By Max Musson:
As Britain goes to the polls, in an election the outcome of which will be largely irrelevant, our news media is full of opinion polls predicting in terms of parliamentary seats won and who might or might not form the next government, that today’s contest will be a very closely run thing.
During the course of the election campaign there have been attempts to stir public interest with all manner of issues, some valid, many spurious, with the aim of convincing voters that the vote they are about to cast will have a meaningful effect on their lives. This is however an illusion – as the saying goes, ‘if voting changed anything, they wouldn’t let us do it!’
This is of course an overly simplistic argument and those who place great store in the innate wisdom of the electorate will be quick to point out that the results of elections have coincided with great change on various occasions in the past – however, I would argue that elections have merely tended to reflect and retrospectively legitimise great social changes that had already taken place.
Let us examine the two greatest issues of our time:
Throughout the decades since 1948, an overwhelming majority of the British people have been opposed to mass immigration and in particular to mass non-White immigration into Britain, but that deeply held desire to preserve the racially homogeneous, ethnically European character of our people has repeatedly been thwarted by the inadequacies of our electoral system, by the mendacity of our media moguls and the corruption of our politicians. Today our people as a distinct entity face oblivion within just one or two generations — subsumed within the multiracial mish-mash that will if nothing changes, result from the current tidal wave of unwanted immigration.
The retention of our nationhood – of our status as an independent, self-governing nation – has always been a fervent wish of the majority of our people, it is after all the reason why during the 20th Century two generations of our men-folk went off to fight two world wars, and yet this desire has been betrayed, repeatedly — thwarted by the inadequacies of our electoral system, by the mendacity of our media moguls and the corruption of our politicians. After almost one-hundred years of such betrayal our nation has been reduced from the status of a world power to that of a vassal province under the hegemony of the European Union.
The policies pursued by successive British governments regarding these two great issues were never voted for in advance by the people. These policies were always pursued in advance using deceit and subsequently presented to our people as a fait accompli.
It could be argued that the Referendum on Britain’s continued membership of the ‘Common Market’ was a retrospective approval of our membership of the ‘Great European Project’, however the fact that the EU was in popular parlance always referred to as merely, ‘the Common Market’ and the full scope of the European project was concealed by deliberate lies and forty years later has still not yet been made apparent to the electorate, demonstrates clearly that no legitimate approval has ever been sought or given.
Furthermore, it could similarly be argued that the British electorate have had the opportunity to reject the policy of permitting mass immigration, at any of the general elections since mass immigration began in 1948. However, the main political parties and our entire political establishment and mass media have colluded in making sure that no direct opposition to continued immigration and the consequent creation of a multiracial society has ever been possible via the electoral system. Furthermore, we need only look to the last general election campaign in which the Conservatives promised to reduce net immigration into the UK to pre-1990 levels, measured in the ‘tens of thousands’, when in fact they have since presided over a parliamentary term in which net immigration has continued, an order of magnitude greater than the target level promised. In addition, our parlous state of affairs is far worse than even the shocking ‘net’ migration figures would suggest. When one considers that the mass emigration of White Britons seeking sanity abroad and hoping to escape the dystopian effects of multiracialism has been an order of magnitude greater than anything prior to 1990, the rate of transformation of our society has been far greater than the net immigration figures alone might otherwise suggest. We have had up to half a million immigrants arriving in Britain each year — a truly unprecedented level of immigration and population replacement!
There have been attempts of course to give voice to the wishes of the British people, but measures have long been in place to ensure that during elections the legitimate voice of the British people has been drowned out and those who protest against the railroading of our nation are smeared, vilified and where necessary, prosecuted by the state for their ‘thought crimes’.
The policies implemented by successive British governments; the creation through deceit of a low-wage, multiracial and multicultural society in Britain, by deliberately allowing uncontrolled mass immigration and the submergence through a combination of both stealth and deceit of our nation into a totalitarian super-state, are the result, not of any democratic mandate obtained at the polls, but the result of social changes that preceded any open discussion of such matters, let alone the testing of public opinion at the polls.
These social changes took place away from the public spotlight and it was decided long before the changes became apparent that the public would only ever be presented with a fait accompli, such that resistance to the changes would appear futile.
These social changes did not take place at a ‘grass-roots’ level within our society, in the kind of ‘bottom-up’ fashion that the politically correct like to envisage, they took place within the higher echelons of our society; among the idle rich and the utopian dreamers of our society; among some of those with generations held hereditary wealth; among those with newly acquired plutocratic wealth; and among those motivated by racial envy and a fanatical messianic obsession.
The social changes took effect from the ‘top-down’, as the prime movers systematically displaced the old leadership elite of our nation and replaced it over a period of several decades with a new agenda driven leadership elite, whose actions took no regard of public opinion because they already had control of the levers of power and control of the opinion forming apparatus of the mass media, such that public opinion when it counted — at election times – could be trusted to keep power in their hands.
If this corrupt system is to be toppled, that toppling will not come from the casting of ballots by the public, it will come from a movement that acquires land, wealth and influence and builds an infrastructure capable of challenging the existing power elite, eventually at the hustings, but well before that, in every arena where real political power resides.
Irrespective of what our mass media may tell us therefore, and irrespective of what the participants in today’s charade may tell us, the outcome of the current general election, whatever it may be, will not alter the course of politics to any serious extent.
The result looks likely to produce a hung parliament and one that will be resolved either by one party attempting to rule as a minority government, or deciding to rule in coalition with another.
It would be nice if circumstances were different and we had a proper racial nationalist party standing in these elections that has a chance of getting candidates elected to parliament, but we do not. In some of the local government wards there are sitting BNP councillors who have the potential to get re-elected and in those wards I would urge our members and supporters to vote for those BNP candidates.
As far as the general election is concerned, the new factor in the equation this time, is of course UKIP and their potential to retain the parliamentary seats they have already and to win more.
UKIP are not a nationalist party, although they are ‘patriotic’ and at their grass-roots rather more nationalistic than any of the other parties capable of winning seats. They also have a policy of getting Britain out of the EU.
I don’t see UKIP as the vehicle of our salvation, given that the party is essentially the right–wing of the Tory Party under another name, given that it has in its higher echelons at least, chosen to become a multiracial party, and given that it has received funding from wealthy Jews, however its members are rather maverick and the party has the potential to ‘throw the odd spanner’ in the works of our corrupt political class thereby delaying their plans. Furthermore, the media portray UKIP as a party of secret racists and political ‘loose-cannons’ and the wishful thinking side of my personality rather hopes the media are correct.
Given all of this therefore, it would be churlish for most of us to abstain from voting completely and I would urge all of our members and supporters to cast their vote in favour of any White UKIP candidates standing in their areas. UKIP are unlikely to become the vehicle of our salvation, but support for them does somewhat shift the political discourse a little further in our direction and this may buy us some valuable time in our efforts to build a power winning movement.
By Max Musson © 2015
# # # #
Richard James
- Edit
In my area Labour have exercised a seemingly constant campaign via leaflets and letters , all addressed personally . Is anybody swayed by those ?
In one of my previous comments I expressed feelings of frustration and a desire to quicken the inevitable demise of our Nation into choas whereby we might stand a chance of grabbing power. But being of a pragmatic disposition and not given to basing decisions on emotional states I knew , even whilst expressing those frustrations that to act upon them in the way I suggested would have been premature .
So rather than voting Labour I did at the ballotbox put my X next to the Ukip candidates name for the reasons laid out in Max’s article above .
We still have time to acquire the six prerequisites and we may be closer to realizing them than we imagine . I believe that we already have many “friends” in the media and other parts of the establishment who are also pragmatic fellows and are keeping their mouths shut , their heads down and their jobs aswell. It is my belief that these friends will , when the timing is right , be only too willing to aid the cause of our Nations salvation and our Race.
frederickdixon
- Edit
In other words, vote UKIP unless there’s anything better on offer. Agreed, but I would be in a quandary if I were a voter in, say, Rotherham where UKIP might have a chance of evicting Labour, but where the BNP – who have no such chance – are also standing.
SerpentSlayer
- Edit
In that case I would say that pragmatism wins. Vote for the one beneficial to the country who would have a chance of winning. No point pissing away your vote on a better candidate if he’s not going to win, in many areas where Ukip are standing, they are only a fraction behind Labour, the few hundred given to a BNP or NF candidate could unseat a Marxist and put someone, who not entirely in our way of thinking, but certainly a lot closer into your local council or Westminster.
Michael
- Edit
I live in one of the Tory Party’s safest seats (top 40 or so) where you could quite literally put-up a dog turd, put a blue rosette on it and it would win by a landslide. We’re having local elections as well today and the Tories have put several leaflets through our doors (our ward has 3 out of 3 Tory councillors). They are worried about losing it to UKIP as they even bothered to put-out a ‘remember to vote’ leaflet today. I voted UKIP for my local council but I voted English Democrats for the local MP as I don’t really trust UKIP (they are basically anti-EU globalist Tories)
Michael
- Edit
My seat is so true blue Tory that many online prediction sites reckon UKIP will come second fairly easily so they didn’t need my vote as well.
Weard
- Edit
My constituency has always been a Labour stronghold. It has also been significantly enriched so nobody else gets a look-in (over 50% of the votes were for New Labour here). However there was a significant swing towards UKIP here as pretty much everywhere else.
I hope that the success of UKIP (at least percentage-wise) will delay the Conservatives’ policy of globalism and unchecked immigration in an attempt to stave off UKIP defections and bring the UKIP voters back into the fold, which gives us a little more time to do something before it’s too late.
Stefan
- Edit
Yay the government won!
No surprise there then!
So on we go with our plans!
Shaun
- Edit
From a personal, maybe selfish level, I’ve found this General Election rather educational.
Firstly, the Sun newspaper. A while back, a friend of mine told me that the Tories would win because they have the support of our dubious ”national” newspaper. I think it’s obvious that the Sun’s support for the Tories has been fundamental to the Tories’ victory at the polls.
The reason? Well, I agree with Martin Webster when he talks about the importance of momentum. The Sun is in no way a paper that voices a credible perspective, but it has been around for a long time, and it’s seen as an authority; and, as Edward L. Bernays says, people form their opinions based on what they perceive to be authority.
Secondly, you have had the charade surrounding Russal Brand. I’ve listened to this guy quite a bit to try to work out what makes him tick, and I’ve concluded he’s a kind of Marxist. He believes in everyone having an equal amount of wealth. All his arguments are based on economics. He also doesn’t acknowledge the negative consequences of multiracialism for White people.
Well, at the last moment, Brand pledged his support for the Labour Party, and I wonder how many people voted for this traitor-party on the basis of Brand’s support. A lot of young people, that’s very possible.
Thirdly, I’ve finally learned what it means to have a safe seat. It’s down to something we all understand: habit! Some people, in some areas, vote for certain parties because they’ve always voted for them, and I think this is based on class.
Take a look around. Do you see many Labour posters in the rich, upper-middle class areas? The answer I no! This is based on class-assioation. It’s kind of sickening really. How can these richer types be so detached from their own people that they see their class interests above their racial interests? It’s down to materialism, individualism, and self-interest.
Lastly, I’m happy that UKIP are only getting 2 seats. Millions of White people have voted for this party, and still, a nationalist, pro-White voice WILL NOT be heard in parliament. Wonderful!
The Tories are going to keep the non-Whites flooding in through our borders, and, as the Daily Stormer says, by the time of the next election it might not even be possible to win at the polls: even if every White person votes for a nationalist party! Our country, as we know it, is finished and it’s time we start to think about getting as much of this country back as possible and getting collectivist as race — starting with small numbers to begin with. It’s very sad, and it’s something that I almost can’t stand to watch on a daily basis; but is reality, and it’s time now for the nationalist movement to face this reality and deal with the problems we face with the totality of abilities passed down to us by our ancestors.
Richard James
- Edit
Driving through a place called Flockton this morning , situated between Ossett , which was once dubbed the Whitest town in England , and a lovely little place it is too I used to live there , Denby Dale and Barnsley . These places really are White .
So whilst driving through them I was stunned to witness so many Labour placards on gate posts and fences . Was this a cruel joke being played upon the unfortunate , betrayed folks who livecin the many multicultural hellholes that our country is now blighted with I mused. A second later it dawned on me . All these places are ex mining communities and as you mentioned Shaun old habits die hard and especiallt so when long memories retain a bitter betrayal. Which brings me onto another point . The labour of old which was a vehicle for international socialism or communism by its other name , was so attractive to the working classes precisely because the Tories despised the working classes and acquiesced the right to vote to the working man because to not to would have been the end of them , they were politically astute enough to realize that and perhaps there is a lesson for us in that . However as we are a so bitterly aware , Labours betrayal of the folks that spirited the party into the position it holds today is a much more bitter one .
I think deep down , White working classe know the Tories despise them , but many see them as being not as bad Labour . With this situation in mind it becomes clear how large donators , especially a group of organised large donators , are able to dictate party policy of both parties , thereby able to control the overall outcome of the election .
Byrhtnoth
- Edit
Western Spring just gets better and better. Whenever I feel moved to reply that this is the best article yet, I know that even better one is on the way. Not that I necessarily support your objectives, but I think that your analysis of current politics is often spot on. I suspect that others who do not identify themselves as nationalists are equally fascinated by Western Spring. In fact this could be one of the most influential political blogs on the internet. I think that Max would be amazed if he knew who follows Western Spring.