During the latter part of 2009 I can remember a recurring theme at the local BNP meetings at which I spoke, something that is not spoken about now, the implementation of the Treaty of Lisbon, which effectively turned the pre-existing consolidated European Treaty into the ‘Constitution of the EU’. As such, the Treaty of Lisbon negated all prior attempts by member states of the EU to retain their sovereign nation status and resist absorption into a European super-state.
The Treaty of Lisbon is in effect an ‘enabling act’, designed to bring about the termination of sovereign nation status for the member states of the EU, but in their hubris and their supreme confidence prompted by the virtual culmination of their plans, EU leaders inserted into the Treaty of Lisbon and therefore the consolidated European Treaty, the seed of their own undoing.
With the beguiling power of the mass media behind them, EU planners never envisaged the possibility that the population of a member state would ever have the opportunity to vote to leave the EU, and so as part of the façade of ‘democracy’ they created in order to hide the true nature of the bureaucratic tyranny they were constructing, EU planners inserted into the Treaty of Lisbon a small and barely adequate escape clause, consisting of just a few short paragraphs, which was designated, ‘Article 50’. Prior to 2009, EU planners never thought to provide a constitutional mechanism whereby a member state might withdraw. Such a prospect was to them unthinkable.
As the December 1st 2009 deadline approached, I can remember explaining to various audiences the importance of Article 50 and that once the Treaty of Lisbon came into effect, it would provide the only way of our people reasserting our nationhood constitutionally, that is, without recourse to force of arms.
Without Article 50, the only way of escaping the tyranny of the EU would be through a unilateral declaration of independence (UDI). Such a declaration would be remain a possibility for as long as a British national government continued to exist, but the Treaty of Lisbon paves the way for the abolition of the national governments of the EU member states and so the option of UDI would not continue for long. The Treaty of Lisbon is an enabling act that facilitates the progressive erosion of the powers of the national governments and in the name of ‘subsidiarity’ devolves many of the administrative powers of government down to the new regional assemblies the EU are promoting, while at the same time usurping the sovereign powers of the national governments, placing those powers in the hands of the newly forming European Government based in Strasbourg and Brussels.
Once the national governments of the member states have given up most of their powers; either devolved down to regional assemblies and ‘city authorities’, or allowing them to be usurped by Brussels and Strasbourg, those national governments will be redundant and the Treaty of Lisbon paves the way for their eventual abolition.
Article 50, creates a crudely defined mechanism through which the government of a member state can negotiate their withdrawal from the EU, but no such facility exists for regional assemblies or city authorities. Therefore once the national governments have been abolished, the possibility for any of the great nations of Europe to reassert their national sovereignty by constitutional means disappears. After that time a nation will only be able to reassert their national sovereignty and right to self-determination through insurrection and by force of arms – in short by fighting a war of independence against the EU army that the Treaty of Lisbon also seeks to create.
Thankfully, by fluke of circumstances, puffed up Europhile, David Cameron, in all his hubris decided to hold a referendum on continued EU membership for Britain and committed the Conservative government to implementing the result. The rest as far as we are concerned is ‘history’. The British people voted convincingly to leave the EU and Theresa May is going through the motions of extracting us from the clutches of that tyranny.
One only has to witness the hostility directed at Britain and against Theresa May in her position as the prime minister of a still sovereign member state, to imagine the degree of hostility that would be directed towards any regional assembly or city authority that might attempt to leave the EU once the remaining national governments have been abolished. Furthermore, it is obvious that any determined region or group of regions would have to defy the armed might of the future EU government in order to regain their sovereignty – in other words we are talking about a potentially catastrophic civil war at some point in the future.
Today is an auspicious day in that it is the anniversary of the surrender of the last remaining Wehrmacht garrison as the Battle for Berlin came to a close in 1945, the last time we had widespread conflict in Europe, and a week from now is the anniversary of VE day, referred to afterwards by the German people as ‘Stunde Null’, ‘Zero Hour’, signifying a paradigm shift in the outlook or zeitgeist of their nation, putting the nightmare or war behind them and forging a new beginning.
Let us hope that Theresa May does indeed follow through with her stated intention of leading Britain out of the European Union, and let us also hope that the people of France also have the courage to elect Marine Le Pen next weekend and that they too have their chance of a referendum to free themselves from the EU. And let us hope that the other member states of the EU do likewise, and that future generations of Europeans can enjoy self-determination and live in peace, and look back upon 23rd May 2016 as a new ‘Stunde Null’, a new Zero Hour when there began in Europe a second paradigm shift, away from soulless globalism and progressive White genocide, putting the nightmare of EU tyranny behind us and forging a new beginning!
Max Musson © 2017
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
Stefan
- Edit
I think we entered a new era around the end of 2012 & now things are beginning to become apparent, hopefully Brexit & Frexit will occur & the German people & others will say enough is enough.
Stefan
- Edit
Looking at the fotos of the damage, reminds of even more was done since 1945, there & here.
Mark
- Edit
Unfortunately i cannot share any optimism about Brexit and possible Frexit.
It would be extremely naive to think that the financial controllers would release our nation or any nation so easily from their grip! Perhaps they planned Brexit all along for some nefarious reason or perhaps they’re more than happy with the atlantacists preference to join with the US.
Theresa May has no real conviction for our nation to leave the EUSSR; she kept a distinctly low profile during the referendum campaign. Theresa May is a self-serving, ambitious career politician who i fear has no principles or moral scruples but is easily moulded to her masters will.
Marine Le Pen will most likely lose the france presidential election to the Rothschild puppet Macron so Frexit will be off the table.
Even if we were to free our nations from the EU it would not free our nations from jewish banking elite control! That is the problem, sadly we will still be ruled by the war-mongering zionist banking families whose power comes from their grip on our nations’ money-supply!
[email protected]
- Edit
This is absolutely crazy. According to the following website, Macron/En Marche have roots that go back to an organization called NEW EARTH, sponsored by: IMF and the Rothschilds bank. tinyurl.com/what-is-en-marche