Number Ten Downing Street yesterday published the Prime Minister’s New Year message for 2017 and as is usual for liberal politicians, she betrayed a complete lack of understanding of the existential threats we face, and of the concerns gripping our people at this time.
Theresa May began her address with the usual platitudes: “The New Year is a time to reflect on what has passed and to look ahead to the opportunities to come. And this year, as I consider all that 2017 has in store, I believe those opportunities are greater than ever …” and then she introduced the issue of Brexit, “For we have made a momentous decision and set ourselves on a new direction. And if 2016 was the year you voted for that change, this is the year we start to make it happen. I know that the referendum last June was divisive at times.”
At this point, May continues with statements of the bleedin’ obvious, and returns to further meaningless platitudes, “I know, of course, that not everyone shared the same point of view, or voted in the same way. But I know too that, as we face the opportunities ahead of us, our shared interests and ambitions can bring us together. We all want to see a Britain that is stronger than it is today.”
“We all want a Britain that is stronger than today”, she says, but what does that actually mean?
Stronger? In what way?
‘Stronger’ will mean different things to different people and so quite obviously, the desire for a ‘stronger’ Britain does not necessarily unite us, and depending on our definition of ‘stronger’, it could well divide us.
Theresa May talks about “our shared interests and ambitions” in the same way, completely ignoring the fact that never before in the history of our island has it been inhabited by so many disparate peoples with such diverse and irreconcilable “interests and “ambitions”.
Take the issue of ‘diversity’. Those with a left-wing and multicultural outlook will tell us that ‘diversity is our strength’, and their ‘ambitions’ will therefore be to make Britain ‘stronger’ by making the population of these islands more diverse.
At the same time, there will be devout Muslims who will not want our society to become more ‘diverse’, their ambition will be to Islamify our nation and introduce Sharia Law to enforce that Islamification. Their idea of making Britain ‘stronger’ will be almost the polar opposite of the left-wing, multi-culti-libtard, as will the outlook of any patriotic Briton. Furthermore, the ambitions of patriotic Britons will differ dramatically from the ambitions of devout Muslims.
Career politicians such as Theresa May use meaningless platitudes such as ‘making Britain stronger’, ‘making Britain better’, or ‘freer’, ‘happier’ or ‘wealthier’, to fudge issues, to placate and deceive the electorate. Replete with such platitudes, and devoid of any specific pledges, their speeches are little more than drivel.
Theresa May continues: “We all want a country that is fairer so that everyone has the chance to succeed. We all want a nation that is safe and secure for our children and grandchildren. These ambitions unite us, so that we are no longer the 52% who voted Leave and the 48% who voted Remain, but one great union of people and nations with a proud history and a bright future.”
We notice that the Prime Minister has not defined what ‘fairer’ means, what ‘succeed’ means, or what ‘safe and secure’ means. These words will have different meanings to the disparate groups that compose the population of modern Britain, and so there will can be no “one great union of people and nations” based upon them.
Theresa May also fails to acknowledge that her office, that of Prime Minister, was specifically created to provide leadership for the British people in particular, not for some imaginary multi-culti ‘union’ of diverse peoples and nations, the very defining qualities of which present an existential threat to our people, with our proud history.
As we read on through the transcript of her speech, we can see that it is entirely composed of platitudinous drivel that is utterly meaningless. It is the equivalent of stating that ‘we intend to make everything nice, and everyone happy’, without realising that it is impossible to be all things to all people in the ‘zero sum game’ of real life. A true leader defines who it is they represent? Declares in whose interests they act? However todays politicians treat us like fools, they seek to deceive and to coerce rather than to lead in any true sense.
“So when I sit around the negotiating table in Europe this year,” Theresa May continues, “it will be with that in mind. The knowledge that I am there to get the right deal, not just for those who voted to Leave, but for every single person in this country. “Of course, the referendum laid bare some further divisions in our country; between those who are prospering, and those who are not. Those who can easily buy their own home, send their children to a great school, find a secure job, and those who cannot. “In short, those for whom our country works well, and those for whom it does not. This is the year we need to pull down these barriers that hold people back, securing a better deal at home for ordinary, working people. The result will be a truly united Britain, in which we are all united in our citizenship of this great nation. United in the opportunities that are open to all our people, and united by the principle that it is only your talent and hard work that should determine your future. After all, it is through unity that our people have achieved great things. Through our precious union of nations – England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Through our union of people – from sports teams to Armed Forces, businesses to charities, schools to hospitals. And, above all, through our union of communities and families. “Of course, it isn’t just big, global events that define a year – it is the personal things. 2017 might be the year you start your first job or buy your first home. It might be the year your children start school or go off to university, or that you retire after a lifetime of hard work. These things – life’s milestones – are the things that bind us, whoever we are. As the fantastic MP Jo Cox, who was so tragically taken from us last year, put it, “We are far more united and have far more in common than that which divides us.” We have a golden opportunity to demonstrate that – to bring this country together as never before, so that whoever you are, wherever you live, our politics, economy and society work for you, not just a privileged few. “So as we look ahead to a year of opportunity and unity, let me wish you and your family a peaceful, prosperous and happy New Year.”
Are we all happy-clapping with deranged, dribbling grins on our faces yet?
I hope not!
There is nothing new in this, I can recall many years ago, observing a local meeting of Conservative activists in Bedfordshire, at which the prospective candidate in a forthcoming election presented his election address, pointing out without a hint of shame or embarrassment that it was a masterpiece of high sounding, but meaningless drivel — that it was deliberately so vague he could not be held to account over any issue mentioned — and he was applauded by those present who thought him incredibly clever.
This is the kind of politician that is responsible for the decades of national decline we have endured starting in the early part of the last century, which now threatens the future existence of our people. These are the politicians that must be swept away and replaced by true leaders following the revolution we all long for when our people rouse themselves, choose to live again and reassert our rightful primacy in these islands.
By Max Musson © 2017
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
janet mills
- Edit
Sorry, Max. as i have been saying, Good-bye, English Rose; being replaced by weeds as they swiftly choke you out of your place–even in the cemeteries–and the cuckoos and cowbirds overrun your nests with their parasitic offspring. and the piece de resistance is the Queen there wanting the taxpayers who are supporting all this filth to ante up even more for her palace refits which she should pay for herself, with her being arguably the wealthiest woman in the world. no one seems to care about the plans of the globalists to bring the extinction of white people–so someone else is going to have to pay the bills. Good-bye to generations of brilliance. I won’t even say “Hello” to the low IQ replacements who have poured into GB–they are already there. I see all the real estate adverts for beautiful countryside estates all over GB but you know what happens: the cockroaches find their way anywhere the white people go so that they can reap the benefits of the creativity of white people and have white people bear the burden of supporting them and their filthy offspring. It would be so interesting if Ms. May had gotten up there and commented on how filthy and destructive the gypsies are and how they destroy every place they go, and throw trash and garbage around, and that GB will not take any more and in fact will be deporting them all, or if she talked about the ongoing rape and sexual abuse and general torment by mudslimes and that GB will be deporting the trouble-makers forthwith, but of course it is all better to pretend “they are just like you and me” although everyone knows that they are NOT and never will be compatible with the rest of us.
Answer to all this: CUT OFF THEIR WELFARE AND THEY WILL LEAVE.
rerevisionist
- Edit
I honestly think this is the first time I’ve seen any critical commentary on an official speech by one of the supposed ‘great and good’. So well done, Max. Maybe the Queen’s speech next. Happy 2017, let’s hope.
Stefan
- Edit
Well let’s be honest this speech isn’t aimed at voters like us, it’s a way of saying a lot but not actually saying anything.
A hole in the air, nothing more.
As a wise man once said “Never judge a politician by what they say but by what they do”.
Stefan
- Edit
BTW did she win the gurning competition she entered, based on those 2 lower pictures?
RichardJames
- Edit
Meaningless platitudes are the political currency in a society of different ethnicities who all vie for, a diminishing size piece of the pie.
For how else can it be for these appeasers ? They turn their backs upon the future Britons who will inherit this disaster, they curry favour with those who know only too well that given time, they will ascend to the corridors of power by virtue of their increasing voter base.
The time is coming when there will be many of these appeasers who come forward claiming to having been against this from the start.
britishactivism
- Edit
As politicians, representing a party, with the aim of that party to achieve governance, it must be quite natural for them to speak in unsubstantiated terms and to try and appeal to all.
Liberals are arrogant enough to believe that their values are held and supported by all; that all peoples seek to work towards the same goals – and that even the most hardened opponent who arrives on these shores could be tempted into their world of consumerism, escapism, a more ‘laid back’ sail through life where you don’t really have to stand up to much or stand up for much.
After all, who does not want “prosperity”, or “security”, or “peace” (as exclaimed by the late Tony Benn)? Who does not want “the best for their children” and “better opportunities” or a “better deal” for this country?
It is meaningless twaddle, but they know it is safe ground. They can twist and turn to face all the different groups (with their many faces) and continue to get votes from them all as they spin all the plates in perpetuity.
All the while, the demographics change, the people in the party change, the “values” slowly change…..just like they always have. The “values” we have today are not the values we had in the past, and nor will they be the same values in the future.
These people are just managers, facilitators, looking at the short to medium term, looking at the next election cycle. They are not leaders, or statesmen. They do not even seem to know or feel that something is drastically wrong. They have convinced and committed themselves to their own platitudes and “values”. When confronted with terror, rape, the loss of our cities to other peoples, they ‘double down’ on it by saying they are determined not to let “hate” win.
They have no belief or comprehension of race, or nation, or of what makes a civilisation. As such, they are not going to save us, or even make any attempt at doing so.
In the bigger picture of life, the world, existence – it is a cruel and sick joke that we are in the hands of these fools and charlatans, conditioned to believe that they are somehow bigger than that of our very existence, that they have authority, that they must be the ones to guide us and thus determine for us how things end up.
Even on the small level they have failed. The Conservatives have not conserved a single thing in the last 70 years. They have lost the arguments and folded at every turn. An article I read the other day put forward the notion that even the smallest of actions carry events forward in one direction or another. (The inability to deport thousands of African slaves in America, which was feasible but never managed to be undertaken, for one example, has led to a major disaster in the here and now).
We are not going to overturn the whole mass of people and problems that we have, by looking at the whole. We seem to tackle it as a nameless, faceless, overarching behemoth instead of figuring out how to stop specific small things that will otherwise reverberate or ripple a long way into the future. The government talks in generalities, but to some degree, so do we.
Our difference is that we care for the long term future. We better understand human nature. We are more educated and cynical about the way nations and civilisations are made and destroyed. We express the right to exist as a race and to look out for our own interests in our own homelands and continent.
Yet, sadly, we must also realise and come to terms with the fact that not everybody is equally as caring about what will prevail 100 or 150 years from now, or even 30 years from now. What the government says is quite enough to “bide time” throughout peoples’ individual lives.
What does “wanting a white future” mean? What will it comprise of, other than our very existence? Who are the “they” we talk about when we say “they are plotting against us” or “liberals are responsible”. We all know the general traits and patterns – but who actually is it, who can be targeted for political removal of influence, how do we stop the next boatload of people coming in, who precisely is in our way?
This is why I think Western Spring project, overall, is correct to suggest that the future is what people make it. People will have to live, embody, imbue, project what it is they want to see. Small changes ripple outwards to bigger events.
Yet for those with an interest in politics itself, I think more should be done to work out who the agents of change are – who are actually viable people for stopping, challenging, overthrowing on the smallest of levels – and not so much defaulting to the very handy “globalists” or “Jewish elites” – which we all use, but whose presence becomes an omnipotent fog that surrounds us whilst we flail about not knowing what to do.
Meanwhile the small actions (and indeed small inactions!) of today’s government (such as this months decisions, whatever they are) will reverberate and multiply into the future. Our situation is pretty dire. Our “leaders” are even worse. We all know what needs to be done, but we do not really want to have to do it, and we do not yet command enough backing in order to do it.
Until that point is reached, stopping legislation, forcing people out of their roles (such as through scandal), anything that can shave 5 years, 10 years, 15 years off the day of our reckoning has to be important. The government talks in generalities, we have to demand the specifics. Immigration is still at a record breaking high – is there no way at all to make sure it does not continue? I think that the attack has to be targeted and relentless, without flitting to other issues or being otherwise led away from it.
Shaun
- Edit
Great analysis!
What can you say? With Mrs May we’re treated to such a fusillade of drivel it’s incomprehensible why people ever vote for these mainstream parties? My theory: people vote for power, and parties that most mirror their own aspirations.
Labour — champaign socialists, working classes.
Conservatives — middle class curtain twitchers, social conformists
Green Party — dope heads, virtue signallers
Lib Dems — phyduo intellectuals, virtue signallers
UKIP — hardcore White supremacists, xenophobic working class communities
Then we have the split between the Vote Leave and Vote Remain camp
Vote Leave — antiestablishment types, open racists, homophobes, ethnic nationalists, bitter old men, conspiracy theorists, bitter young men, the guy in the pub who hates everyone, and so on….
Vote Remain — pro-establishment types, egalitarians, drugged-up baby boomers, public sector cowboys, one worlders, antifascists, virtue signallers, middle-class social climbers, and so on….
Teresa May, using the limits of I suspect a limited intellectual capacity, is trying to placate a whole, diverse defacto Communist state like ours with the yearly drivel. We know who our target auidience is, and we know what they want to hear — nothing by John Lennon.
Folkvar
- Edit
Off topic – A video on Pizzagate. See it before they pull it down.
Stefan
- Edit
Good tasty stuff that Pizzagate video.
RichardJames
- Edit
https://www.express.co.uk/news/…
As part of the programme, the boy was introduced to a white, male officer of a similar age to his father to build a relationship before he was handed over to a younger, Muslim officer.
Sounds like the police may have picked up some tactics from the muslim rape traffic torture gangs.
Detective Superintendent Nik Adams, North East regional coordinator for Prevent, said the child had illustrated a “genuine vulnerability”.
He told The Yorkshire Post: “He was saying that Muslim women shouldn’t be allowed to wear the niqab and he had his head filled with nonsense that Muslims were trying to take over the country.”
“Nonsense” says the dhimmi plod.
The decision to publicise the work of Channel targeting a white schoolboy is an unusual move, but the organisation has repeatedly been branded “racist” and accused of “unfairly targeting Muslims”.
Ah so…they still haven’t learn’t from Rotherham, in that being afraid of accusations of racism are what leads to White children being victims. In this case by the police on behalf of the muslim.
Mr Adams added: “It has had a fantastic impact on him in terms of his school reports, how he has settled, we’re not getting any more of those anti-Muslim comments, he is getting on better with teachers.”
I bet. Those liberal teachers will just lurve their new little pavlovian pup.
Heather
- Edit
A great analysis, and very good comments following.
May is old enough to know of a different time. A time when we didn’t have to have various laws, and quangos forcing “community cohesion”. She talks of fairness yet makes no mention of ditching the “positive discrimination” that is anything but fair to white, heterosexual men, and in some cases women.
She makes no mention of the unfair largesse towards protection for other communities children, while 1000’s of white girls are targeted for rape and torture cultures.
She makes no mention of the unfairness of our older generation yet again being the scapegoats. As our council taxes are set to rise, we are told it’s our old peoples fault for needing more care, as is the NHS crisis.
She makes no mention that it is unfair to spend God alone knows how many millions on foreign intervention schemes, of no benefit to us, and a leaking sieve of Foreign Aid. That’s before we even look at how much it costs to house, school, and give health care, to the immigrants arriving by any means available, and from everywhere known to man.
Her speech, seemingly so wrapped up in this “togetherness” theme just goes to show she knows that it is now a very divided Nation and not because of Brexit. The speech is a pathetic, weak plea. She has no more idea of how to run the mess created than her predecessors. Except of course to create more laws that will come down hard on the dissenters – mainly of our people.
Just when I thought I couldn’t be shocked or angered anymore by our establishment, I read of the 15yr old boy being sent to what amounts to nothing more than a Mao/Stalin correction centre, for voicing opinions that have harmed no one, and is his right to voice.
I see the day children are used as spies on their families, I really can, because our establishment lives in fear constantly of the backlash, it has no option now but to crush the tiniest glimmer of resistance, and it is targeting our young more than ever.