It is not often that I return to the same topic so soon, but in light of a second article published on the Daily Mail website, reinforcing the points made in their original report, I feel it is pertinent to do so in this instance.
On Tuesday May 24th the BBC are to broadcast a programme entitled ‘Last Whites of the East End’, documenting the dwindling to near extinction of the indigenous White people of London’s East End and the obliteration through uncontrolled mass immigration and enforced multiculturalism of their indigenous Cockney culture. Nowhere could there be a clearer demonstration that culture is a product of race, than the disappearance of Cockney culture accompanying the displacement and dispersal of the East End’s original Cockney, i.e. White working class, population.
Unlike Joseph Curtis and Robert Hardman, the Daily Mail journalists, I have not had the privilege of a preview of the programme and so I cannot speak with certainty and I am forced to rely on what I can glean from the articles they have so far published and from the BBC website, but it would appear that this programme is going to mark a significant milestone in the media’s coverage of the impact that uncontrolled immigration is having on Britain. While the programme makers and the BBC may try to deny it, what we see in London’s East End is a shocking portent of what will happen all across Britain in the years to come if nothing is done to protect the interests and ensure the future survival of we the indigenous British.
As Robert Hardman states, “It will make extremely uncomfortable viewing for all the main political parties, not to mention the local council — which is already disputing some of its assertions. And it seems that there are some within the BBC who are worried about this film, too.
“I am sure the channel will issue plenty of health warnings before the start of Last Whites of the East End. And they won’t be referring to the swearing. If you’re the sort of delicate flower who feels threatened by Germaine Greer’s views on gender change or a statue of Cecil Rhodes, then you should switch channels immediately.”
“This is a beautifully made film which neither patronises nor sensationalises its subjects. And it does not mince its words — which may explain why the BBC has put it in a late-night slot at 10.45pm and given it minimal pre-publicity.
“No doubt, if it was about Tory cuts or the bedroom tax or the arts or was presented by the ubiquitous cross-dressing potter Grayson Perry, it would enjoy loud hurrahs on Newsnight or Radio 4. But I have yet to see a single trailer.”
Such a reaction from a mainstream journalist who is no doubt used to moderating his own reactions to racially sensitive issues, and from his colleague Joseph Curtis, demonstrates that despite every effort to soften the message conveyed by the programme, the production company concerned have been unable to adequately ‘wallpaper over the cracks’ evident in the social fabric of London society and the alarming truth is shining through.
The production company responsible for the programme, Lambent Productions, are well respected for a wide range of documentary programmes that have produced over the last twenty years dealing with a range of social issues, and while this Brighton based company is staffed by the usual left-wing and liberal types that are ubiquitous within the mainstream media, they do pride themselves on maintaining certain journalistic standards, as their website states: “What defines our content, whatever the platform, is quality – and a level of originality and authenticity that marks it out.”
Clearly a point has now been reached in London’s East End at which even the most ‘rose-tinted’ of left-wing, liberal ‘spectacles’, can no longer obscure the stark reality of ethnic cleansing.
While they will not welcome any accolades from Western Spring, qualified though they may be, Lambent productions, the BBC programme scheduler and the Daily Mail journalists are none-the-less to be applauded for the integrity they have shown in at least addressing this subject, albeit reluctantly, with some degree of honesty.
The programme makers have still however attempted to fudge the issue by introducing witnesses to the ethnic cleansing of Whites who of mixed race or from an ethic minority background, and by attempting to present such people as genuine representatives of Cockney culture and of Cockney people.
The Mail journalists provide several quotations from a bus driver, Tony Cunningham, of whom Robert Hardman writes: “Tony is a quintessential child of the East End, raised on pie and mash, West Ham and Nan’s tales of the Blitz.
“But much as Lefties might like to brush him aside as a moaning throwback from UKIP (or something more extreme), it won’t wash. Because Tony knows all about that great liberal shibboleth, ‘community cohesion’.
“His mum was fourth-generation Cockney while his father arrived from Jamaica in the Sixties. ‘We was called “n*****” when we was growing up,’ he says matter of factly. ‘I had to educate my Nan. She had a cat called the same thing. She didn’t really get the gist of it.’”
“In other words, Tony needs no lessons in multi-culturalism” – the implication of course being that people of all White ancestry do need lessons in multiculturalism and cannot be trusted to have a balanced view regarding the impact of immigration on our communities — this being the rational for the BBC and the wider media’s past hostility towards White advocates voicing concerns for the interests of our people.
Photographs of Tony Cunningham accompanying Richard Hardman’s article however show that far from being a Patrick Trueman look-alike, the jovial West Indian character from BBC’s East Enders soap opera, Mr Cunningham exhibits so little non-White admixture in his appearance that he could easily pass for White; this fact reinforcing as I have explained above, that Tony Cunningham’s ‘dab’ of non-White ancestry, insignificant though it may be in any other context, provides him with the ‘green card’ of media approval as far as pronouncements on racially sensitive issues is concerned.
Interestingly, Tony Cunningham’s anecdotal accounts of having been called “N*****” when he was growing up, despite his almost completely White phenotype, is testament to just how White the East End of London must have been even thirty-years ago. If as apologists for mass immigration are to be believed, the East End of London has always had a large non-White population, why would someone as almost completely White as Tony Cunningham have been singled out for racial taunts? The fact that Tony Cunningham was called “N*****”, strongly indicates that someone with even his slightly non-White ancestry was in those days still the exception, rather than the norm.
The programme also calls upon at least one Asian witness to the ethnic cleansing.
“Everything this area stood for is being eradicated slowly but surely,” he is quoted as saying, “In ten years’ time, there’ll be absolutely no trace of Cockney culture.”
“Things used to be different”, the Mail quotes him further. “I miss those days when everyone knew everyone”, now according to the Mail, “his children are growing up with little knowledge of ‘the British way of life’. These days, … some schools are more like ‘Africa or Romania’.”
Robert Hardman states, “He is not being particularly outspoken. In fact, it is hard to find anyone who was born and bred in these streets who would argue with him. No doubt, Shadow Europe Minister Pat Glass — who this week condemned an entire Derbyshire village after a ‘horrible racist’ voter dared to voice concerns about immigration — would like to have him carted off for re-education.
“But what is really astonishing is that these remarks come not from some Alf Garnett-style Cockney dinosaur wailing into his pint down at the Queen Vic.
“They are the thoughts of Usman Hussain, a dad with a young family, who is every bit as proud of his East End roots as his Bangladeshi ancestry. He loves West Ham United and has just started up a Muslim prayer group.
“And he is one of many Cockneys[sic] whose moving lament for a dying way of life is the subject of a powerful documentary next week on BBC1.”
Apparently, in the eyes of the BBC and the Daily Mail, it was not true when thousands of genuine Cockney, indigenous White East Enders demonstrated in the 1970’s in support of the National Front and in protest at the influx at that time of non-White immigrants, they were all “Alf Garnett-style Cockney dinosaurs”, but now that it is seen by many as probably too late to do anything about it, the destruction of the Cockney community and their way of life can now be regarded as true, because a ‘Cockney’ Muslim of Asian immigrant descent says so!
Juxtaposed with the assertion that Usman Hussein is “every bit as proud of his East End roots as his Bangladeshi ancestry”, Robert Hardman and the programme makers don’t appreciate the incongruity that apparently his most notable contribution to ‘Cockney’ culture is that he “has just started up a Muslim prayer group”, that most Cockney of all achievements!
The truth is that there is no way of softening the impact of the realisation that a whole community of indigenous Britons has now been almost entirely ethnically cleansed from their traditional East End neighbourhoods and that their entire culture is now on the verge of being consigned to history.
Back in the 1970s, there was a National Front poster which from memory showed a photograph of immigrant filled Lewisham High Street, with the slogan, “Lewisham 1975, your town 19??” and this poster which was deplored by the liberal/left-wing authorities of the time, has proven an accurate portent, not just of London’s East End, but of so many other inner city districts all across Britain.
Let us encourage as many people as possible to watch Last Whites of the East End, not because the programme will tell our side of the story, but because it appears that despite the best efforts of liberal/left-wing programme makers and BBC content editors to sanitise this tragedy, the awful truth is still apparent, that it is a tragedy, one that was wholly predictable, and one that could have been averted if we nationalists had been listened to several decades ago.
If a White community as closely knit and cohesive as the Cockneys of the East End can be ethnically cleansed in a matter of decades, with the authorities and the media turning a blind eye to the problem and actively encouraging the influx of non-Whites, there can be no traditional folk community on the British Isles that will be safe in future, unless we as a nation open our eyes to the danger and begin to organise as militant consciously White communities, not just hoping to remain White, but willing to take active steps to ensure our future survival.
By Max Musson © 2016
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]# # # #
Stefan
- Edit
Well if a long established culture can be wiped out, then a “Johnny come lately” culture with no roots might be even easier to wipe out.
There’s probably a reason why a lot of them have dual nationality.
Alaric Whitestone
- Edit
It’s all part of the plan, the global political elite don’t want cultures, except for the mainstream globalist consumer culture, idiotic chattel they can easily migrate, have no ancestral rights to the land and are too stupid to contest their leadership (Look to Brazil as the prototype for all European nations https://www.amren.com/features/2015/11/race-in-brazil-part-i/ https://www.amren.com/features/2015/11/race-in-brazil-part-ii/ )
Europeans are the greatest threat to this plan, it’s why we are targeted with such ferocity by foreign interests and our own traitorous political class.
Non of this is going to stop until Europeans retake their racial identity’s (And not this stupid blanket term “White” which is used to demean us to the same level as cultureless “Blacks”) English, Scottish, German, Dutch, Etc, and practice in group bias and clan interests to a greater degree.
John Beattie
- Edit
Love your clear thinking Stefan !
Stefan
- Edit
Thank you John, years ago I lived in Stoke Newington Road & it was mainly a Black area at the time & it was like living at the end of the world.
But when I went back for a look, it’s mainly Turkish moslems dominating the area, the Blacks have largely gone.
Some gentrification as well as occured.
So it shows an area can be changed reasonably rapidly & if a sea change occurs, the new occupiers will move on.
On the big scale there was a huge demographic movement in Europe agreed by the allies at Potsdam at the end of WW2 & I think we are seeing a similar thing again.
There was a series on TV called “The streets where we live” or something like that & that clearly detailed many times how areas were changed by deliberate policies that destroyed the communities there.
A lot of times those areas then housed immigrants, then sometimes gentrified to become million pound houses.
The original community never returns.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
For someone such as myself, whose London, East End family go back as far as can be traced, this is a truly heart rending report. Not so very long ago I attended a funeral gathering for a deceased aunt of mine in a Walthamstow pub. One bar happened to be filled with families from the Indian sub-Continent and the other bar was filled with our own family singing, in commemoration, “Maybe it’s because I’m a Londoner”.
An amusing aside which illustrates our nation’s inextricable link with the East End was made by P.G. Woodhouse’s ‘Bertie Wooster’ when he attributed ‘Jeeves’ superior intelligence to the amount of fish he ate. A wide and varied fish diet was long held to be the principle cause of the ‘Cockney Sparrow’ type as exemplified by the East End ‘barrow boy’.
Shaun
- Edit
I agree. It’s sad to see an indigenous culture like that of the East End be ethnically cleansed by the deliberate policies of our traitorous establishment.
We mustn’t, however, look at this horrific development as a reason to give up, and I know you’d agree with me; we should look at it as a reason to get more active in our people’s defence.
Sadly, I don’t think the policies of the 1970s National Front are practical at this moment in history; there are millions of indigenous people who’d like our Island to return to its previous level of homogeneity, but the Aryan morality experienced by our people when face with dealing with ethical questions would prevent a mass movement gaining the political will to do what’s needed; we haven’t experienced the collective battering needed for the mentality to develop.
In my opinion we need a dual strategy.
First of all, I think we need, as Joe Owen suggests, to develop the infrastructure for a political party and go out with the intention of gathering millions of votes all across the country; this is legal, possible, and sensible: we also need to gather together a collective of charismatic leaders who will communicate our message to the masses.
For this to work we must learn from the lessons of the past. We can’t allow this party to be defeated by not tackling our biggest weakness: ourselves!!!!! This means: we can’t be trusting and allow the party to be infiltrated by the Ray Hills of this world. Joe Owens explains all this in his videos.
Another thing: the majority of our people are suspectible to nationalist ideas but they’re not nationalists. We’re dealing with a dumbed down version of our people through generations of dysgenics, so we can’t enter into dialogue with these people through ranting about the Jews, the Rothchild Zionists, the banking system, and the rest of it. Obviously, some people want to be educated but these people are rare and there are plenty of ways these people can learn.
Instead — knowing that our target audience must be approached in the right way — we must developed a precise, nuanced understanding of mass physcology and work from that point.
First of all, we must attract the people who REALLY DO CARE into a movement and persuade them to get active; or, if they have them, share their resources.
Then we must use these people to communicate a simple, non-scary message of national salvation to the sheeple.
Last but not least, we must accept —- fully accept —- there are going to be ”leftists” and these people won’t be moved; they’ll do everything they can to battle for the extinction of our race. i’ll use the words of Saul Alinsky to define how these people should be dealt with: DON’T ARGUE WITH YOUR ENEMY, MOBILIZE YOUR SUPPORT!!!!!!
The second strategy must be the development of racial enclaves.
This will have to happen if nationalists like it or not. Sadly for our future descendants, we may have to spend a long long time sharing our Island with non-indigenous communities. It’s hard pill to swallow, sure; but this doesn’t mean this won’t happen: if we don’t have a worldwide White revolution then we’re going to have to exist within the context of a plural society; getting darker each generation.
How can we survive this? The obvious answer is a form of community balkanization that encourages collectivism in every way. Similar to the strong communities you used to have in Boston, the USA and you have over in Belfast today; minus the sectarian paramilitaries.
In a nutshell, nationalists will have to seize the infrasture within localized target regions and control the area’s culture; then offer a mode of existence that’s superior to the multiracial moras outside of these enclaves that creates community and racial pride in the people within the target region.
When these communities develop (they will) the establishment will do everything they can to break them up; like they did to the people of Boston, the Scottish Highlanders, and the people of the East End. Simply put: we must be one step ahead. We can’t give up. How we deal with these matters will determine the survival of our race!!
The first thing we need to understand with these enclaves is we need to adopt a change of attitude and develop a different approach to power. Very little of activism of the homoerotic, romantic kind, more inflitation, being quick minded, defeating power by submitting to power.
I recommend that everyone reading these words listens to Self Hating Jew’s podcastes on YouTube for the right attitude to take in facing our race’s current existential crisis.
If these two strategies are adopted — combined with the seizure of the 6 prerequisites — it will be possible to ensure the whole country doesn’t become one big East End and set us up to win back our country. We are still the most intelligent, gifted and creative sub species of homosapian to ever walk the earth. I personally believe there are big things in store for the White race; and, in the grand scheme of things, the present reality we’re facing will force us to evolve into a stronger, fitter race in preparation for a magnificent future….
Max Musson
- Edit
Joe Owens makes some sensible observations, however his suggestion of a ‘UKIP with teeth’, a ‘new nationalism’, simply does not make sense, especially as there is nothing ‘new’ about the nationalism that he advocates, he advocates a return to the tactics of the early 2000s as practiced by the BNP.
.
What he doesn’t realise is that if the public are presented with a choice between his ‘new nationalist’ ‘UKIP with teeth’, which presumably will look almost indistinguishable from the genuine, ‘real McCoy’ UKIP, why would people vote for the new, untried and untested, unknown, version of UKIP, when they can vote for the real thing, a party that has been set up for some years, that has a charismatic leader, that is well funded and already has c. 200 councillors and a dozen candidates elected to office at Brussels and Westminster?
.
How is Joe Owens going to differentiate his ‘UKIP with teeth’ from the original UKIP? What is going to be its ‘unique selling point’?
.
Does ‘with teeth’ mean that it will be more hard line or more aggressive on the streets? Because if it does, we are back to the classic nationalist political party model that has been getting us nowhere!
.
Joe Owens is I believe and honest, well meaning man, but he is deluding himself if he thinks his ideas will work.
.
At present we need to focus on recruiting new members into Western Spring and building our funds and our organisation until we acquire the Six Prerequisites. This may not sound ‘sexy’ and exciting, but it is what we need to do at this time. Let us keep our minds firmly focused on the task in hand.
SerpentSlayer
- Edit
I am sure London can be reclaimed one day, just as our brothers in Greece and Serbia will one day reclaim Constantinople and Anatolia. But just like the Europeans who once inhabited those lands, the Cockneys as a culture are lost to us forever. I do hope it serves as a warning, we have lost a regional culture, we may yet lose our very race of we falter in our duty. I think any whites remaining in those colonised areas in London will make excellent saboteurs and informants in the future. We should reach out to help them as soon as it is practicable in my opinion.
JSS
- Edit
I agree with SerpentSlayer, Europe and Britian will be taken back, unfortunately it might not be bloodless though. Old stock Caucasians have an inherent resilience when backed up against the wall. These immigrant scumbags from a certain medieval ‘faith’ will never integrate, hatred in enshrined in their so called ‘holy book’. Unfortunately there are many brainwashed whites out there who: (a) don’t want to procreate (b) church means nothing to them (c) feel entitled (d) bleeding heart liberals with a false sense of superiority over conservative values. The society is infested with cultural marxism, schools & universities are overrun by leftist teachers.
As someone wrote on a blog: These scumbags (who cannot be named) are like a cold, the liberals are like AIDS. You can fight a cold easily, not so when you have AIDS
JOHNNY LEECH
- Edit
We should take some heart, most of the younger generation Cockneys moved out to Essex over the last couple of decades that is why like it or not the UKIP vote in that area is so strong. If you like the “Cockney” has relocated and most of them remain loyal Patriots.
On the 23rd of June we will see how loyal and patriotic the current voting population of our Nation is?
Jonathan Bowden once said “if the era of Empire is over let this not be the era of surrender”!
Max Musson
- Edit
I agree Johnny, let us hope enough of us vote the right way and the count is not fixed.
drquartz
- Edit
I grew up in SE London and went to school in Catford (Brownhill Rd.). I didn’t realise it at the time, but even I must have known which way that area was heading. In 1960 aged 16, I joined the Army as a ‘boy soldier’ – an Army Apprentice. Best thing I ever did. My parents moved at the same time, so I never went back to the area until the day I left the Army 24 years later. Driving back from Germany early in the day, rather than overnight as I had done when coming on leave, I decided not to use the M25 but rather go through central London, particularly Catford and Lewisham. It was GY time (goin’ yam – Army Geordie expression) at Brownhil Rd school – you couldn’t see a white face anywhere. Back in the late 50’s there were probably 6 or 7 in the whole school. I drove down through Catford Broadway and on down to Lewisham and I really disliked what I saw. Gangs on corners, shops with foreign signs, filthy pavements and gutters, houses and business premises unloved or cared for and a general air of depression and danger. I was pretty fit in those days, but I put the central locking on the car. I wouldn’t have dared get out of my car. I drove up to The Old Kent Road, New Cross, Elephant and the Embankment out onto the M4 and back to Wilshire where I had decided to settle. I swore I would never go back to South East London, and to this day I never have. Still got a few years left I hope and things to do, but revisiting my childhood stamping grounds is not one of them.