So who is to blame for the dead of Christchurch? The man who pulled the trigger of course. But apart from him? The media know exactly whom to blame – the “extreme Right” of course ; “neo-Nazi thugs” and White Supremacists involved in some world wide conspiracy of “hate”. The conspiracy of white supremacist hate extends a surprisingly long way – Sky News reports managed to drag in mentions of Tommy Robinson and even Nigel Farage, of UKIP and the Democrats and Veterans Party, complete with film of beer-bellied blokes swathed in the Union Jack at a meeting addressed by Gerald Batten. Compare and contrast with Islamist atrocities where the perpetrators are always an “unrepresentative minority”.
All of which rather misses the point, namely that throughout the West, Left/Liberal elites have inflicted on their populations a deliberate policy of ethnic diversification, carried out – as the great Enoch Powell said many years ago – “against the will and without the consent” of those populations. Did our ruling elites really think that they could commit such wickedness without arousing resistance? Did they really think that if they shut down the legitimate, democratic means of resistance by vilification, by “no-platforming”, by closing bank accounts and social media outlets, by unleashing the Antifa terrorists, that there would not be some who turned to illegitimate means of resistance — to violence?
If that is what they thought, they were ignoring the lessons of history. So if the shooter is the immediate and direct culprit, so our Left/Liberal elite must accept the indirect blame (although of course they won’t) for destroying the peaceful homogeneity of our countries.
In the particular case of New Zealand, in 1951 the population of the country was 92% White (and 8% Maori), and described in the UK as a “British country on the other side of the world”. Now the population of New Zealand is, at best, 72% White and sinking fast under the policy of “diversification” and mass immigration. There is a similar story throughout all countries of European origin, except those who escaped the soft Marxist cultural revolution of the sixties – the source of so many of our woes – because they were in a hard Marxist deep freeze at the time. That is why countries such as Poland and Hungary and even the former East Germany, despite their relative impoverishment, seem so much healthier both ethnically and morally than our own.
Who else is to blame? Militant Islam of course. The carnage in New Zealand is the direct consequence of the horror and bloodshed which militant Islamists have inflicted on their host countries. While mourning the dead of Christchurch let us not forget the dead of the Manchester arena, of London Bridge, of Borough Market, of the 7th July 2005, nor the 22 dead at Charlie Hebdo, the 137 dead at the Bataclan, the 86 dead at Nice. Had it not been for the deliberate “diversification” of our countries neither these tragedies in Europe nor that in New Zealand could have happened. And I have not even mentioned the 4,305 (at least) Christians murdered by Moslems in the Middle East in 2018 alone!
Nor should ordinary non-Islamist Moslems escape all blame, the manifesto of the alleged shooter contains a mention of the defilement of young White girls at Rotherham.
What will be the consequences? It is unlikely that they will be good. Events such as Christchurch prove that unstable characters attracted by violence and the “sinister glamour” of Naziism are not entirely a figment of the Media’s imagination. There will be further calls for the outlawing of “Islamophobia” and further clamp downs on right wing organisations. Reasoned and non-violent racial nationalism such as that of Western Spring will be further tarred with the Neo-Nazi brush. The enemies of the Right will try to do the same to the populist movements on the continent in the hope of stemming the expected populist surge in the forthcoming Euro elections, and they may succeed.
But if anything good does come out of this it will be the ever widening realisation that nations and peoples are happiest and safest when they keep their countries for themselves alone.
By Frederick Dixon © 2019
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
[contact-form to=’[email protected]’ subject=’Membership Enquiry’][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Phone No.’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Postal Address’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Post Code’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Wish to become an Activist, Yes or No?’ type’Activist’ required=’1’/][/contact-form]
# # # #
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
We should also not forget that Muslim deaths at the hands of Muslims, at least so far as reported, already number 368 for the period 1st to 15th March 2019 alone. This should put into context the media treatment of this isolated incident, which is predictably hysterical and pious.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
As Frederick Dixon says, evil begets evil and he mentions the “sinister glamour of Nazism”. However, it’s the Mainstream Media which has fed that “Nazi” glamour to the minds of unstable individuals in the first place. The fake news media are forever trying to confound our natural, human and universal need for Racial Identity with the alleged excesses of Hitler’s Germany.
So, if we’re looking for an ideological culprit upon which to lay the blame for the Christchurch horror, beyond the actions of one lone psychopath, it should be laid firmly at the feet of the Mainstream Media which for the last 80 years have been busily creating our “post truth age”.
John Beattie
- Edit
Many bases are covered by the upsetting ” home run ” . Besides Muslims, I would suspect ANY non-white would now be fearful of the enraged White Man .
Alec Suchi
- Edit
A well argued and balanced article Frederick. Whilst condemning such violent action which may prove counterproductive and will then justify the state to take further repressive measures to counter the supposed threat of the “Far Right”, the reaction to the killings has been predictably self- righteous and hypocritical. When Christians have been regularly murdered in Pakistan, the Middle East and Nigeria, little if anything is reported. Had an equal concern for the suffering of people of different faiths been consistently reported, then some heed could have been given to the current exposure, without dismissing most of it as self -serving hypocrisy.
While we genuinely sympathise with those who were killed in the massacre, our unequivocal contempt need to be reserved for those who will seek to make political capital of it by preaching tolerance ( hope, not hate) and extolling the supposed benefits of diversity and multi- culturalism.
Frederick Dixon
- Edit
Thank you Alec for mentioning the Christians of the East. In my paragraph about the consequences of the Christchurch massacre, I really should have said that it is those ancient native Christian populations that are right in line to be the first, and principal, victims of the almost certain Islamist retaliation.
John Murray
- Edit
The hypocrisy of the liberal media knows no bounds!
When a muslim commits an act of terror the media condemn the attack but then make sure they state that is has nothing to do with Islam.
When a White man does something like this the media do the exact opposite – they condemn the attack and then blame the Far-right and just about anyone with right wing views. They wheel out countless people to discuss the threat of “Far-right” terrorism etc.etc.etc. I even heard someone on Sky News yesterday saying that Donald Trump has blood on his hands! All because the shooter mentioned Mr Trump in his manifesto.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
The present situation following the recent killings may see an extension and acceleration of the so-called “Prevent Programme” to counter “Far-Right” extremism. Special measures will be taken to combat “Islamaphobia” and providing extra security to protect the besieged Muslim community.
We would all welcome genuine action which will make society safer, but it is clear that the recent atrocity will be cynically exploited by those seeking to silence voices critical of “diversity”, Multi-culturalism and mass immigration.As John Murray correctly observes, the action of a lone Islamist is regarded as an isolated event and separate to the teachings of Islam, but a corresponding action by a Caucasian is driven and caused by those upholding “Far-right” sentiments.
It had been reported that somebody had been arrested posting indiscreet views regarding the killings in Christchurch and care needs to be exercised when expressing views not consistent with the values of the Establishment.
Max Musson
- Edit
Care does indeed need to be taken Alec, why as we all know, less than three years ago a couple of tongue in cheek statements by members of a nationalist organisation led to that organisation being proscribed as a terrorist group and several of its ex-members have now been dragged through the courts and subjected to severe prison sentences for their impudence.
Richard Edmonds
- Edit
Evil begets Evil: “So who is to blame for the dead of Christchurch? The man who pulled the trigger of course. But apart from him? The media know exactly whom to blame – the “extreme Right” of course ; “neo-Nazi thugs” and White Supremacists involved in some world wide conspiracy of “hate”. The conspiracy of white supremacist hate extends a surprisingly long way – Sky News reports managed to drag in mentions of Tommy Robinson and even Nigel Farage, of UKIP and the Democrats and Veterans Party, complete with film of beer-bellied blokes swathed in the Union Jack at a meeting addressed by Gerald Batten.”
The System and the System’s media lie, of course. As the great Enoch Powell warned us many years ago – “against the will and without the consent” the System, its media and its politicians are enacting a deliberate policy of destroying our civilisation. From this perspective one can see that “racist” mass-murderers such as the mass-killer in Christchurch, New Zealand, and earlier Anders Brevik in Norway are agents, ancillaries of the System in destroying our civilisation.
Our civilisation will be saved by patriotic men and woman stepping forward into the public and political arena and campaigning to replace the present politicians, who “against the will and without the consent” are destroying our civilisation. The responsibility of all men and women is to protect and safeguard their own community; so that in turn the community may protect and safeguard them. This applies equally to the foreigners whom the criminally irresponsible politicians have invited into Western lands. The foreigners should also want to protect and safeguard the communities they born into, that is, the lands of their origin. This is our understanding as nationalists.
The problems of social alienation and mass-immigration deliberately inflicted on us by the Left/Liberal elites can be rectified and solved by responsible men and women acting in the legitimate interests of their communities. We don’t want mayhem; we don’t want mass-murder and chaos. We want solutions not the destruction of our way of life, hence we condemn one hundred per-cent the wicked and senseless crimes committed by the likes of Anders Brevik and this latest criminal in New Zealand..
JH
- Edit
The police had hardly grabbed the gun from his hand when the Establishment went into overdrive to maximise the political capital. The first response was a knee-jerk reaction for further gun controls – clearly ignoring the (patently obvious) fact that had the mosque worshippers possessed firearms they would have had something with which to defend themselves. These were then followed up by calls for greater internet censorship, and of course, for a ‘global war on racism’, blah, blah, blah.
Such opportunism is despicable.
Terrible though this tragedy undoubtedly is, it should be set in the wider context of the far greater Moslem violence perpetrated against non Moslems (to which your column referred), and which is routinely ignored by the controlled media. Also, to the appalling treatment meted out to many settlers of White European extraction in Africa, Asia etc. in other non-European lands. The MSM is very selective in its indignation here – attacks carried out by Whites on non-Whites in White countries are vehemently condemned, but attacks by non-Whites on Whites in non-White countries are usually either: (a) ignored; (b) excused; (c) encouraged; (d) justified; or (e) even celebrated.
The double standards don’t get more blatant than this. What humbug — what hypocrisy!
The worst thing about an atrocity of this kind is that it plays into the hands of the Establishment and gives it a pretext for even greater repression of legitimate protests against White genocide.
Ultimately, the political elites must shoulder a large measure of responsibility for the current situation – they have done everything in their power to close down democratic debate and peaceful opposition to mass migration. Some young hot heads, sadly and misguidedly, may snap and see no other way of making their grievances known other than through violent means. But what the Establishment sows, it may also reap. As President J F Kennedy once put it, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”
Max Musson
- Edit
Please read my response to John Beattie, our current situation requires us to use lateral thinking, and instead of constantly trying to force our way through or over the roadblock placed in our path electorally, we need to go around that roadblock.
John Beattie
- Edit
The hour is black and we are late. As our Dr. William Luther Pierce said in his Turner Diaries….. ” If we can’t get our people to love us, then we will get them to [redacted]” ?
[ One way or another, we have to break through the ostrich syndrome, or our race is finished (jb). ]
Max Musson
- Edit
No John. In that respect William Pierce was wrong. Terrorism simply takes us down a dead end towards an eventual confrontation with the security services and with the armed might of the state — a confrontation that we cannot win.
.
If some of our people choose to commit ‘bedroom genocide’, then by doing so they demonstrate that they are not fit to survive and by their own actions they will become the last of their genetic line. We must leave them to die off naturally.
.
We must concentrate our outreach on those of our people who have healthy instincts and who want to see our kind survive and proliferate. The model for the successful nationalist organisation of the future is for us to copy tactics of the Mormons and the Jehovah’s Witnesses. Community activism is the way forward. We must build parallel communities that enable us to bypass the ‘road block’ that prevents us from advancing our cause electorally.
Saxon Warrior
- Edit
I notice how the media/ZOG is going overboard with their denunciations of legitimate terns such as: “White Genocide” Fourteen Words” and “Great Replacement” – the system and their lackeys never miss an opportunity to try and link reasonable and popular memes and slogans as somehow connected to extremism! Given (((their))) response to this incident and the Brexit betrayal, I don’t believe these criminals won’t do to preserve their power over us!
Valerian
- Edit
I wonder how many people here have read the shooters manifesto titled ‘The Great Replacement’. I was surprised by how well written it was considering that Brenton failed to graduate from high school and preferred sport to study. I would expect someone like this to produce the quality of writing you see from posters at the Stormfront forum, but my impression is that it was written by a graduate. What we have here is one of the most sophisticated and persuasive piece of political propaganda I have ever seen. It is certainly extremist in the tactics and strategies that it advocates, but in other respects it expresses ideas that are already part of the mainstream. For instance the title of the manifesto was originally the title of a book by the French writer Jean Renaud Gabriel Camus published in 2012. You can read an excellent article about Camus at GrandFacho.com titled ‘Renaud Camus: A Noble Frenchman Speaks’. Similar ideas have been expressed by conservative author Douglas Murray in his book ‘The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam which was acclaimed by philosopher Roger Scruton and Sunday Times journalist Rod Liddle. I seem to remember that excerpts from the book were published in The Sunday Times. It seems to me that Brenton was trying to reach out to the normies because the manifesto demonstrates no obvious influences from National Socialism, so there are no references to race genetics, for instance, which would alienate people for being ‘far right’. Brenton himself does not align himself with the traditional far right, but instead presents himself as being both left wing and right wing just as Renaud Camus does. All in all the manifesto represents a new departure for white nationalists, but it’s ability to change hearts and minds is probably limited because it’s message is vitiated by the horrible atrocity that accompanied it.
Max Musson
- Edit
From what I’ve seen of the manifesto I generally tend to agree with the points you make Valerian, however I would advise our followers not to download a copy of the manifesto and to take your word for it that what you say is true.
.
There is nothing original in the manifesto, nothing that we cannot find elsewhere and as always — as with the ‘Anarchists Cook Book’ and Breivik’s manifesto — the forces of law and order in this country are certain to regard possession of it or it’s presence on anyone’s hard drive as evidence of ‘terrorism’ or ‘terrorist intent’.
Saxon Warrior
- Edit
The only mention of “Jews” is a vague reference to those in Israel – strange for a supposed Ethno-Nationalist! No wonder “some” people think it was some sort of Mossad false flag! Re. the document itself – i thought it was rambling and cliched to be honest!
Max Musson
- Edit
I agree that the sole insignificant mention of Jews does rather make the document look like it may be the product of a false flag operation.
.
Again I would warn against downloading the document because it will almost certainly have tracking cookies attached that will enable malevolent people to draw up a list of probable White nationalists.