by H. Millard:
“Nietzsche got it right, man,” said Homeless Jack “but few understand what he was saying.”
“I TEACH YOU THE SUPERMAN. Man is something that is to be surpassed. What have ye done to surpass man?
All beings hitherto have created something beyond themselves: and ye want to be the ebb of that great tide, and would rather go back to the beast than surpass man?
What is the ape to man? A laughing-stock, a thing of shame. And just the same shall man be to the Superman: a laughing-stock, a thing of shame.
Ye have made your way from the worm to man, and much within you is still worm. Once were ye apes, and even yet man is more of an ape than any of the apes.
Even the wisest among you is only a disharmony and hybrid of plant and phantom. But do I bid you become phantoms or plants?
Lo, I teach you the Superman!
The Superman is the meaning of the earth. Let your will say: The Superman SHALL BE the meaning of the earth!
I conjure you, my brethren, REMAIN TRUE TO THE EARTH, and believe not those who speak unto you of super earthly hopes! Poisoners are they, whether they know it or not.
Despisers of life are they, decaying ones and poisoned ones themselves, of whom the earth is weary: so away with them!
Once blasphemy against God was the greatest blasphemy; but God died, and therewith also those blasphemers. To blaspheme the earth is now the most dreadful sin, and to rate the heart of the unknowable higher than the meaning of the earth!”
Friedrich Nietzsche from ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra’
“Those who believe as I do, man, aren’t here to perfect humans, but to replace them. We’re going to will our specieshood. We don’t look at the past and think that what we Whites did in earlier centuries – our art, our music, our philosophies – are necessarily things to hold up as though they are the essence of our Whiteness. That way lies stagnation.
“No, we look to the future. We say we’re going to will our own evolution, and those of us who do so are going to be the supermen – the new humans – to replace the old, sickly ones, the ones who are now filling old age homes. And, we’re especially going to replace childless Whites who intentionally have not had children and we’re going to replace Whites who practice miscegenation and who pollute our genetic code. I’m talking about conscious evolution. I’m saying we need to start guiding our own evolution instead of just accepting the throw of the dice.
“I say this is completely natural and that we have reached the top of the automatic escalator that took us this far, but now we’re on the platform at the top. There are other automatic escalators nearby, but there are also tools and supplies to build stairs. It’s up to us to choose. So, how do we choose? We have the Teachings to tell us the way. And, the way is to choose the stairs, man, because we can build them the way we want in the direction we want and then we can climb them ourselves, one step at a time going in the right direction.
“Like Alexander, we’re not going to try to untie the Gordian knot and stand around with our fingers up our butts philosophizing about it like the herd – no, we’re going to make our own rules and slash right through that knot, and we’re not going to apologize for living and for being a vital, virile people. We’re tired of the wimpy, bloodless Whites who look like us on the outside but who are weak inside. They are weak seeds, man. They are pathetic sniveling creeps who lack generative power. But, don’t get me wrong, man, we’re not, at least not most of us, boisterous bragging jerks. Yeah, we are vital and forceful, but we are also intelligent and we are clever and we know how to act under all circumstances without compromising our essential bold Whiteness.
“And, while I’m on this subject, man, what about those Whites in the past who painted or composed music? Why do some present day weak seed herd Whites take pride in what those past Whites did? Hell, man, it was just a few individuals who made those paintings and composed that music. And, they were apart from the herd in their days. It wasn’t ‘we’. It wasn’t ‘us’. It was just a few among us. I ask of our present Whites “What are YOU doing, right now? What innovations are you making? How have you stepped out of the herd?” The answer is that most are doing nothing. They are simply conforming to the herd and puffing themselves up because a few Whites did some things in the past. And, these same ones now rail against so called modern art, modern this or modern that. What the friggin’ hell, man -did our kind stop evolving in the 19th Century? Did we stop living?
“Even now, we hear some Whites saying stupid things such as how they’ve decided to not have children because the world is so screwed up or they can’t find a mate who suits them. Those who say such things are not our kind, man. They are weak seeds and they are sickly people who are not full of life, but are full of death. Even the young ones who think this way are old and have one foot in grave. Shun them as you should shun all non-Whites. Tell them to take their sickness and go ride away on their little girly scooters and become extinct lest they infect some of us with their sickly ways.
“And, here’s something else that bugs me, man. What of these other Whites who constantly whine about how ‘they’ or ‘them’ are keeping us down. Screw that. Just compete better, man. When I hear some of our people say such weak things, in my mind I see and hear some sniveling fool who lost a foot race and who then bleats that it just wasn’t fair and that this person would have won but there was competition. “Ohhhh, whiiiiiiiiine, sniff, sniff, it just isn’t fair, I would have won, but there were other runners in the race who ran faster. It’s not fair.” Good grief, get a grip. Compete better and stop whining and don’t expect others to hobble themselves so you can win, you weak seed, bloodless wimps.
“If you want to evolve with us, then you need to survive, expand, evolve, dominate.
“And, each of those words could lead to many chapters about what they mean, but the thing to remember always is that nature screams out to every kind of organism: Survive so you can expand your genetic code and in expanding evolve and fill all possible niches with your particular genetic code so that your particular genetic code dominates in those niches and so fills those niches that it continues to expand to try to fill every niche.
“Our purpose in life, man, to put this in slightly different words, is to make many more like ourselves so our particular genetic code is the winner in the eternal struggle to be and to be more. And, that’s also the same purpose of every other organism. And, therein, is the competition. Know it. Love it. Live it. Compete to win by competing better. Nature doesn’t give any organism a free ride. Losers go extinct. Winners don’t.”
by H. Millard © 2013
# # # #
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Friederich Nietzsche is the key to much of our thinking but we need to view some interpretations of his thinking with caution. We certainly shouldn’t quarrel with Nietzsche’s aspirational side. That mankind is the bridge which leads to the Superman and reflects in philosophical terms the evolutionary theories of Darwin, is just about the most significant point we could make.
However, when Homeless Jack, in his rather ugly American English, pours scorn on humanity he is in danger of slandering vital elements of our Aryan inheritance. As a race we don’t exist as mere individuals, independent of our genetic whole. The American writer Ayn Rand was also a Nietzschean but she used Nietzsche to justify a thoroughly selfish society of “dog eat dog”. In fact Miss Rand’s view of the world has become the backbone of American society and an excuse for the excesses of Capitalism both here under Thatcherism and throughout the world.
It’s only through altruism and the feeling of belonging to a genetic community, it’s only through the heroism engendered by such a feeling that we can raise our sights sufficiently to realise Nietzsche’s vision.
The one
- Edit
Its in our nature to be competitive and to win, you that read this are the result of one sperm out of countless millions that fertilized the female egg at conception.
Also long after a man has grown up and starts a family of his own, just like the lions and other beasts, they are very protective of there young, anything that is a threat to them is dealt with where possible, Any normal parents that is will always want the best for their family. We are built to survive.
frederickdixon
- Edit
I take issue with two things:-
1/ Millard’s dismissal of the great achievements of the whites of the past which, in my view, we should take with us on our journey into the deep future.
2/ Secondly, the evolution of whites, or some of us, into a separate species. It seems to me that the preservation of the racial identity of whites is a sufficient goal in itself, the evolution of whites into a separate species will take hundreds of thousands of years of total separation from all other human types – unless, perhaps, it is proposed to speed up the process artificially by genetic engineering?
Anyway, apart from those quibbles, an excellent and thought inspiring read.
Max Musson
- Edit
In his other essays on this and related topics, Millard asserts that not all White people have the ‘ethnocentric gene’ or ‘racist gene’, and that in the years to come those without that gene will disappear through miscegenation thus creating an evolutionary ‘bottleneck’ and causing speciation. Once all of the xenocentric Whites (i.e. those that are happy to mate with non-Whites) have disappeared, the remaining White people will instinctively avoid miscegenation and while we may still remain interfertile with people of a different ‘race’, we will by definition have become a separate species to the rump of humanity in the same way that a lion is a different species to a tiger.
.
This process could be largely complete within the next 50 years.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
In simple terms Max.
Did I inherit the ‘proud to be racist’ gene from my ancestors rather than it being a mutation or change of neurobiology brought on by life’s experiences to be passed on to future generations.
My thoughts are that I had an advantage given to me at birth but wonder whether it would be a passive or dominant gene that I inherited.
Max Musson
- Edit
I’m afraid I can’t answer your questions for sure, Walter, the existence of a ‘racist gene’ is still a matter of conjecture and an assertion made by H Millard.
.
While some people would appear to have a natural ethnocentricity, despite everything the proponents of multiracialism might do to suppress such behaviour, only time will tell if it does indeed have a genetic cause.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
If a path of selective breeding was embarked upon traits (dominant and passive) could be quite easily recorded over time. Especially if siblings were to be included in the statistics as in the Genus Moet herd for example.
Progeny testing, the use of linear assessment and bell curves etc., the recording of important major or minor traits, also taking into account Mendel’s Law of heredity, together with modern science could be useful tools to help speed up a change.
However another path could be taken such as that of the Chillingham Cattle where natural selection within an isolated environment has led to the strongest king inheriting the herd in so doing passing on his dominant genes. And the herd as a whole retaining its prehistoric ancestry.
Anglo-Australian Alliance
- Edit
Again, from a pagan, naturally oriented perspective, this whimsical notion of a “racist gene” is fallacious in two respects:
.
1) I do not, nor should we, recognise the meaningless cliche “racism” (but unfortunately many in the Cause do, with an inadvertent sublimation to State-speak, use this term without first apostrophising it –as so most concepts are, and should be, regarded). I don’t recognise “racism” anymore than I recognise “regionalism” (fans at a football match chanting, “you dirty Southern bastards”) or “peopleism” (scorn poured on, say, a Scoucer for the stereotype of being a thief)
.
2) The “racist gene” is nothing but a natural predisposition to a love of one’s own without necessitating a hatred of others.
.
And so we find that Nature decrees that a bias toward our own kind (whether from Whites, Blacks, or…), a “racist gene”, is by definition a natural and therefore virtuous reality that all do, or did, by default espouse.
.
It is only since the Zionist/Communist-inspired “cultural revolution” of the 1960s that we have lost sight of the adherence to Nature –with the grotesque consequences now evident.
.
.
If Nationalists want to fight our enemies with hard facts then they would do well to cite Nature. Nature is absolute and beyond conjecture; it is therefore inarguable.
Steve
- Edit
But how do you make the xenocentric Whites disappear?
Max Musson
- Edit
We don’t need to, they will breed themselves into extinction without any assistance from us.
Robert Wakely
- Edit
It is a big mistake to prepare for the future by dismissing the past achievements of the white race. We need a sound foundation from which to leap into the future and that foundation is our art, music, science, architecture, philosophy and religion of the last few hundred years. That is a truly conservative point of view. Now, not all of the elements of those inventions were good (liberalism, communism), but that is the great thing about History. It’s a testing ground which we can all draw from. We know what does and does not work. I do not believe that any human being, no matter how smart, can abandon the past and just invent the (entire) future. Part of the future, yes. Not the whole. I am quite happy to share in the achievements of my race, even if I am not as smart as those geniuses. After all, they did not do it in a vacuum. They were surrounded and nurtured by my culture.