By Frederick Dixon:
There are lessons to be drawn from the unfolding tragedy in Northern Iraq. Some of these are obvious; the crass ignorance and arrogance of the “New World Order” elite which tried to remake an ancient society into a socially liberal western “democracy” safe for gay marriage (and is now tentatively wondering if might not have to go back in to clear up the mess which it created), and the savagery and cruelty of those Moslems who take their religion seriously.
Neither of the above are likely to surprise a regular visitor to this site but there is another lesson, which history has taught us often enough, namely the terrible insecurity of a minority without a homeland.
In the case of Kurdistan we are looking at a whole complex of landless minorities within minorities. The Kurds themselves form a reasonably coherent ethnic community of Aryan origin distinct from their Turkic and Semitic neighbours. They occupy a considerable and continuous bloc of territory, but that territory is divided between four countries (Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Turkey) so that the Kurds have no state within which they are the majority — that is the fault of Britain and France which could have created a state of Kurdistan after WW1 but failed to do so. Thus the Kurds are a minority everywhere and are, or have been, persecuted everywhere. The semi-self governing Kurdish region within Iraq is a step in the right direction but only a small one.
Albert
- Edit
12.000 years our people have lived in Britain, we came across during the last Ice, 80% of indigenous Britain’s can trace their DNA to back then.
To think if we allow mass immigration to continue 12.000 years of our culture may well be destroyed in a Hundred years from 1948, we are half way there.
We the British could be the first civilisation in history to be conquered not by War,Famine or Disease, But by the treachery of a few.
Cry Havoc!
- Edit
Only in Wales and Ireland Albert. Independent research by Leicester University and UCL have shown that English DNA is closer to that of northern Germany, Denmark and Holland as a result of the Anglo-Saxon and Danish invasions. See: English-Germanic DNA explanation on Youtube, for a very good summation. Remember: do not believe a theory by Oppenheimer as he is working to a left-wing agenda to show that immigration is a good thing!
frederickdixon
- Edit
I suppose it’s possible, Cry Havoc, that Britain was populated after the retreat of the ice by hunter gatherers coming from two directions – up the Atlantic coasts to the western parts of our islands, and across the boggy plain where the North Sea now is into the eastern parts. That would explain the resemblance of English DNA to Danish, Dutch and German DNA without the need for a large scale Anglo-Saxon invasion. BUT – and arguing against myself – it doesn’t explain the almost complete replacement of language, religion and place names which occurred then. Perhaps both phenomena happened; the DNA in the east was already substantially Germanic in type but it took a major Anglo-Saxon settlement, later reinforced by Danes, to culturally Germanise the country.
Max Musson
- Edit
The issue discussed here, that of distinguishing between the English, who are designated ‘Germanic’ and the Cornish, Welsh, Irish and Scots who are designated ‘Celtic’, is divisive and the ‘history/pre-history’ promulgated is flawed. The video to which Cry Havoc directed us is also flawed in its conclusions.
.
The haplogroups to which the video refers are based upon mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis, which does not analyse the DNA of the cell nucleus or of the cytoplasm, but merely that of the mitochondrion, a small symbiotic organism that exists within each of our cells. It is the DNA of the cell nucleus and to a lessor extent the cytoplasm that determines our physical and mental characteristics, i.e. or racial composition, the mtDNA is merely a kind of biological bar-chart that is significant for the purposes of ‘genealogy’ rather than taxonomy.
.
What I mean by this is that the haplogroups analysed show us ancestral lines, i.e. the route by which we inherited our genes, but not which genes were inherited.
.
The confusion over this issue is what allows pro-PC geneticists to confound ‘White racialists’ by showing that they have some ‘non-White ancestry’. In fact, the mtDNA analysis merely shows that the individual concerned had ancestors who came to Europe typically via North Africa, the Middle East or Asia, the assumption being that these ancestors were racially the same as the modern day inhabitants of those regions.
.
In fact every European will have mtDNA that shows this, as those regions were the parts of the world inhabited by our ancestors during the height of the Ice Age when most of North-western and Central Europe were uninhabitable. As the ice sheets retreated, so our ancestors moved north-westwards into the European peninsula, but they were already thoroughly ‘European’, because the climate of North Africa, the Middle East and Asia-Minor was in those days, like the climate of modern day Europe, much colder and wetter than it is today.
.
The Upper Palaeolithic hunter gatherers who migrated into Europe from c. 40.000 BP, populating all of Europe, and who reached the British Isles c. 25,000 BP, only to be driven back again by the mini ice-age, and to return again thereafter c. 12,000 BP, were Cro-Magnons, the ancestral stock of all subsequent tribal/cultural groups of Europe.
.
The Cro-Magnons are the people who would have spoken the root language of the Aryan language group and are the stock from whom all so-called Aryan peoples are descended. be they Germanic, Teutonic, Basque, Iberian, Italic, Gothic, Celtic, Frankish, Doric or Ionian.
.
Because the migration routes taken by the extended family/tribal groups of Cro-Magnons differed, and because the population groups involved were very small and isolated over the millennia the invasion took, these groups evolved variations in language and culture, but when the Celts encountered the Britons or the Danes or any of the other proto-nations of Europe, they were primarily of the same racial stock and once their rivalries were settled, assimilation was easily achieved and without any detriment to either lineage. In this way the rich variety of European culture was created over thousands of years and this is why the liberal/left is wrong to view the modern British as a ‘mongrel’ race and it is also why it is wrong to promulgate ‘English nationalism’ in such a way as to divide the indigenous people of these islands, setting those who self-identify as ‘Celts’ against those who self-identify as ‘Germanic’.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
As I have said before don’t think that by letting others look after your interests, that your interests will be looked after!
Any group or tribe will look after their interests first.
A Swain
- Edit
And we are well on our way to being that very minority you allude to.
Odd that the very architects who engineered this genocide of White nations were the homeless tribes of yesteryear themselves yet we don’t see them, one and all, rushing to take up permanent residence in their hijacked middle eastern patch.
No, to the contrary, having systematically installed themselves within the hierarchical layers of power of White gentile homelands over the decades, they are loathe to relinquish their ill-gotten gains and leave.
Perhaps, Gentiles should be looking at forcing the UN to, in turn, compel Israel to accept unconditionally, Asylum Seekers from all over the world like Gentile nations are forced to do and, at the same time, enable Arabs both Christian and Muslim alike to demand unfettered entry into AND Affirmative Action in their hijacked homeland with the aim of reclaiming it in its entirety.
Shaun
- Edit
Once the British Whites reach minority status, Max Musson on this site has pointed to what is likely to happen. Our people will exist within a pluralistic, fragmented country that is governmened by regional, ethnic enclaves that are antagonistic towards out-group members and internal dissent — much like the Middle East is today!
Whites need to prepare for this! Western Spring is the ONLY poltical movement in our country that understands where this country is heading, and it’s the only movement that has a pratical plan-of-action to put our own people in the best possible position. We don’t want to end up like the Kurds! The time to organize is now!
Daniel
- Edit
They never had any genuine intention of trying to ‘remake an ancient society into a socially liberal western “democracy” safe for gay marriage’.
That was just P.R.
The real intention was to destroy a strong, secular Arab state and replace it with chaos, to create an independent Kurdistan in the north so as to severe the so-called ‘Shia crescent’ connecting Iran to Hezbollah, and to promote wider inter-Muslim conflict through-out the region.
All for the benefit of Israel.
Muad'Dib
- Edit
No Frederick, you’re completely correct – there were two waves, a continental and an Atlantic. Both these groups constitute the ‘British’ people; it’s the language and culture which has changed not the people. Firstly the Anglo-Saxons – like the Franks in Gaul, the Vandals in North Africa or the Goths in Italy, Spain and SW Gaul etc – were always a small minority of the population. As for the Victorian twaddle about the Saxons driving the Celts to the West I think you’ll find Ken Dark comprehensively demolishes the idea in his, ‘Britain and the End of the Roman Empire.’ The fact that the two men who established Wessex – Cerdic and Cynric according to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle – have blatantly Welsh names both of which are still used today, Ceredig and Cynrig, ought to warn us of the real situation.
Therefore back to your question about language and cultural displacement, which the Anglo-Saxon invasion actually achieved. You must bear in mind that Britannia had not been under Roman rule long enough for full Latinization to have occurred – as happened in Gaul and Hispania. When the Germanic tribes took these two territories they were simply overwhelmed linguistically by the host population who Latinized the Germans with time.
In Britannia although the elite had been Latinized the peasantry retained their Celtic language. This situation however was not uniform, the further West and North one travelled the more the elite retained their original languages and culture. This is an important point, without an elite using a language it will lose shape and rapidly become bastardised – as happened to English after 1066. The English language which finally re-emerged with the likes of Chaucer was very different to the language of Alfred and Aethelstan. Indeed, without the 100 Years War we might all be speaking French today.
The Romano-Britons did well to begin with, smashing the Saxons at Mount Badon, but ultimately their fate was tied to Rome – which collapsed along with the world of the Romano-Britons. The Britons of the West and North having retained their pre-Roman culture formed the Celtic kingdoms of Gwynedd, Rheged, Powys, Elfed etc. The really interesting develops occurred in the South and East where the peasantry had first a Latin, then Germanic speaking elite. Their Celtic language, with no elite using it – unlike in the West and North – was degenerating into a patois bereft of status and ripe for displacement by another culture, which their new Germanic overlords supplied; namely early Mediaeval Christian.
Does this help?
Cry Havoc!
- Edit
You are trotting out the usual revisionist nonsense that the English have been forced to swallow since the 2nd War. You are wrong on many points.