By Frederick Dixon:
“Lies, damned lies and statistics”; I’m not sure that Disraeli’s famous quote is really fair because figures, if they are accurate and complete, cannot lie. They can though be “spun” to prove that the glass is really half full rather than half empty.
A perfect example of such spinning was to be seen earlier this week when the Telegraph blared that “Britain’s multi-cultural melting pot is gathering speed”.The cause of the excitement? – a study by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) showing that 9% of relationships (two people living together in marriage or co-habitation) at the time of the census in 2011 were “inter-ethnic” compared with 7% ten years earlier.
Given the great increase in the number of foreigners in the country during those ten years such a rise is perhaps not surprising, but what did surprise me is that it is NOT we white Brits who are, to any great extent, being rendered down in “Britain’s multi-cultural melting pot”. I had supposed that as we still make up 80% of the population of England and Wales, the majority of inter-ethnic relationships would involve a White British partner. But when I read the ONS release, rather than relying on the press report, I found that only two-fifths of that 9% involved a White British partner i.e. 3.6% of all relationships.
That was not the only surprise. I had assumed that “inter-ethnic” meant the stereotypical black man/white woman or white man/oriental woman arrangement; but it is not so – in 62% of the inter-ethnic relationships in which one of the parties is White British, the other party IS ALSO WHITE, i.e “White Other” or “White Irish”. “White Other” means of any European origin and so includes white English speaking people of British descent who happen to be Australians, Americans etc.
So the total percentage of all relationships in England and Wales which involves a White British partner and a non-White partner is 1.4%. Is this also the proportion of mixed race births in which one of the parents is White British? It seems logical to suppose so.
These figures are counter-intuitive; we notice inter-ethnic couples where one of the couple is white, we don’t notice couples where one is black and the other mixed race, or where one is Indian and the other is “Other Asian”, so we assume that White/ Non White relationships are more common than is in fact the case. But there is another reason why we find these statistics surprising; we are constantly encouraged by the media to believe that we are heading helter-skelter and irreversibly to a mixed race society with mixed race relationships and mixed race individuals appearing in newspapers, on television screens and in advertisements out of all proportion to their true presence. The purpose of this is to habituate us to race mixing and to induce despair on the Right.
We can see from these figures that there is no cause for despair. Equally, though, there is absolutely no cause for complacency – although race mixing is still at a fairly low level, it is increasing, it is promoted by the State and it will destroy our identity if it is not halted.
By Frederick Dixon © 2014
# # # #
Malachi Martin
- Edit
Sadly, that 1.4% will bred more vigorously than white/white combinations, for reasons I have never been able to work out. The answer probably lies somewhere in the articles posted here in the past. But I did find this information uplifting.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
It’s also worth pointing out, media brainwashing aside, that many of the ‘metro-sexual’ mixed race couples we see around are no more likely to produce progeny than their homosexual compeers. Nevertheless, whilst normality still occupies the commanding heights I think it essential, given the failure of the Christian churches to provide the requisite moral leadership, that we evolve an ethical system which will sustain our racial identity.
As Mr. Dixon points out, we can not afford to be complacent. A few years ago I was at a British National Party seminar where the Party leader tried to reassure us that just a little ‘Salt in the soup’ wouldn’t destroy us. When I pointed out that what might not make too much difference in the grander scheme of things was nonetheless a personal tragedy for those families involved, he replied that I was into skull measuring and so forth. I must confess I was flattered to think he knew me so well.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
Perhaps he didn’t want you too close to his head!
PharmaPhil
- Edit
As I said elsewhere, I have come across a reasonable amount of white women who turn out to be Polish & have mixed race children.
I saw a particularly sickly looking child in Southampton awhile back of this sort.
Shaun
- Edit
It isn’t natural for people to have mixed-race children; so only the most twisted, sadistic people will produce mongrel offspring. Study after study proves that mongrels have vast, irredeemable identity problems. Any ”parent” who would expose this often cruel world to that form of torment needs serious help.
It’s good news that most of our people aren’t that mixed-up by Zio-propoganda that they are prepared to lumber the next gerneration of children with the despiar of being mixed-race. Do I feel sorry for mixed-race people? Yes! Do I think we should make these pitiful specimins feel better by jumping into the melting pot? No!
If you’re mixed-race, you have a very good reason to hate your parents….
BritishActivism
- Edit
It is nice to have some sparks of good news. If I had merely seen the newspapers and the headlines on TV, I would have just assumed likewise to what the author did, got more resigned to the fate, and so on. So yeah, it is good to know the proper breakdown of the figures.
.
Caution does have to be applied to these kinds of media stories though. There was one the other week about the ‘reversal’ of multiculturalism or something. They wheeled out Trevor Phillips and some others to pine over the results of a study that showed people drifting back apart and that people in larger cities were ‘retreating’ into groups that tended to comprise of similar race and class.
.
On the face of it, it would be good news – but some nationalist comments I saw said “the youth are finally waking up”…….but sadly, no, they are not. Not really. Just because there tends to be societal in groups and out groups, trends, birds of a feather sticking together, does not necessarily mean they are consciously and purposefully avoiding others and taking up our positions. Fortunately, I think it all does help in the long run, but we ought to not delude ourselves that there is some racial backlash in the making.
.
Likewise with these results. I bet the low figures are more due to trends, societal structures, ‘birds of a feather’, common interests, or whatever, than an out and out principled and ideological position not to ‘mix’.
.
Thankfully, it seems that despite all their efforts to change society, they are not making as big of a gain as we may have thought. They may not (yet) be concious objectors and on our kinds of wavelengths, but I am content enough to try and ensure that these unconscious conditions continue. The best solution is to remove the possibility of ‘chance’ altogether….. but alas, I cannot see that happening now.
.
frederick dixon
- Edit
You are quite right. The relative abstention of White Brits from these relationships is purely down to chance – it is easier for us to meet and marry each other simply because there are many more of us. There is virtually no ideological resistance to inter-ethnic pairings outside of the small minority of the racially conscious, and I suspect that many White Brits even approve of such relationships. That is why the danger remains very much alive and growing (e.g. 60% of mixed race people are in a relationship with White Brits). That is why the work of Western Spring and other nationalist bodies, spreading the word, building our own communities, is so crucial.
Malachi Martin
- Edit
Another point that has a bearing on this subject concerns interracial marriage between white women and black men. From monitoring the New Nation web site it seems that a significant percentage of black men murder their white wives. Not an ideal situation of course, but in the US it may also result in the execution of the murderer. Thus unions in this category can be self-limiting.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Demographics, the present and the future, unless white folk of all European Nations become more determined and end this madness https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FBo0RNPVfs#t=13
meh
- Edit
But many brown spawn are not produced in marriages or even relationships. I live in a fairly white holiday town, and blacks come down from London on their £9 tabloid holidays, impregnate white girls, then leave. Unfortunately in this supposedly 97% white town a significant proportion of my peers have had mixed babies with various ethnic fathers. I’d say about 40% of the babies are not fully white, the same is true of the nearest city. Also, remember that many people who look white are often not fully white. I agree that for some unknown reason, even people with the tiniest amount of non-white heritage seem to be prolific at producing offspring.
Sorry if this sounds pessimistic. I do appreciate the article and am glad that the statistics that the media are peddling aren’t quite what they are making them out to be 🙂
Max Musson
- Edit
We sympathise with your concerns, but we must be positive in our belief that our struggle will end in victory if we are to turn the tide.