By Shaun de Moray:
We live in the Age of the Internet. Before this age, education, news, and culture was disseminated through regionalist organs of delivery such as the TV, the radio, government libraries, and, for those people stuck with the superstitions of the Middle Ages, the pulpit. This was our experienced reality, so very few people could contemplate politics outside the confines of what was available: System-Propaganda
Only men with incredible amounts of patience, intelligence and luck would ever get close to the political truth. Some men did. We can read these amazing people today, so it is difficult for us to understand that political information used to be far, far scarcer than it is today. We are lucky!
Think about it this way: how many people in the European nationalist scene would have known about the Bilderberg Group, the Frankfurt School, the true nature of Israel, the Zionist control of the West, the Jewish control of the media, the International Banksters, and the White geNOcide Project before the mass availability of the Internet? Maybe some leaders, sure, but we have to face facts: pre-Internet nationalists didn’t know as much about the context of the struggle as we do today.
The problem?
Amongst our people, an understanding of the nationalist struggle is still esoteric. Despite the huge amounts of information available to any of our people who wish to understand our perspective, many people are afraid to access this information because it could get them into trouble and instead, they seek softer options, allowing themselves to be led down blind alleys by people like David Icke, Alex Jones, and, due to the way he has changed his core message of White survival and allied himself with the anti-Zionist left, David Duke.
The Internet is great for waking people up; but many of our people lack the mental strength needed to take on the System for what it is really doing: committing genocide against the White race. Such people often cannot face up to the truth and so in acts of pure self-deception they pretend to be challenging the System when all they are really doing is listening to deluded ideologues, dancing to degenerate music, and taking drugs.
Deep down, most of these people must know they aren’t really challenging the System as they spew out poltically correct cliches that never stray past ”dangerous” ideas such as heavily taxing the rich. But we have to face reality: until the day arrives when we can eradicate these pitiful tendencies amongst so many of the ”free-thinking” caste of our people, this will be the maximum extent of ”rebellion” for most of our race!
What can we do?
We nationalists who are capable of seeing through all the disinformation, nonsense, and cowardice of the ”New Age Conspiracy Movement”, are faced with a major challenge: we must, in every way possible, take on the New Agers until every last person who is capable of thinking for themselves knows we are speaking the truth. There is no other way. We won’t be able to smash the System if a significant portion of potential revolutionaries suffer from a delusion that we can’t defeat our enemies because they’re descended from inter-dimensional aliens, or some other such rubbish.
If the nationalist movement can gather the best of our race into a formidable force the fake opposition movements can be silenced. We must give the masses of our poeple more reasons to follow us than the state! We need to become the only option for our people. We need to do this by becoming the only legitimate vehicle for revolution.
We have advantages. The System is a huge, cumbersome, corrupt, rotting and failing machine, and the New Agers challenging it are idiots. We must win the meta-political struggle. We must be prepared to fight for the 14 words!
By Shaun de Moray
AAA
- Edit
Shaun, this is not directed at you or wholly your argument. But the points I raise are in relation to the (as I see it) general context of your article.
.
The ”New Age Conspiracy Movement” you speak of are not, and never have claimed to be, nationalists. This then to my mind absolves them (in relation to nationalism) of any charge of ‘time wasters’, ‘traitors’, ‘irrelevant’ (as I have so often heard elsewhere) and the “disinformation, nonsense, and cowardice” you speak of.
.
It is easy to opine that non-nationalist opinions are “disinformation, nonsense, and cowardice”. But in their struggle –be that for Truth, anti-Establishment, anti-Zionism, freedom, whatever– they are only doing what they see fit: following their aims to achieve an end goal (as are we nationalists in salvation of our people).
.
Their end goal might be useful to –but not entirely conclusive to– ours. So what? They are not Reds. They are not our direct political antithesis and opponents –they are merely on a different philosophical and ideological trajectory. We cannot –as some in our movement would like– always agree and be this vanguard force of group-think where we all have the same aims and follow a certain book by the letter.
.
People are different –and there are, for instance, (thankfully) many different perspectives within the nationalist Cause. (Shaun didn’t allude to this but I must ask: must we all ruthlessly agree on page 10, section 9, paragraph 5, sentence 2 of a certain text or else face the charge of “race traitor”?)
.
Because these groups alluded to in the article to are not primarily concerned with race, (good lord, how many people are?) but do however wish for a return to a semblance of normalcy where we are not besieged by immigration, this to my mind does not make them irrelevant.
.
There are many non-nationalist but patriotic anti-Establishment groups out there doing what we are not: uncovering paedophillia in the Establishment; blowing the whistle on the Bilderberg group and Common Purpose; shining a light on the evils of Zionism; exposing the Social Services and their kidnapping of children; descrying the ‘education’ system; and speaking of the poisoning by medicine of the public and the obvious detriment that has on us all…
.
I subscribe to the 14 words. But the 14 words are not doing the sterling work that I have described above. There is far more to our struggle -and it needs a pincer movement to address the many issues we face. Unfortunately it sometimes seems to me that a lot of nationalists like to utilise Carl Jung’s concept of the shadow and appoint blame for their own failures and misgivings on the Other, the shadow (“it’s not me, it’s him!”). Put simply, for instance, the “Jews” wouldn’t be able to exact their malevolent influence if it wasn’t for Whites doing their bidding. An uncomfortable point –but a sobering fact and reality nonetheless.
Max Musson
- Edit
You make many good points, AAA, particularly the in the last paragraph, however in Shaun’s defence I would point out that the New Age conspiracy theory phenomenon is only c. thirty years old and other than the writings of Erich von Däniken and the odd ridiculous story about people spontaneously combusting, did not exist until knowledge of the machinations of the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations etc. started to be more widely circulated by various nationalist writers.
.
The Protocols had been famous in nationalist circles during the early 20th Century and nationalist writers had been concertedly investigating and uncovering the activities of conspiratorial NWO groups since the 1950s but it was not until they ‘hit the mother load’ during the 1980s, and all started to become clearer, that the mass media instigated the publication of a Tsunami of New Age ‘conspiracy’ stories to act as a ‘smoke screen’ and to dull the public’s appetite for looking at information regarding real-world conspiracies.
.
Now when we try to inform the public about Common Purpose etc, our true information often seems like a duller, less imaginative version of David Icke’s ‘lizard people’ stories, and of course Icke has mixed much truth regarding organised Jewry and Freemasons into the rest of the incredible nonsense he purveys, for obvious reasons.
Shaun
- Edit
I totally agree that we need to understand political contexts outside of race! The problem: there are people out there who believe we won’t liberate ourselves from the NWO until we connect with aliens, and all that type of thing.
Education is good, but when you have people who believe that our ruling classes are alien-human hybrids we have a major problem. Natonalists need to show people the big picture, and create practical strategies to defeat our enemies…. With a movement you need to understand their end goals; with nationlaists, it is racial survival and cultural environment; with the New Agers, it is creating a bland, homogenous world while taking drugs and other such nonsense.
I’m sorry! I have friends who are stuck in his trap who would have been good naionlaist if they weren’t offered the easier option by the likes of David Icke. We need to challnege these liars; we need to be the ONLY vechile for revolution.
SerpentSlayer
- Edit
It is interesting that some people not only believe that the enemy is extraterrestrial, but that they think only other extraterrestrials can defeat them and therefore there is no point in fighting.
This rests on two issues:
1: the idea that being extraterrestrial somehow makes them invincible, and two:
2: that being unbeatable means we shouldn’t fight.
The first is an obvious fallacy even for the slave minded. The cult controlling this is maybe a few hundred people, any alien technology they may have once had (if we pretend for argument they are aliens) is likely lost for the most part and a handful of armed men could likely execute them upon capture, even with scales, armour piercing bullets would see them off. The only other defence they have are human mercenaries, not a problem made worse by an alien presence.
My answer to the second is less obvious but far more relevant. Even if our enemy had a fleet of star destroyers and a death star that could wipe all humanity out in the blink of an eye, we should still resist with a rifle, a shovel, an iron bar or anything else we can get hold of in our hands. We owe it to our ancestors to fight regardless of what faces us and to resist by any means.
Max Musson
- Edit
I don’t think the extra-terrestrial issue is the nub of this matter, it is more a matter that a whole morass of mutually contradictory ‘conspiracy’ stories have been manufactured by the mass media, in conjunction with the ‘tin-foil hat brigade’, with the intention of creating a smoke screen so that real evidence of real conspiracies can go largely unnoticed. Let us not get too focused on the extra-terrestrial stories because these compose only a small proportion of the bogus conspiracy stories invented and are only believed by a very small number of extremely credulous people.
Shaun
- Edit
According to these New Agers, the only way you can defeat these aliens is by becoming conscious. I’m sorry: I don’t know what that means! Something about being extra nice and hyper relaxed all the time. Wouldn’t that type of mind set be to the System’s advantage?
AAA
- Edit
Aside from Icke’s “lizard people” (which pre-supposes it wasn’t taken out of context) let’s listen to his views on the Origins of Israel & New Mono World Order
.
“We’ll talk about the genocide of Palestinians and the redrawing of the Middle East with Israel as the new dictator. David [Icke] discusses the origins of Israel, which is based on a hoax. He’ll discuss events leading up to the creation of the State of Israel. Then, we’ll talk about where the elite want to take the world and the techniques they’re using to get there. Their techniques include the destruction of nationhood and forced multiculturalism. Icke comments on Europeans who are re-acting to preserve their nationhood, challenging the European Union and fighting back. We’ll talk about how the elite are working hard to establish a one world culture, a mono everything, through killing true diversity. Later, he’ll speak on the inner core of Zionism that functions like a secret society.”
.
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/07/RIR-140725.php
Wayne
- Edit
Having made the mistake of bombarding many of my peers with what I believe to be gold dust, in terms of information, and the common result being said peers staring back at me in wide eyed derision, it seems the best, or only possible course of action is for those of us who do have the mental strength to lead by example and focus 99% of our efforts on those who are already willing to stand up and be counted.
As the current system continues to decay and fail the people on so many levels they will look for alternatives but only in their own sweet time. I still try to plant seeds in people’s minds (albeit with limited success) and think a good strategy is to direct them to do their own research by asking questions such as, what is the Bilderberg group, the petro dollar system, the Balfour declaration, the Yinon plan, 9/11 truth, which I believe will open their eyes a little without scaring them off, and just hopefully will lead them down the rabbit hole where they will come face to face with the beast.
Shaun
- Edit
You must never, however, be a bringer of doom and gloom! Telling people that their race is being killed off, the banking system is run by a greedy group of Jews, and, to top it off, the media is brainwashing the whole planet into destruction is very far from a bedtime story. People don’t want to hear it.
Understand that extreme ethnocentrism (like we have) is rare amongst our people. We need to say things that are true, and then, through our ACTIONS, show a different way. Their System is failing, so we need to get active. The System may have the money; but we have something they will never have: a credible plan for the future…..
Max Musson
- Edit
I don’t think our level of ethnocentrism is ‘extreme’, Shaun, I think it is shared by a great many of our compatriots. The way in which we are unusual however, is that we have the courage to act on our beliefs and fight for them rather than submit to state sponsored PC indoctrination.
BritishActivism
- Edit
One of the problems I’ve had with the recent and more sophisticated ‘new age’ anti-establishment conspiracy / truther / rebellion movements is the wider message being conveyed: that in this fight against ‘them’ (whoever ‘they’ may be), we “all have to come together” in order to defeat it.
.
Whether black, white, Pakistani, gay, liberal, conservative, nationalist, Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, we are all supposed to see that we are in this fight together – and that we must not let “them” divide us in our efforts to ‘expose the truth’.
.
In some kind of convoluted logic, in order to defeat the New World Order regime that wants to make the world uniform, erase all differences and barriers, bring in new systems of government etc….we need to all come together, erase our differences and barriers, bring in new systems together in order to overthrow the old ones…thus creating the ‘new world order’ through the disguise of trying to beat it!
.
Perhaps I am being a little unfair with that assertion, but I hope people can see the point I am making and why it can potentially be counter-productive for us to tolerate it too much (or send people in that direction enough so that it risks nationalists being peeled off into such different niches).
.
If there is such a plot as the New World Order, then why on Earth wouldn’t they also be clever enough to lead the opposition in this exact way so that it goes go hand in hand with their aims? What could be better for them than the main opposition to their plans being used to build their plans anyway?
.
Yet I suppose it is this kind of mental contortion in the ‘search for truth’ that can lead to people going a bit loopy and not knowing up from down any more. I have seen a few people really suffer with this in the last decade – and on that score I actually consider it a little bit dangerous to peoples mental health. It is certainly no way to live life when you get to the point of being paranoid about everybody and everything.
.
In the case of many “conspiracy theorist” sites and movements, the issues being discussed can span into the hundreds. People like Alex Jones can carefully (and expertly) stitch together segments of government reports and newspaper cuttings etc to paint pictures of what they see (or say) is coming.
.
They may well be right on some of it for all I know, it can certainly be very informative and interesting – but in terms of white interests and nationalism, I think it can quickly end up being nothing but a massive distraction away from the essentials required to genuinely better our future. This is why I can sympathise with the notion made in the article that these people and their messages can be counter-productive to us.
.
I’m not sure it is wise to spend our time and energies crushing the new-age-movement though. I think that we can only reinforce our positions and try an win arguments for them. Often the best way to do that is not to crush or antagonise people, but stay solid to our own issues and not back down over them. We have to get better at what we do. In general I just think we have have to plough our own field rather than spend a lot of time trying to divert other people’s.
.
I would not consider such people our enemies, but as a nationalist minded person (with those specific blinkers on) I obviously tend to concentrate more on the matters at hand and would warn people about being dragged off too far on a tangent with all these other things.
.
We need to make sure we can inform people of the differences, warn them of the nature of these other groups – and when it comes to those already in them, try and persuade them to come our way. By going on the attack in some way, going in there and challenging them all the time, I think it will do nothing other than create stand off’s and reluctance for them to listen.
Max Musson
- Edit
I agree with the point you make that we should not expend energy and waste our time worrying about the tiny proportion of people who are so gullible and credulous that they believe the various New Age charlatans.
.
With all due respect to Shaun, this is a long way from being our main priority at this time.