A wave of relief swept the nation earlier this week when Prime Minister Theresa May announced that in future, celebration of the life of murdered Black teenager Stephen Lawrence and the mourning of his death would be centred around just one day a year — the 22nd April each year.
As the 25th anniversary of his death passed, it had been feared that government ministers, Royalty and other establishment toadies, already knelt in fawning genuflection were planning to atone further for the murder of the Black teenager by announcing something truly mind-bogglingly inappropriate, misplaced, tasteless or surreal.
It is after all conceivable in the current political climate that Prince William and Kate might announce that their new son is be named, ‘Stephen Doreen Neville Lawrence Cambridge’ in honour of the murdered teenager, something that could be seen as a great honour in some quarters but which would be gauche, completely cringe-worthy and inappropriate.
Don’t get me wrong, I can appreciate the grief that Doreen and Neville Lawrence have experienced over the senseless murder of their son and I have no wish to offend them. It is always a tragedy when an innocent young life is cut short and I take no pleasure in criticising the announcement made by Theresa May earlier this week, but someone needs to point out the wholly disproportionate and counterproductive attention paid to the murder of Stephen Lawrence compared to the equally tragic racist murders of dozens of young White people throughout this country over recent decades. A disproportionate treatment that is provoking a growing resentment among the indigenous British and which is damaging race relations rather than healing division.
Stephen Lawrence is not the only young person to have been murdered by a racist gang, he is one among many, but the factor which sets him apart is not the heinous nature of his death, nor the bungling investigation of the Metropolitan Police that followed. The police bungling of major investigations is not an uncommon event nowadays.
What sets the racist murder of Stephen Lawrence apart from all of the other victims of racist murder is that Stephen Lawrence was Black and his murder has subsequently been politicised and raised to the status of a cause celebre by the Labour government of Tony Blair, commissioning the MacPherson Enquiry in 1997, and thereafter weaponising the murder as a means of promoting multiracialism and of suppressing and denigrating the legitimate protests of the British people against the growing flood of non-White immigration into this country.
I don’t know of any other family of the victim of a racist murder, who upon seeking justice has benefitted from so much political support, including their very own public enquiry.
Even so, great credit is due Stephen Lawrence’s parents, who did not give up hope of justice when the initial police enquiry failed, but since then they have benefitted from legal representation by socialist lawyer Michael Mansfield QC. Doreen Lawrence was a bank employee and her husband Neville was a plasterer and it is unlikely that a working class couple such as they were would be able to afford the services of a QC. I could be wrong, but Michael Mansfield must either have acted for them on a pro-bono basis, must have acted for them on very reduced ‘mates rates’, or had his considerable fees as a QC paid for by some other generous benefactor.
Also in 1997 the Editor of the Daily Mail, Paul Dacre chose to publish a front page article naming the chief suspects in the Lawrence case under the headline, “Murderers”. When before or since has a major national newspaper risked a libel suit so spectacularly as this in order to secure justice for the family if a White victim of a racist murder?
The MacPherson Report commission by Labour was published in 1999 blaming the Metropolitan Police for bungling the murder enquiry and accusing the police of institutional racism. This latter accusation was ludicrous when one considers the abject terror that fills the hearts of any police officer at the mere suggestion of racism on their part, but it was enough to prompt and panic the Metropolitan police into paying Doreen and Neville Lawrence £320,000 in compensation for negligence.
In 2003 Doreen Lawrence was awarded the OBE for services to community relations; in July 2012 she was invited to take part in the Olympics opening ceremony; in October 2012, she received a Lifetime Achievement Award at the 14th Pride of Britain Awards; in April 2014, she was named ‘Britain’s most influential woman’ in the BBC Woman’s Hour Power List 2014; in May 2014, Lawrence was awarded the Grassroot Diplomat Initiative Award; she was elevated to the peerage as a Baroness in September 2013 and now sits on the Labour benches in the House of Lords; she has been awarded honorary doctorates from the Open University and the University of West London, and became Chancellor of De Montfort University in Leicester in 2016.
All of this sets Doreen Lawrence apart from the dozens of grieving White mothers whose children have died in racist murders, and now to further exacerbate this glaring disparity in terms of the way that those in authority have treated these racist murders, we are to have a special day of the year dedicated to the memory of Stephen Lawrence — as if his memory is not currently invoked often enough! Of course Doreen Lawrence cannot be blamed for this, but a glaring disparity exists and this must be a cause of embarrassment to her.
I do not believe that we should have a multiracial society in this country. Britain should be for the British and those of West Indian and other non-White extraction should be encouraged to return to their lands of ethnic origin. However this belief does not harden me to the tragedy that Stephen Lawrence’s murder undoubtedly was for his family and it does not diminish my regard for Doreen Lawrence – she is a grieving mother who has bravely campaigned for justice for her murdered son. She must realise however, that her grief and her son’s murder has long since ceased to be a personal family affair, in that it has been weaponised by those in authority who seek to disarm and dispossess the indigenous British and drive us into extinction, and she must act to distance herself and her son’s memory from that genocide or else be implicated in it and become a legitimate target of criticism.
Our liberal-left establishment claim to be campaigners against racial discrimination, yet where can there be found a more glaring example of racial discrimination than the disproportionate way in which racist murders are dealt with in this country?
For while Doreen and Neville Lawrence have been the recipients of substantial compensation and a multitude of honours, and are feted by Royalty, by government ministers and by celebrities in the chapel at St Martins in the Field, and while their son’s murder has been elevated to a cause celebre and now a day of the year has been officially dedicated to his memory, there are other mothers and fathers throughout this land who have suffered just as grievously but whose lot is not to have their grief so fulsomely and publicly recognised and whose lot is not to have their loss eased by honours and generous financial recompense. Their grief is something that they are destined to suffer in private tearful contemplation, ignored by government, because their children were White and there is no pity for them in the hearts of those who currently rule over us.
The day is coming however when such injustice as this will be righted, because hubris on the scale now displayed by those who celebrate our diminution and who impatiently anticipate the end of our kind cannot be ignored for ever, and just as public indignation at the iniquitous extravagance of the Rumanian dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu was the agent of his downfall, so mounting public indignation at the iniquity of our dispossession will one day bring about a resurgence of national consciousness in which our enemies will be rightfully vanquished!
By Max Musson © 2018
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
Stefan
- Edit
When you look at the gang alleged to have murdered Stephen & the two who were convicted of it, they should have been stopped long before the murder, they were out of control thugs, who probably thought they were untouchable.
Like with a particular form of terrorism, we all pay a price for the nettle not being grasped.
There are obvious solutions to things but the state would rather spread its grasp.
Stefan
- Edit
It is also the fact that time & time again the established order can take an incident & turn it to its advantage or if it can’t, it ignores it.
They cherry pick.
When we do it, we are condemned for racism or stereotyping.
Stefan
- Edit
There have been many premature violent deaths of Black men in this country but there is no equality in the way they are treated.
It seems to hinge on political motives & gain.
cigpapers
- Edit
We’re covering the UK in MULTICULTURALISM IS GENOCIDE stickers
JOIN THE RESISTANCE TO WHITE GENOCIDE
Cigpapers Pro Shop Is Open
https://cigpapers.blog/2016/02/12/cigpapers-pro-shop-is-open/
Dan E
- Edit
Politics is a dry and uninteresting subject to most people in this country, unfortunately for the masses here; the establishment knows this and uses it against its people. They have always known the the British masses are an easily moulded comodidty. The fact is the Svengali effect is exploited to the full, hence the Steven Laurence syndrome will never be done away with. Unless there is some storybook super-hero waiting just out of shot, I think we are done fore.
John Stephens
- Edit
“I think we are done for”. Hovering between bouts of that feeling, and unfathomable highs of potential, I am like two people.
I want to be none of these. I want it all to become like waking up from a nightmare. Sadly, it will take more than the sum of all we have been humiliated with, and physically suffered from.
A start along this road, would be a gathering of various and disparate leaders, in nothing but a genuine, official guise. We cannot win this war, by losing every battle via division, and self-fulfilling defeatist tribalism.
Are there any plans to contact others, and create a united front, and once and for all, attack our attackers?
Max Musson
- Edit
Yes, John, there are such plans.
LJP
- Edit
Sadly, there will be no Nicolae Ceausescu response to our coming ‘liquidation.’ I have said this before, Britain is the only country in Europe where there is no identitarian/nationalist party representating its native population in the affairs of the their country.The reasons are manyfold from a rigged political system to population apathy, and has been discussed here frequently. Where is our FPO Austria, Fidesz, AFD, Lega Norda, Front National? As has been widely reported Marion Marechal-Le Pen is opening an ‘Academy of Political Science’ in Lyon. We know such an establishment would never be permitted here and we know why. The globalists in the political establishment laugh at our feeble attempts at protest us like hyenas. They know they have the white population in this country exactly where they want it. Come election time, the British are the proverbial turkeys voting for an early Christmas.
Albert
- Edit
The Police was undermined by the Scarman report after the Brixton Riots..and destroyed by the Macpherson report after the murder of Steven Lawrence,
At the end of the day we are now all victims of Mass Immigration.
Regarding Doreen Lawrence, thieir is talk of erecting a statue of her in Parlement Square.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
The Stephen Lawrence case has been elevated beyond all justification for politically sinister and cynical reasons, notwithstanding his unfortunate death. Furtherrmore in securing convictions for his murder, “Double Jeopardy” was abolished, namely that a person could not be trialed more than once for the same crime.
The double jeopardy rule had existed for centuries and yet was cynically abolished to ensure that those accused of murdering Stephen Lawrence were convicted, notwithstanding the problematical nature of the evidence which failed to secure convictions in the previous trial.
How is it that Stephen Lawrence’s death is treated as more important then the death of others who had been stabbed to death, not to mention the many numbers of white people who had been murdered by those of an Afro- Carribean ancestry?
Even the least politicised native Briton is aware of such a blatant discrepancy which will further develop cynicism and bitterness.
It is shameful that Stephen Lawrence’s death has been so shamelessly exploited!
Frederick Dixon
- Edit
Excellent Max. Thank you for this.
francis
- Edit
Hi guys, Tony Shell a respectable English Nationalist has a website containing documents explaining how the anti white racism works and how any attempt to resist leads to aggressive counter attacks from the far left. There are four important documents here to read, I suggest everyone reads and downloads them.
If we are to use legal methods we would have to start proceedings using independent Courts in say Poland, Russia or Hungary.
https://www.thisisourland.info
Max Musson
- Edit
Thank you for that link Francis. I found three of the articles written by Tony Shell to be very informative.
francis
- Edit
Thank you
Alec Suchi
- Edit
The significance of the consequences of the death of the black teenager, Stephen Lawrence, has been unravelling over many years, and whereas the ” Progressive” or “Liberal” considers that there is much in the MacPherson report which requires implementing, traditionalists view such considerations with horror.
In order to secure convictions for the murder of SL and following the collapse of the previous trial, a law which had stood for over 800 years had been abolished for politically expedient reasons! That is the Double Jeopardy rule was abolished which prevented a person from being re- trialed for the same offence after having been acquitted or found to be not guilty.During the retrial the strict laws of evidence were not observed and the two who were found guilty of murder were so convicted on unsound legal grounds, permitted for political expediency.
The MacPherson report stated that the Police as an organisation was “Institutionally Racist”, and many recommendations were made to address this supposed shortcoming.The significance of such a sensationalist and badly considered observation is that the Police are now reluctant to confront directly the law breaking of the non-white sections of society.who now feel entitled to special considerations and in the interests of community relations to be consulted on matters of policing.
Notwithstanding the unfortunate death of SL and the genuine grief felt by his family, it has been claimed that perhaps he was not the paragon of virtue as had been portrayed but that he was himself a gang member.
It is also noticeable that Stephen Lawrence’s mother had him buried in the Caribbean as she didn’t want him to remain in a “Racist” country but had herself returned and has since taken a seat in the Lords.
Even today there are detectives investigating the crime, 25 years after the original incident, a staggering point to consider when there remains many unsolved murders which should be given priority.
Stephen Lawrence’s murder is being given such prominence to maximise the sense of “White Guilt” felt by the Progressive and it encourages the non-white members of society to further their own interests.
francis
- Edit
Read this. This entire case is an abuse of the process
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/abuse-process
James
- Edit
As with a multitude of other high-level events that have occurred in the UK since the loathsome Tony Blair took office, I have always felt a strong sense of suspicion about what is reported to have happened to Stephen Lawrence. I don’t doubt there was a murder, but such is the enormity of attention given to this individual case from the political world that I wonder who the murderers really were, or what was their real motivation.
There seems to be nothing natural about the behaviour of those who have, as Max words it perfectly, ‘weaponized’ the death of this young man. His death is being used as a powerful shame-beating-stick against nationalism, to the extent it became indecent and disrespectful to Lawrence himself years ago.
I’m reminded of the very strange murder of Jo Cox – within a very short time, the media had a full background description of the suspect: inspecting his house with cameras and we had a BBC reporter shuffling through his sitting room, showing ‘Nazi’ books on his shelf, etc. It was like nothing I’d seen before. I seem to remember this happened even before his first court appearance. But most importantly, there has never been more than two/three photos of this man who was convicted of killing her. It’s like he was a thing of fantasy, the perfect suspect to push an agenda against nationalism.
Again, like Stephen Lawrence, I don’t dispute that he was murdered, I just don’t believe what we’re being told by a gross criminal media in collusion with a political establishment who, now quite openly, seek to replace us as an entire race and they use these tragedies to push us towards accepting our fate in silence.
Max Musson
- Edit
I don’t think we should speculate further when there is such a great wealth of obvious conspiratorial activity taking place before our very eyes. I think as far as Stephen Lawrence and Jo Cox were concerned, they were convenient ‘collateral damage’ that was always anticipated as an inevitable consequence of the programme of race replacement and White genocide planned by the establishment. Sooner or later it was inevitable that an innocent Black youth would be murdered by a plausibly racist White gang, and sooner of later it was inevitable that an ostensibly innocent female MP would be murdered by a plausibly racist loner — Stephen Lawrence and Jo Cox just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
.
Given that such murders were inevitable in the heightened state of inter-racial tension that ‘the Great Replacement’ has created, it was simply a matter of the authorities and the media seizing upon them and turning them into a weaponised cause celebre.
francis
- Edit
I would like to advise readers here that the entire trials of Dobson and Norris were abuses of the legal process.
Firstly a tourest took a photograph of a black man stabbing another black man at the site and scene and time where Lawrence was murdered. The photo was printed shortly after the murder. This was therefore a black on black murder, drug turf war motivated.
Secondly the witnesses were all black, none white and would have normally intervened if the attack was indeed racially motivated.
Thirdly the witnesses statements are either inconsistent or unreliable and none identified either Dobson or Norris as the attacker. It is most likely that the witnesses were either bribed or blackmailed into prividing false statements saying that the attackers were white when they were infact black. These false testimonies misled the Police for decades and no one saw it.
Fourth the Double Jeopardy rule introduced AFTER Dobson and Norris were acquitted years before and it is unfair and abuse if the process to introduce for that particular case.
Fifth. The alleged blood on the defendant’s jackets was not found during the first investigation. Someone working in the forensic lab or Police has purposely placed blood on the defendants jackets in order to secure a conviction.
Max Musson
- Edit
Francis, there are undoubtedly many unsatisfactory aspects of this case: the abolition of double-jeopardy; the front-page Daily Mail articles ensuring that it was impossible for the accused to receive a fair trial, the decades long police harassment of the accused, the political pressure etcetera; and the convenient way in which a single microscopic bead of blood was allegedly discovered on just one article of clothing so many years after that article of clothing was first taken into police possession, and after it would have been examined many times creating a very real danger of cross-contamination; all of these factors give one cause to feel uncomfortable with the convictions and to question their moral basis.
.
Never-the-less, we should avoid further speculation, especially to the extent of claiming deliberate widespread police fabrication of and concealment of evidence and particularly to the extent of denigrating the reputation of Stephen Lawrence. There is no way of proving such things and under the current regime there is no court that will entertain a retrial, and such wild speculation simply makes it easier for our enemies to paint us as odd-ball conspiracy theorists. So, let’s stick to what we can clearly demonstrate.
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
Francis, much as such legal outcomes can be frustrating, I think that it is important that we do not become bogged down in retrospective analyses of trials at which we were not present and have not heard all of the evidence or submissions. Straying into the area of abuse of process, which is a specialist topic within criminal litigation, is particularly futile.
Equally, we should not make a fetish of the law – it does not offer us a route out of our predicament. Our struggle is political, and we should restrict our efforts to developing our political analysis, theory, organisation and practice to the point where we can change our circumstances.
francis
- Edit
I agree this case is not worth going into any further, but it does show the corrupt nature of our judiciary.
Google “Solicitors From Hell” and there are plenty of horror stories about solicitor negligence and incompetance
francis
- Edit
Max. I agree we cannot allow ourselves to be distracted by the flaws in this case. I only wanted to point out the procedural defects and the deliberate ignoring of evidence on the part of the CPS in the case. As far as I am concerned Dobson and Norris have exhausted the UK courts systems so no doubt they will take their case to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. They tries an appeal in November and got turned down again so they are not giving up.
I do agree however that this matter should now be closed until further developments unfold.
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
Francis, it is not the role of the prosecution to put exculpatory evidence before the jury – that is the role of the defence. It is the Crown’s prerogative to put its case to a jury as it sees fit, and the defence’s role to undermine the prosecution case so as to bring about reasonable doubt in that case. Insofar as exculpatory evidence was not put before the jury, that is the fault of the defence alone.
francis
- Edit
True but lawyers are supposed to determine if the other sides argument has any validity. It is their duty to the Court that matters first, not their clients.
The case is now very likely going to go to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg following the defendant’s failed appeals in December.
francis
- Edit
Following Dobson and Norris’s recently failed appeals in December, there is no question now that they have exhausted the British legal systems remedies.
They will now be able to the their cases to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg but like former BNP councillor Arthur Redfearn could be waiting up to five years to get a hearing.
I predict that the European Court of Human Rights will overturn their convictions and we see a huge backlash against the CPS, Police and MSM as a result of their chicanery.
Marie Kasaz
- Edit
Hi Francis, do you know if they are going to appeal?
LJP
- Edit
It doesn’t require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires to people’s minds.
Sam Adams (1722 – 1803)