A Very Merry Brexmas to You All!

With the fate of our nation hanging in the balance, we British are now forced to spend the Christmas and New Year holidays this year not knowing what is to become of us. Are we as a nation to once again assert our freedom and self-determination through a free trade Brexit, are we heading for Brexit in name only, a super-Norway deal, a super-Canada deal, Mrs May’s Chequers ‘dogs breakfast’ of a Brexit, or are we to be plunged into a general election or a second EU referendum that could bring about a reversal of our current direction and once again consign us to the status of a subject province of the European Union?

We could not face a more uncertain future and in response to all of this uncertainty we see the pound sterling falling against other currencies; we see the FTSE 100 index sliding relentlessly downwards; property prices are falling and we have reports that consumer spending this Christmas is at a very low ebb indeed. A very Merry Brexmas to you all!

However it didn’t have to be like this and indeed it still doesn’t have to be like this. If only a majority, or even a sizeable minority of the MPs at Westminster possessed the courage and faith in our nation shared by the majority of ordinary British people, we would already be free of the blood-sucking Euro-vampire and could already be charting our course to a bright new future of freedom and self-determination, free from EU tyranny and masters of our own destiny. How different our circumstances could be if only there were some true statesmen and women among our elected politicians!

It was back in 2015 that David Cameron’s Conservative government presented to Westminster the European Union Referendum Bill, which was passed by MPs with 544 votes in favour and just 53 against. It is a lie therefore that Brexit was all David Cameron’s fault. Certainly he played a major role in providing us with an opportunity to free ourselves, but it was an overwhelming majority of MPs who voted for it in Parliament.

Becoming the European Union Referendum Act, the Bill proposed that a referendum was to be held and that the British people were to be asked: “Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?”

We should note here that the wording of the referendum question didn’t make the decision of the electorate conditional upon Mr Cameron, Mrs May or anyone else negotiating some pretext upon which we might remain within the single market or a customs union. It was simply a matter of do we stay, or do we leave?

Later, speaking at Chatham House on 10^th November 2015 about the forthcoming referendum on EU membership, David Cameron declared, “This is a huge decision for our country, perhaps the biggest we will make in our lifetimes. And it will be the final decision… When the British people speak, their voice will be respected — not ignored.

“If we vote to leave, then we will leave. There will not be another renegotiation and another referendum.”

The referendum was therefore promised to be ‘the final decision’, our voice would be ‘respected – not ignored’, and there would not be any ‘renegotiation’ and there would not be ‘another referendum’. David Cameron could not have been clearer. Yet here we are more than two years later facing a parliament in which the decision of our people is not ‘respected’, in which the clamour for ‘renegotiation’ is incessant, and in which there are frequent calls for ‘another referendum’, so that the momentous decision made by our people on 23^rd June 2016 can be ‘ignored’.

As we all know, David Cameron was so bullish about the final and absolute nature of the referendum result because he firmly believed the majority of the electorate would vote for us to stay in the EU and he wanted to use the referendum result to stifle any further discussion of this issue in the future. Had he suspected that the result would go in favour of us leaving the EU, then neither he, nor a majority of Westminster MPs would have allowed the referendum to take place. Such is the hubris of our elected representatives however, they rushed headlong into the referendum only to fall flat on their proverbial faces. David Cameron immediately resigned and we have since had Theresa May leading negotiations with the EU, with first the battle cries, that “Brexit means Brexit”, and “no deal is better than a bad deal”, only for these to be gradually replaced after interminable negotiations by ‘Brexit means Chequers’, and what amounts to ‘any deal is better than no deal!’

Clearly the Chequers deal negotiated by Theresa May with its open ended ‘back-stop’ regarding the Irish border is a contrivance designed to either trap the UK for ever in a position of subservience to the EU – as a vassal state, or to force us to cede Northern Ireland as the price of gaining eventual independence.

Dominic Raab who was appointed by Theresa May to be our chief negotiator with Brussels, and who fairly swiftly resigned that position, is quoted in an article in the Belfast Telegraph, stating: “You would hear swirling around in Brussels – particularly the people around Selmayr, Martin Selmayr in the Commission, and some others – that losing Northern Ireland was the price the UK would pay for Brexit”.

“This was reported to me through the diplomatic channel.

“It is one thing to defend your interests robustly, but there is another thing in the spirit of so-called European unity to be trying to carve up a major European nation.”

With such talk following past assertions by EU negotiators that the terms of the eventual Brexit deal must leave the UK worse off, as a punishment for leaving the EU, and that the withdrawal agreement must contain provisions whereby the EU can punish the UK for any perceived infringements of EU rules during the transitional period without recourse to the European Court of Justice, leaves us in no doubt that the EU cannot be relied upon to exercise ‘good faith’ in the performance of their obligations and in the negotiations to come regarding the Irish border and the back-stop.

Clearly the Chequers deal negotiated by Theresa May is unacceptable. It places the UK in a position where we are hostages to the ‘good faith’ of EU politicians – good faith that as we have seen does not really exist; that we may either face the loss of Northern Ireland or an indefinite period trapped under the influence of the EU in circumstances in which the EU can take punitive economic action against us without any ability on our part to respond. There is the suggestion that the transitional period during which the precise terms of our eventual withdrawal are to be agreed will be short-lived, however it would not be in the interests of the EU to make that period short-lived, it would be in their interests to extend the transitional period for as long as possible – indefinitely, in fact, and given the scant progress that has so far been made in more than two years of negotiations thus far, it cannot be stated with any credibility that an end is in sight!

As we reach Christmas 2018, we have Westminster divided into three camps: Those MP’s such as Jacob Rees Mogg who want a ‘Free Trade Brexit’; we have those who support Theresa May’s ‘Brexit in name only’, which as I have explained would place us subservient to and at the mercy of the EU; and those who want a second referendum, a ‘Peoples Vote’ as they call it, so they can attempt to reverse our decision to leave.

During the more than two-year period since the referendum in 2016 the public have been bombarded by the media and by most Westminster MPs with a torrent of scare propaganda as part of ‘Operation Fear’ in which we have been fed an incessant diet of blood curdling scare stories describing all manner of bad things that will befall us is we leave the EU with no deal, that is, if we leave with a Free Trade Brexit, on World Trade Organisation terms. All of this is designed to make the electorate believe that a ‘No Deal/Free Trade’ Brexit is out of the question and that there are only two viable options: acceptance of Theresa May’s abortive Chequers deal, or to hold a second referendum and upon eliciting a vote to remain, to stay in the EU and never be given another opportunity to vote on this matter ever again.

Those wanting us to remain within the EU, or who are arguing for the Chequers Deal assert that in 2016, at the time of the referendum the British public did not understand the implications of leaving the EU. They argue that we did not realise that leaving the EU would involve us leaving the Single Market and the Customs Union, when in fact this is a lie.

The document sent out by the government to every household in the UK prior to the referendum stated:

“Voting to leave the EU would create years of uncertainty and potential economic disruption. This would reduce investment and cost jobs.

“The Government judges it could result in 10 years or more of uncertainty as the UK unpicks our relationship with the EU and renegotiates new arrangements with the EU and over 50 other countries around the world.

“HM Treasury analysis shows Britain’s economy could be tipped into a year-long recession. At least 500,000 jobs could be lost and GDP could be around 3.6% lower following a vote to leave the EU than it would be if we remained in the EU.

“Average real wages could be nearly 3% lower than if we remained in the EU, which would amount to a reduction of £800 a year for someone working full time on the average wage.

“Treasury analysis also shows that if the UK leaves the EU, after 15 years this could mean:

– a cost per year equivalent to £4,300 per household in the UK;

– a hit to tax receipts of £36 billion a year;

– this is the equivalent of an extra 8p on the basic rate of income tax.

“Some argue that we could strike a good deal quickly with the EU because they want to keep access to our market. But the Government’s judgement is that it would be much harder than that – less than 8% of EU exports come to the UK while 44% of UK exports go to the EU.

“No other country has managed to secure significant access to the Single Market, without having to:

– follow EU rules over which they have no real say

– pay into the EU

– accept EU citizens living and working in their country

“A more limited trade deal with the EU would give the UK less access to the Single Market than we have now – including for services, which make up almost 80% of the UK economy. For example, Canada’s deal with the EU will provide limited access for services like air travel, broadcasting and banking. The deal has been seven years in the making, and is still not in force.

“If the UK voted to leave the EU, we would lose access to trade agreements with more than 50 countries outside the EU. The UK would seek to renegotiate these deals, but this would take years and there is no guarantee that the UK would manage to negotiate terms as good as those we enjoy today.

“The UK would miss out on the benefits of the trade deals currently being negotiated by the EU, including with the US and Japan. When these are successfully concluded our exports to the EU, plus other countries covered by EU trade deals, would account for 82% of total UK exports.”

In light of the above, it is evident that the British electorate were made aware of the possible negative impact of Brexit and yet we still valued or freedom and self-determination more, and we still voted to leave!

We recognised that in this modern age, aspiring super-powers like the EU use economic pressure and trade barriers in place of the machinery of war in their predatory quest for power and the acquisition of land and resources. We recognise that the EU wishes to politically dominate the UK, or failing that to make us pay a heavy price for our freedom by forcing us to cede Northern Ireland to them.

Furthermore, just as we British would in the past have defended ourselves vigorously if threatened militarily by a predatory neighbour, we recognise that it is the duty of every patriot to do all that we can to defend our land and free our nation and our people from EU domination. If freedom means that we suffer a period of economic hardship, then so be it! If freedom means that we make an enemy of the EU, then so be it; and if every man and woman is required to take up arms to defend our land and our freedom against the predatory aggression of the EU, then so be it!

In earlier articles I have explained that the constitution of the EU is based upon the constitution of the Soviet Union. It is well known that a large proportion of the senior politicians and bureaucrats governing the EU are ex-Communists and it is therefore easy to see why the EU as it is presently constituted appeals so greatly to them. It is easy also to see why those same politicians and bureaucrats have begun to adopt a predatory mind-set. The entire ethos and the culture of the EU is a monstrous fabrication, it is a totalitarian tyranny dressed up as a democracy in which the will and welfare of the peoples of Europe are blatantly disregarded.

It is well known that the autocratic globalist elite positioned at the heart of the EU are guided by the vision of Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi and that their aim is in fact the elimination of the peoples of Europe as distinct nations and as distinct peoples and our replacement by a deracinated mulatto population through a combination of mass Third World immigration and the promotion of race mixing.

There are now less than 100 days until the 29^th March, when we are supposedly scheduled to leave the EU, an outcome that is by no means certain. During the remaining days before we reach that deadline great pressure will be brought to bear in order to push through Theresa May’s Chequers deal or in order to secure a second referendum and we nationalists will need to play our part, doing everything in our power to ensure a Free Trade (No Deal) Brexit and we must on this occasion set aside factional differences and to in together. We must use this festive period to formulate our plans and the action we can take in the New Year.

Sadly, we have no dominant nationalist political party that we can all rally around, our political enemies have gone to great lengths to see to that, but that does not mean we are powerless. We should at the very least raise this issue of Brexit with everyone we meet during the course of the next three months. Furthermore the three main points that we must hammer home in our discussions with others are:

1.  That when we voted in 1975 to join the ‘Common Market’ or the ‘European Economic Community’ as the EU was then known, we did so on the basis of false assurances that the Common Market was simply a trading bloc, which would have no effect upon our national sovereignty. This was a blatant lie as it was always intended that the Common Market would evolve by stealth – through ever closer union – from the ‘Common Market’, to the ‘European Economic Community’, to the European Union – a political union in which the individual national governments of member states would be progressively made redundant. Edward Heath the Prime Minister who took us into the EEC in 1973, admitted as much, many years later in a television interview that he had deliberately lied to Parliament and the British public. Britain’s membership of the EU began with a lie and we have been lied to regarding the intentions and eventual aims of the EU ever since, and we cannot therefore rely upon any assurances given to us by the EU in our Brexit negotiations, and nor should we believe the dire predictions of economic chaos and ruin should we leave;

2.  That the European Union is modelled on the Soviet Union – it is undemocratic and totalitarian in character – and just as we would never have countenanced the absorption of the UK into the Soviet Union, we should not seek to remain a part of the European Union either;

3.  That the EU is driven by the spirit of Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi – that senior EU politicians are the recipients of an annual prize in his name – and that his stated aim is the creation of a supra-national state populated by a mulatto race. This is why there is uncontrolled mass immigration into Europe and why most EU leaders do nothing effective to stop it. It is all part of their plan.

We nationalists must pull together in the months and years ahead if we are ever to become a potent political force and we should use the period between now and 29^th March as an opportunity to practice the kind of co-operation that will be needed in the future. Let us support each other’s initiatives so that even though we are divided and relatively powerless at present, it cannot be said that we failed for want of trying.

A Very Merry Brexmas to You All.

By Max Musson © 2018

# # # #

JOIN WESTERN SPRING

Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

# # # #