By Frederick Dixon:
Just in case you hadn’t noticed, we have just celebrated the birth of Jesus – or at least enjoyed the Christmas holiday if we happen to be non-Christians. So this is as good a time as any to reflect upon babies, or rather upon the fact that rather too few White British babies are being born.
Until about 1970 our birth rate was running well above the replacement level of 2.1 children per woman; in those days the Daily Express was able to tell us “young couples forgo a new car to have that third baby”. With the end of the baby boom the birth rate slumped to around 1.6 and until very recently remained at that level which, in terms of numbers, means that at the birth rate’s nadir in the 1990s about 500, 000 children were born in England and Wales each year, only half the number born a generation earlier. That is not the end of the story, for while the overall birth rate may have been 1.6 children per woman, it differed wildly from one part of the population to another – if Pakistani women in Britain were averaging 3.6 children (and they were, and are) what could the birth rate have been among White British women? I have never seen that figure, perhaps it would be too alarming.
Since 2000 the birth rate has perked up considerably and is now at about 2.0 per woman, almost back to replacement level. There has been some slight improvement in the White British birth rate due to older women taking the plunge before time finally catches up with them, but the overwhelmingly predominant cause of this increase, as we all know, is the mass immigration of foreigners who are heavily concentrated in the child bearing age groups. The projected increases in our population are due entirely to further immigration and the progeny of immigrants, while the numbers of White British children born is certain to fall because of the on-going drop in the numbers of White British women in their child bearing years. Not only are there fewer White British women in their fertile years but they are having fewer children; it was reported the other day that, while forty years ago 10% of women had no children by the time they reached the cut-off age of 45, today the proportion is 18% and a further 17% have only one child. Forty six per cent of graduate women have no children by the age of forty five. So now we see why, according to the Department for Education, if things continue as they are, White British children will be a minority among under 18s in just 22 years from now.
Yes, it IS depressing, and I’m well aware that a depressing article stuffed full of statistics is the very best way of turning off readers, should there be any who have managed to get this far. Yet for a full understanding of the immediacy of our country’s dire plight there is nothing like cold, hard, statistics, and if anything should persuade us that we must pull out all the stops to save our nation – and to do it now – these are it.
I would not wish to put all of this before you if I could not see a chink of light in the darkness and a great opportunity for our people in the years to come. The late Malcolm Muggeridge once declared that liberalism is a collective death wish, and in the dwindling away of our people we can see the working out of the liberal disease. We see it in mass immigration, in the abortion of 200,000 babies every year, in the disintegration of the family, in race mixing, in the celebration of the “child free” status, in the elevation of career above child bearing, in degenerate and corrupting entertainment, in the schooling and broadcast media which promote all of this.
Yet WE, we racial nationalists can see all of this and so we can stand aloof from it, for racial nationalism, whatever else it may be, is above all a celebration of LIFE and the utter negation of that liberal death wish for which we are the cure. We know that whatever life may throw at us, whatever we may have to go without, the bearing of children in abundance is our greatest achievement, our gift to life, our duty to our race and nation, our duty to our forebears. Those of us who are denied children can still achieve great things for our race and nation through their work for the nationalist community. Thus, as the old society declines into a rotting, raceless chaos our racial nationalist society, multiplying generation by generation, will become our nation REBORN. We already have the ideology of that society – that we must maintain our racial identity free from non-European contamination and that our countries are for ourselves alone – and Western Spring and other groups are forging the sinews of our future community life.
If we have the courage and determination to lay the foundations NOW, our descendants will have what they need to build a new society and a restored country.
By Frederick Dixon © 2015
Albert
- Edit
Somali Woman knock out between 7 to 9 children..sometimes more, Whites are having more children but unfortunately the skilled working class and lower middle class are still not having more than one too two children..and these are the people that we need to have more….but they are the ones who cannot afford children.
Brin jenkins
- Edit
In the 1960’s the Liberals started the “Make love, not War.” It was a very successful campaign heralding in the hippy dropout generation of wasters.
Dennis Healy made his statement in the house, “It is every mans right, to choose not to work, of course he is entitled to draw the dole!” What a time, we all knew it was crackers but never saw where it was leading.
Abortion on demand, marriage breakdowns, womens rights and inflation. It has destroyed our civilisation promoting the over taxed International multi culti mess we see now.
Maurice
- Edit
When Fred Dixon writes of ‘our racial nationalist society, multiplying generation by generation, will become our nation REBORN’ he is indulging in wishful thinking. To create the demographic changes he dreams of would require a change in values and lifestyle for the liberal majority who feel antipathy for ‘racial nationalism’. Therefore, unless they can moderate their rhetoric in order to broaden their appeal, the racial nationalists will always be preaching to the converted amongst the right wing sects.
Currently the public is unaware that sub replacement fertility is a problem in Europe because the subject appears to be taboo for politicians and the media. It requires some major establishment figure to speak out in public on this subject and warn the public of the long term consequences of replacement migration. This is not going to happen because as far as the establishment are concerned the problem of sub replacement fertility has been solved by immigration. Anyway, someone from this kind of background could not say in public that it is the birth rates of whites that are the problem, because that would be racial discrimination.
You have to remember that the majority have been thoroughly imbued with liberal values, amongst which is the belief that everyone is born equal and that at birth we are like a blank slate ready to be formed by our environment. For this liberal majority race is irrelevant, because they believe that nothing of our identity and potential is determined by genetics. Therefore they can see nothing wrong in allowing Third World immigrants to have our children for us. However, when they pass a school yard and see all the black and brown children they may feel uneasy, but such is the power of their conditioning that they do not see this as the symptoms of a crisis. Some of them may discover articles on the internet reporting research that predicts that if current trends continue then by 2066 the majority of people in Britain will be Muslims. You do not have to be ‘racial nationalist’ to find such a profound cultural and demographic change disturbing. Someone who has reached this point will have had their liberal belief system challenged and perhaps be ready to join a movement like PEGIDA in Dresden. The majority of Europeans will never support racial nationalism because there is no scientific evidence to support it and because of their collective guilt over Nazism and colonialism.
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Maurice, you don’t seem to realise that the strategy we advocate is one of forming exclusive racial nationalist communities. Once we have done this, all that remains is that we ensure that our numbers increase through sexual reproduction at a greater than replacement rate and at a greater rate than the immigrant populations. Eventually, over time, we will spread to completely re-occupy or lands.
.
What the majority of the current White British population do will not ultimately affect the outcome. They can eventually choose to join us, once they are reduced to persecuted minority status, or they will become extinct and we will replace them too.
frederickdixon
- Edit
Max is quite right. We must begin with those who already belong to us, perhaps 1% of White Brits, and form us into an organised community with a convincing ideology. Part of that ideology will be, as Max says, reproduction at above replacement level, hopefully well above. Our community must also evangelise, identifying and recruiting those who might be sympathetic, a task which will become easier when we have flourishing groups which can be seen to offer something much better than the decadent, rootless society outside.I’m sorry to say that in time most White Brits will be lost to liberalism, race mixing and wilful childlessness BUT the silver lining is that that is how and why our descendants will have the opportunity to replace them and thus become the nation reborn.
I think that we could take Hassidic Jews as a good example of what I have in mind. Jews in general – secularised and leftish – have low birth rates and often “marry out”. Hassidic Jews never marry out and have many children, so that in this country, where the Hassidim comprise 15% of our Jewish population, they have 40% of Jewish children and most Jewish marriages are Hassidic. It has been said that in this century the Hassidim will redefine the meaning of Jewry; it has also been said that throughout history it is always the “extremists” who win in Jewry – it looks like it’s happening again, and that’s because they have both the ideology and the organisation.