We have now been able to enjoy yet another episode in the “Project Fear” story as Dave and George ramp up their vision of a post-apocalypse Britain should we peasants dare to defy the global establishment and vote for freedom. This ghastly vision does cause one to wonder, and I am by no means the first to notice, what on earth did our Prime Minister think he was doing when he ordered a referendum knowing what horrors awaited should we vote to leave? There are only two possible answers – either the “Remain” case has a lie at its heart, or Cameron in his arrogance didn’t bother to acquaint himself with the arguments, and if that’s the case why should we trust anything said by a man who can treat our country’s fate with such casual disdain?
The controversy over Turkey’s possible admission to the EU also illustrates this man’s slipperiness. He has, for reasons best known to himself, been a frequent and enthusiastic advocate of Turkey’s early admission – what was it he said about “paving the highway from Ankara to Brussels”? Now he tells us that Turkey will not be admitted before the year 3000 because Britain will use the veto to keep it out. So which is it? We have two indications of the government’s real intentions should “Remain” win the referendum – one is the gift of £1,800,000,000 (1.8 billion pounds!) of British taxpayers money to help Turkey and the other aspirant countries,including the bandit stronghold of Albania, prepare themselves for entry so that they too can void their surplus populations into our once “green and pleasant land”. The other indication was a “reassurance” from a government source that people from those countries would not be able to freely enter Britain until an interim period had expired, presumably seven years as in the case of Romania and Bulgaria; but why would they need an interim period if they’re not going to be admitted?
Anyway, back to the Treasury forecasts. Suppose they are right and we do slip for a quarter or two into a “technical recession” as the Governor of the Bank of England called it. It means that the economy does not grow. Is that so bad? Osborne’s predictions of economic growth up to 2030 are predicated on immigration from the EU of 300,000 per annum – so (if his theory is correct) immigrants are necessary for growth but growth is necessary to provide jobs and homes for those immigrants! I seem to remember that one of the principal effects of the recession of 2008 was that immigration dipped sharply and many eastern Europeans returned home, if only temporarily. As four fifths of people entering employment in this country for the past several years have been foreigners, perhaps they will make up four fifths of those losing their jobs in George Osborne’s “DIY recession”? Of course this is not an argument which the “Leave” side could possibly make, but I can!
Not all growths are benign. Vote Leave!
By Frederick Dixon © 2016
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
One thing I truly fail to understand, and would be grateful if Mr. Dixon or anyone else could explain, is the “scare” story that Brexit will cause a drop in house prices. Surely a drop in house prices is to be welcomed…why not? Those who already own property and want to sell won’t be inconvenienced if the price drops because, unless they’re planning to emigrate, the price of their proposed new house will remain commensurate. Furthermore, even comparatively wealthy young people are finding it impossible to buy a home these days and get on to the property ladder. A drop in house prices would give them that opportunity. Am I missing something?
Frederick Dixon
- Edit
Yes it is a bit of a puzzle. I suppose there are two groups likely to lose out if house prices go down – those who have bought houses as an investment for their retirement and those who have recently bought their homes with big mortgages and slim equities. But as the latter group were advised in the last recession, just sit tight and wait for prices to go back up again; in other words, treat your house as a home and not as an investment. But you’re right, most people will either be unaffected or (as with first time buyers) somewhat advantaged.
More generally, and this is a criticism of the “Leave” campaign, there is a perfectly cogent economic case to be made for Brexit. It has been put together by “Economists for Britain” led by Patrick Minford. But we haven’t heard it. I can only hope that when “purdah” ends on Thursday (and the Treasury will be unable to come back on Minford’s arguments) the “Leave” people make a big splashy presentation of their economic case, followed by an even bigger and splashier presentation of their immigration case which – unlike the economic cases for both sides – is irrefutable because it’s a matter of fact. Enough of Boris wandering around Yorkshire waffling about bananas!
Stefan
- Edit
Yes I would have thought generally a fall in house prices would be a good thing.
The present London Mayor worries about the cost of housing but while it’s allowed to be used as a cash cow for foreign investors, “Gold Bricks” I think was the term he used, the prices will only go up.
Along with allowing developers to produce housing aimed at that market.
Then there’s Gordon Brown & his hand in the whole “Buy to let” market.
Housing should be for housing primarily.
Janet
- Edit
take a look at the stats for countries’ 2014 and then look at the 2025 projections. white folks’ countries decline whilst brown folks’ countries keep on keepin’ on.
https://www.deagel.com/country/
https://www.deagel.com/country/forecast.aspx
it is going to mean more than simply price drops in housing.
Troy Vilhelmsson
- Edit
If THEY (The Hierarchy Enslaving You) did not want Great Britain to leave the EU, they would not allow an ignorant, stupefied and bovine electorate to have the keys of fate in deciding whether or not it happens. This applies whether there are referenda or not. The ‘choice’ is illusory, always.
Furthermore, if we do leave the EU, it will not be for reasons that are in the interests of the native population of these thoroughly raped islands. It will be because the business/industrial/financial overlords decided it would be so. This embarrassing clamouring to ‘Vote Leave’ is almost like our version of Donald Trump: “vote for this – it’s our only hope”, when in actual fact neither option offers any hope at all for our racial survival, if one cares to look at it for any reasonable length of time.
The Commonwealth will allow the influx of alien racial junk to continue unabated; feminism will continue to destroy family, female and fraternity; the global kleptocracy will continue squeezing every last drop of lifeblood out of our people and our land, and at the top of it all, our racial enemy will still rub his palms together in gleeful satisfaction that the plan borne of his instinctive drive to colonise and consume his biological enemy – the Aryans – is reaching it’s penultimate stage.
Max Musson
- Edit
To a great extent you are right Troy, under the current corrupt electoral system that exists in Britain and throughout the Western world, our enemies can indeed gerrymander ‘fix’ the outcome of any referendum to suite themselves and the outcome of the forthcoming referendum however it goes, will not in itself put right the things that are wrong nor bring about the salvation of our people. That said, Britain being outside of the EU will make it infinitely more feasible to engineer the national revolution that we all desire and for that reason alone we should do everything in our power to bring about Brexit.
.
To use an analogy, we are like the character played by Leonardo De Caprio in the recent film, ‘The Revenent’, at the point where he is being mauled by the grisly bear, and there is a point in that scene at which the bear throws the De Caprio character to one side while she tends to her cub, and it is during this brief period of relief that the De Caprio character musters the wherewithal needed to finally kill the bear.
.
In that scene the De Caprio character was totally at the mercy of the bear and had the bear persisted in her attack he would certainly have died. He had no way of making the bear pause it its attack, but the bear for whatever reason chose at that vital point to attend to her cub and that factor was critical in the survival of the De Caprio character.
.
We are in the same position regarding the EU referendum. For some inexplicable reason our enemies have given us the opportunity to reverse a development that has been disastrous for us as a nation and they appear not to be too concerned at the outcome; there are after all members of our political establishment prominent on both sides, and you are right that our enemies may have decided that it will be better for them to have Britain outside the EU, just as the mother bear decided it was more urgent to tend to her cub than finish the De Caprio character off. So, in that it is in our interests to be outside the EU, we should seize this opportunity to make that happen, even though our enemies are relatively happy either way.
.
It may be that the whole affair is a sham and that the outcome will be fixed, and if it is, we will be no worse off than we are now, but if our enemies are ambivalent about the outcome, then we should take advantage of that ambivalence as much as we can and as with the De Caprio character, it may give us the breathing space needed to strike a killer blow against our enemies in the years to come.
Daniel
- Edit
We’ll soon find out if the people are stupid enough to fall for it. Again.