes Jews have been behind much of the liberal message to whites, a message they don’t apply to themselves or Israel.
But whites carry a share of the blame as whites chose to accept this message. By choosing to accept some responsibility, we can start to take remedial action at least amongst white people.
———————-
Thanks Kradmelder.
Like any victim of crime there’s the issue of partial responsibility on the part of the victim. For example a young woman dressed provocatively wandering about at night in a dangerous part of town; the car owner leaving his keys in the car in the same areas, etc. In other words, “they got what they deserved for being so stupid.” cases.
But the ongoing third world invasion into White countries is a massive crime, tolerated (so far) because it has been preceded by long-term and ongoing psychological warfare. That psychological warfare uses the White sense of altruism to guilt trip us into tolerating this invasion in the cause of not being labeled a “racist, nazi”, etc.
This hidden warfare, the propaganda and consequent brainwashing is pushed non-stop through the hijacked media, education, political institutions, etc., so that commonsense has been turned on its head and now it’s the duty of all to celebrate our own racial destruction.
So I don’t blame the victims, I blame the criminals, since the victims only “crime” has been to follow “socially engineered” norms of behavior dictated by the psychopaths and traitors in power.
Despite the foregoing I kind of agree with your last sentence. Taking some of the blame can act as an extra stimulus. When you finally realize you have been taken to cleaners by master con artists, that sense of having contributing to your situation can add useful fuel to ones rage and “remedial” action.
So I don’t blame the victims, I blame the criminals, since the victims only “crime” has been to follow “socially engineered” norms of behavior dictated by the psychopaths and traitors in power.
Despite the foregoing I kind of agree with your last sentence. Taking some of the blame can act as an extra stimulus. When you finally realize you have been taken to cleaners by master con artists, that sense of having contributing to your situation can add useful fuel to ones rage and “remedial” action.
kradmelder
- Edit
Katana, I guess I am immune to this social engineering because I don’t mind being called a nazi or a racist. Such terms don’t negate my views in any way or make me feel bad. If choosing to mix primarily amongst my race, and only have civil discourse with other races, makes me a racist or nazi, so be it. I harm no other race with such views. I only am an obstacle to those trying to destroy whites by assimilation. I will not be converted into a multiculti, any more than I can be made to believe cancer can be good for you and should be allowed to spread.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
I like the bit about reasonable people, yes they seem reasonable, though they are anything but.
They mean to win & implement their ideas, democracy & choice don’t come into it at all.
Steven
- Edit
Would it not be better to say Zionist or Jewish SUPREMACIST Jews? The leaders of that community have a hypocritical double standard when it comes to what they call ‘racism’. Apparantly, we native Britons are being shockingly ‘racist’ if we show any kind of real ethnic awareness or concern for our ethnic future but if the Israeli government declares (as it has done on numerous occasions) that Israel is the “national homeland of the Jewish people” and that this requires the state of Israel to have very strict immigration controls and tough ethnic requirements for Israeli citizenship so that Jews in Israel remain the huge majority of its population it is just being nationalist.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
Zionism is the only acceptable nationalism in the PC liberal world, anything else is just plain Nazi!