Following the murder of Labour MP Jo Cox earlier this year there is to be a by-election in her constituency of Batley and Spen and in tribute to her dedication to the displacement and race replacement of the British people, the other two main establishment political parties, the Tories and the LibDems, have chosen not to contest the seat.
In light of this co-operation on the part of the establishment parties aimed at ensuring the replacement of Jo Cox by a new MP of a similar ilk, it is rather depressing that the nationalist political parties ostensibly representing the interests of the indigenous people of this country have chosen to make themselves a laughing stock in the eyes of the world by standing no less than four candidates to split the nationalist vote and ensure not just that no nationalist candidate will be elected, but that each nationalist candidate will get a derisory vote.
It is the belief among Western Spring members that electoral politics do not represent a viable route to power for our movement at this time. Not only has the entire socio-political landscape been poisoned against us by our enemies in the establishment and in the mass media, not only do we have a fractured and divided movement lacking any of the resources (the Six Prerequisites) needed to seriously challenge for political power, but we cannot even negotiate an agreement not to stand against each other in the minor elections that we are capable of contesting.
Had the four nationalist parties taking part in the forthcoming by-election agreed to pool resources and stand just one candidate, it might have been possible to make this by by-election a mini-referendum on continued mass immigration and it is just conceivable that the public of Batley and Spen may have responded by giving the nationalist candidate their protest vote. However, we all know that with four nationalist candidates, each one with a near identical policy platform, the public will be mystified and confused, the public will see us as lacking in even the most basic common sense, and the Labour candidate will be returned to Westminster with a resounding majority.
“O wad some Power the giftie gie us
To see oursels as ithers see us!”
[Robert Burns]
Batley and Spen will be an embarrassing debacle for British nationalism in which we will be seen as dogs fighting over the scraps from a rich man’s table.
The nationalist parties involved have negligible resources and so their election campaigns will in the main be fought on a shoe string, and this will ensure a feeble showing at the poll.
If each of the nationalist parties concerned were to wage a half-way decent campaign, in which there would be an election address delivered to each of the 35,000 households in the constituency; in which the parties concerned would hand-deliver a second leaflet to each of those households; and spend just five minutes canvassing at the door of each of those households, it would make no difference to the outcome of the election — in the current circumstances Labour would still win. Furthermore, if this were to be the case, that each of the nationalist parties were to wage a half-way decent campaign as described, they would waste over 13,000 man-hours of labour, which costed at the national minimum wage, and including the cost of lost deposits, leaflets and election addresses, would amount to a waste of almost £93,000.
We all know however that the nationalist political parties concerned cannot afford to expend anything like that amount of effort. They lack the money and they lack the manpower and therefore they are doomed to receive a derisory vote.
Imagine for a moment however that those four nationalist political parties opted not to contest an election they cannot win — and they pooled the £5,360 they would save in lost deposits and other expenses, and their supporters chose to apply the 13,000 man hours of labour doing overtime at their place of work, donating the extra income received to our movement – our movement would have £93,000 to spend on a campaign headquarters for the North-West.
Just think what could be achieved if we went through this same exercise once a quarter for the next two years? We could then contest several constituencies in the North-West with the benefit of a well equiped campaign headquarters and possibly in excess of £500k in the kitty with which to wage a nationalist election campaign, the like of which the North-West of England would have never seen before!
We nationalists must stop going off at half-cock!
We nationalists must stop engaging in hopeless election campaigns with bull-at-a-gate recklessness!
New members and the contributions they make to our cause are like the ‘seed corn’ of British nationalism and we must stop consuming our seed corn after each harvest in elections campaigns that we are woefully equipped for and which we cannot win. We must collect our seed corn and save and wait for the start of a new growing season — until a new electoral ‘spring’ — until we have the seed corn and resources needed to ensure a rich harvest.
Please help us prepare for that ‘spring’, stop wasting our resources and join Western Spring today!
By Max Musson © 2016
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
Robert
- Edit
I think you are right Max – that this by-election held in the wake of the murder of Jo Cox MP, will be an embarrassing debacle for British Nationalism.
The British Democratic Party have made a wise decision not to get involved in this farce, in my opinion. Since being formed 3 years ago, they have built up community support in target wards and local seats and have polled as high as 12% through intelligent and sensible campaigning on issues that affect ordinary Britons lives. There is a certainly a place for Nationalist demonstrations by other groups, but the BDP have cleverly adopted the strategy of not holding marches and demos (thus avoiding confrontation with the opposition), and so their image with voters is good. (The Searchlight mole Ray Hill wrote in ‘his’ book that he feared that the 1970’s/1980’s version of the BDP would become the respectable electoral face of British Nationalism, while the BM etc would be the street movements – a twin track strategy).
https://britishdemocraticparty.org/
Max Musson
- Edit
The BDP have very wisely stayed out of this impending debacle. I was pleased that they participated in the recent Leaders Conference and I look forward to greater co-operation with them in future.
John Rice
- Edit
The BDP is a two men and a dog outfit, in the four or so years they have been ‘active’ they have yet to get a basic infrastructure in place. They are like the old gang parties, come May and election time they put up a few candidates in Leicestershire (and one in Bradford), and the rest of the year they do sweet fanny adams.
Robert
- Edit
Good to hear that the BDP took part in the Leaders Conference. They have some very able people, who thankfully seem to have a sensible head on their shoulders – Andrew Brons, John Bean, Adrian Davies, Liam Kernaghan to name just a few of the intelligent active members, writers, speakers and thinkers. If only more nationalists got behind them and joined their ranks, British Nationalism might actually be getting somewhere.
Max Musson
- Edit
There are indeed some able people in the BDP Robert, just as there are in some other nationalist groups. The next step for them to take however is to recognise the folly of continually replicating the tactics of old that have repeatedly failed.
.
The eventual success of our movement does not lie in greater numbers of nationalists participating in the electoral process at this time, it lies in greater numbers of nationalists actively contributing to the acquisition of the assets we will need to mount a serious challenge for political power. Once we have those assets (the Six Prerequisites), electoral success will inevitably follow, but electoral success will remain elusive for as long as we continue to ignore the need for those vital assets.
.
The Leaders Conference took place because one nationalist organisation out of the many that exist, took the time and made the effort to acquire the financial strength to host it, and we will host more in the months and years to come. All hope of progress comes from this, for without Western Spring and the fresh thinking we have introduced, nationalism will remain in a state of terminal decline.
Eddy
- Edit
I’m amazed all this talking up of the British Do-Nothing Party, they do have some intelligent people, however, they don’t do anything but fight a couple of local elections every year and run a web site. They have no membership and it’s easy to see why, people are prepared to join an active party, a party that is not interested in developing in any way attracts no support. Their idea of building the party from below just doesn’t work, yet they keep trotting out this nonsense.
Nationalist4UK
- Edit
Well written Max.
Having few nationalist candidates really do confuse the voter. This is why nationalists need to agree to have one nationalist candidate per constituency.
By the way I believe the same constituency voted for Brexit as well.
Also I’ve edited your speech to the part which you talk about the electoral corruption. This makes it easier to explain to people on forums and comments section of social media.
Max Musson
- Edit
Thank you for that edited compilation, I have now embedded it into this article. 🙂
Keith Axon
- Edit
What is wrong with the competing nationalist parties, as they all scurry around in the dirt for the crumbs off the table of nationalist voters, in this election?
Liberty GB, candidate, Jack Buckly
Anti Islam the main issue.
The National Front, candidate Richard Edmonds
racial nationalist no compromise.
The British National Party and candidate Dave Furness are
civic nationalists.
The English Democrats candidate Therse Hirst
They act as SPOILERS canceling each other out. Any suggestions for the progress of our cause from these four?
John Rice
- Edit
Although I do agree with some level of electoral activity, I must admit what the various groups are doing is stupid.
So much for all this talk coming from the NF about unity (on their terms of course).
Stefan
- Edit
Also the Labour Party are standing a “soap” star, neatly blurring the line between reality & TV drama.
John S.
- Edit
I’d like to thank Western Spring for bringing this outrage to my attention. I did raise concerns in my party (one of the four mentioned) that this was a bad idea and that we are wasting time, money and effort in fighting this election.
As always, these party “leaders” think they know best. The regional organiser dismissed my concerns. Fair enough. But now I see that three other parties have also put themselves forward and that Max has elucidated this arrant waste of money that could be/should be better spent elsewhere, I am now revoking my membership and donations to the party.
That’s it. They’re not wasting my money anymore and I’m not wasting my time.
Bentley Graves
- Edit
Hello John,
I fully understand how you’re feeling and as a former member of the British National Party myself, may I humbly suggest that you consider filling out the contact form above and arrange a meeting with Max? I for one would welcome you should you decide to join us here at Western Spring where good money isn’t just wasted in pointless endeavors such as those pointed out in the article above.
Regards
Bentley
John Salisbury
- Edit
I stopped paying membership to political parties years ago for precisely this reason. I got too sick of seeing money poured down the drain every election cycle to absolutely no avail. Nationalist party leaders are either the stupidest creatures on Earth, or they care more for being big fish in small ponds than they do for the cause and for our race.
Tina (Eng Dem)
- Edit
This is doing the rounds on Stormfront.
Well, this certainly is an eye opener. I didn’t know so many groups were contesting this election. This is silly. I am not happy.
Christabel
- Edit
This: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-16fTQH-Tkc
vs
this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QP9oWQeJcfI
Never in 50 years have you had the chance to put up a candidate for an MP in which Tories are not standing. An opportunity like comes along once in a lifetime. The breakthrough you have been waiting for. But with this attitude it will pass you by. Have you become so accustomed to failure? This constituency voted Brexit. They need to hear what Richard has to say. Will you organise and get yourselves up to Yorkshire – pronto?
Max Musson
- Edit
You don’t appear to appreciate Christabel, that despite no Tory candidate, ‘we’ don’t have an opportunity to stand a candidate against Labour without opposition from the ‘right’. We might have done if the nationalist political parties had the sense to co-operate and work together, and we might have done if there was not also an ‘English Independence’ candidate. As it is, the right-wing vote will be split five ways in a constituency in which Labour already had a majority, even before the sympathy vote they will get following Jo Cox’s murder.
.
It’s not a matter of being accustomed to failure, it is a matter of recognising the circumstances in which failure is inevitable. It is a matter also of recognising that time, money and effort expended in the pursuit of inevitable failure is a tragic waste given the dire state of our nation.
Christabel
- Edit
Disgusted by your defeatist attitude. This is tunnel vision. Why haven’t you written a rallying call supporting the longest standing nationalist in the UK? Instead you have encouraged everyone to sing from the same hymn sheet. There are no obstacles which cannot be overcome. The BNP can be persuaded to step down, after all, Richard was their Deputy Chairman and National Organiser. So; organise and communicate. Has anyone enquired if there are to be hustings?
Richard would demolish Tracy Brabin in a debate, she is the same calibre as this silly woman, yet she got to be a Tory MP:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBd6yFuiQrk Kelly Tolhurst shockingly out of her depth.
Do not forget that Jo Cox was elected under Miliband, not Corbyn. Nuff said about Corbyn who last week proclaimed there would be ‘no limit’ on immigration. The Brexit vote is to your advantage and has the potential to cancel out the sympathy vote. But you need foot soldiers, you already have vast numbers of them, so why not?
You ARE accustomed to failure, which is so ingrained in you that you cannot recognise that these circumstances, (no Tories) are unique. You would not have achieved the Derek Beackon victory with this ‘beaten before you begin’ attitude and you need to summon it again – very quickly.
John Salisbury
- Edit
A cynic might well think that these “parties” (more accurately, infinitesimal groupings of part-time political hobbyists) opt to stand in elections such as this one, not in order to get out the message, or because they are deluded enough to think that they have the remotest chance of winning, but because they need to show signs of activity in order to continue demanding membership payments and donations from the few poor souls they have managed to con into supporting their time-wasting and money-wasting activities. No doubt their respective websites will afterwards feature reports detailing the excellence of the campaigning and of the public’s response, with an invitation to sign up and hand over more hard-earned cash so that the futile struggle may continue ad infinitum.
Rick Lee
- Edit
For those interested, here is a collection of other relevant articles in relation to this hot topic:
Another Electoral Debacle!
The Futility of Electioneering
Electoral Corruption
svenlongshanks
- Edit
I think you will find that none of the parties have any delusions of winning, but they will all gain free publicity and it will let the public know there are at least 4 nationalist parties in that area alone, who do not support Labour and Jo Cox’ policies.
We have to adapt our techniques to respond to the environment and those parties are all making the most of this chance to get free publicity and show a united front together, in being opposed to letting Labour just appoint another traitor to replace her.
It also means that area will be targeted for nationalist propaganda from 4 sources, not just 1.
I thought the same as you at first Max, but after thinking about it for a while, I realised it is actually a great strategy. We arent going to win, so lets just use the chance to get our message out instead.
Rick Lee
- Edit
Sven,
Great to see you posting here -please continue.
You offer some fair points but I feel these are negated by the following:
1) Most literature posted through doors ends up in the bin;
2) It is not a united front if four (ostensibly similar) groups are not united in putting forward only one candidate;
3) As Max has shown, the publicity aspect is offset by the £90-100,000 possibly wasted (we could purchase three or four properties in Northumberland for this).
Thanks,
Bentley Graves
- Edit
Hello Sven,
As Rick has already said, it’s great to see you posting here. I also think you’re doing a sterling job with Radio Aryan which a few of us always listen to in our Paltalk chatroom.
I fully understand the point of view you’re putting across although I just happen to disagree with that particular strategy now. For me, seeing those four “nationalist” candidates on the ballot is akin to Groundhog Day. I really have lost count of the number of by-elections, council elections and also campaigns to get our people on to the local parish council that have failed miserably and cost money that would have been much better spent elsewhere.
The problem with electioneering is it can become almost a hobby, something one does because one has always done it. I know of a few very well known “old-guard” nationalists that would fall in to that category and without disrespecting them or their efforts somebody has to take a step back and say “look, this just isn’t working.” I’m sure I don’t need to remind people of one of the definitions of insanity.
The truth is that nationalist organisations have been following the same path and doing the same things over and over again since early last century and every single endeavour has amounted to nothing, in the grand scheme of things.
Yes, we have had minor successes along the way, a few local councillors here and there, some well publicised campaigns, sudden boosts in membership to a particular party at a given time, but not once have we achieved anything where we are in a position to exercise any power.
We must all be honest with ourselves here and realise that this isn’t a hobby, it isn’t a process undertaken to make us ‘feel’ like we’re doing ‘our bit’ to save our country and people from racial dissolution. We MUST be successful within the next 30 years and by successful I mean running this country with a nationalist Prime Minister. If we fail to achieve this goal then we have lost and 15,000 years of history will be flushed down the proverbial toilet.
The British people have already been provided with two opportunities over the last hundred years to turn things around and on both occasions they chose the wrong option. The first was in 1979 with the National Front when Thatcher turned up and gave her infamous “swamped” speech which won the Tories the election; the second occasion was at the height of the BNP in 2010 but as we all know, the BNP not only failed to get a single MP elected, they had their entire group of elected councillors on Barking and Dagenham wiped out due to gerrymandering and a huge anti-BNP publicity drive from the establishment.
We have to learn from these things and stop making the same mistakes over and over again.
The current state of the nationalist political parties in the UK is almost embarrassing. The BNP for example has less than 500 members now and is barely in a position to even contest a local election. The NF are rife with in-fighting and have a very small membership; Britain First don’t even qualify as a nationalist group if you like to look at that disgusting page they have on their website called “Britain First and Racism.” The other groups like Liberty GB, the English Democrats etc. can hardly be called ‘nationalist’ either. So ideologically we are left with the NF and possibly the BDP (British Democrats). Neither of these two parties have any money and both have an extremely small membership.
We simply can’t rely on this situation to save our people no matter how standing in an election makes us ‘feel’.
We must also note that politics is always the last rung of the ladder when aiming for political power. First you must change the culture and then you enter the political battle as the last hurdle. Western Spring understand this and we have a well thought-out plan to achieve this (see the Six Prerequisites).
The time is now for all nationalists to come aboard and join us in this battle for racial salvation as there is no other way it can be done, so I urge everyone who hasn’t yet filled out the contact form above to do so and let Max explain our plans to you in person. The clock is ticking, we don’t have an eternity to do this so join us now and maybe, by all working together, we can turn this mess around.
I strongly suggest you read Max’s article on the futility of electioneering before we continue this discussion: https://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-futility-of-electioneering/
Warmest regards Sven,
Bentley
Albert.
- Edit
Nationalist Parties don’t stand a chance and will never get anywhere, for the simple reason that the media is largely staffed by cultural Marxists and disproportionately owned and/or controlled by Jews who are hostile to us.
But their is hope The British people are moving to the right the main parties can no longer ignore the indigenous population, Britex proved that, We Nationalist still have a role to play in persuading people to move to the Right.
For example the Media only talk of people’s concern with Eastern European immigration, Third World and Muslim Immigration is hardly mentioned, at every opportunity I explain to people it’s Third World mass immigration for the last Seventy years that have caused such damage to this country, I am often shocked at people’s ignorance on this subject but Sixty years of Brain washing I really should not be surprised.
svenlongshanks
- Edit
Thanks Bentley Graves and Rick Lee, glad to hear you make use of our radio project.
How much would it cost to stick Western Spring on the ballot? Probably less than £500. The more nationalist parties on there, the more chances there are of getting your name mentioned by the mainstream media and into the public consciousness. An advert in the mainstream newspapers would cost many times that.
I dont think this about winning or even who gets the most votes out of the nationalist parties. Its about drawing attention to it.
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Sven, you ask, “How much it would cost to put Western Spring on the ballot?”, and you then suggest an amount of “less than £500”, but it would cost £500 just for the deposit required to stand in the election. The additional costs involved in running a ‘paper candidate’ would be minimal, approximately £460 for fairly basic election addresses, but running paper candidates has been done by nationalist parties for years and if this tactic was effective in winning new members, there would be thriving nationalist branches in most towns and cities all over the country, but sadly, there are not.
.
When a nationalist party stands in a parliamentary election as the NF did with Richard Edmonds in Carshalton and Wallington in 2015, and the vote received — just 49 votes in this instance — represents less than 1/10th of one percent of the electorate, it sends out a very negative message. It tells the electorate that support for the NF in that constituency is almost non-existent, and it is a fact of life that few people are motivated to take up a cause support for which is almost non-existent.
.
When four different nationalist parties stand in the same election and all four get a derisory vote, this not only tells the electorate that support for nationalism is almost non-existent, it also tells them that among the few people in that constituency who do support nationalism there is — even in the face of the impending destruction of our nation — an inability to get on with our fellow nationalists, thereby indicating that our cause is even more surely doomed!
.
When we draw attention to ourselves it must by through demonstrations of power; power derived from numbers, power derived from resources, or power derived from money. From a propaganda standpoint we should never draw attention to ourselves in situations where we are likely to appear, weak in numbers, weak in terms of resources, or weak in terms of finances. Power attracts, whereas weakness repels, and we should avoid public demonstrations of weakness at all costs.
.
When we are weak, we must go about our business of gaining strength in private and only when we have amassed significant strength should we display ourselves in public.
SerpentSlayer
- Edit
I think democracy is a waste of time. In Britain we are incapable of anything. Abroad we have Nationalists in ascendance. Here we have myriad futile endeavours that seem only to waste time and resources.
We have to think realistically. We must gain political power, directly or indirectly. To do this we must have the ability to influence the government and public opinion.
We need a united Nationalist front. One that can fund other endeavours and ensure we work together.
This in mind, I think our best route to power is by exploiting the stupidity and ignorance of the elites. Brexit surprised them for God’s sake. Any working class person would have gauged the mood differently.
We have a vast disenfranchised peasant class, to which I belong, they are quicker to action Tha any of our other social groups, less to lose and with more grievances.
We must mobilise the wrath of our hard working, instinctively loyal peasant class. They are given terrible jobs, if any, forced to live in areas surrounded by foreigners who cut them off from their roots and given no political representation. They are then called every name under the sun by those who have the comfortable distance necessary to praise globalisation.
I think too many of us have cared about “respectability” (sucking up to those classes of people largely too cowardly to stand up for their birthright)we must stand up for the people who are still loyal to their blood, who have the will but not the direction to retake their homelands. The people who do not care about “racist gaffes” but about the food ont heir table, the soil under their feet and their fellow Englishmen.
We must learn the lesson of Marxism, Marx realised that the working class were a potent force, but his followers realised that they would not renounce their blood and soil. We must harness their power and give those people their land back for all of our sakes.
Wysiwyg
- Edit
Hi Max,
Much of what you say holds water.
Why then, are you not taking the bull by the horns and working towards a UNF yourself?
Max Musson
- Edit
A UNF? What do you mean by that?
Keith Axon
- Edit
I think the meaning is Everybody must rejoin Mother the NF ,just my thoughts and it will never happen ,a new name is needed to unite every party under an umbrella name such as The Nationalists
Max Musson
- Edit
Keith, we organised the recent Leaders Conference and what we need is grass roots nationalists and influential individuals such as yourself to urge the various existing organisations to participate in the process of ‘ever closer union’ that I have proposed. Rejoining/joining a longstanding but floundering organisation that is currently bereft of new ideas would be a pointless exercise.
.
We need people such as yourself and the local organisers of the various nationalist groups to openly declare support for the strategy that we have outlined on this website and to begin to work with us towards the acquisition of the Six Prerequisites — and in defiance of their party leadership if necessary, if the leaders of the parties concerned will not see sense of their own volition.
Wysiwig
- Edit
Sorry Max. I meant Unified National Front.
Max Musson
- Edit
I am. We organised the recent Leaders Conference and we will organised further similar events to bring nationalist leaders together with the aim of eventually forming one organisation.
barge
- Edit
Surely Mark Collett’s recent speech at the London Forum and numerous articles from this site have said it all. There’s little point fighting elections until there is a local community of active nationalists campaigning on local issues. If there are any ideological differences amongst them they can be hammered out locally. Clearly in Batley and Spen there is very little local nationalist presence with candidates coming from all over England.
Max Musson
- Edit
You are right barge, and over the next few weeks I will publish a series of articles that will spell out the process through which nationalists can begin to transform their local communities into militant White communities capable or resisting the advancing tide of multiracialism and multiculturalism.
.
Local organisers of other groups and parties that wish to participate in the process of radicalising the White communities in their areas can email me, [email protected], and become affiliated to Western Spring.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Max is quite right to seek ‘Six Prerequisites” as a foundation for a successful ‘Movement of National Salvation’. To revise the six prerequisites they are…
1/ Over six hundred, quality leaders; approximately one for each Parliamentary Constituency.
2/ White enclaves, ideologically aware communities, from which our bid for power can be launched
3/ A network of 5th columnists working behind the scenes, ready to tilt the balance in our favour once the time is ripe.
4/ An alternative media, including internet sites and a T.V. station.
5/ A powerful street presence.
6/ A war chest of £100,000,000
In case that last prerequisite seems over ambitious we might remember that the Zionist/ American nexus found it necessary to pour no less than $5 billion into their successful bid which toppled Yanukovych during the Ukrainian Maidan Square revolution.
But, as the proverbial Irishman said… “If I wanted to get there, I wouldn’t start from here.”
The question is therefore, how do we go about obtaining our six prerequisites? We could all sit around a table of course and happily agree on their desirability, but what do we actually needed to get there? The answer is, a combination of hard work and moral courage. If one thinks about it, true respectability, as opposed to the superficial bourgeois variety of respectability, flows from courage. For this reason we should be sceptical about the many schemes for racial salvation which, no matter how clever, place stealth before moral courage.
How then do we select the champions for our cause?
One thing about all the decent, worthwhile candidates in the Batley and Spen by-election is their dedication and moral courage. After the vicious murder of Mrs. Jo Cox M.P. our opponents are going to be seething with hatred. It is only from those who are prepared to withstand such hatred on the streets, and ironically, in this case call for the death of the psychopath responsible for her murder, that leaders of sufficient quality, as mentioned in the first prerequisite, will be selected.
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
With regard to the second prerequisite, what happened to White Independent Nation? Their “Nick Grifford” spoke at the London Forum, but the website is down and the blog inactive.
Shaun
- Edit
The people at WIN have the right ideas, but I think it’s impossible to expect a critical mass of activists to concentrate themselves within ”target areas” without an already existing infrasature there to resettle them.
When Zionism was in its infancy, the Jewish colonists divided their attention between two poles: business and politics. The original founding Zionists created the instrasture needed to attract their co-ethnics and that’s why it succeeded. We don’t appear to have these types of people within the nationalist struggle, so that’s why the 2nd prerequisite idea has to be attempted in a much more realistic way; mobilizing support amongst existing communities like Mark Collett explained in his recent London Forum speech might be the best strategy.
In regards to elections….. What Mr. Musson has been labouring to explain since he started the WS site still stands true. You need to contact your potential supporters in a powerful way and that includes a sophisticated media aimed at mobilizing our support —- which is a massive part of the electorate. The average person with nationalist sympathies won’t vote for a party that he he/she feels won’t win, so you must create that mass perception through media; there’s no other way.
On a side note, the Trump campaign has a rather strange side effect. Have you noticed the way the left react to Trump’s possible election? Many of them say they’re leaving the USA. Couldn’t the nationalist movement, if it ever gets its act together, put forward a Trumpique-type figure, and then when the left ”threaten” to leave the UK if he’s elected; couldn’t there be some nationalist front organization that arranges for these people to settle in the multicultural utopias of Iraq, Syria and Brazil? Yes…. That would be nice. Bye bye.
Max Musson
- Edit
WIN tended to rely on Nick Grifford for their propaganda out-reach and you are right that he seems to have become inactive over the last year. Consequently the pilot ‘enclave’ started by WIN in the North-East, which still exists, has not grown to any appreciable extent during that period.
.
As Shaun has pointed out, citing Mark Collett’s recent speech, it is impractical to expect people to move large distances to remote locations, and community building doesn’t need to be confined to remote ‘enclaves’. It has always been our intention that enclaves (militant, intentionally White communities) should be created all over the UK and all that is required is for a group of people (a minimum of one initially) to begin cementing their local community through traditionalism, the promotion of local customs and cultural events, and the promotion of racial consciousness and ethnic particularism.
.
There is nothing to stop any one of us from initiating such a programme of community re-building in the areas where we live. Such activity is easier if there is an easily definable community in existence already, but this is not an absolute necessity. I am shortly going to begin publishing a series of articles that should act as a guide to anyone who wants to take up this idea and I will be pleased to hear from anyone who does take up the idea and experiences success.
Philip
- Edit
Although not an infrequent visitor to your site it is the first time I have posted an opinion. Your article and this election encapsulates the reason why I have never joined a Nationalist Party although I did consider the NF years ago. The ‘Right’ in general in this country have always lacked cohesion, direction, and a true a sense of identity. The NF morphed into the BNP and then part into UKIP and various splinter factions. It is easy for the establishment and their sponsors(we know who they are) to pick each one off in turn.
In contrast the with nationalist parties in other countries tend to hold firm and not dissolve and reform every decade, even when their popular appeal on occasion falls back. A good example is the FPO in Austria who promote their national identity openly with cultural fairs and folklore days. The same in Hungary which is overflowing with folk dance troups. We, the native population of this country, have lost our self respect and sense of worth (our enemies have seen to that) and that is why it is now a mongrel state (the Coudenhove Kalergi plan has succeeded here) It is one reason I had my DNA analysed (nothing exotic all European haplogroups)) so that my descendants will know who they once were.
Sadly as a European ethnostate this country is finished and your article tells the story of why.
Max Musson
- Edit
While I understand your motives Philip, I think you are being unduly pessimistic in your dismissal of any hope for the future. Nationalism in this country has historically lacked cohesion, but so too has the left and one only has to look at the back-stabbing and fisticuffs taking place within the Conservative Party and UKIP to see that this is a tendency within all political groupings. It is also all too easy to look abroad with rose-tinted spectacles and to assume that the same thing does not exist elsewhere.
.
What is needed is not for individuals to be so aghast at the current lack of cohesion that they then add to it by refusing to join any organisation at all. Cohesion will come when one organisation achieves a critical mass such that it is indisputably the best and most appropriate vehicle through which to advance our cause. This can only be achieved if people like you join.
.
No nationalist organisation in this country has even 1,000 active members at this time and my belief is that once that figure is reached by one organisation, the ‘success breeds success’ principle that we see in the board game ‘Monopoly’ will take effect, numbers will rocket and the cohesion we all wish to see will become a reality. The solution rests in your hands, and the hands of others like you.
Philip
- Edit
Thanks your reply.
What the nationalist movement desperately needs is charismatic leader. There are some good and able people in the nationalist movements (and I have met one or two of them) but none dare I say have the ‘Nigel Farage’ effect. I even heard a BBC journo call him the main political personality of this era, praise indeed from the an organisation which I regard as the arch-enemy of the British people. Ok UKIP was initially promoted by the establishment to counter the then growing threat of the BNP and Farage gained publicity and media time on the back of it. Sadly all the BNP had to offer was Nick Griffin. The rest as they say is history.
As far as viewing the continental nationalist parties in a glowing light, well I can only speak as I find. They they seem more able connect and identify with their fellow countrymen. There are undoubtedly many reason for this that do not apply to this country. Perhaps the breakthrough of a Le Pen or Wilders figure will change the mood music here as well. I hope so but the clock is ticking and not to our advantage.
Paul
- Edit
Jack Buckby with Liberty GB got there first and SHOULD of been respected. Instead candidates from other parties parachuted themselves in to mess up a competitor and gain minimal publicity.
I’m not a complete fan of Liberty GB (Counter-Jihad and counter-signally) but Jack Buckby took the bull by the horns, put himself in position and is doing all he can to bring interest with his campaign, interact with the public, gain media attention as well as producing consistent online media content, whether making youtube videos, going on radio shows and articles & interviews on more Pro-White media outlets (not just party news sites).
Jack has taken the expected negative flack but has gone out there to explain WHY he stood, or at least has communicated through media avenues why he has. The other parties for all intents and purposes have not. They will say they have of course but you only need to compare what Liberty GB is putting out compared with the other parties to see that Liberty GB at least does it with a purpose.
Max Musson
- Edit
Yes, Jack was the first to throw his hat in the ring, and the others are ‘Johnny-come-latelies’, but he should have conferred with the other nationalist parties beforehand and obtained their agreement to run a single nationalist candidate.
Keith Axon
- Edit
None of the other Nationalist party’s are interested in a clear playing field they just want to be spoilers for their own selfish reasons and their fiefdoms and the free publicity and ,they are in my humble opinion not interested in any type of Unity Politically of the FRAGMENTED political movement despite some of the talk, and talk is cheep.
svenlongshanks
- Edit
The candidates have all been interviewed and give their reasons for why they chose to contest the election here:
https://www.heart.co.uk/yorkshire/news/local/batley-and-spen-by-election-candidates/#gs4Vig6EkZFeM8j6.97
There are so many standing for the reason that Henry Mayhew states, but the Nationalist parties are also using it to gain publicity for our sentiment.