Politics

Emily Boughton has a Rant!

131 Views 44

We have today received rude comments posted by a lady named Emily Boughton, who posted in response to the article by H. Millard entitled, “Whites Shouldn’t Be Forced To Live Among Non-Whites“. She is American apparently, and we have assumed that she is quite young and naïve because of the rudeness of the comments and foolishly infantile arguments she has voiced, but so as not to disappoint her we have decided to publish her long diatribe in the form of an exchange of views, which we hope you enjoy.

Fame at last Emily, we hope you enjoy it too!

Emily: Hate to break it to you numpties, actually, I don’t….this is a good thing! But there is only ONE race, the human race. We are not different on the inside at all. We only look (slightly different) on the outside due to genetic mutations depending on our surroundings as we all migrated and settled, and migrated some more.

Colour is a purely superficial thing that means nothing outside of which colours you like to decorate your house with.

WS: Actually Emily, it is you that is wrong. There are very significant differences between the races in terms of external appearance and physical proportions. For example if we were to place a typical indigenous European child within a classroom full of typically African children, it would be child’s play to spot the White child wouldn’t it?

Furthermore, these differences are not just in terms of appearance. There are racial differences in terms of speed, physical strength and stamina, which demonstrate that the differences permeate the entire body, not just the outer surface. How else could one explain the domination of track athletics events by black and African sports people? How else could one explain the domination of swimming events by White competitors?

Lastly, given the fact that the various races have taken many tens of thousands of years to spread across the globe and given that differential evolution had given rise to distinct racial differences in hair type; in hair colour; in the degree of hairiness of people; in skin colour; in eye colour; in the shape and form of the eyelids; in terms of height and physical proportions; in terms of dentition; and in terms of athletic ability, wouldn’t it be unbelievably incredible if the only facet of humanity that failed to undergo any racial differentiation whatsoever was the brain?

Doesn’t it stand to reason that if evolutionary pressures acting upon human beings have been capable of causing some to evolve almost pure white skin, while others have evolved almost completely black skin, that the great likelihood is these pressures will have also caused some racial variation also in terms of intellectual ability and character traits?

Has it not occurred to you that this is why every evolutionary psychologist that has explored this area, has found that there are race differences in intelligence and also in character traits?

Emily: Every single one of us evolved from Africans, and this can be traced back through testing to the very first humans. It is only science, plain and simple.

WS: Every single one of us evolved from the same single celled organisms too. So what?

A lot has happened since our ancestors left Africa, and they have undergone a tremendous amount of differential evolution.

Emily: Violence stems from massive inequality, poverty, segregation and abuse, has nothing whatsoever to do with race. And if I recall, most gun massacres if not all, in America were from white people….

WS: Why is it then that crime rates were lower during the great depression of the 1920s and 30s, than they are now? No one in the West, black or White is as poor as White working class people were then?

Emily: It is also scientific fact that we need to mix races as this lowers our risks for birth defects and disease. The more similar we are, (NOT different) the more we increase our risks for ill health AND lower intelligence. We need genetic differences in order to be healthy.

WS: Genetic defects and vulnerabilities to disease only manifest in populations in which there is a custom of intermarriage with siblings and cousins such that genetic diversity is almost completely eliminated.

Within the White race there is easily enough genetic diversity for our people to remain healthy. After all we have remained relatively free of genetic diseases throughout our 100,000 year history so far.

Within the White race we have people with skin colour ranging from pure white through to pale brown; we have hair colour ranging from platinum blonde, golden blond, strawberry blonde, through auburn, red and all shades of brown to very dark brown; we have eye colour that varies from pale grey-blue through green and hazel to brown. We have short people and tall people, fat people and slim people. We have massive diversity within one race.

The other races have much less diversity. Their hair is almost always black. Their eyes are always brown. Their skin colour ranges from light brown through to black.

We White people don’t need to worry about genetic diversity, but we do need to worry about miscegenation. Race mixing will cause us to disappear because White genes are recessive and that means the mixed racial population that will result from miscegenation will almost invariably have black hair, brown skin and brown eyes and our White diversity will be obliterated.

Emily: Multiculturalism has nothing to do with control. The elite powers that be that rule over all of us assert their control much more easily by divide and conquer. Where were all of you when we learned about the wars????

WS: What you fail to realise though Emily, is that a society can only be ruled by exploiting racial divisions, where different races exist juxtaposed together in the same multiracial society.

This is why the ‘elite powers’ you refer to, allow uncontrolled non-White immigration into European countries, so they can divide and rule the resultant fractured society.

Emily: Fran, you are hysterical, I almost peed my pants laughing at your stupidity! Who built the USA, Australia, New Zealand? Why it was the IMMIGRANT white people that STOLE the land from the native people’s committed genocide on them, brought disease etc and then ravaged the natural resources to near depletion, and now are having to deal with those consequences. If this is intelligence, than god save us all from ‘intelligence.’

WS: You are right Emily, the USA, Australia and New Zealand are the highly developed, high technology societies we see today because WHITE PEOPLE BUILT THEM.

Perhaps White people did take the land from the non-Whites and kill lots of them in the process, but the non-White tribes that existed in those countries used to fight among themselves for the land and they used to kill each other in those struggles, so nothing much changed when the White man arrived except that we were much better at it than them.

Emily: And no, I’m not a white hater. I’m not any race hater because that is wrong. I am a disliker of complete idiocy and immorality as written in this article and most of these comments. I am American, therefore I am a mutt, of many different races. (no such thing as a pure race).

WS: At the beginning of your rant, Emily, you stated that “there is only ONE race, the human race”, but now apparently there are “many different races”.

That was rather foolish putting both of those statements in the same diatribe. It seems that after all, you are guilty of the kind of ‘complete idiocy’ that you dislike so much.

Let us hope you grow up soon!

# # # #

44 thoughts on “Emily Boughton has a Rant!”

      1. Steve

        - Edit

        I think it’s good to publish things like this, so that the orthodoxy can be directly challenged & logically answered.
        I doubt her mind will change though, anymore than ours will.

  2. SerpentSlayer

    - Edit

    Just cross the bridge and ignore them, what this article is is throwing a goat under it hoping you can cross the bridge more peacefully.
    Those infected with liberalism rarely show any signs of reacting rationally to reason, instead they are determined to continue in a kind of mass hysteria that relies on the constant reinforcement of a denial of objective reality.
    They can read even a well written and in depth article on the need for human biodiversity and only see what they have been told to see by manipulative educators and emotive films.
    We should ignore them, we attract only the strong of will and and character and we should be content with that. The liberal and communist vermin will likely die with few children and at the hands of the utopia they believe they live in.

  3. frederickdixon

    - Edit

    Just a repetition of the tired old clichés which were fresh and new (but still wrong) about thirty years ago. The times they are a’changin’…

  4. Donna

    - Edit

    “But there is only ONE race, the human race. We are not different on the inside at all. We only look (slightly different) on the outside due to genetic mutations depending on our surroundings as we all migrated and settled, and migrated some more.”

    If that were the case how can race be determined from the remains of a crime victim? How can a persons race be determined from DNA?
    That’s like saying there is only one type of whale, all big cats are the same, all apes are the same, all birds are the same.

  5. MsBridgit

    - Edit

    I cannot really add anything, her stupidity leaves me breathless. I hope she is not involved in organizing the next expedition to Mars.

  7. Will Mossop

    - Edit

    The lack of thought and simple observation of nature and world history make people such as Emily Boughton unworthy of intelligent debate though I understand your likely reason for posting her comments in order to shoot them down which you do very well but I would raise one point about your own response which always grates with me when I read or hear it.
    “A lot has happened since our ancestors left Africa.”
    Firstly Africa did not exist. Africa (and indeed the names of all continents) truly are a construct of man unlike race which is a factual reality of nature.
    I’ve also never agreed with the definitiveness of ‘we all came from Africa.” It should always be qualified with “to the best of our knowledge and at the present time it is believed the first homosapiens may have originated from an area south of the equator.”

    1. frederickdixon

      - Edit

      Whether or not archaic humans first came from Africa (they probably did, but scientists are not unanimous) “we” did NOT. Our Caucasian sub-species most certainly first evolved OUTSIDE Africa and the white end of its spectrum evolved right here in the Europe/Mediterranean area. In fact it’s not unlikely that the genes for whiteness came from the Neanderthals with whom our ancestors appear to have interbred, and who were most certainly light skinned – they have been shown to have had the mutation which causes that whitest of characteristics, red hair.I wonder if the same mutation – which has no obvious evolutionary benefits – could have appeared accidentally twice in precisely the same place?

  8. Shaun

    - Edit

    H Millard is a great writer, but you need to have a few shared premises to appreciate what he has to say. This lady just can’t get it! She is programmed by the System, and she lacks the ability to think for herself — these types of ”people” aren’t worth the hassle.

    Nevertheless, I feel like the author made a mistake in the way he replied to all her stupid postulations. He was trying to JUSTIFY the existence of the White race (in essence) and this allows anti-White creeps to barrage you with leftist shaming language.

    Remember: if logic meant something to these people they wouldn’t have accepted the lies of the Cultural Marxist System!

    Also, we must remember that we should never try to convert anti-Whites because they are too far gone. What is important is the people ”listening” to the dialogue between the pro-White and the anti-White.

    Use the mantra.

    You say:

    Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone.

    Anti-White will say:

    That’s racist.

    You say:

    You’re just saying that because I’m White; anti-racist is a codword for anti-White.

    Anti-White will say:

    Tell me, what’s wrong with Black people?

    You say:

    If Black countries and ONLY black countries were being flooded with non-Whites immigrants and, through forced assimilation and raising immigrant birth rates Blacks were being GENOCIDE in their own countries like Whites are in White countries would you call him a racist?

    Or do you only want genocide in White countries?

    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.

    Ok, forgive me for sounding pedantic, but I have learnt that we don’t need to justify ourselves we need to control the language and IMPOSE our own terminology during racial discourse. The author was very intelligent — far smarter than me — but he must understand this simple concept: we must wake people up the reality of White GENOCIDE and not give these anti-White creeps a science lesson.

    Paradigm shifts happen through memes; not vast deposits of knowledge.

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      You make some good points Shaun, but you assume that I was addressing Emily Boughton when I responded to her statements. While it would ostensibly appear that way, the exchange of ideas format for the article was simply a device which enabled me to address our nationalist audience and anyone else who might visit this website.

    2. BritishActivism

      - Edit

      I suppose it can get quite difficult to know just when to apply various tactics or stances.
      .
      I only say this because I think we are in the unfortunate business of having to both show that we have capabilities of scientifically and historically undermining their “facts” whilst at the same time not turning into some defence (of what we need not defend).
      .
      By entering into arguments (whether it is the Mantra or with the usual argumentation we are all familiar with), it is still, to some degree, dealing with people who are mostly rabidly on the opposition – and not those who, as you say, we perhaps ought to be concentrating on winning over.
      .
      The Mantra can be useful, but perhaps for the most part it is aimed at showing to third parties (who are viewing the said exchange), in order to get to the real roots of what these antagonistic people wish for and believe – and to thus show them up for the bags of contradiction they are; and thus exposing the ‘programming’ that they have been imbibed with since birth.
      .
      The person involved in receiving the Mantra is not likely, in my opinion, to have an about turn and come to support our positions. Maybe a seed may be sown in some of them after the intensity of these kinds of exchanges, something that can hopefully start to break down the programming and allow them to think and study things for themselves.
      .
      Other than that, the show sometimes seems to be for third parties who might have a bit more independent thought and thus be open to listening to ‘controversial’ positions like ours. The mantra, ironically, can perhaps lead to some engages with justifying ourselves (via the double standards theme)…..with people who we will never get to see the light.
      .
      I suppose I share the view that we spend too much time as a movement trying to justify ourselves where we need not really have to do. I also think you are right that with the little time left, we might well be wiser to try and entice those who are much less programmed than Emily.
      .
      The trouble for me is that I was once parroting out the kinds of stuff she was coming out with. I did not understand the whole race issue, not in the slightest. I saw no sense in it, so to me, it was nonsensical, therefore those who were “racist” were nonsensical.
      .
      But of course, at that time, I had no idea what was going on or what the implications would be. By trying to “prove” people wrong, I came to educate myself as to what it was all about. Most people do not make it that far. I did, but I guess I am blessed with the capacity for some independent thought and study.
      .
      (You certainly do not get into this for the laugh or a happy go lucky lifestyle! It is hard to come to terms with and I think it takes great skill to master all the concepts at play and deal with them appropriately).
      .
      People like Emily often seem to confuse race denial with egalitarianism, or, rather, the idea treating people equally, ie, that race ‘should not matter’. But that is not the same thing as ‘race does not exist’.

      They thus manufacture the science and repeat the clichés in order to fit things to this paradigm, because they – albeit foolishly – think it makes them good people, “open minded” people, more moral people than us and our “nasty” “hate filled” positions of “prejudice” (lol).
      .
      Unfortunately, as we nationalists are all to familiar with, there is often nothing more closed minded than some of these people, and when, or if, the full reality of the situation hits home to these people, it often becomes clear to them that they are not helping to make things better, they are not doing ‘good’ by perpetuating their nonsense and that their actions are ultimately some of the most immoral of all. It takes some people a lot of thinking and wrestling to shake off these kinds of dogmas that saturate society.
      .
      I do not know about Emily, she may be not quite as ‘ranty’ as we think, but people like Emily, or those on the receiving end of the Mantra, are indeed often already locked in some “anti-racist” battle mode. They want to stick it to the “fascists” and the “racists”.
      .
      They will often not be persuaded by the Mantra, for as they are already in battle mode they are not really taking in what is being said, as they are instead thinking of things to say in order to try and prove us wrong. They tend to do this rather than step back and deeply question themselves and what they believe in.
      .
      They are often not listening, nor interested in listening because it would turn their world upside down (like it did mine) and mean a hell of a lot of learning for them to have do whether it be ideological theory, history study, and yes, ‘conspiracy’ study of what kinds of people and situations have led things to how they are today.
      .
      As long as we are not apologising or feeling the need to defend or justify our own existence, articles and responses like Max’s can perhaps prove useful in not only being a set of re-usable and concise points to use in exchanges elsewhere, but also in confirming and refreshing those of us who might have long dropped out of these inane battles with die-hard opponents.
      .
      I appreciate that the Mantra is aimed at ultimately cutting through the swathes of nonsense that we need not even get into for our cause – such as “slavery” and “welfare” and “IQ points” etc – but sometimes, a well rebuffed address is a more subtle path to beat; if there is any chance of winning over the people already on the cusp of slotting things together.
      .
      The ‘How Whites Took Over America’, the ‘Diversity Comes to Africa” and the “Anti-Racist Hitler” cartoons are also very good to throw at some of these people. They may very well dismiss them or poke holes in some of the material, but if they go away thinking about the concepts of what they have seen, then maybe they might learn to be a bit more “tolerant” of people they currently do not seem to understand.
      .
      With this, you again have a point with the ‘memes’ and not the depths of scientific knowledge.
      .
      The trouble is, if people do bring up the matter of science to try and ‘prove’ you wrong, what is one supposed to do? A meme driven retort will not always suffice. We also sometimes need people who can and do study science and can professionally undermine the thrust of an opponents beliefs, if not only to show we are not all “knuckledraggers” with no education or insight.
      .
      For wider society and a more general movement, memes are probably the way to go. With individual exchanges, it may not always be that easy. I suppose it can get ‘horses for courses’ depending on who you might be dealing with, what their attitude is, who the real audience is, etc.
      .
      I am not a massive user of the mantra, I have to admit, but I can see it has some role to play (for the reasons you cite). I think as long as a defender is not going into it on the back-foot and is able to use an array of tactics, it is perhaps useful to have a bit of both in the mix.

      1. Francis

        - Edit

        The issue with these people is they have been indoctrinated with the utopian ideals of Liberal Newspeak. These are all about compassion and emotions; if we open are hearts enough all the problems will go away. It’s a very romantic mantra and to the young who want to change the world it is very attractive.

        With these things it’s more about presenting yourself to the third party than convincing the other person. Be aware of Allinsky tactics which are used to wear down opposition. Keep responses short and let them do the talking.

        It’s a common tactic on left wing blogs when they want to defend the actions of non-whites, when it is obvious that they are guilty, they will make extremely long posts spouting out lots of clichés, victimhood and biased science. It is evident they are clutching on straws but in the mind of a marxist they will never be wrong and will continue with the Allinsky style attacks.

        Never feel the need to reply to every anti-white, marxist argument unless 3rd parties will see it. The attacker will believe in the same cliques and for every argument one a new one will appear

        1. Steve

          - Edit

          Have you ever come across that thing where you will get attacked for your grammar or spelling despite others being as bad, as a way of attacking your viewpoint without actually answering the points being made?
          Also if you go on a very hostile site, different characters will also use different methods of attack, one will call you a Nazi & racist, another will go on about spelling, another will go on about anti Semitism & so on.
          Even somebody who seemed like an ally might suddenly turn on you.

  10. Franks

    - Edit

    She represents the American Education System and echos what she has been taught in this system from a very young age. At what stage does she begin to question what she has been taught? I do not know. Maybe never and she will go through life in this mode. I suppose it make obtaining a job easier. Against stupidity even the Gods struggle in vain.

  11. A.Numptie

    - Edit

    I would suggest that Emily is not American at all for a start also who say’s we all evolved from Africans the same experts that change their minds every day on a variety of subjects.
    If there is only one race and that is “the human race” and we did indeed all come from the one organism then the same could be said of all the animals in the world that they are all the same and we shouldn’t segregate them where we do, they will just rub along together and respect one another the hungry wolf won’t eat the fat sheep because that wouldn’t be ace.

    1. MsBridgit

      - Edit

      I thought it had been refuted that we came from Africa at all. The world was once one land mass before it broke up. There was no such place as Africa. Perhaps the educationalist think the people are stupid……….well on second thoughts…..

  12. David Yorkshire

    - Edit

    So Emily, let me get this straight: we are all different on the outside, therefore we are all the same on the inside. Really? I mean really? I take it philosophy and biology were – are? – not your strong suits at school.

  13. Steve

    - Edit

    Part of the issue is that if Emily is an American but not a native Indian, then she’s an immigrant herself & not in her homeland, so issues of guilt & belonging play into that.
    She’s bought into PC orthodoxy & not thought it out logically because you’re not supposed to question “facts”.

  14. Cry Havoc!

    - Edit

    This is a quite normal response from the brainwashed, revisionist-history fed people of today. They are in fact sheep: as they are incapable of using their own minds when confronted with something that doesn’t fit in within the simple view of their world. And thanks to so many whites believing what Emily believes, the whites, like sheep, will be slaughtered. Emily spouts the current saw of how whites stole land and exploited other races. She needs to watch “Monty Python and the Life of Brian” ie “What have the Romans ever done for us?” Answer: they’ve given us civilisation, sanitation, education, hospitals, medicine, laws and so on. Well Emily substitute whites for Romans and you will, if you learn to think straight, appreciate the irony of the argument. Because unless whites wake up soon, then everything that our ancestors fought for, will be lost; and if you don’t suffer from those consequences, then your children and grandchildren certainly will, and they will curse you and your stupidity.

    1. Steve

      - Edit

      I see a lot of evidence that even though the comfortable middle class don’t get it, their children will, as they find it increasingly difficult to get a decent job despite having very good grades at university.
      Some middle class types in their 50’s will find themselves redundant & no chance of anything decent as they will be in direct competition with hordes of younger immigrants.

  15. Steve

    - Edit

    Emily like me has no medical knowledge but I know that basic thing about transplants being race specific & certain medical conditions afflicting certain races more than others.
    I mean who heard of a white person with sickle cell anaemia?
    So race is certainly provable in that way.
    The Jews certainly believe in that concept.

  16. Steve

    - Edit

    I often say that white people probably invented at least 90% of the modern world one way or another with the British high up in that with the Scottish being very significant too.
    With the Asians who are very wide ranging peoples, in my experience you can divide them into moslem & non moslem with the non moslem half being more intelligent & progressive.
    The Arabs, well they got lucky because we wanted what they wanted to sell & could buy in civilisation & modern conveniences on the back of that.

  17. SigBrit

    - Edit

    Quick answers. She says the only difference is skin colour, denying any genetic or biological difference. Then absolutely contradicting herself she starts spouting eugenics saying we all need to be interbred like some kind of biology experiment because we are GENETICALLY different. She fails to understand that incompatible genes are more likely to produce birth defects than eradicate them. She seems to have only learned about wars between different races…. Where was she when we all learned about wars between the same races? Does she think people of the same race have never gone to war with each other? Bizarre! She tries to avoid dealing with all of the black mass murderers and rapists in the west. Does she think they don’t exist, that their victims are undeserving of recognition, because they are white? How deeply racist she is. She tries to avoid answering any points put to her by simply, like the ‘useful idiot’ it is, coming out with yet another ‘slogan’ in each of her propositions, not realising how badly she is being defeated. She then tries to use the example of the USA as a place where white people have damaged the nation! Even though non-white seem to be desperate to go there and vacate their own non-white countries for a better life. She also fails to understand that we now know that the first inhabitants of the Americas where white pre ice age settlers, who made the mistake of thinking that they could peacefully co-exist with an influx of mongolian (now called native American) immigrants.
    Well done for publishing this.

  18. Shaun

    - Edit

    People like Emily used to confuse me, but nowadays I accept people like her are, in some ways, the most human of all: 95% of people can’t think for themselves.

    Essentially, she is a product of culture. What I mean is she has internalized the narratives given to her through the mass media, the education system and internationalist governments and she has believed every word.

    She is tragic, but completely harmless. All she needs is a new set of programming and she would be quite pleasant to be around. She may have a relative value in the labor market too — as long as her job doesn’t involve too much abstract thinking….

    I think we have to accept that some people will never get it. We must, for the sake of sanity, try to reach the 5% who can think for themselves, the 20% who will believe anything, and the 1 in 3 (from my countless reading of history) who are naturally ethnocentric.

  20. Shaun

    - Edit

    Chris:

    Emily is a ”tolerant, intelligent human being” and she learned to be this through the Culture Industry. How many pro-white role models has Emily seen during her countless hours of watching the TV, the movies and the music videos? Answer? Maybe none!

    Emily, tragic because she is normal, wants to be like the people she has watched all her life, so why would she adopt beliefs, values and world views that don’t conform to the central message of today’s Zio-media?

    We are all social animals and we all have a strong instinct to conform to a certain code of behavior. Some people, however, learn to distance themselves from the whirlpool of emotions that constitute collective human life, and think about reality from an objective perspective. They call these people ”thinkers”, and, in reality, very few people are interested in what these thinkers have to say: the average person likes to be entertained, not educated. Emily is one of these people.

    Anyway, she has been given an education! She just doesn’t know it! Every time she tuned into the MSM she gave her soul over to the insidious Masters of Discourse who programmed her to hate her own race. She is now so brainwashed she believes she deserved it — this Stockholm Syndrome, a recognizable mental illness!

    Nevertheless, all the Masters of Discourse can do is alter the individual’s ”soft wiring” through culture and then hope, through the person’s own volition, they use their frontal cortex to control the primal urges that tell them they must reject this demonic, anti-white culture.

    That’s why we mustn’t allow anti-white people to defend their position through programmed terminology. Keep banging on about White-genocide (which is true) and keep asking the anti-white why they don’t want White people to exist. Asking questions shows you have the moral high ground and a constant repitition of a very simple concept will open the gates to the hard wiring that screams at us all, PROTECT YOUR OWN KIND!!

    For anybody that is interested in how this whole soft wiring through culture works I suggest a study of the author Howard Bloom. He is a Zionist and very worried about the future of Israel (if I was a Jew, I would be too); but he does understand human nature better than most people alive! Read him. He understands where all of this globalist, neo-liberal nonsense is going.

    1. Fran Waldron

      - Edit

      Shaun
      “People like Emily used to confuse me, but nowadays I accept people like her are, in some ways, the most human of all: 95% of people can’t think for themselves……….”

      Please Shaun, do not try placating and excusing the hate crime of that creature by the name of Emily.

      She deserves to be hung drawn and quartered for treason and for the aiding and abetting of global White genocide.

      Covert Marxists WILL be identified in the fullness of time and expediently dealt with along with their overt Marxist bedfellows.

  21. Fran Waldron

    - Edit

    Very interesting viewpoints regarding memes have been raised as well as the need to engage in perpetual repetition of said memes. However, they must be accompanied by appropriate responses to the endless half-truths, fallacies, outright lies and misinformation being bandied about by the Marxist propaganda camp.

    Under no circumstances must the Marxist anti-White race-hating movement be allowed to keep on getting away with its worldwide genocidal agenda against the White race. It is our job to relentlessly ridicule, correct and counter charge this movement with Crimes against White indigenous Humanity whilst at the same time continuing to expose them collectively as being the intellectually corrupt and profoundly evil side, not White Ethno-Nationalists.

  22. Fran Waldron

    - Edit

    Emily:

    “Fran, you are hysterical, I almost peed my pants laughing at your stupidity! Who built the USA, Australia, New Zealand? Why it was the IMMIGRANT white people that STOLE the land from the native people’s committed genocide on them, brought disease etc and then ravaged the natural resources to near depletion, and now are having to deal with those consequences. If this is intelligence, than god save us all from ‘intelligence.’”

    I think you will find that it’s your take on the issue that is highly ignorant and laughable, stupid!

    First of all, ALL humans have at various points in time invaded and conquered the lands of their neighbours and/or further afield. These invasions were and still are almost invariably wrought through direct warfare.

    What we are seeing, in the case of the White world, is not invasion by direct warfare, but in the course of the 20th and 21st centuries, an orchestrated stealth invasion by the whole of the non-White world which has actually now developed into increasingly full-blown internal warfare against every host White population they’ve been permitted to invade, in spite of the fact that those non-White ethnicities most guilty of present-day invasion of White homelands, have had theirs’ returned to them during the course of the 20th century thus rendering their presence in White homelands unjustified and basically illegal, most especially in view of the fact that the architects and orchestrators of this ongoing invasion AND genocide of White peoples in their own homelands, are a colluding cable of alien Ashkenazim and traitorous White gentiles across the globe.

    Arabs and certain Orientals, by way of examples, have also invaded and conquered the lands of other non-White races and ethnicities for far longer than White nations have ever done and some non-Whites are still doing so up to the present.

    Certainly, their conquest and rule was and still is anything but humane. In fact, both were indeed far more inhumane than White invaders of old ever were. Did the previous two mentioned above leave technological, scientific medical and structural legacies behind on the scale of those of White invaders? Well, what’s your response to this question then.

    Before you go mouthing off about how evil and nasty big bad Whitey is just remember that non-White nations do little to help other non-White nations across the globe in terms of financial aid/direct intervention like providing professional personnel, medical/food/clothing/educational and infrastructural provision to name just a few examples. Rather, it’s grossly altruistic White nations who do the vast majority of this kind of pandering even to the point of deliberate neglect and personal indifference to the ever-increasing basic needs of their own racial brethren both at home and abroad.

    You won’t get away with retorting that these ‘developing nations’ are still in dire poverty and somehow can’t afford to shower goodies on the rest of the under-developed non-White world. India has just recently sent a shuttle into space. Brazil, Malaysia, India, China, Vietnam and a number of African countries are now forging ahead of much of the White world.

    Are you going to complain about this and accuse these of being evil exploiters of their poorer racial kin and environmental contaminators, then? Not likely, you two-faced anti-White race-hating Marxist toe-rag.

    Britain, for one, has sent India billions since she was returned home rule back in1947 and is still doing so to this day, the idiots. India has quite recently requested that Britain stop sending this financial aid because the Indian government suddenly deems it terribly patronizing and insulting – would you believe!!!!!

  23. Chris

    - Edit

    Emily tries but misunderstands. With reasoning like that if there was one human race, Emily, along with a lot of well-intentioned idiots, won’t be coming first.

  24. Shaun

    - Edit

    Fran Waldron said:

    Please Shaun, do not try placating and excusing the hate crime of that creature by the name of Emily.

    Yes, I agree. Emily, if that is her real name, is an evil creature. I think, however, there is no use in getting angry with these people! Study them like rats; and then use them to create public arguments that descent White people can learn from. You can’t change most anti-Whites — hell, if you can believe it is ok to genocide your own people you really are a monster!!!!

    To change the subject, I believe that anti-Whiteism takes the same form as religious belief. You have a God (multiracial societies); you have a clergy (Cultural Marxist ”intellectuals”); and you have a devil (the ”Nazis”). Like most religions, anti-Whitism has no basis in reality.

    Humans, though, aren’t rational creatures so many people’s instincts to conform and find meaning make them accept crazy systems of beliefs.

    One man (no offence) believes that a Man who lived in the desert 2,000 years ago rose from the dead and is now looking over us all.

    Another man (offence intended) believes there are no racial differences and multiracial societies are the best option for all white countries.

    Frank, as I said I agree with you. I find these anti-Whites repulsive; but I also understand (as I’m sure you do) that you can’t reason with them. Try and tell a lifelong Christian that his beliefs are insane and see how he or she reacts. Logic will mean nothing. The same holds true with politics.

  25. Emily Boughton

    - Edit

    Ah ha ha! This is hysterical! You morons wouldn’t know logic if it came up and slapped you in the face. I’m posting this internationally so that the world can make fun of you lot. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      It may have escaped your attention Emily, but Western Spring already has an international readership and so there are people from North America to Europe and Australia who already know how ignorant of the facts you are.
      .
      Furthermore, our website thrives on publicity and so any further exposure you can give us will be gratefully received.
      .
      BTW we won’t be publishing anything more that you post on here. We are sending you to sit on the ‘naughty step’.

  27. Scarlett

    - Edit

    She contradicts herself by claiming there is only one race, then says there are different races. She also failed to answer: “Every single one of us evolved from the same single celled organisms too. So what?” And “Why is it then that crime rates were lower during the great depression of the 1920s and 30s, than they are now?”

  29. Shaun

    - Edit

    I’m so glad Emily is posting her anti-whiteist dialogue all over the Internet. I detected, in her last comment, that she isn’t the naive moron that I thought she was — no, she apparently HATES white people. She deserves her comeuppance.

    I’m sorry to say I told you so, but my analogy with religious belief being the same as irrational political beliefs holds true. She must have read the dialogue, she must have seen the contradictions in her arguments, and she still holds her beliefs.

    This young lady cannot be reached through logic (Emily, logic means the process of reasoning and reasoning is the process of coming to accurate conclusions). The only way it is possible to reach people of this nature is through culture or mass opinion.

    I’ll explain:

    If Emily was surrounded by a hegomonic caste of pro-white cultural icons she would try to emulate them, and she would be pro-white.

    If Emily woke up and discovered that, were she a rat, she couldn’t get her cheese by being anti-white anymore she would change her ”beliefs”.

    As I said, if you can be persuaded to hate your own race then you really haven’t got any morals. I’m glad that I, Shaun Tisson, may have many faults; but at least I can’t be persuaded to hate my own people just because my country’s rulers have decided to lick the boots of the Zionists…..

Comments are closed.