By Max Musson:
In recent days I have published two articles attempting to explain what is going on in Ukraine and the implications for White nationalists worldwide.
Events have since appeared to be spiralling out of control and following the realisation that back in 1994, Britain and the USA had signed a treaty with Ukraine guaranteeing her territorial integrity, there was a period over last weekend during which we were possibly on the brink of World War Three.
Thankfully, it appears that despite the bombastic rhetoric not even Cameron and Obama are stupid enough to declare war on Russia and all they have so far threatened Russia with are trade sanctions and political isolation. This moderate line reflects two things: firstly, that Western leaders have no stomach for a war with a country as well armed and economically powerful as Russia; and secondly, in their hearts they know that Putin has acted in a measured way to the growing crisis, taking only the minimum steps necessary in order to protect Russia’s vital strategic interests.
Indeed, we in the West should give thanks to Vladimir Putin for acting in such a way that he has been able to allay his own countries concerns without delivering such an affront to the West that war would have been precipitated. Had streams of Russian tanks and infantry poured across the border with Ukraine proper, occupying large tracts of land to which Russia has less of a legitimate claim, the outcome might have been entirely different.
Therefore while Western leaders will not like what has happened and might ‘huff’ and ‘puff’ mightily, they have not suffered such a loss of face that they feel justified in throwing common sense to the wind.
Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the USA remained the sole world super-power and we saw former assets of the Soviet Union: East Germany; Yugoslavia; Poland; Czechoslavakia; Bulgaria; Rumania; Latvia; Lithuania; and Estonia assert their independence and move across from the old Soviet Bloc to align with the rapidly expanding New World Order built upon Zionist and American economic imperialism.
Upon the collapse of the Soviet Union, the leaders of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine had signed a treaty establishing the ‘Commonwealth of Independent States’ (CIS) as a successor entity to the USSR. At the same time they announced that the new alliance would be open to all republics of the former Soviet Union, as well as other nations sharing the same goals. The CIS charter states that all the members are sovereign and independent nations and quite soon all of the former Soviet Bloc states with the exception of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania had joined the CIS.
The vacuum left by the collapse of the Soviet Union has allowed China to rise and assume superpower status and there have been a number of other new players, but in 2000, Vladimir Putin assumed the presidency of Russia and almost immediately set about halting and reversing the decline in power and influence of the Russo-sphere.
Almost immediately Putin’s leadership was tested, as not content with the geopolitical gains already made, the NWO, invigorated by the arrival of a number exiled Russian, primarily Jewish, oligarchs fleeing Putin’s retribution for their shameless pillaging of the Soviet/Russian economy, continued their attempts to prise further former Soviet Bloc republics away from the Russo-sphere. They employed what have come to be known as ‘Colour Revolutions’, and created the supposedly ‘non-aligned’, ‘Easter Partnership’ in 2009.
First in 2000 there was what became known as the ‘Bulldozer Revolution’ in Serbia, then the ‘Rose Revolution’ in Georgia in 2003′, the first ‘Orange Revolution’ in Ukraine in 2004 and the ‘Tulip Revolution’ in Kyrgyzstan in 2005.
The Eastern partnership comprises: Armenia; Azerbaijan; Belarus; Moldova; Georgia; Ukraine and the EU, and the EU provides the executive for this group, so no prizes for guessing which was the dominant partner and what the aims of this group are!
In Ukraine however the new government installed after the ‘Orange Revolution’ was fairly short lived and disputes over natural gas supplies from Russia soon led to a reversal of fortunes and a return to pro-Russian government under Viktor Yanukovych in 2010.
In my earlier article entitled ‘Ukraine – The ‘Orange Revolution’ Turning White?’, I explained how an assemblage of American based governmental and non-governmental agencies of the NWO have been active in Ukraine stirring up discontent within the Ukrainian population with a view to luring Ukraine away from the Russo-sphere and towards joining the European Union and NATO. Recent visitors to Ukraine have reported large billboards promoting EU membership and bearing slogans designed stir discontent among Ukrainians prior to the beginnings of the recent disturbances in Kiev.
The following video features a speech made by Victoria Nuland, the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs at the US State Department, who is Jewish, at an International Business Conference on Ukraine in Washington on 13th December 2013, in which she makes evident the degree of commitment and activity behind NWO machinations in Ukraine and the fact that since 1991 the US government alone has spent over $5billion on political agitation in that country.
A further illustration of the degree of meddling in Ukraine’s internal affairs can be gauged from the following video which features an alleged cellphone conversation between Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Wyatt the US Ambassador to Kiev, in which they can clearly be heard discussing the tactical manipulation of key individuals involved in the All Ukrainian Union, the people who have now declared themselves the new government of Ukraine. Notice also Nuland’s insulting dismissal of EU concerns about what the US is doing, saying, “fuck the EU”. This recording was apparently leaked by the Russian authorities at the beginning of February and in a subsequent news conference Nuland did not deny the authenticity of the recording, commenting only on the fact that the leaking of it violated a private diplomatic conversation.
In view of the strategic importance to Russia of her Black Sea fleet and naval base at Sevastopol in the Crimea, it was inconceivable that Vladimir Putin would sit idly by and watch as Ukraine is pried away from the Russian Bloc, letting those vital security assets fall under the control of NATO. Therefore anyone planning to establish a position of greater independence for the Ukrainian government would have been wise to ease the way for their proposals by providing firm assurances to Russia that her strategic interests would not be threatened. However, the new self-proclaimed government of Ukraine did not do this and in fact did the opposite, giving every indication that Russia’s interests would be violated.
The 19th Century German statesman Prince Otto von Bismark is famous for having asserted that “politics is the art of the possible” and there was simply no possibility that Vladimir Putin’s Russia would not act to secure their interests in the Crimea.
The new government of Ukraine is therefore now faced with either the probability that Russia will annex Crimea and possibly other majority ethnic-Russian parts of East Ukraine, or with the prospect of going to war with Russia in a conflict they cannot possibly win. They gambled on receiving military support from NATO, but NATO countries are not in a position to go to war with Russia, not unless the security of the West is directly threatened such that there is no other course of action, and certainly not simply to uphold the territorial integrity of a nation whose new leaders have just made such a dangerous miscalculation, amounting to extreme provocation, in their relationship with Russia.
For reasons already discussed in my previous articles in this series, it is understandable that Ukrainian nationalists have wanted to reduce foreign influence over their country and more especially the influence of Russia, and they have my sincere sympathy in this respect. However, they must act in a manner that is cognisant of the geopolitical power politics that are at play in their region, which make their position very precarious, and they must tailor their nationalistic fervour and their political idealism to what Bismark would have regarded as politically possible.
Vladimer Putin does not appear to be a White nationalist in any ideological sense, but he is widely regarded among White nationalists and European nationalists as the most nationalistic of the current crop of White leaders. He is in my opinion a pragmatic nationalist, someone who is fundamentally nationalist at heart, but driven more by what is practically achievable than by what is ideologically desirable.
Putin’s Russia is often portrayed through the Western media as imperialistic, when fundamentally, Putin is simply attempting to re-unite the Russo-sphere, protecting the interests of Russia and also protecting the interests of ethnic Russians who have been left isolated, living as a minority within former Soviet buffer states that have now become independent republics.
While the newly created independent republics of the Russo-sphere may feel somewhat aggrieved by the former domination of their countries by the Soviet Union, it would be wrong to conflate Putin’s desire to re-establish the power and influence of the Russo-sphere through the creation of a Russian Bloc with the cruelly despotic and often genocidal rule over the Russo-sphere that was a feature of the Soviet Union.
It is undoubtedly true that corruption still exists within Russia and while the system of government is not as democratic as one might hope, Russia is in this respect no different to the EU, which is often characterized by nationalists as the ‘EUSSR’, reflecting the fact that the constitution of the EU is modeled on the constitution of the old Soviet Union.
The wider geopolitical consideration for any White nationalists within the Russo-sphere should therefore be one of seeking common cause with Putin’s Russia and while not necessarily wishing to be absorbed into a ‘greater Russia’, at least acting in co-operation and in support of common interests.
For any White nationalists within the Russo-sphere to claim that they wish their nation to distance itself from Russian influence and join the EU – as a means of getting rid of corruption – and as a means of enjoying greater democracy and self-determination – is quite frankly, laughably naïve. Such an action would if nothing else be to ‘jump out of the frying pan and into the fire’. The great advantage for White nationalists of the Russo-sphere in remaining loyal to, and in supporting the Russian Bloc, is that while some elements of corruption and bureaucratic tyranny may still accompany their association with Russia, the worst excesses of NWO rule are avoided: i.e. the export of jobs and manufacturing capacity; uncontrolled Third World immigration leading to displacement and race replacement; political correctness and enforced race mixing.
In short, while association with Russia may result in some degree of exploitation and oppression of one’s people, at least Putin’s Russia is not intent on the cultural and racial obliteration of one’s people as well.
It would appear that nationalists in Ukraine may have therefore made a major strategic blunder in facilitating a coup d’etat by pro-EU/US/NWO elements within the All Ukrainian Union.
Heroic and well intended though their actions have been, there is a real danger that Svoboda and Pravy Sector have not only delivered their country into the hands of agents of the NWO, they have provoked a crisis in which Vladimir Putin must act to protect Russian interests in the Black Sea and the Crimea in such a way that it now looks certain that their country will be partitioned.
It is naïve and baised to describe what we have seen happen in Crimea as having been caused by ‘Russian imperialism’, when the ‘Colour Revolutions’ and the establishment of the Eastern Partnership and the obvious meddling by Western governmental and non-governmental organizations in the internal politics of various Eastern European states, including Ukraine, are clear evidence of imperialism by financial and economic means, by subversion and sedition.
Notwithstanding all of the above, I wish Pravy Sektor luck in their attempts to create an independent nationalist Ukraine. I would feel so much more confident of a successful outcome however, if the recent revolution against the Yanukovych government had been the result of extensive planning and preparation by Pravy Sektor and Svoboda. This does not appear to have been the case however, and I fear that in making a settlement with Russia, they will now have to accept the loss of Crimea, which was an autonomous region of Ukraine, and which is populated largely by ethnic Russians, and possibly the loss some of the other largely ethnic Russian provinces of East Ukraine as well.
Ceding these areas to Russia should provide the minimal assurances that Russia would want in order to leave the rest of Ukraine alone and in order for Russia to recognise the legitimacy of the new Ukrainian government, especially once new presidential elections have been held.
Furthermore the ceding of these territories plus the provision of assurances that Ukraine would want to maintain good relations with Russia and would not allow its territory to become a station for NATO troops and missiles, should be a price that any Ukrainian nationalist would be willing to pay. The Ukrainian people have not had an independent state throughout most of their history – at various times various parts of Ukraine have been incorporated into Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire. A Ukrainian state has only existed for ninety-six years and for the first seventy-three of those years it was the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, part of the Soviet Union, and as such did not include Crimea, which was part of the Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic (see the map above) and therefore true independence for the Ukrainian people with retention of 90% of the territory currently designated the Ukraine, would in my view be a very satisfactory outcome. Also, just as it would be iniquitous for the Russians to seek to dominate the predominantly ethnic-Ukrainian parts of Ukraine, so it should be deemed iniquitous for the Ukrainian people to seek to dominate the ethnic-Russian Crimea and the predominantly ethnic-Russian parts of what is nominally East Ukraine.
Let us hope that some kind of compromise arrangement of this sort can be achieved and that nationalists are able to extend their influence within the new independent Ukraine.
By Max Musson © 2014
# # # #
DiverCity Jones
- Edit
Excellent even-handed essay. I enjoy reading your blog as a native and resident of the Southeastern United States.
Shaun
- Edit
I think the best solution for the Ukrainian nationalists is to try and draw up support for their parties for the upcoming elections.
I believe the East Europeans are a lot more ethnocentric than us Western Europeans; so they could use hardcore nationalist rhetoric (within reason) and swerve their people away from clutches of the EU, the Zio-banks, and the NWO.
I think it is good that Putin has managed to avoid war. Despite the hypocrisy of the NWO, I don’t think they fancy starting a war where THEY will be affected.
Slightly off topic, I think the genesis of Putin’s greatness (for want of a better word) is his emotional strength. He trains, he eats well, he is focused — that places him a trillion levels above the weak, degenerate rats who constitute our ”elite”.
Is Putin a nationalist? To be honest I don’t know. The test will be how he responds to the Euro Elections in May when nationalist parties are expected to do very, very well. I suspect he will take a measured view: he will support any independent country that is pro-Russian. Like Bismark, Putin understands that politics are the Art of the Possible.
Tony L
- Edit
“In short, while association with Russia may result in some degree of exploitation and oppression of one’s people, at least Putin’s Russia is not intent on the cultural and racial obliteration of one’s people as well.”
Actually, I make you wrong in this. Putin is not a nationalist, he is an imperialist and a strong man. I delight in him kicking zog’s NWO, but he is allowing Asian immigration from the former SSRs into Russia.
I agree with your analysis of what the Ukrainian Nationalists are and should be doing. They boobed by abolishing Russian as an official language. The Russians are now in Crimea and it looks like the referendum there will return the region to Russia. This will be a good thing for both Russia and Ukraine. A nation can only hold the territory that its people hold. And Russians form the majority in Crimea. It may be hard on the Ukraine, but that is the fact of the matter.
I know that you’ve been critical of Svoboda with regard to their coup, but they have played the cards they had and made the alliances they did as best they could. They now have a position within the new Parliament and with elections coming in May, they may improve that position. There is no chance of EU membership in the short term because these things take years – ask the Turks! But if the EU are going to give them aid in the short term, then who’s using who?
Max Musson
- Edit
I stated that Putin does not appear to be a White nationalist, but appears to be a nationalist of sorts.
.
Clearly he is not a racial nationalist in any ideological sense and you are correct that he has permitted Asian immigration from the former SSRs into Russia. However he has built the Russian economy on the basis of industrial ‘champions’, which are ‘public-private’ partnerships in which the state owns greater than 50% of the shares and which are required to place the national interest above private profit. Furthermore, he does appear to tailor his actions and interventions within former SSRs in line with areas of settlement by ethnic Russians and his foreign policy is orientated around a Russo-centric agenda.
.
In these respects therefore, his behaviour has been significantly nationalistic in character, albeit that you might be right and his personal motivations may turn out to be more a reflection of his own personal desire for power than anything else. Only time will tell.
.
With regard to ‘who is using who?’, I hope you are right and that Svoboda and Pravy Sektor do have a ‘game plan’ that will see them emerge victorious in the end. So far however, my contacts in Ukraine have expressed that same hope, but do not appear to have a previously formulated plan and are simply reacting to events as they unfold. As you say, playing the cards they have been dealt. The danger however is that continued association with the EU and involvement in the ‘Easter Partnership’ will enable the oligarchs of the NWO and their Western governmental and non-governmental agencies to tie Ukraine into a fixed path of entry into the EU with financial assistance in the form of ‘Golden handcuffs’. Again only time will tell.
.
One thing we can be sure of however is that the events and the revolutionary momentum in Ukraine did not happen by accident. The NWO will not be reacting to events as they happen, they will be following a planned agenda in which to as great an extent as possible, the turn of events will have been anticipated. Even the occupation of Crimea by Putin will have been anticipated and this is why nationalists need to engage in long term planning so that we are playing ‘chess’ at their level, two or three moves ahead, not just reacting to our opponent’s last move.
Joe
- Edit
Ukraine: “Right Sector” Leader Dmitry Yarosh Meets with Israeli Ambassador, Pledges Allegiance to the Jewish Race
https://www.dailystormer.com/ukraine-right-sector-leader-dmitry-yarosh-meets-with-israeli-ambassador-pledges-allegiance-to-the-jewish-race/
You have got your analysis completely wrong in the last few articles, Pravy Sektor is a Kosher group. The events are not spiraling out of control, you are just getting your analysis wrong.
Only websites that have got it right so far are the Dailystormer and NationalistAsatruNews
https://nationalistasatrunews.com/complete-chronological-archive/the-ongoing-jewish-war-against-ukraine.html
Simple Jews instigate riots, Jews take over Kiev, Russia moves to take Crimea, the rest of Russian-Ukraine will either kick the Kiev Jews out or they too will go to Russia, just like Osetia during the 5 day war.
Max Musson
- Edit
Thank you Joe, I am aware of these undercurrents, however there are a great many true nationalists within Svoboda and Pravy Sektor and we need our denunciations of treacherous elements to be balanced against retaining the good-will of those elements that are true.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
Talking of pledging allegiance, did you see Dave Cameron in Israel doing that very thing & pointing out how Jewish he is.
If that doesn’t prove whose interests he puts first, then I don’t know what would.
Dispater
- Edit
The most detailed analysis I’ve seen anywhere – thank you.
I’m not convinced that nationalists in our sense if the word are driving either Kiev or the Ukraine, just a game of Risk being played out between East and West. Your scenario of a superpower backed nationalism does indeed appear to be the best possible outcome for Yukraine, or for Crimea at the very least. The populace who remain pro EU should take a look at Greece before selling their souls to that particular devil.
Your articles have been most enlightening.
Red Scaur 99
- Edit
Great article, the Ukrainian right are being led up the garden path into a confrontation with Russia, white brother versus white brother again.
Ukraine’s leader of the far-right Pravy Sektor (Right Sector) paramilitary movement Dmytro Yarosh has announced his presidential bid in elections planned for 25 May.
The ultra-nationalist movement’s chairman Andriy Tarasenko said that Right Sector will also become a political party.
“Dmytro Yarosh will run for president,” he said. “We are preparing for a congress, at which the party will be renamed, and we will participate in the elections in Kyiv, the elections in all local councils, towns and villages.”
“We remain the leaders of this revolution. We are mobilising, we are preparing to react to foreign aggression,” Tarasenko added, claiming that the movement was ready for a full-scale war with Russia.
Steve
- Edit
I largely agree with your analysis & if Ukraine does become part of the EUSSR, then Russia will probably be targeted next.
There will foreign backed agitation & Putin thinks there has been already & has clamped down on the activities of some foreign sponsored charities & the like.
As you say no war & I bet Russia keeps Crimea or at least the Black Sea ports.
I think the US etc are spinning it as something bigger so that when Putin settles for what he wanted all along, they can say “Oh we won, we stopped Russia invading Ukraine” which wasn’t happening anyway.
Sadly I think white nationalism in Ukraine will not be a winner & the country will be diluted/polluted if the EUSSR gets its way.
But Russia anyway is showing signs of making all our errors in becoming a modern service economy that consumes foreign goods.
Kradmelded
- Edit
Putin is one of the only white leaders in Europe actively defending his own people against external and internal threats. He is not to be trifled with. He quickly sorted out the largely Jewish oligarch vampires who were sucking the life blood out of Russia. When the Israelis fomented the Georgia South Ossetia war in 2008, Putin very quickly put an end to this blatant attempt to hijack Russian Caspian gas and sent them running back to Israel.
His warning to the Israelis regarding Syria were also blatant and Putin is not one to be manipulated by these middle eastern trouble makers like the americans are.
It may come to pass in the not so distant future that the future of white Europe will largely rest on Russia. The americans are largely losing all respect in a leadership role due to the continual middle east shenanigans they let themselves be drawn in to. A by product of these is that increases muslim emigration to the west, further increasing terrorism and muslim unrest within western countries.
heechee
- Edit
RT has recently been showing some interesting stuff about the “revolution”Others are picking up the information but predictably not so much our own controlled media.If Ashton’s voice in the telephone recording can be verified beyond dispute it might have global consequences for the EU/US.
https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/world/kiev-snipers-were-opposition-hitmen/article5754177.ece
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/ukraine-kiev-snipers-reportedly-hired-by-opposition-leaders-not-yanukovich-according-to-bugged-call-9171328.html
I believe there is much more to come, But first we must wait and see what Crimea’s referendum brings and the response of the Zios and Ukranian puppets to the expected outcome of the vote. As the Zio oligarchs continue to be placed in positions of power it could very interesting to see what happens in the north east of the Ukraine as well.
Kradmelder
- Edit
Several developments in the Ukrainian crisis are getting increasingly worrying for whites. The Ukrainians are off to see Barack Obama with a begging bowl. The worrying bit is the guarantees of border security by NATO on the table. WW2 started by western nations guaranteeing indefensible borders of an east European nation. So did WW1. Putin is refusing even to talk to the Ukrainians so an easy diplomatic solution isn’t on the cards. And most likely the Crimea will choose to go to Russia. This will distance Russia from western white nations, at a time when white solidarity should be increasing, even if conflict is averted. It seems Russia at the moment is the only counter to the Judaeo-neoconservative threat engulfing the world.
.
Then we have Foxman and the ADL and other Jews, always ready to scream the H word and anti-Semitism at any signs of white Nationalism. They are stirring the pot by trying to raise antagonism especially against the Svoboda party. The World Jewish Congress has attacked the party and wants it banned. Banned by who? Don’t white Ukrainians have the right to form parties representing their views, or does international Jewry have to consent? At the same time, they seem strangely silent about the predominantly Jewish oligarch robber barons that disproportionally pilfer the Ukraine. As if that is somehow acceptable and Ukrainians don’t have the right to protest.
.
Somehow, I believe the resolution will lie with Putin, not with the bleatings of liberals or the actions of the USA..
PharmaPhil
- Edit
Also they don’t want the Holodomor brought up either, not only does it rival the Holocaust, it implicates Jewish involvement too.
They don’t want any competition that might derail their agenda.
Kradmelder
- Edit
Phil, the agenda is truly a snake pit of an agenda. Israel is staying well clear, even when Dolinsky, head of the Ukranian Jew Committee asked them to intervene. The Israelis have come short tangling with Putin before and are not going to get involved directly. But they are pushing the americans as their usual proxy. AIPAC is voicing intense concern about the situation in the Ukraine, and the entire International Jewish establishment is going into laager around their Maidan government, with the exception of the Svoboda party that they want to cast out. .
The USA’s Jewish Secretary of Treasury, Jack Lew assured them unlimited amounts of money. American tax payer’s money, borrowed from jewish banks and repaid with interest of course. Meanwhile they are slamming Obama, saying ‘less rhetoric and more action” . They say ‘The President has to overcome the “perceived weakness” of his response to the crisis in Syria this past summer’. They are trying to manipulate and goad Obama into rash action on behalf of international jewry. Obama hesitates as he knows the American public is war weary, and tweaking the Russian bear is certainly not what America wants. He doesn’t want to act against the wishes of the majority of the nation, or even the USA’s best interests.
Any senior American who speaks out is crucified in the media. Obama knows this. Even if they remain silent and only voice an opinion in private, like Lt Gen Boykin, they are attacked and painted as racists and their career is finished.
AIPAC and jewish action groups still want to push America into war in Iran and now potentially Ukraine. They act in open opposition to the wishes of the American public. Is this what democracy is about? Rule by the Jews?
The Holodomor, yes. It is the fact that most of those Bolshevik commissars were jewish.