I’m not sure whether or not the Commonwealth conference has quite finished yet. I thought it had, but then caught something on the radio the other day about a related function or reception, but as my interest in the institution is limited I didn’t really pay attention. Perhaps I should have, because this seemingly moribund organisation is coming back to bite us.
It is not by coincidence that the conference was overshadowed by the Windrush scandal. It’s a great pity that the name of this pretty Gloucestershire river should be associated forever with the beginning of the great tragedy – the transformation of England by mass immigration into something quite alien – which began when the SS Empire Windrush docked at Tilbury on the 23rd June 1948 with several hundred Jamaicans on board. This article is not concerned with the rights and wrongs of the so-called “Windrush children” – yes, the Government fouled up (identity cards would have avoided the problem but they’re offensive to delicate liberal consciences) and yes, innocent people have suffered, but the numbers concerned are utterly insignificant when set beside the scale of immigration, legal and otherwise, now besetting our country.
It’s an irony that throughout the great days of the British Empire, Britain herself, the homeland, the mother country, remained almost untouched. The last census to be counted before the arrival of the SS Empire Windrush, that of 1931 (the census of 1941 was cancelled because of the War), disclosed a total non-European population in the United Kingdom of just 7,000. But just as the Empire began to dissolve into the Commonwealth, the then Labour government’s British Nationality Act of 1948 saw fit to confer the right to live in Britain on all of its erstwhile subjects. Hence Windrush, and in the following years hundreds of thousands of “Commonwealth immigrants” poured in. Public concern was intense (hence the explosive reaction to Enoch Powell’s great speech) and gradually, grudgingly, half-heartedly, government enacted a series of restrictive measures which got the situation more or less under control – until Blair was elected Prime Minister in 1997 and opened the floodgates to immigration from the world beyond the EU.
The Commonwealth is the shadow on earth of the old British Empire. For that reason it enjoyed a sentimental regard on the conservative right, while the left loved it, and still loves it, because it’s full of colourful people who are so much more exciting than the “pale and stale” variety. I suspect that the Queen’s long love affair with the Commonwealth has elements of both sentiments.
As every nationalist will know, the evolution of the Empire should have seen an “ever closer union” (to borrow a phrase) between the United Kingdom and the other British countries (as they still saw themselves down to the 1960s) of Australia, Canada and New Zealand. The non- white countries should have been let go, retaining only trading links and no right of settlement. But what didn’t happen didn’t happen, and we are where we are – out of the EU and trying to rebuild the commercial links with the Commonwealth which we severed in 1973.
And it is here that the great danger lies. India – our favoured partner for a free trade agreement – is already making ominous noises about visas in exchange for trade, and the Tories seem inclined to indulge these demands. Boris “it’s not about numbers it’s about control” wants a “liberal” immigration policy. He is supported by Gove. Someone called Chris Skidmore, described as “Conservative Party Vice-Chair for Policy” wants to “reset” immigration policy and “de-toxify” it. Influential Conservative commentators such as Fraser Nelson and James Kirkup demand a liberal immigration policy and insist that Theresa May is the only one in the Cabinet who still believes in the “unattainable” target of 100,000 net immigrants per annum. These people know perfectly well that the Brexit referendum was won on public concern about immigration, but it now seems that they intend merely to replace EU immigrants with non-EU.
Nigel Farage has said that there is a betrayal coming, and it is certainly beginning to look more and more as if he is right. With immigration at the levels which we have experienced for the last twenty years, and with white British birthrates in England and Wales already down to 60% or below, our country faces an existential crisis. We had better get ready to fight all over again.
By Frederick Dixon © 2018
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]# # # #
Bill Baillie
- Edit
Frederick Dixon, I agree with every word of your article. The Australians used to have a White Australia policy but since they became dependent on Asian markets they have opened the gates to the Third World. Boris Johnson pretends to be a great British patriot but his obsession with the Commonwealth could be our downfall. We are exchanging Poles for Pakistanis.
rerevisionist
- Edit
I doubt if ‘being dependent on Asian markets’, even if it’s true, was the reason for erosion of white Australia by Jews. It’s the same process as elsewhere. I recall a book by George Mikes [Hungarian Jew; pronounced ‘Mee-kesh’] on Australia, in effect saying policy was shocking and outdated. I remember in about 1970, someone in the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation called ‘Laurie Aarons’, ‘Secretary of the Australian Communist Party’, advocatin immigration. Fake economic reasons for nonwhites are a favourite with Jews: “They’ll pay our pensions”, “They are skilled workers” being two such lies.
francis
- Edit
Well at looks like Brexit won’t even happen now anyway. With over 12 million foreigners living in the UK and increasing the pro EU brigade will probably win the second Referendum anyway. I predict Remain would now win over 20 million votes and that will reverse to 2016 Referendum.
India can get lost, so too can the commonwealth and the monarchy with it too.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
A very well written article, Frederick.
It is paradoxical that if we were to meaningfully leave the European Union and were able to control our borders then we could be in a position whereby non-European migration may increase, for example from India, in exchange for certain trade agreements.But in the process European immigration would virtually end and in the process less would be arriving of a compatible racial and ethnic stock. This would exacerbate an already critical situation.
It has long become clear that the Conservative Party is not an organisation which would protect the national interest in terms of demographics and would subordinate everything in the interests of trade and Big Business.Hence for commercial expediency, mass immigration would be tolerated.
Since the War, the Labour Party has never taken seriously the concerns of white Britons as regards the threat posed by mass immigration and has been even more zealous than the Tories in accommodating the arrival of non-Europeans to our shores.
Many White Britons, especially from the working class voted to leave the EU as it was a vote of protest against the Establishment and vested interests of Big Business, all wishing to remain. Furthermore the Referendum was conflated with the pernicious effects of mass immigration whereby our cities have been transformed beyond recognition, due to the stark demographic changes.Although voting to leave would not directly resolve the legacy of non-European mass immigration, the “Common People” felt empowered to act in a way which would both displease and inconvenience global vested interests.
Max Musson
- Edit
Alec, you are right, however there is little value any more in drawing any distinctions between Labour and Conservative where mass immigration is concerned. There was once a time (about 100 years ago) when on such issues the attitude of both Labour and Conservative Parties was more aligned with our own, but as recent decades have shown; Labour desire the transformative effect of mass immigration for deranged egalitarian and humanitarian reasons; while the Conservatives desire the transformative effect in order to commoditise humanity in the service of global capitalism.
.
Under the current Conservative government, we now have the son of two of the ‘Windrush generation’ presiding as Home Secretary over the policy we should as a nation adopt in resolving this issue — a son who is promising to “do right” by the Windrush generation and whose sympathies evidently lie, not with the indigenous British people, but with the immigrants from whom he is supposed to protect us, and from whom he is so closely related by blood.
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
A Pakistani Home Secretary – what could go wrong?
francis
- Edit
The details of all BNP and other nationalists details being handed over to ISIS and Antifa
Max Musson
- Edit
The full membership list of the BNP has been published twice now, which means that list will have found its way into the hands of both Antifa and ISIS, and nothing particularly dire followed.
.
The greatest danger to us is not a manifestation of extreme violence, which would arouse our people from their slumber, but the slow, almost imperceptible withering of our national consciousness that comes from an extended period of low-level and seemingly tolerable hostility.
francis
- Edit
Watch this, it is inspiring: When The English Began To Hate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j12y9OwEC34
francis
- Edit
Read this. We CAN actually sue for racial discrimination
https://libertygb.org.uk/news/discrimination-case-anglophobic-bbc-wants-silence
Max Musson
- Edit
Of course we can in theory sue for racial discrimination. However, before we can sue we must first be discriminated against and be able to demonstrate that the discrimination we have suffered was based upon our race, religion or nationality, which will not be easy when the entire legal profession is hostile to the concept of rights for Whites. You will notice that the Souster verses BBC case dates back to 2001 and there has not been another case like it since.
francis
- Edit
Max. I agree. In fact there were three trials for the Souster v BBC case.
The first case was in 1997, at an Employment Tribunal. The claim succeeded because of the successful Power case that year.
The BBC successfully appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal in 1999 arguing that the English no longer existed.
The final case was finally settled at the Court of Session in Edinburgh (Scotland’s Appeal Court) in late 2000. The Court of Session ordered that the English DID exist as race under the Race Relations Act (1976) (under the definition of national origins) because England and Scotland were once separate nations.
The reason why no similar case has been fought today is twofold.
Firstly the Equality and Human Rights Commission would never fund such a case due to its own racial bias and secondly you correctly state the legal profession is largely hostile to the rights of indigenous white Europeans.
The Bolshevik Jews laid the legal weapons for non whites including the Muslim Brotherhood to use as a weapon to destroy us and take over.
I think Tilbrook’s solicitors in Essex are the only firm of solicitors who take on an anti English discrimination case.
Alternatively we could sue as Litigants In Person in the County Court.
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
Alternatively, we could remember the old dictum that “a man who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client” and avoid the quagmire that is legal process altogether. The system is loaded against us: the law making, law enforcing and tribunals at every level are all in the hands of those who have given in to the enemy’s ideas.
Our struggle is ideological, political, cultural, metapolitical. We need to think and organise as a resistance movement.
francis
- Edit
Looking at the local election results today, it looks Corbychovs Laboir Party has peaked. They should be making massive gains at this stage and even Londonistan is not entirely marxist.
Labour are seething with anger because their invented Windrush scandel didn’t work. Now the vipers in Momentum and the Blairite Israeli vipers are about to turn on each other and split the Labour Party in two. Labour either becomes the Wahhabi Islamomarxist Party or it becomes the Blairite Labour Party for Israel. It cannot be both.