By H. Millard:
What do you think, man, is that a fair question? Haven’t I just set up the premise and the conclusion that Hitler was a saint? Doesn’t it sound as though I just assume that everyone knows he was a saint?
I started this essay with that question because the other day I picked up a book (the title of the book doesn’t matter) and I thought it was supposed to be an objective investigation of Hitler’s values and ethics. See, I’m always interested in values and ethics, because I think we Whites are on the wrong track with universal values and ethics and we need to adopt particularistic values and ethics; meaning we have to start looking out for ourselves alone and not worry about those unlike us. In fact I think every single White should always stay out of the business of non-Whites. Don’t help them. Don’t interfere. Let them live or die as nature and luck would have it. The world to me is White vs. non-White. I always ask: “Is this good for Whites?” If it is, it is good and it is moral. If it isn’t, then it is bad and it is immoral.
Well, anyway, in the very first sentence of the book–in the first four words–the author sets the premise and his conclusion by asking: “Why was Hitler evil?” Then in the next few paragraphs he uses the word “evil” several more times either in front of Hitler’s name or to describe him.
What a stupid way to start such a book. It might have been acceptable to start with something like: “Why do some people say Hitler was evil? Then, the author could go on to define what he means by “evil,” and talk specifically about what type of people say Hitler was evil and why they might say it, and then develop his thesis. Instead, he just assumes that everyone will accept his biased opinion that Hitler was evil and then instead of offering a fair look at Saint Hitler’s values and ethics he just cherry picks various things that fit his prejudice and ignores things that don’t fit. Such a biased value judgment in a book that is supposed to be making a non-emotional and rational investigation of something is absurd and is hardly an unemotional and intellectual look at the subject. It’s just propaganda.
Exactly what is “evil.” The author doesn’t define it. So I will. The simple definition is that evil means “morally bad.” Now there are other definitions, but I don’t want to waste time on an etymological analysis of the term, so I’ll just stick with morally bad. But I will also offer the following definition of “moral”: of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior.
Was it morally bad for Saint Hitler to want to save White people? Nope. Was it morally bad for Saint Hitler to want to consciously help evolution go in the best direction so White people become smarter, healthier and less prone to diseases and afflictions and live longer, happier, more fulfilled lives? Nope. What about the war and all that? That was thrust upon him. He was simply trying to protect Germans who were living in lands that were once part of Germany or adjacent to it and which had large ethnic German populations. And, of course, there were the Communists who wanted war as part of their plan for world domination.
I want to tell you this , man, I think at some time in the future, and it may not be that far off, millions of Whites are going to realize that what Saint Hitler was really about was saving White people from extinction and that he wanted us to evolve ever higher. When all the anti-White propaganda dies, and it will, Whites really may come to think of Hitler as a saint and a savior who was fighting the forces of evil and darkness that were, and which still are, trying to destroy us as a distinct and unique people. Yes, these forces are playing at White genocide. These dark forces won a temporary victory against good in the skirmish that was WWII. And, it really was just a skirmish in the long view of history. Although haters try to paint Saint Hitler as just being for Germans, he was really for all Whites. He was Pan-Whitest or Pan-Aryanist (they mean the same thing).
And, I think Whites will come to realize that Saint Hitler was ahead of his time and was trying to save all Whites from all the attacks on White people by non-Whites. Today, even some of the lowest consciousness Whites can see the war on White people that is raging in every formerly all White but now mixed nations.
So, is it evil to help White people survive? Of course not. And, is it evil to want us to improve? Nope. Is it evil that Saint Hitler was concerned about White people and not other peoples? Nope. Shouldn’t we take care of ourselves and those most like us? Yup. Isn’t that the moral thing to do? Yes. In fact, we Whites have got to get rid of this false universal outlook on humans that lumps us all together as though we’re all the same. That way lies our genocide and extinction. Such a belief is anti-nature, anti-evolution and anti-White. We Whites have to start realizing that we are a different kind of human and we have to want to not only save our differences but increase them. We must diverge more from other types of humans. That is our highest possible destiny, but it requires that we avoid any gene flow from other types of humans in order for the fundamental forces of evolution to work.
Even though evolution never stops and it works whether we know it or not, we are thinking beings, and we now know how much of evolution works. With such knowledge, we are commanded to take charge of our evolution or risk devolution. Having this knowledge puts the responsibility squarely on our shoulders. We can’t ignore it, once we know it. It is a heavy responsibility but it is our responsibility as White people. We must will ourselves forward along an evolutionary trajectory that is best for us alone. We have no responsibility to other kinds of humans. They are our eternal enemies in the gene wars, even if many of our kind and their kind don’t realize it. The gene wars are eternal and they are automatic. They don’t require evil intent. They don’t require any intent at all. Non-Whites can be nice people, they can be friendly, they can be attractive. They can have all good things about them, but it doesn’t matter. In the gene wars, it is an endless battle between different genotypes to be the most numerous type and the dominant type. Good and evil have no part in the discussion on this level. These are terms made up by humans and they do not exist in nature. They are relative. We use them as they relate to our kind and other kinds. We shouldn’t even try to save other peoples, man. They have their destinies and we have ours and we shouldn’t mix or blend them. If we save them, we’re just helping our enemies in the gene wars. It’s nuts. We save them, so they can wipe us out. That makes no logical or moral sense at all. That is evil relative to us.
Our highest destiny is to continue along an exclusively White path biologically, intellectually, spiritually and genetically so that we separate more from other humans and make the next great leap in evolution to full specieshood when we will no longer be able to bear children with non-White humans. That is our nirvana, our enlightenment, and the higher state that we seek, man. It is more than just sitting around cross legged and humming or trying to empty our minds–it is a real and physical change that we will experience and it will be accompanied by a spiritual change as surely as the scent of roses comes from the physical DNA of roses.
Now, not all of our kind will make it, man. I don’t know how many of us will, but those of us who do will be the mothers and fathers of the new species. Arman says we’re going to go through a bottleneck and many of our kind will go extinct–that means many of our family lines will die out–but those of us who get through it will be the progenitors of a new species. And, those few new ones will breed like crazy and they will become a huge population of the New Whites–the ones above our present corrupted and weak seed Whites. Eventually, because this is the way evolution works, the new ones will prove to be better adapted than earlier humans to every niche habitable by humans and they will replace other forms of humans who do not have these adaptations and who will not be able to compete with us. This is how evolution always works–usually blindly–but with us it will be consciously.
Arman says our new ones will look pretty much the same as the best of us now look and he points to ancient Greek and Roman statues as to what he means. He says that most of our changes will be internal and the most important one will be our inability to bear children with other types of humans. This is important because it will stop gene flow and increase the speed of our evolution even more. Remember, evolution never stops.
Arman says in this big leap we will take into full specieshood that we will be more intelligent, more cunning, more sure of ourselves, healthier and have more intuition. He also says that we will live longer and have greater reproductive success because of a higher birthrate than others. He says our skulls will change and be longer and taller to accommodate more brain matter, and that this longer shape of our skulls will be necessary for our women to pass our babies through their birth canals safely since their birth canals and hips won’t change enough to accommodate extremely bulbous skulls. He says that we will be able to walk right by earlier humans on the street and not generally be seen as different. He does say that we will be Whiter and have a different (not unpleasant) odor to us than earlier humans but the odor will usually only be sensed by dogs and other animals with a heightened sense of smell. If our DNA goes through an analysis, it will also show that we are a different species.
Back to Saint Hitler, the Savior of White people. I say again that he actually foresaw or anticipated the war against Whites that is going on in the world today and tried to head it off. He may not have seen it in all of its permutations, but I think he saw the trajectory of it from his position back then.
Look at the mass miscegenation. Look at the attacks and murders of White people in every formerly all White land. Look at the mass immigration of non-Whites to formerly all White lands. Look at the war that is waging against White people by non-White people and look at how weak seed Whites are actually helping dig the graves of their fellow Whites. We are under attack, man. Look at our present low birthrate and look at all the things that work to keep our births down: homosexuality, birth control, abortions, late marriage, celibacy, early deaths, suicide, putting material things over having children, and more. There are forces trying to wipe us Whites out, man, and they have lots of tools to do it.
Saint Hitler saw it coming and tried to stop it. And, those who hate White people have been misleading people about him and his movement ever since. One of the ways they do this is by trying to lump all humans together, so we Whites won’t see ourselves as the different type that we actually are and so we will thus take the part of non-Whites against our own White interests. The apathetic White masses are told to not trust their eyes when they notice that different races look different. They are told not to trust statistics that show different races have different abilities. They are constantly told that race doesn’t exist. Well, in this last regard, the reality is that the so-called major races of humans not only exist, but they are more than races, they are subspecies that are further divided down into races. Thus, there is a White subspecies and we have White races within our subspecies albeit with blurred lines, but generally corresponding to some of our ancient nations. But all non-Jewish Whites are closely related. We are all brothers and sisters and cousins, man. We shouldn’t try to distinguish one group of non-Jewish Whites from another; because we face an external enemy, an enemy that wants to wipe out all non-Jewish Whites, every last one of us.
Look at how the haters of Whites are trying to censor everything about Saint Hitler, man. They are banning books. They are arresting people who tell the truth. They are persecuting people who simply question historical events in the WWII era. It’s nuts that more Whites don’t realize what is going on and demand it be stopped. We are free people, man. We have a natural right to question, to think, to convey our thoughts to others. No one has the right to censor us if we are not calling for harm to ourselves or others. But the haters of White people know that once we shake off the present conditioning and realize who and what we are and that we have a destiny that is one with our DNA and once we start living consciously and intentionally with this destiny in our minds and hearts, that the next time we try to save the planet and our kind, that there will be no stopping us.
You know the story of the lion raised by sheep who thought he was a sheep and acted like a sheep until another lion told him who and what he was, don’t you man? Well that lion that thought he was a sheep is us right now. But I’m telling you that we are lions not sheep.
Another way that we are being attacked is through bedroom genocide. This is miscegenation. It corrupts our White DNA code and turns us into non-Whites. It is assimilation, absorption and extinction. The haters of Whites are using constant PR methods to try to convince us to jump in bed with non-Whites.
See man, we Whites have a right to exist as Whites. We have a right to self-determination as Whites. We have a right to be truly White and to love ourselves for being White. We have a right to love Whiteness. We have a right to our own self-identification and self-determination.
Look, don’t take my word for any of this, and I’m not going to turn this into a book length study, because if you read unbiased books about Hitler and the Nazis and their philosophy and connect up the dots, you’ll learn for yourself what Saint Hitler was all about. He believed in evolution and he wanted Whites to evolve ever higher. Saint Hitler knew that all non-Jewish Whites are related. We are one distinct and unique people by birth no matter what White nationality we are born into.
We don’t need Jews and other non-Whites or even weak seed self-hating Whites who are White on the outside but non-White on the inside telling us what is right and moral and ethical. We don’t need them butting into our affairs and ways. They should butt out. And, we should also practice non-interference in the affairs of those unlike us and be indifferent to them. They should be almost invisible to us. Those who are not our kind should mind their own business and we’ll mind ours. We don’t want to mix with them. We don’t want their diversity. We don’t want their multiculturalism. We have a higher calling and a higher duty. We are following our highest possible destiny which is to evolve along a White trajectory. I believe that If we don’t follow our highest trajectory–our True Path–that humankind will go extinct. It will only survive if we Whites survive. We are the new humankind aborning. We are the new model human, man. We are the future species of humans and we’re now living in one of those transition periods where the old model humans still exist at the same time as us–at least for a time. In a few thousand years when future humans look back, they’ll see that our divergence from other forms of humans made us the one line that led to all future humans while the other forms of humans alive in our present day went extinct. That is the future if we do the right things today to save humankind for extinction. We have a heavy burden on us, man. We are selected for this responsibility of saving humankind through us and one can believe that we are selected by God or one can believe we are selected by nature, and it doesn’t really matter one way or the other to me which of these you believe. I know in my heart that we have this by revelation, man, and it is true.
If Saint Hitler knew as much about evolution and DNA as we know now, he might have handled things differently. For example, instead of sending troops to secure lands full of Germans, he might have just stayed within the borders of Germany and worked to increase the population of Germans to the maximum. Then, when the seams were busting, Germans could simply walk across borders and take over other nations in a democratic manner by becoming citizens of those nations and voting themselves into power. However, in the long view of history, it won’t matter. We are the new humans. We are the future–if we make it so by living consciously and intentionally with our survival, our expansion and our evolution constantly in mind.
By H. Millard © 2014
# # # #
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
I’ve said elsewhere that while fear of being called a ‘Racist’ has led to the rape of our children so too has fear of being called a ‘Nazi’ led to the rape of our civilization. With the Second World War now safely behind us and the alien mass-media more and more desperate to maintain it’s losing battle against the truth we’re now in a position to re-assess the historical value of Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich.
One question about H. Millard’s courageous and apposite article I’d like to ask is when he suggests we allow the Coloured people of the world to fend for themselves. If as he says we Aryans are evolving away from the rest of humanity why, so long as we retain our racial exclusivity, should we feel genetically threatened. I would suggest that it’s as much in the Aryan interest to help regulate what happens to the rest of the world as it is to tame any other part of Nature.
Rerevisionist
- Edit
Very good article; courageous and apposite, as Michael Woodbridge says. I have doubts about speciation: we have long lifespans; but taking a very long view, maybe. As to the rest of the world, Kipling presumably was serious when he wrote of ‘the white man’s burden’. But perhaps he underrated the burden.
Muad'Dib
- Edit
I don’t think you grasp how important a role the Nazi Myth plays in Jewish affairs. Their state, Israel, is paid billions annually by Germany as reparations for the Holocaust – which never occurred. One can gauge how crucial this fiction is felt to be by the shear volume and persistence of films and TV programmes designed to reinforce the mythology pumped out by the Jewish controlled studios. However, the real clincher is the legal situation – you can go to prison for pointing out some inconvenient facts concerning the Nazi ‘death camps.’
They play the victim card brilliantly and of course receive further billions not to mention military technology and equipment from America, which by today is little more than an Israeli puppet.
Rerevisionist
- Edit
Very good point, and very useful reminder. However the actual money made from it is a small proportion of money made from the Fed’s printing of paper, then claiming interest on it. And ditto for central banks around the world. And rents and payments on assets bought from that paper, e.g. in the whole US rental sector. And science frauds, such as the jewish nuke ‘industries’ controversial – see nukelies.org). And profits from weapons, bases, etc. I wish I could provide estimated figures; such is the slow progress of revisionism I don’t really know. Jews have a problem with the holohoax. I suspect they’d prefer to let it drop, with some sort of exit strategy. But how can they?
PharmaPhil
- Edit
If anything the zionist lobby seem to look for new ways to keep the Holocaust alive & relevant to their arguments.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
I think looking at the difference between the treatment of the German & Japanese regimes of WW2 is instructive.
Both were about at the same time & did much the same things if you read the history books.
The Japanese were the ones who got nuclear bombed, it seems they were the bigger threat.
But the US seems to have been more interested in prosecuting Nazis than the Nipponese but there were a lot of notable passes on who got prosecuted.
But then you have the over punishment of Rudolf Hess & his strange death.
Some of it seems to do with who was useful to the US & fighting the Cold War.
Maybe emphasis is placed on the Nazis due to who the perceived victims were & promoting that is still useful to a particular political lobby.
There are still tensions between Japan & China, the Japanese military are becoming stronger & more aggressive.
Rerevisionist
- Edit
In my view, the nuclear bomb myth was made up because Japan was far away and easier to censor. Germans would have laughed at the nuke myth, since they had many firebombed cities which would look the same as a supposedly nuked cities.
Incidentally the ‘rape of Nanking’ seems to have been yet another Jewish atrocity lie (see numerous on-line sites). Japan was of course funded by Jews in the war against Russia (1905 ish); maybe they then turned to China? There’s a hell of a lot still to learn.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Without meaning to be too flippant, I am all for flogging (selling) Adolph’s mummified index finger to further the cause.
Many of the early Christians made fortunes dealing in saintly relics of warriors. Saints Edmund of the English and Saint Ragener of Northampton (Prince, Soldier, Martyr), being just two examples of fighting men turned into martyrs. Both made saintly after death in war to win favour with the populous by the church.
On a lighter note some saints apparently had a remarkable number of bones, close on six million in a few recorded cases. Although some historians now say that the claim of six million is bogus or at the very least grossly exaggerated.
It is also muted that many of the bone relics were, in actual fact, from chickens.
But then again I think taking a great man’s name in vane and profiting in such a crude manner might be perceived as a bit Jewish, unchristian or even blasphemous.
Max Musson
- Edit
I see your talents have been wasted, Walter. You should have made a career as a script writer for Monty Python!
PharmaPhil
- Edit
Thinking about Nazi relics, there was a programme “Dead famous DNA”.
I think the Hitler DNA lead nowhere but the Eva Braun one supposedly proved she was a bit Jewish!
But I think a lot of Europeans probably are difficult to distinguish genetically from Jews with their origins in Europe.
They just claim a difference.
Shaun
- Edit
I would confidently take a DNA test to prove I have no Jewish blood! It’s all English, Scottish, Irish and French Hugonoet in my blood lines. Nothing else.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
I think I may have Huguenot blood too!
PharmaPhil
- Edit
What I’m referring to is that some European Jews claim to be Jews & maybe practice the religion but have no Semitic genes in them.
Some of the zionist lobby claim that all Jews are genetically identifiable as Jews but I don’t think so, then there are the zionists who are not in any way Jewish but serve the cause.
Shaun
- Edit
Jews are an ethnic group of mixed racial composition. I think the Sephardic Jews may even have a bit of negro in them. Although Jews have a lot of European admixture, they cannot be compared to an Aryan.
SerpentSlayer
- Edit
I don’t see what is unchristian about selling the bones of a hero for profit, it sounds very true to Christianity and its origins to me.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
And there was I thinking someone might criticize me for having not mentioning Tannhauser. To do or to not undo; that is the question?
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Grammar Walter!
IRONKRAFT
- Edit
The six million figure, is typically juvenile. It actually represents an ancient religious number, in reference to “victims becoming chosen”.
Max Musson
- Edit
Yes, the six-million figure crops up with monotonous regularity in all sorts of situations. I heard somebody saying that in Britain, six-million wild birds are killed by domestic cats each year. Imagine that!
JP
- Edit
Hitler is a saint. And he’s the only white man worth anything who’s ever walked this earth. Hitler wanted whites to be free and he’s the only white man who has ever taken them on. HH
Valgeir
- Edit
Breed like crazy?
You will never get the good old English or European people to put any kind of madness into regeneration. What has been visible is a considerate attitude which have kept our civilization small and steady. It is the newcomers who have no instinct or plan for their offspring – and look who is coming running into our societies.
Todays population growth in the world looks lethal to our type and we have to come up with a response which can help us from drowning in the new numbers. The first solution lies in finding methods, attitudes and ways to get us stick and hold together. We could survive just by this, if it hadn’t been for the covert war upon us.
We need a new radical family policy! The only attempt to solution so far have been the old nazi idea of baby factories, but it still looks mechanic, cold and inhuman. It is possible to formulate a family policy which we share with our unwanted guests, but i also see that since different cultures have different views on family planning, every religion should have their own well fare system.
But i guess we can’t have that before we have won completely. But to fight for it will expose parasitism in the system.
A solution which will be more tempting for every year going, as the breakdown of the well fare state is greatest progress to be seen, would be to let none on a wellfare program have more than a single kid.
Another interesting look is at Africa. They have said for ages that their population excesses are due to lack of retirement schemes, that their children are a needed part of their wellfare. Such a system could be created here too, but for us. Children paying for their parents retirement. Remember that human resources are still the greatest among resources. To give birth and educate creative children to become well socialized children is actually a economic miracle – in time. Any system including this understanding, even if it was just a little bit, would be evolutionary.
If we don’t create family planning ideologies and solutions for world population expansions, they will be forced upon us, in times of catastrophe, helped by the lack of other plans, by the usual elite, and the solution will of course not be to our advantage, to put it mildly.
Saint Hitler? What a bad joke. That Jesuit agent? Its about time that we understand what has been going on, and that we have to make a our own ideology. To never again be fooled by their agents, to never let Zionists represent us, never let them dream our dreams, for they always turns into nightmares. Geert Wilders reason to be critical of Islam was just his Zionist identity. The safety of Jews in Netherlands. He is as blond as bleaching does it. Wherever types of Geert Wilders class are doing the freedom fight for us, he is taking the place, the attention and votes for our true candidates.
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Geert_Wilders
Brin jenkins
- Edit
Hitler dropped bombs on me and I remember it, the Air Raid siren awakes my memories making my flesh creep still at 78 years. After the conflict was over, the question had been raised of parading this “Monster for public humiliation”. Although only 9 years I was disappointed that he had cheated us, and we never saw his body torn apart by the just mob!
Later on I started to wonder at the relentless anti Hitler rhetoric that still continued for 25, 40, 50, and 60 years afterwards. Is has been relentless and extreme in its bias and I had to wonder why this was. Now of course I see it was to keep all Nationalists suppressed, and out of influence. It’s worked very well with some youngsters knowing little of War time Britain and the history, but all about the evil drug crazed idiot that some how persuaded us into War killing 6 million Jews.
Only a few of us have questioned this, whilst allowing our own nearly complete destruction by our own so called benign political leaders. People are now waking up to our destruction, most will still not put two and two together and ask the burning question of why?
A Pollard
- Edit
H. Millard- What exactly do you define as white? The Ashkenazi Jews being originally from the Khazars who are Aryan and converted to Judaism, and thus not genetically Semitic, how would they not fit into Hitler’s encompassing of the white race? Would you say it is related to political and economical forces at the time that separated them, even though they are white?
Again, playing the devils advocate, why were Hitler, Himmler and Hess obsessed with Tibet, enough so to send an official convey there. There obsession also revolved around the occult, so Saint Hitler is not an appropriate title. Perhaps Shaman Hitler would be more fitting.
Hitler is a fascinating subject and I do agree he has been demonized throughout the west, though not in the middle east. They love him there! Go to Beirut and you will see posters of him hanging next to Che Guevara begging to be purchased for a university student’s wall.
Perhaps if you based your essay on more than one un-nameable book, which you “thought was supposed to be an objective investigation of Hitler’s values and ethics.” Perhaps then with more resources as well as the intellect to know that there is no objective investigation of Hitler’s vales and ethics, only then could you possibly write a compelling article.
Just a few points I thought worth mentioning. Please read below Max Musson’s comments on being white:
Max Musson has elaborated on what it is to be white and white genetics in general below taken from his article on DNA Testing and How White Are You https://www.westernspring.co.uk/dna-testing-how-white-are-you/#comment-99553
“As I keep telling people, because of the recessive nature of White genes, anything more than a truly insignificant level of non-White genetic inheritance will be visible in someone’s physical make-up. Therefore, if someone looks White, with no detectable non-White features, they have nothing to worry about in this respect, irrespective of what their family tree might otherwise suggest.
If we now focus on someone with Jewish ancestry, the first mistake that a genealogist can make is to assume that the Jew in question is a full blooded hereditary Jew and not a Gentile who converted to Judaism, or the son of a Jewish mother and a Gentile father. If we apply the same principles to someone of partially Jewish genealogy, as we did with the mixed race examples involving blacks and Whites above, we can see how someone with a single Jewish ancestor just two generations back might not have inherited any Jewish genes at all. For someone with a single Jewish ancestor ten generations back, the likelihood that they will have any appreciable genetic inheritance from that one ancestor is most unlikely.
.
In the case of Ashkenazi Jews, most of them have resulted from the conversion of the Khazars, who originated from southern Russia just north of the Caucasus Mountains, and then spent several hundred years travelling across Europe with significant intermixture with European populations along the way, before arriving at our shores. The chances of an Ashkenazi Jew found in one’s genealogical record being 100% of Semitic origin is therefore extremely remote.”
Max Musson
- Edit
You state that the Khazars were ‘Aryan’ with a certainty that sets you apart from any serious historian, because one can only speculate as to the precise racial composition of the Khazars. I tend to suspect that they were probably a ‘mixed bag’ with European, Turkic and Semitic influences. With the conversion of the Khazars and the assimilation within their number of a number of proselytising Jews, who would have been of predominantly Turkic and Semitic stock, the original Ashkenazi Jews would have been rather more Turkic/Semitic in character than they are today on average.
.
It is these exotic genetic influences that set Ashkenazi Jews as a group apart from those of us who are of untainted European genetic ancestry, albeit that specific, nominally Jewish individuals may have acquired European genetics to such an extent they are physically indistinguishable from the European populations among whom they live. There does remain also the matter of behavioural characteristics and the degree to which an individual will either because of genetic or cultural influences self-identify as a member of a separate in-group, separate and because of the social dynamics of multiculturalism, inevitably in competition therefore with their European neighbours.
.
Were Hitler, Himmler and Hess “obsessed with Tibet”? The fact that a delegation of archaeologists may have been authorised by the National Socialist government to conduct an expedition to Tibet, in the same way that other expeditions will have been authorised in many other countries, is not evidence of an ‘obsession’.
.
H. Millard makes reference to one book and states, “the title of the book doesn’t matter”, because the book to which he refers is typical of so many books written about Hitler as anyone of an objective disposition examining this subject will be aware.
.
As for the passages that you quote from my earlier article in which I make reference to the significance or otherwise of partial Jewish ancestry, there is nothing within the passages you quote that contradicts my position or that of H. Millard. What therefore is your point?
.
If because of the small amount of ‘Jewish Ashkenazi ancestry’ that supposedly showed up in the DNA tests that you took, you are wondering whether this is significant or should influence the way in which you self-identify, I would be inclined to say not.
.
It is clear from the variation in the four sets of test results that you obtained that these tests are not very accurate and I would therefore take no notice whatsoever of small percentages ‘measured’ that have no impact upon your physical or mental characteristics.
.
You stated previously that from a physical perspective you appear to be a typical German and have predominantly German and Irish ancestry. This is reinforced by the DNA tests that your undertook, albeit that the test results are as I have said, not very accurate.
.
Unless you have knowledge that one of your ancestors within living memory has been a practicing Jew or has self-identified as a Jew, I would discount the indications of remote Jewish ancestry indicated in the DNA test results as simply being the result of errors inherent within the test process and therefore irrelevant.
.
I hope this puts your mind at rest.