The launch of the “I was a stranger” campaign by Christian churches in the US to back “immigration reform” (i.e. the complete racial destruction of America) raises the pertinent question once again: not can Christianity survive the West, but can the West survive Christianity?
Calling immigration reform a “religious imperative,” the Evangelical Immigration Table is asking Christians across America to engage in “40 days of praying and reading scriptures related to immigrants and immigration,” in what it has named the “I was a stranger” challenge.
This phrase is drawn from the words of Jesus Christ, as quoted in the New Testament book of Matthew 25:35: “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in.”
According to the new initiative, the churches intend to draw on “more than 850,000 Facebook and Twitter users,” while its website features a downloadable toolkit for churches interested in participating.
The goal is to have Christians—including politicians involved in the immigration debate—reflect on what the Bible teaches about immigrants,” it continues.
Bill Hamel, the president of the Evangelical Free Church of America, and one of the leaders involved in the campaign, spoke of immigration as a rights issue.
“I missed the civil rights movement, I watched and did nothing and for decades I have regretted those days,” Hamel said. “I’m committed not to sit this one out.”
The frontal attack on America’s racial integrity by the Christian churches cannot help but recall the words penned by Marcus Eli Ravage, a well-known Jewish American immigrant writer who wrote many books and articles about immigration in America and Europe between the world wars. He also penned a famous biography of the Rothschilds.
Angered by growing anti-Semitism from Christians in the early 20th century, Ravage pointed out that if people were looking for a “Jewish conspiracy” then they should stop talking about Communism or Capitalism, but face up to the fact that Christianity—and therefore the post-Roman Western Civilization—has a Jewish spiritual, historical, intellectual and even moral basis.
“Our tribal customs have become the core of your moral code. . . A Jewish rebel-prophet is the central figure in your religious worship. . . Half your wars, great and little, are religious wars, fought over the interpretation of one thing or another in our teachings. . . We have imposed upon you an alien book and an alien faith which you cannot swallow or digest, which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit . . . Your religion, your education, your morals, your social, governmental and legal systems, are fundamentally of our making. . . You Christians do not seem to know where your religion came from, nor how, nor why,” Ravage wrote, before continuing on assert that Christianity was nothing but a form of Judaism which Paul (Saul of Tarsus) had used to subvert the Roman Empire.
Ravage’s works, recently republished under the title “A Jew Answers Anti-Semitism” make disturbing reading for Christian and atheist alike, and are critical to understanding why exactly Christian churches appear to be so hostile to European racial integrity today.
frederickdixon
- Edit
The quotation from Ravage says it all. Sadly, people do need something beyond themselves to believe in. Can a belief in race and nation fill that need? I remember reading (probably in Spearhead) the late – and very sorely missed – John Tyndall remarking that “race is my religion and the nation is my church”. That is a spiritual belief because its a belief in something which is older, deeper and wider than our own brief and narrow spans, but its a belief entirely devoid of any supernatural element.
If we could somehow combine some such understanding with the preservation of our cultural inheritance from Christianity – the incomparable buildings, liturgy, music which lie close to the heart of our national identity – then we would have something worth believing in.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
If nothing else the threat brought about by coloured immigration is bringing two thousand years of Christianity into focus. We are now at a cross-roads where it should be possible to extricate our Aryan heritage from the dysgenic oppression of Christian dogma. Even now we have racial nationalists who talk about preserving our Christian heritage as though our Western culture grew up because of Christianity rather in spite of it. However, this can’t be for much longer.
Up until the ’70’s, before the full horror of what was happening to our race became apparent, it might have been possible to delude ourselves into thinking that an older form of “muscular” Christianity was our true tradition and liberal Christianity a mere aberration. When one thinks of the exquisite beauty of sacred Christian music, gothic cathedrals, the Sistine Chapel, not to mention the poetry of Blake and Milton, it’s only too easy to identify with the Christian tradition. However, if we’re to retain our sanity and identity we have to make a clear distiction between the superficial Christian propaganda and gloss on our culture and the deeper genius and aspirations of our folk.
David Warner
- Edit
Someone once said that the Anglican Church in Britain ‘backed the wrong horse at the time of the Industrial Revolution’, but it could also be said today that the evangelical church in Britain stands at a fork in the road – where it must determine where its loyalties lie. Many of us believe that there is an all-out racial conflict coming that will eventually engulf the whole of Britain – once the debt bubble (estimated by some sources at over 900% of the nation’s wealth) bursts. This will result in economic catastrophe, forcing the government to privatise the NHS and scrap the benefit system. Then we shall see the terrible fruits of this nonsensical failed social – engineering experiment called ‘multiculturalism’. The evangelical churches will be forced to choose sides – will they stand with the indigenous people of this country? – or will they side with the immigrants? Should they opt for the latter – they are well and truly finished.
Robert Wakely
- Edit
First of all I would like to point out that there are believed to be at least 33,000 protestant Christian denominations in the world, so Mr Hamel’s opinions can hardly be representative of all protestant denominations. They all have different doctrines. That’s their basic problem. His personal opinion is important to hear but that’s as far as it goes. Certainly he does not speak for the Catholic Church either.
The quote from Marcus Eli Ravage is another complete red herring and the nonsense he speaks can be refuted easily. “We have imposed on you an alien book..” Really? So we are to understand that St Paul spent his time evangelising on behalf of Pharisaic Judaism, spreading the thoughts, words and opinions of the Temple Rabbis as a sort of undercover agent? Pull the other one. Or, we use the Old Testament in the Bible? They should be glad of that. However, Jesus pointed out that the Pharisees had lost contact with the Jewish people, were self absorbed, and had failed miserably in their priestly obligations. If only they had followed the Torah more faithfully! Jesus was probably alluding to the fact that, by his day, the Jews had started living by an early form of the Talmud. If you really want to understand Jews, read the Talmud, not the what we call the Old Testament. There’s a world of difference.
We are also informed by Ravage that, “Your religion, your education, your morals, your social, governmental and legal systems, are fundamentally of our making…” What nonsense. Is the New Testament part of the Jewish religious canon? Our system of law? The Parliament? Two thousand years of Catholic refinement of our beliefs? Of course not. The only common point of contact was the fact that Jesus was an observant Jew and that is irrelevant, because he did not like what he saw in the His own Jewish people. If we actually were a branch of Judaism I suppose they would love us a lot more than they do.
Crebolina
- Edit
Ravage, as a former Rothschild biographer, would have been well-versed in disinformation tactics.