By David Yorkshire:
The following is a transcript of a speech I gave at a nationalist meeting in the summer of last year.
I’m here tonight not to talk about politics, but about something broader and more far-reaching. I’m going to talk about culture, because culture is that which shapes politics and ideas in general, and we are going to look at how this is achieved.
Now even the word culture itself has been politicised and there is ongoing debate about what culture actually is between the various factions of the Marxian left, who exclude any input from the right. I can define what culture is quite succinctly: culture is how a people expresses itself in the world. Marxists and neo-Marxists, of course, wouldn’t like that because that definition implies that distinct peoples create distinct cultures. And yet it obviously is so. Leftists are always trying to sell us the lie that it doesn’t matter if we are flooded with immigrants from all over the world because we are all the same. Well if we are all the same, why do we have multiculturalism?
Now one of the ways a people expresses itself culturally is through the arts: through painting, sculpture, poetry, theatre and so on; and I’m going to start off with a bit of poetry. This is a poem by the greatest German writer of all time, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and is called simply Ein And’res or Another One, as it’s part of a series of lyric poems:
Geh! Gehorche meinen Winken,
Nutze deine jungen Tage,
Lerne zeitig klüger sein!
Auf des Glückes großer Waage
Steht die Zunge selten ein.
Du mußt steigen oder sinken,
Du mußt herrschen und gewinnen
Oder dienen und verlieren,
Leiden oder triumphieren,
Amboß oder Hammer sein.
Most of you are now probably wondering what the hell is going on. This man comes in – we don’t know him from Adam – recites a two-hundred-year-old poem in a language we don’t understand; is he mad or something? Well, it may be true that I’m quite eccentric, but some of you may have thought, hang on, there might be something to this, and had a listen, and although you didn’t understand it, perhaps got a sense of the poem’s music and power. Poetry – if it’s good poetry – should have that effect and Goethe is a master of his craft. So let’s have a look now at what it means. This is my literal translation of it:
Go! Obey my beckoning,
Use the days of your youth,
Learn early to be smarter!
On the great scales of fortune
The balance rarely stays still.
You must rise or fall,
You must rule and win
Or serve and lose,
Suffer or triumph,
Be anvil or hammer.
In other words, you have to be the strong man or the weak, the victor or the victim. This is an eternal truth – and poetry is all about putting great truths into succinct and powerful words. Two hundred years ago, we were a nation of conquerors: our great empire that would come to span a quarter of the globe was under construction. As white Europeans, we would come to dominate most of the world. Wir waren der Hammer: we were the hammer! A hundred years ago, we were hanging onto what we had and the scales of fortune were shifting.
Now, in our present time, we have seen a complete reversal. Any kind of pride in ourselves as a race, any pride in our past achievements and glories, any will to becoming something greater than we are now is ruthlessly crushed. We are now the anvil and we are being hammered by other peoples and other races from all over the world.
What happened? Well again, what happened goes back to culture. I’m going to give you a quotation by Benjamin Disraeli, who, as we all know, was the first Jewish Prime Minister of Great Britain. David Cameron himself is of partly Jewish stock and his probable successor Ed Miliband is also Jewish, but we shouldn’t worry about that of course, because what does it matter if the person who governs us is not of our ethnicity? We’re all human, aren’t we? No one looks after the interests of their own people first, do they? If that’s the case, why should it have mattered when whites governed South Africa and Kenya and Rhodesia?
Long before Disraeli became Prime Minister, he was a writer of considerable note. Some of his most famous books were what are called industrial novels or ‘condition of England’ novels, which are usually about the hardships working-class people suffered in factories, cotton mills, workhouses and so on. Disraeli was also a good friend of Lionel de Rothschild of the infamous Rothschild banking dynasty.
Disraeli said that ‘literary fiction offered the best chance of influencing opinion.’ And he was right. All the arts have an emotional effect on people that is immediate and bypasses reason. This is why the arts are so rigorously controlled now. You look at every programme the BBC broadcasts; it is completely ideological. The revamped Dr Who is just a series of thinly veiled allegories for left-liberal propaganda.
Back in Disraeli’s day though, there obviously were no televisions and books were the primary means of entertainment. Disraeli did not really care about the plight of the poor in the same way as, say, Dickens, Elizabeth Gaskell or Charles Kingsley did, but saw it as a way of playing on the sympathies of his middle-class readership for political gain. At the time, the working class were fighting for various rights, including the right to vote, through the Chartist movement. If you could give the vote to people antagonistic to the ruling class, you could bring down the whole established order and create a new elite to replace them – led of course by people like Disraeli himself.
Bear in mind here that he was not a Whig Liberal politician but a Conservative: those who are meant to conserve the established order. Disraeli helped to change the rules and regulations in both the Houses of Commons and Lords to accept Jews who wouldn’t renounce Judaism. Bear in mind that Talmudic Judaism is explicitly anti-Christian and anti-European.
Now I don’t blame the Jews for undermining our society and putting themselves above us. They’re looking after their own interests and the interests of their group. They’ve heeded the words of Goethe (especially as their Heinrich Heine was a great fan of his as a young man): you have to be the hammer or the anvil.
At one time, they were banned from many European countries and in the ones where they were allowed to stay, they lived in restricted areas we call ghettos. They were the anvil, but now, through bribery, through working on people’s sympathies and, it must be said, through their industry, they have become the hammer. Even now, they are plotting against the sovereign nation of Iran. But I don’t blame them; I blame the corrupt fools in our own tribe who let them out of the ghettoes.
Neither has our history all been about the Jews. We give them too much credit for our downfall. The fact is that even before they got any power here, our civilization had been in decline for some time. As we came out of the mediæval period, the great overarching cultural structures began to break up. Christianity was beginning to lose its authority and was fragmenting into various sects with slightly different interpretations of the scriptures. Monarchies began to cede ever more power to the rising mercantile class that now governs our society, and then the so-called Enlightenment or Age of Reason began at the end of the seventeenth century, which saw the rise of numerous rival philosophies.
This meant that people were becoming more and more individualistic and identifying themselves less and less as part of a group. When that happens, it is very easy for rival groups to pick you off. Frankly, when the Jews decided to conquer us, we were there for the taking. One thing I’ll say for Muslims is that they never forget they are part of a group and they never question their own cultural values. This is why they are so difficult to break down individually.
Another important thing that happened really during the late Renaissance period was that the mercantile and bureaucratic caste that would go on to form the modern middle class began to remove itself culturally from the lower orders. Don’t forget that in Elizabethan England everyone from all walks of life went to see the same play. As this middle class culture became more prominent, culture in general became more feminised, because, when you think about it, merchants don’t lead a particularly masculine lifestyle: it doesn’t rely on heroism or physical strength and endurance as with the warrior and labouring castes.
As the middle class gained more power, so these more feminine art forms gained in cultural value and, for example, literary forms that explored relationships and analyses of ordinary life were promoted as being more intellectual than heroic fiction, whereas heroic fiction also has great depth in exploring the human condition; it’s just done in a different way. In the twentieth century the heroic form became completely disprivileged, largely due to the First World War, which is the reason boys now hate reading at school. Masculine forms have been forced into low cultural forms like comics.
Yet it was not always so, and poetry was not always about love and emotions and flowers, although there is nothing wrong with such poetry. Poetry has many themes and many forms. This is my translation of the beginning of the Anglo-Saxon poem Beowulf:
Hold. We of the Spear Danes hear of the power
In bygone days of our clan kings,
How our thanes did daring deeds.
Oft Scyld Scefing emptied the mead-benches
Of enemy hosts of many peoples
And awed their earls. From that first time when he was
Found helpless and wretched he was well-repaid by Fate,
He waxed under clouds, grew in worth
Until before him the folks nearby
And beyond the whale-road had to bow down
And give gifts. That was one good king.
This is a heroic poem; it is about strength, masculinity, bravery, what it means to be a warrior, what it means to be leader and protector of a people. This poem comes from a time when your village had a very real threat of being attacked by raiders and the three creatures Beowulf does battle with in the poem are symbolic of such threats. These threats are coming again today now that we have gangs brought over from the slums of the third world by our illustrious politicians.
Unfortunately, the kind of literature that our young men will be familiar with will be things like To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, which even back in the 1980s, we had to study at school. Why did we have to study this? It was to ‘show us’ that white society is evil, that whites in general are bigoted and unjust, and to socialise us into white guilt, so that when a white is attacked in the street by a black, his first reaction is not to attack back, but to think ‘I deserve this.’ There is now a huge industry in this kind of literature where whites – especially males – are denigrated and reviled in this way. I immediately think of Zadie Smith and Toni Morrison.
This also has another function, which is to turn the white man’s women against him; because, if you grow up believing the men of your own tribe are inherently evil, effete and cowardly, you’re not going to want to marry one and bear his children, are you? This is why heroic literature was also for girls and women and the whole tribe: because it gave cohesion to the tribe and made the women proud of their menfolk.
But heroism was only one theme among many when the storyteller came round to impart these tales and verses to his audience, and there was something for everyone, but there were always morals in the tales. How many folktales have you heard where you must beware the outsider? That’s not very inclusive, is it? Keeping the werewolf at bay is not very conducive to diversity, is it? You’ll notice too how many of these outsider figures like witches and vampires have aquiline noses. Who are they getting at here?
I’ve concentrated a bit on literature here, but culture takes many forms. I recently attended a Scottish dance group, where I was actually dragged up for the last dance. This is something that white especially working-class males are reluctant to get involved with, as they feel that it is somehow silly. The fact is they have been deliberately alienated from their own culture. How often is Morris dancing ridiculed on television? And yet, if it is done properly, as I’ve seen at the Whitby folk festival, it is primal and full of energy and is a cousin of Bavarian and Austrian Schuhplattler. But the kind of people the BBC like to show doing it have a strange lack of lower jaw.
It’s the same with dancing round the maypole, which you rarely see now. When I was at primary school, we did it every May Day and it’s actually a fertility ritual that has its origins in paganism. These dances are natural and organic and full of meaning and spiritual energy. One thing I noticed about Scottish dance was how many of the dances were based on weaving, with the participants weaving in and out of each other like the threads on a loom. This makes perfect sense when your society’s primary industry is the manufacture of textiles like tweed. You look at the various dances now: they are inorganic and devoid of all meaning and are set by crazes and trends.
The other thing I noticed was the huge imbalance of men and women. There were several attractive single women in their twenties and thirties without male dance partners, and if they have gone so far as to take up forms of dance that are traditional and absolutely European, then they have already taken a few steps towards being in a meeting room like this one tonight.
Politics doesn’t really attract women. Many nationalists have wondered why this movement has largely failed to attract women and have thought that softening our image and moderating our policies are the answers, but they are wrong. The reason women are not drawn to nationalism is that virtually no one has created cultural groups that work alongside the political struggle.
If you look at the Irish nationalists of the late nineteenth century, they set up metapolitical structures whereby people would absorb nationalistic ideas without even realising it: groups like the Gaelic League that promoted the Gaelic language, dance and music, the Gaelic Athletics Association that promoted Irish athletics, sports and games, and the Celtic Twilight, which was a literary movement that focused on Ireland’s heroic past and mythology. W B Yeats was the most famous and influential figure in that literary movement, although there were other noteworthy writers like Lady Gregory and John Millington Synge, and was founded on the works of an earlier poet called James Clarence Mangan, who translated the poem by Goethe I started with into English. He knew the importance of the messages in that poem: ‘learn early to be smarter’, ‘you must be anvil or hammer’.
In time, I would like to see these metapolitical structures emulated here. But first we must do two things and there is something everyone can do. The first is to look into our own culture, your own traditions, your own history and heritage. For over seventy years, leftist historians like the Marxist Jew Eric Hobsbawm [he was gracious enough to die a few weeks after this speech] have been rewriting our history to make white European the villain of the piece. He is the slave master, the concentration camp guard, the rapist of Africa; he is essentially the stuff of mediæval dæmonology. It has been almost completely erased that wherever he went, he created hospitals, sanitation and better living standards that raised longevity and quality of life. In what was once Bombay, now Mumbai, they still have the Victorian sewage system we constructed over a hundred years ago – and it still works, although it struggles to cope with a population that has increased tenfold to twenty million. The people who have largely taken our place as world governors take without giving back.
We must not let the rewriting of our history go unchallenged. ‘He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.’ Isn’t that what George Orwell said in Nineteen Eighty-four? Get to know your culture and let no one take it away from you. Why? Because it’s yours. You wouldn’t let anyone steal your mobile phone, would you? Well, your culture is more important, because it gives you a sense of who you are and being robbed of it is the worst form of identity theft.
In the Communist Manifesto it says: ‘You say we will do away with culture, but all culture is bourgeois culture.’ Rubbish! We’ve looked at some folk culture today: it is the link between us and our ancestors and shows us where we’ve come from so that we can see where we’re going and what we are capable of achieving in the future. But the reason Karl Marx said that was to get people to reject their own culture – and he’s almost succeeded. Why? Because a people without identity can be herded like cattle.
The other reason to get in touch with your own culture is that, like it or not, we are now part of a multicultural, multiethnic, multiracial society. This has been imposed upon us and we do not like it, but nonetheless it is the reality we face, and we have to deal with it because you can only go forwards from the point where you are now. Before 1948, you didn’t need to have such a strong sense of who you were, because almost everyone you met was part of your tribe.
Things have changed now: these people – or rather peoples – who have come in from Africa and Asia and elsewhere are very vocal about telling us who they are and who are not part of their people, but can we do the same? If someone asks you what does it mean to be White British or White European or simply White, can you answer them? And if the answer is no, reconnect with our culture and who we are, because if you don’t know the answer, our enemies have won the mental and moral battles already.
Whether the people who now own that much fought-over strip of land in the Middle East actually came from there is an irrelevance; they have it now. Everything else matters not. And they managed to get it because for hundreds of years, they looked after their own culture and guarded their own identity and worked for their own interests; and what’s more, they were right to do so. Just as, if I were running the country, I would expel the lot of them, like Edward I did. And I would be right to do so. Everyone with an ounce of sense fights for the good of their own tribe, because if you don’t you will be swept aside by people with more mental strength, given to them by their security in their own identity. The idiot liberals who believe in this ‘one world’ garbage are absolutely wrong in their view of the world and are merely weak minded fools and victims in waiting.
Now I said there were two things I would like you to do. The second is I would like you to take up a pastime. It can be anything constructive: it can be a sport, a musical instrument, an art form, or an academic pursuit. And I want you to get good at it. Everyone has a modicum of talent in something. You’ll find out what your talent is because it’s generally the thing you enjoy. And I’d like you to join some kind of club, whether it be a rugby club, an athletics club, a writers’ workshop, an evening art course, a dance troupe, a band or whatever and that’s the first stage.
The second, once you have reached a decent level and once you have observed how these groups are organised, will be to form your own groups, just like the Irish nationalists did. Some of you may take your talent to a very high level. You may even get on television; and if you do and you get that trophy or that prize or award and the interviewer comes up and asks you what inspired you, you say: ‘I did this for my people, for my tribe, for my race.’
And the interviewer will probably say: ‘You….you’re one of those,’ and he won’t mean a homosexual, because that’s to be encouraged in a left-liberal society. And if he’s white, male and working for the BBC, he will probably be one anyway. ‘You’re one of those,’ he’ll say, ‘You’re a racist!’
And you say: ‘Racism is a word invented by a communist Jew, Magnus Hirschfeld, and he designed it as a deliberate attack on my race. That’s why Jo Brand is allowed to say only whites can be racist; that’s why the Jewish academic Susan Sonntag was allowed to say that the white race is the cancer of humanity; that’s why another Jewish academic Noel Ignatiev is allowed to say the white race should be destroyed. I have oppressed no one, yet why is it my people are being pushed out of our own ancestral homelands? Why can a negro show pride in his race, but I can’t in mine?’
And that’s all you’ll be able to say, because they’ll have cut the mic by then, yet the message will be out. But you have to get to that point first and only a few will. The others will coach the clubs they have formed, which is an invaluable task in itself. But first we must defeat our apathy. Life is for living! You’re only here once. Make use of that time. And don’t let the left tell you it’s too late to do anything. It’s never too late. Look at Israel.
I’m going to leave you now with a last poem. This is by T S Eliot, perhaps the greatest poet of the twentieth century in the English language. Our enemies would call him a racist, an anti-Semite and an elitist bigot, whereas I would say he was a traditionalist, a cultural conservative and a fine man concerned about the problems that beset his own race. You can look up his purportedly anti-Semitic poems yourselves, but I’m going to read an extract from the last of his Four Quartets called Little Gidding, which puts nicely into verse many of the things we have been looking at this evening:
We are born with the dead:
See, they return, and bring us with them.
The moment of the rose and the moment of the yew-tree
Are of equal duration. A people without history
Is not redeemed from time, for history is a pattern
Of timeless moments. So, while the light fails
On a winter’s afternoon, in a secluded chapel
History is now and England.
By David Yorkshire © 2013
# # # #
Nimble
- Edit
An excellent article, it’s given me a lot to think about.
ConnalOakesHolt
- Edit
Wonderfully inspiring. An excellent plan!
Franks
- Edit
We must reach out into the estates where our people still reside and not just the leafy middle suburbs. This will be our greatest challenge. Give our people their culture, their history and also give them heroes. Give them heroes.
Crazy Englishman
- Edit
My 6 year old boy came home from school with an example of the twisted “education system”, a book titled Georgina and the dragon, in which George and Georgina are twins, it conspires that George prefers to stay at home sewing while his sister goes dragon slaying.
I couldn’t bring myself to let him read such damaging and insulting material, I proceeded to explain to him the history of St George, and also how he should always question what he learns throughout life, as this can only lead to better enlightenment.
It has become a growing trend of equality and diversity training in this year’s curriculum, a whole half a term focused on India and their culture, a week on Grace Darling (but the teacher failed to mention that Grace’s farther was even present at the rescue, let alone instrumental). Not to forget an African dance group that visited at the end of the last school year.
A few months ago I saw footage of a perverse politician, stating that rural areas are lacking the enrichment that the third worlders offer, so by way of amendment and in preparation for the future tsunami of immigrants, they are increasing the budget for the brainwashing of our children, this along with a teacher that seems to be totally embracing the liberal swing, makes correcting their miss-teachings a fine line to tread without breaking a young child’s faith in school.
David Yorkshire
- Edit
I’m afraid that you have to break your child’s faith in school, for school is little more than a brainwashing camp into ideas that will result in all kinds of pathologies, psychological complexes and, ultimately, the destruction of our race. The neo-Marxist education system is there to abuse white children.
katana
- Edit
An impressive informative speech that doesn’t shrink from highlighting the role that many Jews have played in undermining our society.
That poem from Geothe is also impressive in its masculine no nonsense Germanic statement of the real world power struggle that we always exist in, despite how much we try to wish it away.
The background and motivation behind Disraeli’s writings was new to me and makes a lot of sense.
I have to say I really like your style and depth of thinking. The “awakening” is happening and it’s happening because of people like you and websites like WS. Thank you!
I would urge all readers to copy this article and email it on to your contacts. Every bit helps and quickens the day that we take back our world.
Shaun
- Edit
Great article! Culture is the genesis of collective belief, so it stands to reason that a pro-white message and pro-white role models would have a major effect!
I think, however, the old chestnut (although true) about Magnus Hirchfield won’t work unless the person is ready to listen. Think: imagine an interview with a BBC journalist after you’ve won a prize for horse-shoe tossing and you say, ”well, the term racist was a invented by a Marxist Jew {although true} called Mangus Hirchfield.”
For a start, most people don’t know what Marxist means. They will instead hear the word ”JEW”; and then they will think ”HOLOCAUST”. Then the conditioned masses will think you’re a Nazi-who-wants-clone-Hitler-and-kill-six-million-Jews. That’s the truth!!!!!
No, the moment you start mentioning Jews you have lost the argument. I know this from experience. You should instead say this (sorry to sound patronizing):
Interviewer:
What does this mean to you?
You:
I hope this can inspire other White people to fight the genocide against our race.
Interviewer:
Aren’t you racist?
You:
You’re just saying that because I’m White; anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.
Interviewer:
Why are you so filled with hate?
You:
Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone. White countries and ONLY White countries have had conditions thrown on them where they can’t ensure their long-term survival — it is GENOCIDE!
I’m sorry to critique such a great speech, but I feel the interview part of it followed a misconception that our people will wake up once they become historians. No, we need to spread memes and the best way to spread them is the mantra. Forget about waking people up to the ”Jews” (unless they are teachable or you create a mass audience and they can be subjected to a mass repetition of propaganda) and concentrate on spreading a succinct, easy message that we can target at all White people.
Once we get White people to understand that they are being genocided (which is possible if all nationalists get on board with the mantra) the Jews won’t be a problem. Hell, they can all go and live in Israel and be the Master Race over there. I’ll buy the tickets!!!!!!
Max Musson
- Edit
Shaun, you may be right about the mantra, but I believe the mantra needs to be modified. When we have said ‘Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians and then say ‘White countries for everyone’, it sounds as though we are supporting the idea that ‘White countries should be for everyone’. What we should say is, ‘ We are told that Africa is for the Africans and Asia is for the Asians, but then THEY say White countries are for everyone. White countries and ONLY White countries have had conditions IMPOSED upon us that will cause the obliteration of our people — its GENOCIDE!’
.
When we talk about ‘White countries’ and White nations’, we should never talk of ‘THEM’, we should always be talking of ‘US’. It is ‘US’, ‘WE’, the White people that they are trying to destroy.
Thomas a'Becket
- Edit
It is key words in any mantra. Anglophobia, anglophobic, ethnic cleansing of the English, genocide of the white race etc. that become easy to repeat time after time after time that are important.
We want our country back, taking our country for example back, once out in the public domain are easy to repeat.
Stop the genocide of the white race, give our children a future!
David Yorkshire
- Edit
“I think, however, the old chestnut (although true) about Magnus Hirchfield won’t work unless the person is ready to listen. Think: imagine an interview with a BBC journalist after you’ve won a prize for horse-shoe tossing and you say, ”well, the term racist was a invented by a Marxist Jew {although true} called Mangus Hirchfield.”
For a start, most people don’t know what Marxist means.”
Firstly, I never said Marxist; I said communist. People know what communist means. Always try to throw in the words torture and gulag when you mention the word communist.
Secondly, people don’t readily sympathise with Jewish causes anymore. Even many on the left, aligned now with militant Islam, don’t like them. They support the Palestinian cause etc.
If anyone throws the word holocaust at me, I say “A fairytale intended to induce the masses into accepting Zionism and submitting to the machinations of organised Jewry”. I invite the challenge. I’ll take on all comers on the holocaust narrative and others must also be prepared to do so. If you can’t even name your adversary, how on earth are you going to prevail over him?
Nimble
- Edit
‘Interviewer:
Aren’t you racist?
You:
You’re just saying that because I’m White; anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.
Interviewer:
Why are you so filled with hate?
You:
Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone. White countries and ONLY White countries have had conditions thrown on them where they can’t ensure their long-term survival — it is GENOCIDE! ‘
I have to disagree with these forms of ‘debate’. As far as I can see the constant YouTube comments of ‘Anti-Racism is just a codeword for Anti-White’ are simply the right of centre version of ‘you’re a racist’.
It’s a bad mantra plain and simple, like it or not, it IS equating White people with racism, it is giving leftists the perfect opportunity to say “See? You’re admitting it yourself, Whites are inherently racist, which is why to be anti-racist we have to be anti-White”.
I cringe whenever I see that mantra written on comment sections…
The ‘Asia for Asians, African for Africans, White countries for everybody’ line isn’t as bad, but I think mantras in general do little good, no brainwashed from birth average White man or woman, ready to leap at any ‘racist’ comment, is going to suddenly turn to racial realism because someone wrote an often repeated line, and an often mocked line (again mocked because it the former mantra sets itself up to be mocked).
Thomas a'Becket
- Edit
What it had done has implanted the thought of genocide into the mind. Because genocide is the key word whichever side of the debate you are on.
Thomas a'Becket
- Edit
We often forget that people don’t debate whether or not a Cadbury flake is the cumbliest flakiest chocolate in the world. They just buy a bar next time they go down the shop.
Shaun
- Edit
Dear Mr. Musson, I have given what you have said some thought and I don’t agree for two reasons:
1. The meme has already started so we have no power over it.
2. Too many words create too much confusion.
I have spent a long, long time trying to work out why our people think the way they do, and I have concluded that the problem isn’t what they think, it is that they don’t think. In reality. they CAN’T think.
The early Marxists understood this, so did master propagandists like Bernard Bernays. You must, if you want to change group behavior, create a simple cluster of beliefs (a meme) that can be decoded by the idiot masses using their own powers of reason and logic.
The moment you start mentioning THEY the average White person’s brainwashed unconscious will produce feelings of discomfort that he be branded a racist. No, good propaganda offers a shock — in this case the truth of White genocide — and is delivered in a way that can be remembered; and, most importantly, passed on to others.
That is a good meme.
Of course, the mantra needs to be heard at least 3 times before the person remembers it and that is why you can’t have too many words or too many questions attached. If WE can manage to link the Mantra throughout the collective White unconscious there will be a paradigm shift — or, to be more exact, a shift in perception.
I’ll say one thing: the beauty of the mantra is how you can use it to identify ant-whites (sounds very much like the other ”anti” doesn’t it) and find out who is with us and against us. I reckon we have just over half of the White race.
Crazy Englishman
- Edit
The mantra is fine for the nationalist movements basic outline, although I agree that white countries for every one, sounds more like an invitation.
We need an obstacle put in the way of peoples sheep like march through life, that will cause them to choose a better path, although it has been said that people don’t like facts thrown at them, or they prefer the comfortable lie, How else do we get people involved asap in the little time left?
I once was going to produce my own leaflet, in the form of a thankyou note from our executioners, but I gave up on the idea as a bad one, due to lack of expertise among other reasons.
This was my basic idea
A BIG THANKYOU
from your government
Thankyou:
For your inability to wake up
For your lack of willing to look beyond tomorrow
For your materialistic lifestyles
For failing to recognise your people, as extended family
For allowing us to give away your home land
special thanks to:
Media and arts, as this wouldn’t of been possible without suggestive programing.
Haters of the white race, for twisting your patriotic pride into a racial crime.
The politically correct, for propagating our views.
We have almost reached a point of no return, and will soon be allowing your replacements to help enforce your grandchildrens genocide, approx 25 to 30 years from now.
What can you do to help?
Embrace multiculturalism, have mixed race children, Carry on and stay calm.
Take immigrants as individuals, you won’t see an overall threat this way.
But most of all DO NOT educate yourself on the consequence of immigration.
most grateful the BIG Lib.Lab.CON
ANTI RACISTS PRO ANTI WHITE
===================================
Anyway decided to leave it to more professional types, but I feel that more propaganda needs to be spread to keep the movement alive, also to let people know they are not alone in their thinking, or even to get them thinking.
Max Musson
- Edit
An interesting idea. You’ve got me thinking. 🙂
Shaun
- Edit
Dear Crazy Englishman,
I think you are onto something with the idea of a thank you note!
Nevertheless, I think it is important that we understand the basic mentality of our target audience (non-nationalist Whites). I believe you can sum it up in one word: belief.
For 60-odd years our people have lived among non-Whites and many of them have had wonderful, peaceful lives. Most Whites haven’t integrated into the various non-White cultures, but the wealthier Whites have been left alone. Many of our people can’t see a problem. Or, to be more precise, they BELIEVE their current reality won’t be affected that much by the changing demographics of our nation.
If their lives won’t be effected then they also believe their decedents’ lives won’t be effected. These people, the non-thinking masses, are in a pleasant Zio-media-induced dream that I envy. They are robots following the lifestyle obsession culture of the corporate west.
In short, these people need to be shocked out of their robot state. Gurgieff, a great thinker of the last century, believed robot-level consciousness was the genesis of what we now call the sheeple mentality, and he said the only way to break this mentality is a shock.
Telling the target audience that they should feel guilty (as they should) about their apathy toward white decline might work on some people, but it isn’t shocking. telling Whites they are being genocided is shocking, and it easier to spread than a letter.
Remember: the average IQ is 100. That level of intellect is no prerequisite for remembering a letter, but it fully capable of remembering a meme.