The Peoples’ Purple Army

By Frederick Dixon:

 We’ve all seen it coming, the rise and rise (so far) of UKIP. How should we as Racial Nationalists react? We know that as a civic patriotic organisation, UKIP is very far short of what our country needs. As it moves closer to the possibility of power so the draw of the liberal centre will become irresistible; UKIP’s latest star, Carswell, – already tipped as likely leader after the general election – has made many statements in favour of immigration and has denounced what he calls “angry nativism” , although “angry nativism”, it might have been supposed, is why people vote for UKIP! Farage has said that he wants to recruit skilled engineers from India rather than from continental Europe while Carswell (again) speaks of UKIP being for “first and second generation Brits as much as for those whose ancestors came over before the Norman conquest” – in other words, UKIP too wants to pander to the minorities.

Yet we do take pleasure, do we not, in the rise of UKIP? In part this is surely due to the sight of the rotten old parties which have so betrayed and abused our country at last beginning to get their come-uppance. But it is also because those who support UKIP repeat again and again that “we want our country back” – just as we do. Well, UKIP is not going to get our country back for us but it could still render one great service if it can frighten the other Parties into bringing about a genuine slowing down of immigration because, if immigration is not slowed, our displacement as the majority population in our own country is certain and in pretty short order – it has been forecast that at the present rate of decline White British pupils will be a minority in schools in England by 2037, just 23 years from now.

In other words, UKIP can buy us time; however immigration friendly some UKIP bigwigs may appear to be, they have aroused expectations that something very substantial will be done about immigration if they are ever in a position to do it – if they do not, there are others willing to oblige an electorate increasingly detached from traditional political allegiances. And outside electoral politics altogether we will have more time to build that survival capsule which our race and nation are going to need for their long term survival and eventual recovery, a capsule built from a coherent and attractive philosophy and a strong and cohesive organisation.

By Frederick Dixon © 2014

# # # #

18 thoughts on “The Peoples’ Purple Army

  1. If UKIP can shift the “Overton window” in our favour, then that’s one good thing they can do.
    I don’t think they’ll deliver on their promises but maybe they are playing a long game by short term pandering to political correctness to survive?

  2. Farrage is just another slimy politicain who thinks it’s ok to lie to British public.
    When he shouted out ” We are not a racist party!” wouldn’t it have been funny if — at the top of his or her lungs — somebody shouted out ”Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White!”.

    1. I don’t think you can say that Farage is lying to the British public, as he’s not in power and therefore hasn’t yet had an opportunity to renege on his promises. It would however be accurate to say that in the main, what he’s promising will not solve our national problems. While UKIP have many members who might be termed ‘racist’, Farage is correct when he declares the party as a whole to be non-racist.

      1. Max, I think they’re all the same. You wouldn’t become an ”acceptable politicain” if you had any form of morals. UKIP are good for blowing off steam, but they’re not good for the White race. But that’s mainstream politics. A dirty business infested with the lowest forms of life: people like Nigel Farage!

  3. Ukip are pro immigration, just not mass immigration, Ukip are a start…and hopefully from this as the indigenous population moves further to the Right, a genuine Nationalist political party will emerge.

  4. Michael Woodbridge

    - Edit

    Anyone who was in attendance at Nick Griffin’s St.Helen’s meeting last Wednesday (8th October) will realise, if there was ever any doubt about it, that the BNP is now lost to us as a Party. As such any hope that our nation will be saved primarily through the ballot box is quite dead. What Mr. Farage is proposing is no different from a slightly watered down version of what the BNP proposed under Nick Griffin when the Party caved in on its Racist principles and allowed coloured people to become members. Furthermore, Mr. Farage’s proposals are no different from traditional Conservative Party policy.

    The trouble with traditional Conservatism is that it only ever fights a rearguard action. As Evelyn Waugh said, “The problem with the Conservative party is that it hasn’t been able to turn the clock back by so much as a single minute.”

    That’s why we need a Movement, not a Party. We need to become proactive instead of reactionary. Instead of bemoaning the state of the country and the number of mosques being built on our “green and pleasant” land we must urgently start raising money and resources to build our own communities and power structure within a Movement of National Salvation.

    1. Well said! We also need to make a lot of nationalists understand that they need to dig into thier pockets and spend their money on the cause rather than proping up the Zio-System with meaningless consumpsion on unessential junk.

    2. Yes, a national movement for salvation of our peoples, wherever on the planet we dwell. At odds with many, is the root style for said salvation. Our friends are working on the legal example of Underground forces in WW2, with / by the formation, along a legal yet underground political cell network. History proves our only choice at this point.

  5. Ukip buys us some time , yes that is the gift of Ukip. A secondary benefit which results from a welcomed Ukip victory is that , as you mentioned , there are supporters of Ukip who mistakenly believe that Ukip is an anti immigration party , either because they do not really listen to Ukip members when they speak about welcoming skilled migrants from India and other Asain regions or that when they do they are being , nudge nudge wink wink about it . Either way it matters not .
    The claims made by the stale old parties of treasonous past dealings , which assert that Ukip gains are due to protests votes is I hope true. Again we hear these types of accusations made by pathetic losers and hypocrites who espouse the democratic process , only as long as the people are voting for them , once the people stop and change tack then we hear the familiar cries of ‘ making political capital ‘ or ‘protest votes’ . Never will these scoundrels admit that the point of a political party is to represent the values and interests of it members and voters and that if its members and voters stop supporting them then they would do well to listen to those members and voters and find out from them just where they have gone wrong instead of making peurile accusations. No , these self appointed morons think that it is their job to tell us what we should think and to tell what we should want and who we must accept. So I hope that these are the reasons for Ukip success.
    A success that gives way to a stark realization in the minds of those who put their faith in Ukip to deliver their hopes and dreams that Ukip , the party who brought us back from the brink , have left us teetering on the precipice , staring into the void.
    Only then , when all hope is lost , when the scars of betrayal receive no salve shall the people realize that something else is needed.
    It is darkest befor dawn….. But the dawn does eventually come.

  6. I fail to see how allowing (or more accurately forced) non-White members really changed much. The establishment don’t play ‘sporting’; we we’re outflanked. If they didn’t the BNP would get banned and we would be back to square one and most of the population would forget about it the next day. At least they stand out like a sore thumb unlike undercover journalists and trouble makers.

    How many non-white members actually stayed with the BNP? The Sikh columist, the black Christain and Claire Knaw? The party stayed pretty much all White and the non-whites were not swaying party policies. The difficulties that came about was Griffin being disengious like with the Sikh columnist and the Sikh on the election broadcast.

    We were outflanked then just like we have been outflanked today about focusing on International Islam and extremists, to the glee of Zionists, when our problem is racial and the extremists are fuelled by Zionists actions, funded by our wealth. When it comes to ‘waking people up’ the migration of Indian Sub-Continent Muslims are far better than African ‘Christians’. Islam is the most apparent political ramification of foreign immigration but they only make up around a third of the foreign population and the apparent strength of Islam in the UK is down to Zio-Saudi funding and domestic Jewish groups supporting Islam to provide a climate of Christianity vs Islam conflict.

    I adopt fascism and sympathise with it out of practicality but it is ridiculous when I read conservative commenters and rhetoric concentrating on doomsday Islam. Our society has been subverted so much people do not name it for what it is, a non-White future but describe it as a political/cultural threat when it is off race. A young Muslim Pakistani, Indian, Turk etc in the west will continue the path towards having more affinity in attitudes and behaviour to the Black than to the ‘beards’ who first came in the 1950’s. The Choudray clowns do not pose a political threat but to provide ammunition for controlled opposition EDL and patriotard Britain First.

    Here’s is an analogy that represents International Christianity & International Islam:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukzhXkEd1Mk&list=UUB0lb4xyF9MgdN9VCawPoWA

    The Native British people have more friends in Tehran than Tel Aviv…

    1. Being forced to change its constitution and ostensibly accept non-White members didn’t change the character of the BNP much, which is why some of us argued that the party should not engage in an expensive legal battle over this issue with the EHCR. We argued that simply because non-Whites are not banned from membership it wouldn’t mean that significant numbers of them would apply to join, and in this we were proved right. It was the Griffin camp who decided to waste hundreds of thousands of pounds on fighting a legal battle that the party would never be allowed to win. The battle with the EHCR was their Stalingrad.
      .
      You are right also that some allegedly ‘nationalist’ groups have been duped by our racial enemies into focusing their energies primarily on ‘Islamism’, the EEC and ‘Queen & Country’ ‘plastic patriotism’, rather than the real issue of race.

  7. I think the way forward is to hope for an English Parliament which will enable to take back control of the Police, Education and NHS which is now controlled by our enemies.

    We need the same as the Scots and the Welsh do – a national voice and then we can start to regroup and regain our lost self confidence.

    1. I appreciate your sentiments Francis, but simply having an ‘English’ parliament will not provide our people with the freedom and self-determination that we all seek, any more than a nominally Scottish parliament has granted the same to the people of Scotland or a nominally Irish parliament to the Irish. This is not an English, verses Scots, verses Irish, verses Welsh issue, it is a matter of the subjugation of our people to alien elites who view the destruction of our nations and our race as a prerequisite for the establishment of a global tyranny. Thus we see Scotland, Wales and Ireland being inundated with Third World immigrants just as England and all of the other countries of Europe for that matter.
      .
      What we need is a revolution and that revolution must be driven by all and any good White people we can muster, irrespective of their national or ethnic background.

  8. U.K.I.P. are blatant controlled opposition. It is their role to allow all the Africans and Asians already here to stay (already 30% of our country, census says 20% back in 2011 but that does not include the ones let in since, illegals, not to mention the fact that we know how they lie about everything), and keep letting more in on top, keeping the % going higher and higher, and hopefully fooling airheads into thinking we are doing something.

    1. You’re right, we are near minority already. I don’t care what the ”experts” say. I recently travelled from the Scottish Highlands back to London and in many of the major cities I was the ONLY White person in the street.

      Most White people, however, ONLY mix with other White people, so we underestimate how many non-Whites live among us. One thing is myth: we AREN’T going to become a minority by 2066. By that time, we will be — if nothing is done — about 25% of the population, and most of them — if nothing is done — will be practicing miscegenation or enduring perpetual victimization in a multiracial hell-hole. Rotherham will be everywhere.

      Think about it? Do our people, a race that charmed the secrets of the Universe, deserve to face these types of conditions just because we have White skin and we happen to be mentally superior to the other peoples of the world? No! It isn’t our fault that we are, along with the East Asians, the only people on the planet who are capable of creating something that attracts the Third Worlders in the first place: civilization!

      The problem, my friend, is our essential goodness as a people. We experience empathy for the sufferings of people, and this has been used against us — the non-Whites KNOW we have this weakness. It’s time to do something very, very, very simple: STOP CARING ABOUT ANYBODY ELSE BUT WHITE PEOPLE. See how long the piss takers last when the Aryan man and the Aryan women turn off their sympathy for people who want us dead?

  9. Farage is given almost constant coverage in the media.
    He seems to be on TV most Sunday lunchtimes, in particular. Presumably the idea the governing elite has is to use him and his party to draw away potential support for nationalism and channel it into relatively harmless anti-EU campaigns.

Comments are closed.