I was happily enjoying a solitary lunch in an Italian restaurant the other day (a very nice minestrone as it happens), when my solitude was interrupted by the proprietor wanting to chat – it was a quiet day. Well, you have to be polite so I indulged him even though his English is only marginally better than my Italian. He wanted to talk politics, so having stumbled through Brexit (he’s in favour) and Boris (I’m not in favour) we reached Salvini; “he wanna be next Hitler, he want everyone in black shirts.”
I mumbled something non-committal, but I did think he was being rather unfair to Signor Salvini who, as far as I know, has never expressed homicidal intentions towards the hundreds of thousands of Africans, Arabs, Pakistanis and Afghans imported into Italy by mainly north European “charities”. It is this importation, against the will and without the consent of the Italian people, which both explains the rise of La Lega and renders it absolutely necessary. It is, or should be, obvious that the importation of such people into a settled and civilised country with a low birth rate and a generous welfare state, poses an existential crisis for that country.
I hope I am not being too paranoid when I say that I suspect that those who fund and staff the “charities” are well aware of what they are doing, and will be well content if they accelerate the end of European civilization as we have known it. But why would anyone, most of them Europeans themselves, wish to do so? I can only guess at the workings of the Leftist mindset, but extreme egalitarianism, a sense of guilt about living in rich and comfortable countries, a sense of guilt about colonialism, all presumably play a part in this malignancy. And never underestimate the Leftist capacity for masochism – in their minds we all, White Leftists included, deserve to be punished for our “White privilege”.
Perhaps Salvini will save Italy. If he does he will, indirectly, have gone some way towards saving a large part of Europe. The ultra conservative Law and Justice administration in Poland, Orban’s in Hungary, comparable governments elsewhere in eastern Europe all have either inspired Salvini or drawn inspiration from him. Likewise the rising patriotic movements in western and northern Europe. A rising tide of resistance to mass non-European immigration has been evident for some years, but it was the invasion of 2015 – sponsored by Mrs. Merkel – which gave Right wing populism its recent impetus, and in the process may just have saved the countries of continental Europe, although France (and perhaps Germany, Sweden and the Low Countries) may be too far gone.
So what of Britain? Are we too far gone? Where is our Salvini/Orban? I ask these questions because I was very struck by one curious fact in all the manoeuvring for the Tory succession: amid all the clichés – aspiration, prosperity, growth, openness, deregulation, one nation (a real favourite, that one) and so on and so forth – there was one glaring omission, one huge gap. In describing their aspirations for post-Brexit Britain no-one mentioned immigration. It is a curious omission since everyone knows that had it not been for public concern over excessive levels of immigration we would never have heard of UKIP, there would have been no referendum and no Brexit. Yet since the referendum it has almost completely disappeared from view.
This non-mention of immigration in Tory post-Brexit plans is because the Conservatives are going to dump their pledge to reduce it. It was always the case that the Leave campaign was an uneasy alliance between nationalists (Farage and Co) and globalists (Boris etc.). As it is the globalists who are in government it is their vision of Brexit which is going to be implemented, and that means more immigration. The last member of the cabinet to stick to the pledge, albeit only verbally, was Mrs. May but she’s now history.
Now, in just the last few days, the silence has begun to end and we begin to discern the way it is going to go. Boris has often expressed his “enthusiasm for mass immigration” and has reiterated that enthusiasm in a very recent article for the Evening Standard. Hunt has said: “I understand the message of the British people that immigration must be controlled. The only long term solution is to raise the skills of our young people so they can fill the jobs business and the public sector want” – so the desire of the public for a reduction in numbers has been fudged into “control” and the prospect of any such reduction kicked into the long grass. Hunt has also explicitly dropped the pledge to reduce immigration to “tens of thousands”. Meanwhile, the Home Secretary Sajid Javid is designing a post Brexit policy which removes almost all restraint on the importation of “skilled” workers (meaning anyone qualified to A level equivalent) from anywhere in the world. So the number of immigrants in any one year is very likely to increase even beyond its already insane levels, but the sources of immigration will change from Europe to Asia. A spectacular home goal for most of us Leavers!
So where is our Salvini? Our Orban? Could it be Farage? Hard to say, because he doesn’t talk about immigration any more, and his Brexit Party is severely hampered by the first-past-the-post electoral system. But there remains a gap in the political spectrum for a movement of the patriotic right. The public demand for such a movement will revive as soon as people realise that the “establishment” has cheated them of the reduction in immigration which they have expected ever since the 23rd June 2016, and they will note the existence and success of such movements elsewhere in Europe. The gap will be filled because it must be filled.
By Frederick Dixon © 2019
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]# # # #
John Beattie
- Edit
Same ole same ole.
Stefan
- Edit
I don’t have much faith in Nigel Farage, I guess if he gets power, we will see what he does with it,
I would imagine in the run up to the General Election, once Boris fails to deliver Brexit as he doesn’t have the support of Parliament, Nigel will then outline other ideas for when he replaces the Conservative Party.
Though that would be difficult under the FPTP system, PR would favour them.
So I guess Nigel will want PR introduced.
exlib
- Edit
Is everyone in the UK neutral or OK with population replacement?
Max Musson
- Edit
The vast majority are opposed to population replacement, however like the peoples of most other White nations, the indigenous British have largely been cowed into remaining silent for fear of being accused of racism.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
Nigel Farage had said during the recent European elections that there is no longer the concern for immigration as had existed previously and had even argued in the past that immigration would increase from the Commonwealth once the UK had successfully left the EU.Mr Farage is self-serving and has little integrity. He resigned from UKIP and should have vacated his seat as MEP as previously agreed but continued attending the European Parliament as an independent member until heading a new party. He has shown little loyalty. As party leader of UKIP he resented any constraints placed on him by the National Executive, and prefers to lead rather than serve.
I have spoken to several Italians regarding Matteo Salvini and they all expressed reservations. But that could be because the Italians here in the UK may feel themselves vulnerable to anti-immigration sentiments. They perhaps do not realise that opposition to European immigration would only occur if the numbers arriving were unsustainable, whilst opposition to immigration from the Developing World is based on matters of culture, heritage and race.In Italy the Italians would no doubt be more assertive and unequivocal in their support of Signor Salvini.
Si potrebbe dire che Signor Salvini e’ il salvatore d’ Europa! ( we could say that Mr Salvini is the saviour of Europe)
frederick dixon
- Edit
Thank you, Alec. Farage was right to say that public concern about immigration has diminished. It seems to have peaked around 2011, with another pulse in 2015 as a result of the invasion of that year sponsored by Mrs. Merkel, but since the referendum in 2016 public concern has dwindled markedly.
This indicates, I think, that concern is shallowly rooted. It peaks when attention is attracted to the Calais “jungle”, to attempts to storm cross-channel lorries, to disorderly scenes at railway stations in Munich and Vienna and (to a lesser extent) when there are terrorist atrocities. It has now diminished because of the Brexit vote – people think it’s going to be brought under control, by which they mean “reduced”. They may be disappointed – see above, and if they are disappointed there may well be political consequences .
BUT, If immigration is sharply reduced post Brexit, all well and good. But that will present us, as nationalists, with a dilemma. The public will no longer be interested in anti-immigration propaganda. We can still talk about race, but will anyone be listening? See the British Future report 2/7/2019 – those who believe that Englishness is ethnic has fallen from 21%in 2012 to 12% today and among over 65s from 35% to just 16% today!.
The decline in interest in race must be due in large part to the sheer – and ever-increasing – difficulty (and even danger) of getting a fair hearing for any point of view other than those of the Left and of minority interests. Our point of view is never heard by the general public save through hideous misrepresentations in the MSM. We have to apply our minds to reaching a much broader public with our reasoned and moderate racial realism than the already committed who search the internet and come across sites such as this.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
In many ways we should be more concerned with immigration than ever, as the increase in our population rises by 250,000 annually. At the peak of immigration in the early 2000’s the majority was from Europe, including Poland which didn’t pose an existential threat to the native British, but was a matter of accommodating sheer numbers and the demands on infrastructure, housing and services.The one group from Europe which was not well regarded was the “Roma” community who are said to have arrived originally from India over 700 years ago.
As immigration from Europe has been decreasing and some even leaving the country, arrivals from the developing world, including Africa and the Indian sub continent continues unabated. Despite what Farage claims, immigration will remain a major concern as its detrimental effects will become clearer as previously unaffected areas fall to “diversity”.
Civic nationalism has its place to attract a broader base and to encourage those who have only encountered negative views of the cause, but as Frederick states, to extend awareness of racial nationalism to a wider public has proven so difficult. The terms racialism and “racism” are used interchangeably , the later is a default position taken by the left to attack any views considered threatening or dangerous viz a viz their own distorted and absurd world view
The left claim that race does not exist biologically, as it is a mere “social ” construct but accuse their opponents of “racism ” at every turn. They ignore differences in behaviour patterns and mean average intelligence between the races and claim these differences are merely due to “white privilege” and oppression confronting the poorer performing groups. And yet we can see that within forty years the former Rhodesia and in 25 years the Republic of South Africa have been transformed from well organised first world countries to utter squalor and chaos, because of the different peoples running the countries.
However as the left are keen to assert the concept of social construct this should be applied to the notion of gender which is a total contrivance, in contrast to the biologically determined “sex” which is binary.