by H. Millard :
European men (that means Whites) have grown 4″ in the last 100 years: see here.
Other studies have shown that White heads are also changing. They are getting larger by becoming longer and narrower: see here.
So what’s going on? Scientists aren’t sure. Some scientists, as seen in the first article linked to above, chock up the changes in body height to better health care. Others have other ideas.
As a working hypothesis it might be worth considering the possibility of rapid evolution via mutations (natural selection also enters the picture). And, in this regard, when a species evolves, it doesn’t change all at once. There will be a small mutation here and then one there and so on.
In the case of the larger and longer heads which have increased the size of the White skull which can then accommodate a larger brain (larger by about the size of a tennis ball, according to the second article above), one might ask why, if nature “wants” to increase the brain size of Whites, it is making White heads longer and narrower instead of expanding the skull side to side?
The answer may be that the White female birth canal and pelvis are not evolving fast enough to allow the safe passage of a baby with a wider head, so nature has simply made the heads longer to allow the same increase in internal brain size without requiring a larger birth canal and larger pelvis. It’s an engineering in flesh problem, and nature may have found, as it usually does, a workaround to solve the problem.
One could come up with an animated short to explain this quickly:
VOICE FROM THE SKY: Nature, I want you to give these people a larger brain.
NATURE: Ah, okay. (Thinking to herself: How am I going to do that? If I give them bigger brains, it means I have to give them bigger skulls, and if I give them bigger skulls they may not pass through the birth canal without killing themselves or their mothers or both. Eureka! I’ll just make their skulls longer and narrower and this will increase the inner skull size to allow a larger brain.
And, to go on in this vein, we might postulate that Whites are somehow more mutable than other types of humans and that’s why we’re seeing the changes in Whites but not in other peoples.
Just look at the wide diversity found in White people that you do not find in others. We have blond, black, brown, red hair. We have curly, wavy, straight, coarse, fine hair. We have blue, green, hazel, brown, grey eyes. And the variety goes on and on in characteristic after characteristic with all sorts of minor variations such as all the various shades of blond hair.
And if, in fact, Whites are more mutable, it may be because our genes–the genes that make us a unique human type–are flexible–which might be the result of their relative newness. A hint in this direction is the fact that most White phenotype characteristics are recessive, such that it takes two White parents to produce a White child. This might point to these genes being less fixed and more easily changed.
An easy example of the effects of recessive/dominant genes can be seen in Barack Obama. He had a Black father and a White mother, but Obama is Black. He is not half White and half Black. He is Black. This is because his mother’s White genes were recessive and weren’t expressed. They would only be expressed by mating with another White.
It takes two White parents to make a White child, but it only takes one White parent and any other type of human to make a non-White child.
by H. Millard (c) 2013
# # # #
Steve
- Edit
Maybe you’ve hit on why whitey must go, we’re about to evolve to Homo Superior?
jackdaw
- Edit
Japanese women have to accommade a larger baby head , hence their flat , but broad pelvic structure, as opposed to the African, hottentot (big ass) type of pelvis.
Observer
- Edit
This is an interesting post. Ever since human history began, ‘progress’ in all its guises has almost been a flatline affair, in other words, existing conditions in man’s living arrangements had barely changed during the whole of this time – human evolution was a painfully drawn out process. That is of course until recent times, which we now call modernity. The birth of modernity is not an exact date, but suffice to say, by the time of the industrial revolution the age of modernity had well and truly arrived.
The flatline progress of countless thousands of years suddenly took off like a rocket and it is this rocket-like trajectory which we are now living in, I have said many times we are nothing but hunter gatherers in space suits. It is almost as if this explosive change of living conditions had outpaced man’s natural ability to evolve at the same speed. Hence hunter gatherers in space suits.
Modernity has been surpassed by post modernity, in other words the iron age of heavy industry for westerners has receded into history, we now live in a super-scientific age in which the most important commodity required is for a higher human intelligence, Could it be said that our old class society is no longer viewed as rich vs poor, but as intelligent and educated vs the low IQ masses? To me this does seem the case as to why our elites consider themselves as the natural leaders of the herd, and the rest of us as human cattle.
It is this combination of modernity and super-scientific postmodernism that has enabled the high IQ – high achievers to into a position where they could high jack the world and its people. And it is this process that we’re are witnessing in our time. These people want to rule the world.
In concluding this comment, I need recourse to my tin foil hat for I have seen many times on my journey through the blogosphere references to a cull of the world’s population. In essence, what these pronouncements predict is the human population of this planet is to be reduced by something of the order of 80%, in other words to reduce the world’s population to less than a billion people. Some say this agenda has already been set in motion and whites are the first on zee liste.
It is at this moment I think I had better make a hasty retreat – exist stage left. , Holding on grimly to my tin foil hat of course.
ConnalOakesHolt
- Edit
Are you sure that these “elites” are more intelligent? They may have gone to schools which charge exorbitant term fees and I grant you, they most probably recieved a higher quality education, from a higher calibre of teacher. But are the positions to which, for example, David Cameron and George Osborne or Tony Blair and Peter Mandelsohn, ascended due entirely to superior intelligence in a meritocracy?
The fields of Science and its various branches, medicine, physics, genetics and Technology, which I assume are included in your phrase super scientific postmodernism, are littered with highly intelligent people whos works have been suppressed not because of errors or innacuracies, lack of intelligence ,but because their findings go against the current orthodoxy.
The investigative studies of said departments all require funding, which may come from a variety of sources, government grants, sponsorships from interested parties in various industries, backers in high finance with no interest beyond that of a return on investment.These groups play a huge part in either promoting of suppressing new information and can make or break careers irrespective of intelligence levels.
Similarly, these schools to which the elites attend act as training grounds and networking clubs. Here, the sons of International Bankers play rugger with the sons of Prime Ministers. To a certain extent, their lives are mapped out for them. They are groomed for the positions that they will eventually act out in.
From these positions of power, these elites are able to shape the experience of life for whole populations.
If we look at the education system, do we see one that is designed to produce intelligent, racially aware white children, who have been taught the truth about their heritage and their race? We do not. What we see is an education experience designed to mould a child to fit with the current orthodoxy which has been decided by those who attended an elite school with the intention of moulding and shaping the sons of powerfull international financiers and their political stooges, who then go on to promote or suppress the various ingredients of life which would result in their maintaining their positions of power and wealth or see them fall from grace .
The result is a plutocracy, rather than a meritocracy.
What I have described above does not even begin to address the issues of untapped potential in the youth of white working class kids or the effects of poverty upon a childs education or parents who work long hours and have little time and attention, despite their best intentions, for their childs education.
These elites might view us as mere cattle, but they are not more intelligent nor are we bovine.
We must be careful not to perpetuate the myth that these “elites” are the best people for the job, so as to speak. To do so helps them maintain their position of power over us. A power which is weilded with malign rather than benign intent for us, the indigenous white Britons.
Steve
- Edit
I think the politicians you describe aren’t particularly clever as you say, it’s the fact that they’ll do as they are told.
In fact having corrupt or decadent people in place is good for the agenda, if they step out of line they can be destroyed & removed quickly, to be replaced by someone more cooperative.
George Watson
- Edit
I have read somewhere, but now can’t find it, that current thinking may be wrong. It has been assumed that whites evolved from blacks. However, the first whites are found 8,000 years after mans first appearance. This is nowhere near enough for time for natural evolution of such magnitude. What is known is something dramatic happened in the gene pool. Nobody knows what this dramatic event was. I may have it wrong and white development may have been only 8000 years but I hope you get the gist.
Steve
- Edit
I’ve always thought much the same & if we all came from Africa, how is it we evolve & advance but they don’t?
I favour the idea we whites came from the Caucus (Kavkaz) mountains area.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
There have also been some American studies that suggest despite some miscegenation, fundamentally Aryan man is evolving away from other races. Unfortunately I don’t have the details but it’s an interesting hypothesis.
James Albion
- Edit
If a Black man marries a White Woman and has children the children will be predominately Black. If a White man marries a Black Woman and has children again they will be predominately Black. It is obvious miscenigation is a danger to the White races
Robert Wakely
- Edit
To ConnalOakesHolt, politicians and their friends are a White sub-species. They are superior to the general White population in cunning, not intelligence!
Steve
- Edit
Cunning = dishonesty?