Among the various nationalist groups in Britain, an increasing number have now turned away from electioneering as the means by which they hope to bring about political change and the salvation of our people.
These groups have come to realise that the majority of the electorate are now so thoroughly mentally conditioned by our corrupt mass media that they are incapable of exercising their right to vote in a rational way. Furthermore, these nationalist groups have come to realise that the electoral system in this country is deliberately administered in a sloppy manner – such a sloppy manner as to facilitate widespread electoral corruption on the part of our current political elite.
When nationalist political parties contest elections, we are grossly and unfairly demonised by the media and portrayed as hateful individuals who are alleged to have psychopathic tendencies and who if we were ever allowed to acquire power are likely to commit genocide as a result of our alleged irrational hatred of minority groups.
In reality however, nationalists are driven by precisely the same concerns and desires as the majority of the British people and if only the public would exercise more effort to get to know the candidates standing in elections, they would realise that nationalists are not a threat at all, that we want only what is best for our people and merely wish to put the interests of our people first, ahead of the minority groups to whom establishment politicians continually pander.
This gross imbalance in the reporting of political issues by the media, especially in reporting at election times, is the first line of defence employed by our corrupt political establishment to prevent the emergence of a radical new and uncorrupted political force.
Virtually every time there is an election the bulk of the public are duped into once again voting for either of the two main establishment parties, either because they are daft enough to think that despite all of the evidence these parties do actually care about us, or that by voting for the least worst of the two, they are at least securing government by the lesser of two evils.
Time and time again, ‘Tweedle-Dee’ is elected to government in place of the out-going and discredited ‘Tweedle-Dum’ by a public who don’t seem to remember that five years previously, it was ‘Tweedle-Dum’ that was elected to replace the out-going and discredited ‘Tweedle-Dee’. The public don’t seem to realise that the policies pursued by both ‘Tweedle-Dee’ and ‘Tweedle-Dum’ are in effect identical, with only cosmetic differences, and that logically they should be looking for a new political party to vote for in preference to the two main parties that have had so many chances, so many terms in office, and who have been utterly discredited every time.
Occasionally, a nationalist political party despite all the odds, has managed to get a handful of candidates elected in locations scattered across the country, and those isolated individuals have then faced systematic exclusion by the elected representatives of the establishment parties, thereby denying them any influence over government policy either nationally or locally.
The nationalist groups that have turned away from electioneering have, as I have already stated, come to realise that our electoral system is deliberately administered in a sloppy manner in order to facilitate widespread electoral corruption on the part of our corrupt political establishment.
So sloppily are our elections administered that it would be possible with relatively limited resources, for the incumbent political party in government to gerrymander election results on substantial scale without anyone knowing outside of a relatively small conspiratorial group. This is the second line of defence employed by our corrupt establishment political parties to prevent any non-establishment parties from ever achieving political power, to prevent us from making sufficient electoral gains to acquire even a toe-hold on political power.
After more than a century of trying to gain political power through the ballot box, more than forty different nationalist political parties have tried every possible permutation in terms of the presentation of our policies. They have invariably suffered either a near total ‘news black-out’, in which they have been completely ignored by the media, or have suffered a withering hail of lies, abuse, smears and denigration, such that we have never had more than sixty local councillors elected at any one time, and never more than three candidates elected at a higher level. It is time we realised that until the balance of power in Britain is changed by some other means, there will be no electoral route to power for us.
If we are to acquire the political power needed to prevent being dispossessed and race replaced, by the traitors at Westminster, we must concentrate our efforts elsewhere and pursue a non-electoral strategy designed to change the balance of power. Once we have achieved this, once we have ‘levelled the playing field’ somewhat, we might then have the influence needed to pressure the establishment into conducting elections fairly, or at least more fairly than today. Electioneering might once again become a viable proposition.
For now however, and in the foreseeable future, electioneering is a futile waste of time and resources — falsely raising hopes among the more naïve among us, only for those hopes to be cruelly dashed – causing widespread disillusionment and wasting both time and resources that we cannot afford to lose.
Community activism is the way forward. Through community activism we will ‘earn our stripes’ and demonstrate the value of our ideas where the public are concerned.
We do not need to be elected — to acquire the ‘badge’ of establishment approval — and the formal title ‘councillor’, before we can engage in work designed to improve the lives of our people. We can do that straight away, and by our good deeds shall we be known.
Of course we cannot effect new legislation, but we can lead our people along the right path — those who have the wit to follow — and through work designed to once again forge a common bond and a true sense of community among our people, we can begin a revolution that will not be dependent upon the capricious support of a largely disillusioned and disoriented electorate. The White nationalism of the future will be a self-regenerating, bottom-up, revolutionary, racial nationalism that will issue organically from our people, immune to the corruption and the machinations of those who currently hold the levers of power. This, is the way forward!
John Stephens
- Edit
You have certainly painted the true British landscape, Max. With real sadness though, I fear that our ancient “tribal” instincts for individuality, and small group
mentality, are more prevelant today.
History has proven many times, that a lack of a collective mindset, is far more damaging to us, than enemies and suchlike. As a student of history, studying pre-Roman Britain, and post Roman social structures, I have concluded a rather sad ending.
I have in my collection of encyclopedias and other books, a frightenning and telling story, that repeats itself down the ages. Imagine my shock, when my private research led me to a passage, openly stating that the ancient Cornish and other Britons, over two thousand years ago, were “eager to have intercourse” with foriegn trading sailors and merchants.
We were apparently, also: “honest in our dealings with Jewish money-lenders”, after the Norman Kings and Barons, introduced the deadly debt-induced commercial idea of “borrow now, pay later” system. With traits like these, we are never going to control our destiny as we would like to think.
In more recent times, potential mass political movements, like the N.F. and the B.N.P., showed promise. Then, the above traits, along with a near suicidal tendency to muck it up via petty arguments, cliques, and egos, ensured a fizzling out of such high-energy starts.
I even made a speech a few years ago, that included hammering out a plan to start up a collective Nationalist Allotment scheme. Out of dozens at the initial meeting, five were interested. Three actually arranged and made it work. Then myself and one other were left to it.
I then fully understood my intellectual researched material in real-time. There was no collective intuitive willpower. No attempt at even verbal excuses as to why they couldn’t be bothered, and certainly, no understanding of what a simple allotment could have led to, like the wider ideas you stress in your movement. Which way Western Man, indeed.
Max Musson
- Edit
The problem with your historical references is that they are just that, references to a time beyond living memory, of which we have only scant information and little understanding. It would be a mistake to think that conditions and attitudes recorded in ancient times have a direct bearing on today.
.
Secondly the nationalist movements you mention, and all others tried to date have been primarily nationwide political movements, launched into a withering hail of enemy lies, smears and distortions before any real preparatory work had been done. Before any infrastructure has been created to support them over the long haul, and this is why they failed.
.
They also relied upon winning over the currently capricious majority of our current populations if they were to be successful in elections, whereas the strategy proposed by WS does not rely upon that. We are prepared for an evolutionary bottleneck – a phase of minority population status in which many of our current population will be lost to us forever and after which we will have the task of rebuilding our numbers through natural reproduction. We are not placing all of our hopes on a quick electoral victory that will snatch us back from danger in the nick of time, we anticipate living through the fiery crucible of racial dispossession, emerging on the other side, possibly decades, maybe even a century later, as a new people, like burnished steel, hardened by that experience.
John Stephens
- Edit
Fair comment. I fear though, the powers that be may not allow White folks, to create what would essentially be, our version of an “Indian Reservation”. Or of course, at best, a similar multi-site version of the South African model.
The utter vindictiveness and brutality, we know our enemy is naturally endowed with, along with their bought and paid for “traitor class” in the controlled and highly militarised “free democratic nations”, would show itself amplified by the million.
I agree with your principled attempt at long-game survival, and much of what you say. However, there MUST be a secretive, non-aggressive, “Special Forces” type unit, to at the same time, protect, use intel, and divert major threats, as your agenda is actioned into fruition.
Good former Armed Services member’s, skill-sets, are truly wasted at this moment in time. Many would enjoy taking part in helping to build what you and many of us, deem a necessity. Some of them, suffering from flashbacks, stress, and lack of confidence in civvy street, would find it an excellent challenge.
I have to be careful, but if this aspect is something you are interested in, simply answer back AGREED. I may be able contact you privately to talk further.
Max Musson
- Edit
What we are attempting to create will not be our version of an “Indian Reservation”, because such reservations were imposed upon the Indians by the US government with the intention of containing the Indians, neutralising any threat they might pose and managing their gradual genocide.
What we propose is the creation of ‘Beachheads” from which we will expand and reverse the invasion of our land. Beachheads that will be regarded by our enemies as insidious ‘tumours’ from which metastases will spread out into the surrounding ’tissues’ of our dying nation. However while such ‘metastases’ might be regarded as a pathogen as far as our corrupt rulers are concerned, they will for our people be health giving ‘white corpuscles’, seeking out and neutralising the agents of the disease that currently afflicts us.
As I have stated on several occasions, our intention is to remain within the law.
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
The formation of anything resembling a militia would put those involved or implicated (not always the same thing under the prevailing system of ‘justice’) in danger of breaching of public order legislation, as others have found to their cost.
Max Musson
- Edit
That is right. Any organisation that plans to use violence as a means of achieving it’s political goals will be in breach of the Terrorism Act 2000 and John Stephens knows this. He appears to have been attempting to get me to publicly incriminate myself.
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
Inchoate offences either at common law or under s.1 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 tend to attract the same sentences as completed criminal acts. It is wise to steer clear of entering into apparent agreements, however loosely framed, to enter into acts which could be deemed to be preparatory of offences.
And that’s entirely aside of the wisdom, or lack thereof, of seeking to co-opt shell-shocked veterans into metapolitics.
LJP
- Edit
This has no relevance to your article Max but I need to put this observation somewhere before I forget it. Did anyone see the France v Scotland rugby international at the weekend? As is the custom these days the two teams came out hand in hand with young children. In total, two teams of 15 plus subs, about 40 children appeared. Looking along the line as they played the national anthems I counted only one white child, a fair-haired boy who looked bewildered. If this is the state of French population at that age group it is already beyond the midnight hour.
John Stephens
- Edit
Lip.
It may be beyond the midnight hour, but we can take the batteries out of the clock.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
It is certainly true that much cost and effort has been in the past expended by nationalist groups in electoral politics when more promising means and measures should be adopted for the long term furtherance of the cause. Yet we must not abandon entirely electoral politics as the opposition would seize the opportunity to portray us as anti- democratic and merely a street movement. seeking to gain power through violent means.
In many respects it is matter of strategy and balance, and at this moment the electoral route is certainly the least promising option due in large part to the “first past the post” system employed in the UK. We need to pick our batles more carefully within electoral politics.
Max Musson
- Edit
Alec, I have not suggested that we should abandon electoral politics forever. Just for the foreseeable future while such activity is clearly futile.
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
We should abandon electoral politics until such time as we can control overwhelmingly local authorities and the legislature, merely formalising our organic strength and confidence on the ground. ‘Democracy’ is a mug’s game, a mere political arrangement to count heads, which has nothing to do with racial survival. Our politics must be applied biology.
Eddy
- Edit
One thing many seem to forget is that is that most Nationalists were recruited by the BNP at a it was operating like a normal political party i.e. fighting elections. These people have never know any other form of activity, they joined the BNP because it was a normal party and fighting elections was part of this. The reason the micro Nationalist have failed to recruit these people is basically that they are seen as sects, and not engaging traditional activity.
Max Musson
- Edit
That is not correct. The British Democratic Party has tried to recruit ex-BNP members into its ranks to continue electioneering no avail. So have several other of the newly formed and quickly disbanded nationalist political parties.
Eddy
- Edit
I don’t think you can compare the BDP with the BNP, a lot of former members joined the BDP but it lacked drive, leadership etc. I notice that For Britain is recruiting many former BNP members, these people are lost to the Nationalist Movement, they will no doubt be electioneering. You offer a fantasy, at least they are spreading propaganda.
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
If there’s a fantasy here it’s that the same old activity (leafleting, flyers, stickers, meetings, whatever the means for disseminating propaganda) is going to produce different results from decades of the same activity previously. This activity-for-activity’s-sake, like marches, demonstrations, electioneering etc., has had no discernible benefit whatsoever. Look at the state were in! Everything that has gone before has failed. Only organic, grass roots, community and network building can both prevent further abject waste of time and energy and lead to real gains on the ground, within our folk organism. It’s a long-term, generational strategy which requires an unfashionable degree of patience and foresight. As such, it’s not for everyone. Nor is it supposed to be. Some will select themselves out. So be it.
Frederick Dixon
- Edit
The creation of a solid nationalist base through community activism is absolutely essential for two reasons: 1/ as a stronghold within which our race and culture will be secure while the society around us rots and 2/ to act (as Max puts it) as a beachhead from which we can advance when the time is ripe.
However, it may be that at some times and in some circumstances that nationalist base should contest elections, either through one of our existing parties or through a new one created for the purpose. This would really be a propaganda exercise to let people know that nationalists are still around and can be contacted.
I have argued in the past that such is the present state of nationalism that elections, with their derisory results,far from demonstrating that we are still around actually demonstrate the reverse. BUT in the right place, at the right time with a united nationalist effort and concentrated resources – including plenty of boots on the ground – we might pull of a surprise. Remember the victory of the BNP in Millwall in ’93 – previously if the public thought “nationalist” they thought NF, now it was the BNP.
There are in fact only three ways of getting a political agenda on to the statute book: 1/ winning a general election, which is not going to happen! 2/ winning the moral argument. At present the Left has the moral argument all buttoned up, hence the victories of the race, feminist, gay, transgender lobbies. We have our own moral agenda (and a far superior one because it is based on the truths of nature not on bogus egalitarianism) but nobody is listening to us. 3/ frightening the big parties into adopting our agenda by taking votes off them – that was the Ukip tactic and it worked.
Particularly at a time like this, when politics both here and on the continent are in flux, we must write off nothing which might achieve our ends.