Immigration, Politics

This Happy Breed?

77 Views 28

By Frederick Dixon:

This Royal throne of Kings, this sceptred isle,
This other Eden, demi paradise,
This fortress built by nature for herself,
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea
Which serves it in the office of a wall
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.

Has any other country ever had such a magnificent hymn of praise as the words which Shakespeare puts into the mouth of John of Gaunt in his King Richard the Second? It is hardly necessary for a patriot to say more about his love for England because Shakespeare has said it all, and any words would be lame and stumbling beside his glorious verse.

And yet, to read those words is a bittersweet sensation for we all know how vilely our lovely and beloved land, and her people, have been betrayed. Her people, that “happy breed of men”, those who we know to be our own kind and our own kin, whose faces are familiar, whose voices stir memories of others we have known, whose ways and thoughts we know and understand. For how much longer will there be a “happy breed” in “this little world” – a world because it is a country sufficient unto itself needing no other?

For how much longer? The latest figures from the Office of National Statistics are not encouraging – 26% of children born in England in 2012 had a foreign born mother, and that does not include all those who had a foreign born father but a British mother, and all those ethnic minority mothers who were born in England. Do not imagine that this is a phenomenon restricted to London and other big cities – some of the loveliest counties, Surrey and Hertfordshire, Bedfordshire and Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire all have foreign births at the national average.

Those who have, in their malice, hatred or ignorance, contrived the dispossession of the English have deprived us of something which every other English generation before our own has had, and which Shakespeare certainly understood; continuity, the knowledge that when our time on this earth is over the England which we have loved will go on. We have no such assurance and for that sin alone our country’s enemies – Human Rights lawyers first among them – will deserve the rope when the time of reckoning comes.

Once upon a time, and really not so very long ago, the English were able to believe that their government saw their country as they themselves saw it – as the homeland of the British people which it was the duty of the government to protect, as indeed it had just done with great effectiveness in WW2 (we may see WW2 differently now, but the generation which lived through it really did believe that they had lived through their country’s “finest hour”). The bitter truth now is that it is the British state which has become the most dangerous enemy of the English people.

This has come about because the institutions of the British State have passed into the hands of those whose instincts are international rather than national. This can be traced back in this country, at the very latest, to that sentimental attachment to the coloured races which was a development of 19th century evangelicalism. That in turn found a suitable match after WW1 in cultural bolshevism and the hideous child of that mating, born after a long gestation, is political correctness. Political correctness is instinctively internationalist and therefore connects quite naturally with the demands of global capitalism. Add to that poisonous mixture the post-imperial longing of Conservative politicians for an internationalist position – a Britain that “punches above its weight”, that “sits at the top table” (only a politician educated at Oxbridge could come up with that simile!), that grovels pathetically for a “special relationship” with the United States and we begin, perhaps, to see how the British state has become the most dangerous enemy of the English people. This is the state that has permeated all of its institutions with compulsory “equality and diversity”, that ensures that Union Jacks are to hand for Mohammed Farah and Christine Ohuorogu to wrap themselves in as shining examples of “new Britons”. This is the state that likes to call itself “the nation” thus completely misrepresenting the natural, ethnic, basis of nationhood.

In reality the British state, the United Kingdom, is an assemblage of older nations in various stages of digestion by Britishness, and in no case is the digestion more advanced than in England. There have, though, been signs in recent times that the process of digestion has halted and may even be going into reverse. This is a hopeful development because whatever happens in Scotland during the course of this year, whatever may be the ultimate fate of Northern Ireland or Wales, England – to save herself – must rediscover her own true ethnic identity – her pre-British identity – and secede from the institutions of the British State. How does England secede? – her people can do it a few at a time, creating our own new institutions, organisations and enclaves which we can govern in accordance with our own ideals and philosophy.

It is from patriotism, that love for a particular country and its native people, that a wider racial nationalism can develop as one realises that other, similar, countries share much of our history, culture and ancestry. Thus a free England, restored to her own “happy breed”, can build a racial nationalist fellowship, first with the other British peoples and then with the wider white world.

By Frederick Dixon © 2014

# # # #

28 thoughts on “This Happy Breed?”

  1. Nimble

    - Edit

    ‘Thus a free England, restored to her own “happy breed”, can build a racial nationalist fellowship, first with the other British peoples and then with the wider white world.’

    I just fear for the non-Whites who have been mixed so much that they ‘pass’ for White, many are, there was a black mayor in some London borough back in 1913, they have been here invading our land for much longer than most people imagine. Unfortunately there are many who ‘pass’ for White, Sweden’s PM, along with his two brothers and three children, all appear White, yet have a black great-great (great?) grandfather, the Queen of Sweden is descended from an Amerindian chief, a number of British, as well as other members of the European aristocracy, are descendants of Gannibal (the African slave elevated to the court of the Russian Tsar, general in the Russian and French Armies, ancestor of Alexander Pushkin, and later adding his genes to the European gene-pool, at least in certain ‘nobility’.

    .

    There’s also examples like Thomas-Alexandre Dumas, the half-black French general who’s genetic lineage has remained in Europe well into the 1900s with a French athlete being a descendant of his in the Olympics.

    .

    At least with most non-Whites we can see them for who they are, but these heavily mixed non-Whites who appear White are a serious problem for the preservation of the British, as well as the European gene pool. It’s extremely worrying to me. Anyway, there’s nothing we can really do about it.

      1. Nimble

        - Edit

        Unfortunately the more I see people, the more this doesn’t seem to be the case, and I worry more because, while I think I have a better eye than most people to spot racial features, many people simply don’t.

        .

        Sadly, I’m speaking from experience, my sister is dating a quarter black man, and his sister, also a quarter black, appears white, there’s very little about her that would indicate non-white genes and most would assume she was white, and there’s many more examples out there.

        .

        If the conquest of the white world continues, then it won’t matter, and I agree it’s not the worst of our problems, but if we can pull ourselves out of the invasions and occupation of our lands, then it is something we should and will have to confront.

        1. Max Musson

          - Edit

          Your last point is correct Nimble, but the issue is one that can be rectified through a simple public eugenics programme that the overwhelming majority of our people could easily be persuaded to support. Fear not on that score!

        2. Steed

          - Edit

          But remember… even someone who is a quarter black has predominantly English/British/white ancestry! That doesn’t make them white, but it does mean they have a strong ancestral connection to this land. An uncomfortable truth, but a truth nonetheless. I’m not excusing miscegenation, but it has happened in all nations and to all peoples. It can’t be undone and so – short of willing our own suicide – there’s no point dwelling on it.
          .
          I, like you Nimble, have a natural and overwhelming inclination towards purity in all its forms. I’m a perfectionist. But purity doesn’t exist on this Earth (anymore). Even the bluest azure lake is tainted by something man-made. If you’re a spiritual, take the approach that purity of spirit can still be achieved. Even a man who is 1/16 non-white may possess an Aryan spirit and may achieve that ultimate of spiritual goals.

          1. Max Musson

            - Edit

            Because of the recessiveness of White genes, for anyone to have any perceptible White features present in their phenotype, they must already be 3/4 White. Therefore all people who are perceptibly a mixture of White and some other race, have greater White ancestry than one might initially imagine and someone that one might imagine is 1/16th non-White will probably be no more than 1/32nd non-White.
            .
            If we begin with a predominantly White population, most of whom will be untainted by miscegenation, then it will be possible to ‘undo’ the relatively low level of miscegenation that may have already taken place, and this can be achieved as I have already indicated by involving the entire population in a benevolent eugenics programme that will not only eliminate, progressively and over a number of generations, any non-White genes that may have found their way into our gene pool, but also any other undesirable genes, such as ones that make us susceptible to certain hereditary diseases, ones that cause ugliness, stupidity etc. There is therefore no need for us to voice despair while our nation is still overwhelmingly White and on the contrary, we have cause to feel optimistic for the future.

          2. Nimble

            - Edit

            I disagree, Steed, I think that quarter Negroid ancestry completely and utterly destroys any ancestral connection to the White land they are living on. The connection might be there, technically, but they don’t see it, they don’t feel it, and as if they would. I would challenge anyone to find someone with a quarter non-White genetics in England and ask them if they truly felt proud to be English and felt an affinity with the history of the Anglo-Saxons, to the post Norman English identity, all the way up to the modern era.

            .

            9/10, if not 10/10, they would say no, they might say they were ‘proud to be British’, which literally doesn’t mean anything anymore, but English? If you pressed them on whether they had a real affinity and felt a connection with our history, origins and people? No, I don’t believe they would.

            .

            In fact, one only needs to look at African Americans to see how their affinity to Africa was undone by the levels of miscegenation in their gene-pool, the majority ignored black movements, such as Garvey’s, to head back to Africa, and, while partly that’s probably because a life, even a segregated one, was preferable to them in the US, they recognised that the percentages of White genetics that most African Americans have had changed them significantly from pure ‘blooded’ Africans, it had changed their phenotype so they largely stuck out like a sore thumb among Africans, but their entire history and culture was different. The point is that they were still largely African genetics wise, but the percentage of White genetics that they have, a result of sexually active slavers, changed them so that the majority of their genetics, while African, still completely changed them and made them, at least made them feel, incompatible in Africa among pure Africans.

            .

            No, it can’t be undone, but a number of Mulattoes and other such percentage non-Whites largely in towns and cities does not mean that ‘ it has happened in all nations and to all peoples’, that’s just ridiculous. Do you think the people of Zambia have much Chinese ancestry? What about people in Norway having much African ancestry? I really don’t see the truth in the statement that miscegenation has happened to all nations and people.

            .

            Hmmm, well I’m not spiritual, a White Nationalist country with a eugenics programme, like Max said, is desirable, but until then if someone claims to be 1/16 non-White, then they are non-White in my eyes, if they don’t know of it and therefore don’t voice it, and they look completely White otherwise, then there’s obviously nothing to comment on, because we wouldn’t know regardless.

  2. Shaun

    - Edit

    Another great article. It is sad, though, that our nation’s so-called ”finest hour” preceded our nation’s ruling classes committing ethnic genocide through the erection of an anti-white multiracialist state.

    It is tragic, despicable and wrong.

    Nevertheless, one of the reasons the English have allowed this to happen is their essential goodness. The Cultural Marxists knew what we were like as a people; so they, in their evil, criticized our virtue as a nation and created one of the most homicidal weapons of all time: White guilt.

    Many English people have allowed a sociopathic caste of globalists and their useful idiots (a Leninist term) to make them feel that white identity, white ethnocentrism and white history is evil. Filled with basic decency, many English people feel the non-white hordes need to be compensated so they don’t resist as these people destroy us through collectivist business strategies, unspeakable levels of crime and race-ending levels of miscegenation.

    On the other side, of course, we have two more problems:

    1. Willful ignorance
    2. Cowardice

    For an example, take a look at our people’s reaction to the Islamist sex gangs.

    For many reasons, many English people are too locked into the superficial ”values” of Zio-globalism to risk dissent; so they, to keep within the boundaries created by the System, ignore what is happening to their race’s most vulnerable all across the country. This is willful ignorance.

    Also, at the moment, the White English male has allowed himself to slip down the social scale. Not in an economic sense, but as a man. The truth: the Muslim sex gangs target our most vulnerable people because White men don’t make them pay. This is cowardice.

    The tragedy is this: I have no doubt if these Islamist sex gangs were confronted by a disciplined, ordered and ruthless group of White men they would crumble and show themselves to be the worthless cretins that they have always been. Anyone can be tough guy when they are victimizing a people who won’t fight back, but I wonder how they would like if they were the ones being targeted?

    The solution? The System needs to be rejected in its totality and this will only happen if White people can change their culture from within. We need leaders who the sheep can imitate; so women can be women and men can be men. We aren’t a stupid race; and we have, within the context of our collective potential, enough left to ensure our survival.

    Of course, the System is designed to keep us suppressed, and the central will of the System is designed to engineer our destruction. A question remains: do we want to survive more than these animals want to destroy us?

    2. ConnalOakesHolt

      - Edit

      Yes , if we are waiting for our actions to be sanctioned from above we will meet our death as a people first.
      Nothing is guaranteed, everything is possible.

  4. Steve

    - Edit

    Maybe a leaf out of Israel’s book is required?
    In other words you would have a section of the white population who are whiter than white in the genetic sense, racially very pure & encouraged to breed, whereas others would not be.
    Also certain positions in our country would be only open to them, such as politics.
    Whereas the reverse is true at the moment.

    1. Nimble

      - Edit

      I’m not following you? You’re suggesting we should wilfully allow ourselves to become an elite minority whilst having the majority be a non-white, mongrelised population? I’m not sure if that’s a misinterpretation, but regardless I’d rather we cease to exist than that become the result of us. Even in that sort of situation the White elite sooner or later become genetically polluted given enough time and breeding.

      1. Steve

        - Edit

        Sorry I mean a white elite amongst whites, not a situation like South Africa was.
        Most of the others could return to their homelands.

    1. frederickdixon

      - Edit

      Can you think of any other major country in the world which does not have its own government, but is ruled in part by elected representatives from other countries? Well yes, all the countries which belong to the EU I suppose. But England, uniquely, is both governed by persons elected to represent Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and, through the British State, has delegated many of its powers to the EU. This is wrong and undemocratic and needs to be ended. The whole concept of Britishness needs to be renegotiated, to allow both for a self-governing England and for some sort of close fellowship with the other British countries – Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

      2. Steven

        - Edit

        Do you wish to see an end to the United Kingdom? I personally don’t but this is something that is now in the hands of the people of just one part of the Kingdom.

  6. Graham

    - Edit

    Thank you for another excellent article which will require some time to think about. Here not entirely related to this article are some reflections.
    When the English were driven off the land by the enclosure acts they left their native wisdom behind them on the fields that rejected them, and migrated into the Georgian city slums.
    They took with them a despicable forelock touching politeness to the powers that be, whoever they are, especially when those powers were to hand, and on the other side they kept a vicious muttered backbiting towards their masters and an attitude of pulling down anyone who tried to rise up above this level of hypocritical dissimulation.

    These peasants also retained their village idiot impression which has evolved over generations in the leaden English sense of humour; this awful legacy which still hangs over us today as a toxic cloud and of which we are supposed to be so proud.

    Nationalists could give English people a new connection to their own fatherland by putting the ultimate ownership of land back to the English state and not as it is today the monarchy.
    That one of the first duties of a Nationalist administration would be to directly order that all unregistered land in England (fifty per cent of the land surface) is registered and refusal by the landlords will mean that land being taken over forever by the English state.
    It would put a few spiny burrs up some of the dark places in our homeland and also make the English aware that this is still their land and that they and the land are one and the same.

  7. Steed

    - Edit

    It’s great to see articles like this on this website. I fear when organisations like Western Spring deny the English yearning for our unique identity, or dismiss it, or try to absorb it into a catch-all ‘Britishness’. It is a politicial union not of our making, not one of true nationhood (common descent and culture). I admire and value my Welsh and Scottish cousins, but I feel as much, if not more, familiarity with my German brothers.

    1. Shaun

      - Edit

      I don’t think anybody is denying English identity. Englishness is something that should be embraced and it takes only a little time of dedicated study to understand it is a privilege to be born an Englishman. We are, at the highest levels of our people, up there with best!

      Nevertheless, let’s be honest. Englishness is racial, but it is also a result of history, traditions, customs and symbolism that evolved in a particular time and space. Underneath it all, the English are a part of the White race. End of story.

      Although I agree it is great to embrace your English heritage. The problem begins when you become parochial and don’t see that national identities shouldn’t be above our highest ideal: preserving the White race. Separate identities are fine, but ALL White nations face the same problems so the less that separates us the better.

      1. frederickdixon

        - Edit

        I think you’re putting the cart before the horse. National patriotism is a natural instinct and provides the material from which may develop the more sophisticated concept of international racialism, but patriotism must be there first, international racialism cannot grow in a vacuum.

        “Underneath it all, the English are a part of the white race. End of story”. I disagree profoundly that that is the end of the story. Whiteness is essential to Englishness, but it is not enough. If you were to take your argument to extremes you would have to accept that one could replace the entire population of a very English county, such as Norfolk or Wiltshire, with Latvians and nothing of significance would have changed. I think that would be wrong and I’m sure you do too!

        1. Shaun

          - Edit

          I do understand that there is a natural feeling of alliance to your birth nation. I’m sure the English disliked the Normans after they invaded in 1066. Both groups were White; one group was there first!

          The Normans, of course, assimilated into the English mainstream and their royal dynstey produced one of the greatest kings in the White race’s history: King Edward the 1st.

          To be honest, conversations about culture and national identity confuse me! I can understand a person preferring English food, music, philosophy, and architecture another White nation, but I can’t see much traction within our culture to implant the idea of racial survival-ism.

          You can have a strong sense cultural identity, but still be a multiculturalist. Also, you can preserve a lot of a nation’s through books, plays, buildings, and poems, etc. You can’t, however, preserve a race that has died out through low birthrates, warfare or miscegenation.

          A rich, intelligent Chinese person could be culturally English; but he could have a son who organizes an anti-white campaign because he hates our people. Race matters.

          Also, a non-White person can love our country! They can support our football team, our history and our troops. They could even dislike mass-immigration, but — due to their race — they are the material of our race’s destruction. Harsh but true.

          As I said, underneath it all the English are White and so are the French, the Germans, the Russians, the Swedish and the Serbians — we are all basically the same.

          National feeling is one of the only parts of our culture that has some positive value. Having a sense of shared destiny, fate and history with a racial group is the material needed to activate a people’s survival instincts. A way you could frame this idea within the context of culture would be to refer to a time in our past when we resisted non-white invaders. People need inspiration.

          Nevertheless, we haven’t got racial stories entwined within our culture to the degree of hyper-ethnocentric people like the Jews. The Jews have Yom Kipper, Passover and Hanukkah — and each of these traditions is premised on racial victories. It unifies them across borders against their perceived enemy: the entire human race!

          At the end of the day all we are left with is the basic truth: we are White people living in England who are in danger of extinction due to potential conflict, mass miscegenation, and low birthrates.

          I agree with you in some ways my friend: I would prefer Norfolk to be filled with English Whites than Latvian Whites (unless there was a plethora of good-looking women). But I still maintain what I say: we have to frame our arguments on racial grounds. For that reason the less that divides the White race the better.

          1. Steed

            - Edit

            frederick echoes my thoughts well. Thing is Shaun… likelihood is that the early English (and likely all white nations) didn’t view themselves as ‘white’. It was only really with the advent of contact with the non-white World that ‘whiteness’ took on any meaning. Prior to that we were simply ‘of our tribe’. So from that point of view, Englishness comes before Whiteness. I would humbly suggest that whiteness only has any relevance in our current climate where all white nations are under attack.
            .
            Now… here’s where I agree with you, and have always been clear about my position. All white nations must work together. I stand by that statement with every fibre of my being. I have an interest in ancient history and human origins, so I also acknowledge the common origins of all white Aryans. I also feel a strong kinship with all Germanic peoples. But the fact remains: different white nations have evolved to have contrasting charcteristics – aesthetically, artistically, linguistically and psychologically. I happen to feel most comfortable with the characteristics of my own nation (and, incidentally, with those of Germanic nations generally).

  9. Shaun

    - Edit

    Steed, good points:

    I do agree. I can’t imagine if you and I were a member of the Welsh tribes during the time of the Angle invasions we would see them as ”White brothers”. We would think within the context of our tribe; we would resist the ”Germanics” because they weren’t descended from our principle genetic pool.

    Common sense dictates that White people didn’t become White until they saw non-Whites. I agree, I have heard that said before.

    You are also right about the differences between the different strands of the White race. If we are seeking truth we must accept this is a reality — all I’ll say is our differences are only slight compared to the differences we share with other, non-White peoples.

    I’m not an expert on how culture effects a people’s general behavior, but I think it obvious that many differences are grounded in biology.

    I remember being impressed by the intellectual capacity of the Dutch when I was in Amsterdam; and thinking, with some pride, they were superior to my own people back in England. The Dutch do have a better education system, but their IQ scores also point to an empirical fact: they score 7 points higher than the English. And we ain’t stupid — far from it!

    I love the French. Although many racially aware people may look to the Germans as the elite of our race, I prefer the style, artistic flare and creative irrationality of our closet European neighbor. Look at their cathedrals. I would suggest their idiosyncrasies are the foundation for creative powers that Nordics don’t possess.

    The Polish and East Europeans have a toughness and determination that is inspirational. Maybe this toughness was forged in the fires of feudalism, Marxism, or the weather; or maybe, due to their sturdy constitutions, they are the physical elite of our race. The evidence: look at how they dominate combat and strength sports.

    You have made some good points, but as Francis Parker Yockey used to point out: any attack by the non-White world against a section of our people is perceived by them as an attack on the whole White race. Our divisions aren’t illusions, but neither is the common perception amongst our enemies that we are all the same. This is a paradox, yes; and this is the truth….

    I became aware of race when I noticed the anti-whitism of my so-called ”friends” when I was a teenager. I was 17, mixed with blacks, talked like them, and looked up to them. Put it this way: I am well aware of how the lies of the Zio-media can create a warped perception of self, society and existence.

    I had a fight with a black fella and won — actually, I won very easy. I expected it to end at that; after all, his friends were my friends. I later had to fight a whole group of them and, due to the anti-White nature of the attack, I knew from that day that race mattered.

    I woke up.

    I still don’t see the whole non-White world as bad, and I see a hell of a lot of White people as very far from good, but I know one thing without equivocation: to the non-White world, we aren’t English, French, Spanish or Irish — we are White. We are a people they are terrified of rising in their own protection because they all know they have very, very, very bad karma.

    Steed, I agree with what you say. There are differences between the various White peoples both in genes and culture — I also see that as a positive. In the fullness of time what potential creative solutions will our people think up amongst all that diversity?

  10. Anglo

    - Edit

    “Britishness” is as much a threat to England and English identity as any Pakistani or Kurdish immigrant.

    Do not forget many of the pre-eminent Anglophobes among the British political class are either Scottish, Welsh or English (the latter’s first loyalty is invariably to “Britain” rather than England).

    Every time I see a Union Jack fluttering from a house or car I feel my country is being invaded, quietly, stealthily and with the approval and connivance of the British establishment.

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      Personally, I would as happily die carrying a battle standard bearing a Union flag as any of the ‘national’ flags of the constituent parts of the British Isles, and vice verse.
      .
      Anyone who harbours such antipathy towards the sisters nations of these isles that they ‘feel their country is being invaded’, needs to seriously reconsider their priorities. Genetically, culturally, ethnically, and racially, we British are virtually indistinguishable and our focus should be on the threat to our existence that emanates from non-White immigration.

Comments are closed.