By Frederick Dixon:
I suppose I’m like most men in that shopping is not a favourite chore; as far as possible I try to decide exactly what I want, go in and get it and come out as quickly as possible. But, being a bookworm, I make an exception for bookshops and will browse at length before coming out, very often, with nothing. So the other day I found myself in my local Waterstones and noticed – not for the first time – that there is a section of shelving called “Horror and Fantasy”. Horror stories always sell, although ghost stories (another standby of yesteryear) seem, appropriately, to have vanished into thin air. What I particularly noticed this time was that books in the Horror genre are now heavily outnumbered by those in the Fantasy category. Once upon a time, Fantasy was largely limited to Tolkien, Mervyn Peake, and a handful of pulp authors; Tolkien is still there but he has been joined by Charles R.R. Martin (“Game of Thrones”) Robert Jordan and countless others.
Now I do not pretend to have read all this stuff (although I do plead guilty to Tolkien and Martin) but what all these works appear to have in common are two things – a more or less medievalesque setting (knights, dragons, castles etc.), and, in the background, a mighty civilization which has collapsed, but for whose remains the heroes and villains do battle. Such works of heroic fantasy – like horror stories, ghost stories, crime novels, historical fiction, science fiction – are only enjoyable from a safe distance; we would all very much prefer NOT to find ourselves in such circumstances, and yet (and here, at last, you can probably see where I am going) we are heading straight into one of those collapsed civilization scenarios, and escapist fiction will be all too close to reality.
I write, of course, of the present mass invasion of Europe by hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants from every corner of the Moslem world. This is nothing new in western Europe, but for long it was “a cloud no larger than a man’s hand”; now it has grown to cover most of the sky and bids fair to swallow it entirely. This third great Moslem invasion of Europe is even more dangerous than those which were halted at Poitiers by Charles Martel, and at Vienna by Sobieski, because the enemy is already within the gates and the West (Eastern Europe may be a different matter) is simply too decadent to resist. Once Islam is in a commanding position within our societies no part of our familiar world will be safe – ever.
The decadence of the West is a profound psychological sickness which may stem ultimately from the catastrophic shock which was administered to a settled and orderly society by the events of 1914 to 1945, but whatever the ultimate cause may be the symptoms are all around us and are all too familiar – the rejection of patriotism, the rejection of all restraints on personal behaviour (no matter how base), the pursuit of pleasure and self- indulgence. Of all the symptoms of decadence, a loss of belief in the value and the future of our societies is the worst, and the most dangerous, because it is the underlying cause of the collapse in the birth rate throughout western Europe since about 1970. For two generations our birth rates have been well below replacement level and of nowhere is this more true than of Germany where the average woman now has only 1.3 children (the lowest level in the world) compared with a replacement level of 2.1.
That is the same Germany which has precipitated the present phase of the crisis by throwing open its doors to the entire population of Syria, such is its pathetic eagerness to be liked. The Moslems, whether Syrian or not, suffer from none of the symptoms; they have an iron moral code, a strict family life, a high birth rate and a belief that fecundity is ordained by God. Who is going to be ruling Germany when our grandchildren are drawing their old age pensions?
Yet it need not be like that. The on-going collapse in the white population of Europe (the historian, Niall Ferguson, has said that it will be the greatest loss of European life since the Black Death) will leave gaps which must be filled. Could those gaps yet be filled by White Europeans? Of course – we still greatly outnumber the invaders; if even a proportion of Europeans could throw off our psychological sickness we could in time recover everything. How? How can we throw off the death spiral of decadent liberalism and replace it with abundant life? By rediscovering a philosophy which places country, family and fertility before all things, and which will ensure that our descent shall inherit our homelands. In other words, by rediscovering the fundamental principles of Race and Nation.
By Frederick Dixon © 2015
# # # #
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
A very thoughtful and well argued article. The irony is that there are probably more
White people in the world than ever before. The problem is that proportionally we are a desperately, decreasing minority. The moral corruption of the White/Aryan has been thorough and it would take just one generation to cease reproducing before we disappeared from history altogether.
The dilemma could be remedied straight away however, if every Aryan who understands the situation were to speak out at all times without fear or favour; to his work colleagues, his boss and his family. The “politically correct” agenda which holds the Western World in thrall is no more than moral blackmail and once we call the blackmailer’s bluff he will be disarmed and rendered harmless.
What we’re suffering from is a lack of moral courage. All the clever schemes in the world won’t save us as a race and nation if we’re too cowardly to speak our minds or nail our colours to the mast.
Dan England
- Edit
Your so right we do suffer from a lack of courage but who’s going to make that first vital move.
Ryan
- Edit
As an academic point I would personally call it moral subversion rather than moral courage.
–
A large amount of the pro-infiltration supporters we see on TV parading their liberal moralality would of been activists in the Volksgemeinschaft if they grew up in a different location and era.
Albert
- Edit
Their has been a Billion White Abortions since the 1960s,
I had three children, after two the family planning at the clinic was telling My wife and I not to have anymore, at the same time saying fcuk all to non white immigrants,
White working class and lower middle class are just not having the amount of children for our race to survive, Where millions of immigrants most don’t work have on average 5 children, with Somali woman having 8 to 10 children, and its not all immigrants white trash are knocking out on average 5 children often from different men.
I said to my Son who has two children, you have to have more Son, He said Dad I can’t afford anymore, Mortgage £1300 a month, Nursery £1100 per month,
The best of our people are being wiped out genocide.
Max Musson
- Edit
We need family members to begin living in close proximity to each other again, so Grandparents can baby sit their grandchildren while Mum and Dad go out to work. The nuclear family doesn’t work any more, we need extended families if we are to thrive.
Dan England
- Edit
I and everyone I know who are grandparents we all look after our grand children when the mothers and fathers go out to work, this may not be the case in your area but here in the North East it is a necessity for all.
Max Musson
- Edit
I’m glad to hear that Dan, I’m sure that what you describe happens to some extent all over the country, but sadly in these modern times, children often follow career opportunities that take them to towns that are some way off from their parents. I wasn’t making my comments pointed in any direction, this need to promote family cohesion is very important and applies throughout the country and at every level.
John Beattie
- Edit
Can boast of 5 grandsons and 2 grandaughters. Cannot boast about racial awareness amongst them. By fluke just today offered free rent (a bit towards heat bill) to youngest daughter miles away with newborn son, then she could as well seek out or whatever, new rental back in Ontario. Expecting a drop dead reply. Regardless, Max has it right.
SerpentSlayer
- Edit
I was unaware that that was no longer the norm. I grew up in the nineties and early noughties. Myself and my little sister spent most of the school holidays with my nanna and aunty who live round the corner, when they were busy my other aunt a few streets away looked after us. I seem to have been blessed, I went to an almost all white, all boys school that taught me how to stand up for myself too, which is apparently also rare. It was quite a shock for me, reaching adulthood, I was kept in a 1970s bubble in my little town. I can’t believe how much society has disintegrated.
Dan England
- Edit
As a youngster in the forties and fifties I was an avid Sci-Fi reader I just couldn’t get enough ofit, the stories I read then seemed to have a lot in common with what is happening now with the one exception they were just stories. I could put the book down and return to sanity where I would be safe knowing that those storieI were just someones imagination.
Have you ever had a bad nightmare and dreamt you had woke up out of it only to find it was still going on, well I feel like that now, this can’t be reality.
How is it we had so many great men in the second world war who could put their minds to solving problems, surely there must be men out there who can see the situation we are in and disapprove of it. Has everyone been taken over by the body snatchers and mind controlers, or are we all just waiting to be saved in the nick of time.
frederickdixon
- Edit
Dan, I remember reading a science fiction story in the fifties where a school master and two of his pupils (a boy and a girl) shut themselves in an underground chamber – I think it was something to do with the nuclear paranoia of the time – and took a drug which enormously slowed their metabolism, so that a thousand years passed in what seemed to them to be just one year. Then they emerged into an England in which all towns and cities had vanished – and so had the English themselves to be replaced by a race of dark skinned nomads speaking an alien language.
Back in the fifties it seemed an absurd fantasy, now I remember it with unease.
Heather
- Edit
One of the reasons our people are not having as many children has been mentioned and that is the financial cost. For some it is just a case of not being able to have as many shoes, or handbags that worries them. For others it really is because decent housing is unaffordable in the rental sector, or their mortgages and other costs are crippling.
The chance of being given a council house as a young couple trying to start out together is almost nil in some areas.
As I know from personal experience saving to buy then leaves you with a choice of return to full-time work after having a baby, or defer having a baby until you can at least spend some time at home. I chose the latter, as although it is deeply frowned upon by many I actually wanted to be a full-time Mum at least until school years. I have had a lot of stick for that from the “my career is more important” brigade. In fact at times made to feel downright stupid and worthless.
I wish more families could return to a traditional style, where Mum’s could stay at home, if they wished, and raise their children, at least until school years. That is financially out of the question for many.
Having worked in Day Nurseries in the past I’ve seen many women who would love the opportunity to be a full-time Mum. They seemed burnt out by the pressures of work and trying to run a family and home. Many, openly admit they wanted to be at home, and give more time to their pre-school children.
Under that sort of pressure, it’s not surprising that the amount of children a couple have is limited.
White trash, is mentioned, and I would say that they are victims of the decadent society, where such people are encouraged not to seek a better life for themselves, or their children. They are the ones that have been encouraged to take this way of life and told it is their right and their “lifestyle choice”, handed benefits, and now we see them being ridiculed and used as cheap TV on all these various “Benefits Britain” programmes.
Is it because the state think they will be easier to hoodwink, and teach about the virtues of multi-racial society? Many crave the “brown baby” to add to their collection.
frederickdixon
- Edit
All perfectly true, Heather. Yet our country, where the conditions which you describe exist, has a higher birth rate than many at 1.9 per woman. OK, I know this number is inflated by the high immigrant and “BME” birth rate but even among the White British it is probably 1.6 or thereabouts. Are conditions for families even worse in countries with much lower birth rates, such as Germany or Japan? I don’t know, but I’d be surprised if they were.
It’s a combination of things; of course the financial and physical constraints which you describe are a large part of it, but underlying it in all developed countries is that psychological sickness, that selfish focus on NOW and ME.
By the way, on this business of coping with additional children, I remember the writer Mary Kenny remarking once that an aunt of hers, when asked how on earth she would manage yet another child – she already had several – replied “oh, we’ll manage because we always do”. And they did.
Max Musson
- Edit
The last time I seriously examined fertility statistics for the indigenous British, the total period fertility rate was 1.7 and falling, and that was in the early 1980s. I would estimate the current TPF rate for we indigenous British to be in the order of 1.3 at present. Interestingly though this was the level that the German TPF rate had fallen to during the Weimar period and as the German recover during the late 30s and early 40s showed, such a deplorable state of affairs can be rectified if the political will exists.
frederickdixon
- Edit
As you say Max “if the political will exists”. We have the will and we must keep hammering away on the theme.
On the birth rate per woman, recent figures show that the TFR for British born women was 1.77 in 2013 and 1.76 in 2014. The ONS release in which these figures were contained made the point that the TFR is boosted by a higher birth rate among second generation BME women, so for White British women a figure of 1.5 or 1.6 seems reasonable.
Heather
- Edit
I would agree with the psychological sickness of the ME and NOW and have known many Women where money,clothes,and different men in their beds was seen as the pinnacle of life achievements. Many men also seem to have this mind set, and as we know it takes two to have a baby.
Some I know have deeply regretted it. I have known women who have had abortions, and seemed to boast of it, as if it is some testimony to their being free and independent spirits. Then there was and seems to be still in trend, the foul and vulgar “Ladette” culture. I don’t see any of these things helping in building families.
As someone else mentions in their post, is that all part of the Frankfurt School’s plan.
I know that people managed with larger families, as Mary Kenny’s Aunt noted “because they always did”.
I was born in 1963, the last of 8 children. In my street we had families of 10 children, 13 children and I would say on average on the whole estate that 5 children was the norm, but many had more than 5.
They were very good families,with morals and discipline. In fact the better behaved your children were, the higher the status seemed to be amongst the Women. Now I look back I am in awe at how well these women coped on a shoe string, how proud and dignified they were.
Having said that, I think women have come to expect and quite rightly too, a little bit more than just coping day to day, and there has to be some quality to our lives.
They may have managed better because hardly any of them worked outside the home, except seasonal work such as Strawberry picking or potato picking.
Modern women who can’t afford Nannies, and cleaners, are expected to hold down a job outside the home as well as inside.
MsBridgit
- Edit
I think the people have been absolutely terrified by the race laws that were enacted purely and for no other reason than to to silence resentment while the country is being reshaped.
They fear the State police knocking on their door because of a flippant accusation of a remark that might be construed as a racist remark by a person foreign to this country.
Fear is this counties greatest enemy. No-one really understands what the parameters are of Free Speech in this country and are terrified to test it.
GEORGE
- Edit
I have to disagree with Max. A mans wage should be enough to support the family. The wife should be at home running the family. Cooking proper meals, cleaning, taking kids to school, washing clothes etc. Today that sounds so sexist. The fact is that the wife at home was a full-time job. Important and the heart of any society. Woman are the very life of our society. Never has the housewife been considered as a useless unproductive part of our national structure.
Up until the 1940s women had no choice in working. They had to work because the mens wages were not enough. If you look at our ancestors struggle for a better life wasn’t it basically the struggle for the right of women NOT to work? I’m simplifying but would ask you to think about this view when looking at our history. Wasn’t this at the heart of the Frankfurt Schools ideology and the creation of feminism?
Feminism is at the heart of the destruction of our society. If women were to look at the social history of women they would realise this. What feminism has done is destroy what our ancestral women did and says that their efforts were worthless. As usual today the truth is a lie and lies are the truth.
Talking about horror books and films. Have you noticed the rise of the zombie? I have always seen these as an analogy of the future for European whites. A small group of surviving whites try to fend of the invaders that are trying to destroy them.
Max Musson
- Edit
I wasn’t suggesting that both husband and wife should work to earn money as an ideal or as the norm, I was simply stating that in the current economic environment in which both are required to work out of economic necessity, it would be better if they were located close to their parents, so that grandparents could look after their grandchildren. I believe we need to revive the extended family, which was the norm here in the UK until the later half of the 20th Century — another thing that our so-called ‘victory’ in WW2 brought to an end.
frederickdixon
- Edit
This is a very interesting point George, and has awoken a distant memory. I do believe that it was in the later 19th century that social reformers succeeded in making it the norm for women to be required to give up work on marriage.This was regarded as a great advance for women. Didn’t last very long, did it?
John Beattie
- Edit
The second “income” only covers day care, hairdresser, 2nd car, dry cleaning, lunch money, more to pay on taxes, etc., etc. = no profit whatsoever.
Stefan
- Edit
I too notice the zombie films & even the Nerf guns for kids with a zombie theme & other toys too.
It isn’t much of a psychological leap for people to draw parallels between zombie films and our current situation.
I think one film did feature attempts to integrate & socialise zombies but it all went horribly wrong.
“Dawn of the dead” I think was an accurate portrayal in many ways of the way things are going.
Albert
- Edit
Because of the high Immigrant birth rate, our young men of fighting age will be outnumbered in around 15 years, London Youth are already totally outnumbered, you never see groups of white youth…its like they have been exterminated,
The only White people thats left in London are the very rich, The middle class, white trash and the Old that has been left behind.
It is unbelievable how fast this has happened, Local Government are now shipping out immigrants too towns and cities all over Britain they offer them cash incentives and promises of all new appliances etc, They moved free.
When I talk to people most are against immigration, but when i say we are living through our own genocide most people look at me as if i am mad…people just do not realise the seriousness of the situation.
Max Musson
- Edit
Most White people regard themselves as being among the overwhelming majority in this country and so it is difficult for them to envisage a time eoon when Whites will be in the minority.
.
One way to illustrate the rate of change is ti simply go thrugh a little maths with them:
.
Explain that the birth rate among Whites is just 1.3 children per couple on average. This means that for every twenty White people of child bearing age alive today, in one generation there will be just ((20/2)x 1.3)thirteen, and the generation after that there will be just ((13/2)x 1.3) eight. So the number of White people in their prime will more than halve in just two generations.
.
It will take longer for this to translate into a proportionste reduction in the population overall, because we have to wait for all the infertile old people from earlier generations to die off.
.
The scary thing is that this process began during the 1970s and so we are well into the process of national auto-genocide. We are not an ‘aging’ population because so man old people are living so much longer than ever before, although that is a factor, but primarily because the proportion of young people within our numbers is nose-diving.
.
On the other hand immigrant groups are having as many as 4.5 children per couple, but even if we assume the number is only three on average, this means that for every twenty immigrants of child bearing age today, there will be thirty after one generation and forty-five, one generation after that.
.
When we add into the mix the fact that 600,000 predominantly White people leave his country each year and in their place 300,000 predominantly non-White people immigrate into the UK, it becomes obvious to anyone how quickly he situation will change.
Pierre
- Edit
Max Musson
- Edit
Thank you Pierre, that’s quite funny.