By H. Millard:
It seems that Whites suffer more than other races from a neurotic need to mother and save the world.*
These pathetic Pathological White Altruists–I call them Great White Mothers and Great White Fathers–hide their neurotic savior fantasies behind do-goodism which is then praised by their fellow neurotics. Their efforts always eventually bring contempt, disgust and hatred from those they try to save.
These creeps will drive right over White people who need help to help anyone who is not White and this is a clue to their neurosis. But, when you see glowing reports of their do-goodism in the newspapers, the newspaper will often try to feature that odd White person who needs help.
The sane way to help people is to have an appropriate level of rational compassion but to mostly leave them alone and let them fend for themselves. Be indifferent and do not interfere in their ways. When Pathological White Altruists barge in with gifts, these gifts always come with religious or cultural or psycho/social strings that in some way forces those helped to conform to White sensibilities or in some way makes things worse in the long run.
Consider all the White efforts to feed people in Africa “to stop suffering.” What is the result? The number of births increases and next year there are more to feed–so there is even more suffering. Then, the food aid is increased–which increases the birthrate and there is even more suffering the year after that. Soon there are even more millions who are born who are suffering and the food aid must be increased again. It never ends as long as there is food and aid given. The population will always increase to need as much food and aid as can be obtained. If the food and aid are stopped, the population will decrease. It works for so-called lower animals and it works for humans.
But, of course, with mass transportation the teeming non-White masses don’t have to wait in their homelands to get free food and aid, they can simply move to the lands where the Great White Mothers and Great White Fathers live. And that’s what millions are doing. They don’t bring any benefits to formerly all White lands. They bring crime and disease with them and begin turning those lands into New Africas.
Soon, these once prosperous White lands have huge welfare rolls that are funded on the backs of the ordinary White citizens who must endure not only feeding the immigrants who are not their people, but must also endure the crime and social dysfunction that has been forced on them as a result of the actions of the Great White Mothers and Great White Fathers–who are often internationalists who can simply up and move to safer, more prosperous and still untouched White areas, once they’ve screwed up one formerly White country after another.
The process is one of a rolling dystopia and a plague of humans who despoil a land more than any plague of locusts ever could.
Remember the do-goodist War on Poverty in the U.S.? Has poverty ended? Nope. Why not? Because, the War on Poverty, like all Pathological White Altruist plans, was not based on nature’s ways–including so-called human nature (which should really be plural because there is not one human nature, but many). The premise of the War on Poverty was wrong, and with a wrong premise the resulting failure was entirely foreseeable. It’s the same thing with feeding Africa and with the actions of local Pathological White Altruists in various once all-White and all right nations that are now becoming non-White and not-all right nations.
* This may not be a White (read genetic) characteristic per se, but may actually be a product of a particular religious ideology which is artificial and is simply layered on like a cheap coat of varnish over some Whites who are caught up in the cult like belief that personal “suffering” via altruism is somehow saintly. Add this to the self-shame for being born White that some of these self-hating neurotics carry around and you begin to see a fuller picture of who they are. Whites need to adopt and internalize a belief in non-interference in the affairs of non-Whites and we need to demand that non-Whites not interfere in our affairs.
We might put this in terms similar to this: As the right of each distinct people to live in accordance with its own ways and evolution, and to face whatever fate has in store for them by themselves, and to develop its own philosophies, world views, religions and cultural ways are considered sacred, no Whites may interfere with the fates of non-White peoples, nor may non-White peoples interfere in the fate of White people. Each distinct people is on its own to live or die as fate will have it.
Some of us already follow this philosophy of non-interference and also indifference to non-Whites. They are not our kind and they are not our business so long as they do not harm our kind. We care only about Whites. We know that our self-preservation and the survival of our family lines now and far into the future is helped so long as there are many other Whites who are alive and reproducing more Whites. The more Whites the better, and the death of any pure White, or lack of reproduction by any pure White is a sad day for all Whites. There are too few of us on this dark planet, and we need to make many millions more just like us.
By H. Millard © 2015
# # # #
Brin jenkins
- Edit
The last paragraph sums it all up for me. Harm me or mine, and Mr nice guy is no more.
I deeply resent those perverted tea time TV adverts about saving the Worlds black children, dogs, donkeys, polar bears or anything else with a drip drip demand on our meagre savings. Our own are infinitely more precious to me then the rest of the planet. TV companies need to realise the antagonism building up by their perverted campaigns, they can all go to hell for me.
Like Bono was told at a Scottish concert when he slow clapped his hands saying, “Every time I clap my hand a child dies.” A voice called out from his audience, “So stop the Bloody clapping then”.
TV advertising companies please note. not one penny for your beggars adverts.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
I thought it was all his fault!
Walter Greenway
- Edit
It’s your fault. You left Africa 30,000 years ago without teaching the locals how to dig a water well.
Hadoestabut7745
- Edit
But did they leave Africa? Seems not:
Anatole A. Klyosov, Igor L. Rozhanskii – Re-Examining the “Out of Africa” Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids) in Light of DNA Genealogy
https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566
(Likely the races (i.e. subspecies) of man (including Congoids, Caucasoids) are descended from a common ancestor and not from one “African” originator).
PS: off-topic here but just so you know about it:
Kate Middleton, Duchess of Cambridge, visiting Barlby Primary school, London, with transvestite Grayson Perry (in a dress)
https://i57.tinypic.com/29llbv9.jpg
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2911257/Every-inch-yummy-mummy-Duchess-Cambridge-pretty-navy-meets-arty-children-Grayson-Perry.html
Max Musson
- Edit
Regarding the evolution of the modern races of man, I have long contended that in-so-far as we have a common ancestor, there is no reason to believe that ancestor originated south of the Sahara, i.e. in the African faunal zone, and there is no conclusive evidence therefore that this common ancestor was Negroid.
.
My belief based on skeletal morphology rather than genetic evidence has always been that Homo sapiens sapiens originated in roughly the area indicated by the study you have provided a link to (North Africa and the Middle East and that our common ancestors then migrated outwards in all directions, going south into sub-Saharan Africa where they interbred with vestigial pre-sapiens Negroid populations, eastwards where they interbred with vestigial pre-sapiens Australoid populations and then northwards, where they split into two; one branch migrating eastwards where they interbed with Denisovan and vestigial pre-sapiens orientalid populations; and westwards into the European peninsula where they interbred with the vestigial proto-sapient Homo sapiens neanderthalensis populations.
.
Thank you for the link you provided, I shall study the findings in that paper.
.
Regarding the Duchess of Cambridge story, one has to laugh or one would cry!
Albert
- Edit
The only time I donated money was to the Australian Flood victims a few years ago, Kith & Kin.
In Africa they will not help anyone outside their tribe…..
Shaun
- Edit
H Millard’s concept of pathological altruism rings true if one chooses to observe the sickening behaviour of that creep who brought back Ebola from Africa.
There isn’t anything ”nice” about a person who will step over their own kinsfolk in order to ”play the humanist” to a bunch of non-Whites who have NOTHING to do with us. These people are egotistical, selfish rats, and, to be honest, they’re a disgrace to the White race….
frederickdixon
- Edit
“Remember the do-goodist war on poverty in the US? Has poverty ended? Nope.” Perhaps these do-goodist types, should remember the words of Jesus, “the poor are with you always”.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
The war on drugs or terror seem to have also failed.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
Yes some of our sort are our own worst enemies.
heechee
- Edit
Well I disagree on a point. We have trained millions of Africans in our ways, so now is right the time for some of that liberal altruistic compassion. It is time we donated them all to their original homelands, with their new knowledge, that they may aid their fellows.
I am happy to suffer our loss but glad to have helped. I believe it would even make me feel all warm and fluffy inside
rerevisionist
- Edit
‘Training’ isn’t the same as having deep understanding.