The Failure of the Cultural Death Camps

By Colin Liddell:

The internationalist Leftist elites that have ruled Europe since World War II have failed. They have failed not just by our high and exacting standards, but by their own low and sloppy ones. They have created the very world that they most feared, and generated a situation that even they are now coming to realize is unsustainable and impossible.

If they don’t realize now, then it won’t take too many more years to enlighten them. All that they hold dear – gay rights, women’s lib, abortion-on-demand, the moral free-for-all, welfarism, gender equality, and even racial equality – now hangs by a thread, all because their great game plan is coming unstuck.

They thought that the way to win total victory in the great cultural and ideological war with the old conservative order was to destroy it with multiculturalism, a perfect strategy because it was something that could only be fought against with racism, parochialism, and a rejection of the global economy – all things that had been stigmatized beforehand. The old order was caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place. The more they fought back the more the Left could screech the dreaded R-word and their other incantations and intimidate their naive and befuddled opponents. Fish being shot in a barrel would have put up stiffer resistance.

But this was only half of their grand strategy. They realized that once traditional Europe had been destroyed or cowed into impotent acquiescence that they would be left with a new problem: vast populations of still grateful immigrants, who nevertheless had their own values, interests, and agendas quite distinct from those of the Left.

The very values that had made the non-White masses an effective weapon against the old order also made them utterly divergent from their Leftist benefactors on social values, general outlook, and much else.
So, the Left had a further plan, a little sketchy perhaps, but a plan nonetheless. It was to be a cultural version of the great scheme of racial extermination of which it had accused its enemies, the Nazis, in WWII; a plan to subject the immigrant hordes to identity genocide and cultural extermination on a vast scale. Instead of train timetables and the amount of fuel expended to burn X tons of human flesh, this would be about TV schedules and how many megabytes of porn could be downloaded.

You can kill a people bodily by massacring them, or working them to death, starving or gassing them. All these are possible, but require a will that few if any civilized peoples have ever had. The Left’s plan however was that, having filled Europe with vast, non-European hordes, who would inevitably be mainly from the Islamic world, they would de-Islamify them to the point where their original culture became less important than whatever football team they were given to support in its place.

But killing these people culturally may be even more difficult than killing them bodily, because the people in question are not the Christian, partially Westernized, and racially confused Hispanics that America has to digest – a much more feasible project – but are instead Muslims. It would seem that Europe’s Leftist elites made their biggest miscalculation here, even bigger than their supposition that Blacks from the West Indies and Sub-Saharan Africa would seamlessly segue into Europeans after serving apprenticeships as bus conductors, toilet cleaners, and drug dealers.

In his own way the Leftist has always been something of a Christian supremacist. He – because, yes, the Leftist is still mainly a man – thinks of it as the strongest and most resilient of religions. After all it took hundreds of years for Leftism to break it down to the point where fellow travellers in the Church could steer it towards female bishops, gay marriage, and social and political irrelevance. Islam, by contrast, he assumed would be a pushover.

Perhaps it was the war-comic-meets-celestial-sex-manual absurdities of the Koran that lowered his esteem for it to such a low level. But the Leftist’s complacency was informed by his own racism and the conceit that only the most closeted and archaic fools could possibly hang onto such an ill-conceived religion as Islam. In the full glare of the Liberal, Leftist sun, Islam was sure to melt into nothingness.

The plan was that the Muslims, after serving their function, would be exposed to empowered Western women, broadband porn, supermarkets, sneering satire, and droves of atheistic teachers and professors who would make their childish Islamic certainties disappear in a puff of smug logic. The assumption was that within a generation or two the former cannon fodder of multiculturalism, so successfully deployed against those stuffy old conservatives and prickly nationalists, would have settled down into the rootless, decultured masses that Leftism craves as the raw material for its utopias.

The third world Camp of the Saints would be welcomed by the cultural death camps of the West in the schools, shopping malls, and universities. Instead of barbed wire, machine gun towers, barrack huts, and gruel, they would be given priority on housing lists, welfare, television, junk food, and the internet. Instead of bullets in the back of the head or one-way trips to the proverbial showers and ovens, their Islamic souls were to be destroyed by the flood of knowing, sensual, cynical, and superior European ‘culture.’

Their women were to be taken from them by parading around them the ‘liberated’ women of the West, with their short skirts, dead wombs, and glitzy fashions. “What sloe-eyed little doe from the Third World could resist that?” the complacent Leftist thought, possibly rubbing his hands at the thought of some extra exotica for his own bed. As for their young men, they were to be consoled by the pleasures of the hedonistic West, sport and the hot-n’-cold-running porn that would be piped in, at taxpayers’ expense, to every abode.

Half-baked as it was, this was the plan, but how soon it has become unstuck! Almost everything that could go wrong has gone wrong. The Muslims have cleaved to their old ways, or picked up those of other alienated and resentful groups, like the West Indians. Rather than mixing with the spiritual poison of the dying Whites, they have segregated themselves by taking over neighbourhoods, keeping their women at home, and maintaining their traditions and birth rates. Not hard to do as Europe’s Leftist elites insist on picking up the bill.

The power is flowing in exactly the opposite direction to that expected by the Leftists. Instead of being subjects of de-Islamification, they instead range out to groom, rape, and occasionally impregnate the indigenous women, and make converts among the spiritually vacuous Westerners.

Some Muslims fall away, but not nearly in statistically significant numbers; and those that do Islam sometimes kills or calls back. Even the cultural acid that the Left had placed its faith in, the endless drip-drip or porny materialism, delivered through the modern media, seems powerless. Yes, they watch the internet porn to remind themselves of the worthlessness of the infidels, but they also use the same medium for video clips of their enemies having their heads sawn off.

As for critiquing and ridiculing the religion of an uneducated sixth-century camel herder, even this has to be toned down for fear of provoking a violent backlash. Yes, Mohammed the epileptic paedophile is thus immune to official criticism because the Leftist elites fear the very same charge of “racism” that these multicultural minions allowed them to make against the old order.

As for the attractions of the leftist mindset, Muslims and other Third Worlders seem strangely unmoved by the joys of doctrinal atheism, gay marriage, childlessness, wind power, and bicycle lanes.

So, Islam keeps its coherence, Muslims keep their identity and their women keep pumping out the all-important children. And as their numbers grow, the politicians who once fawned on them as a tool and tactic to get at others, now increasingly fawn on them for their own sake.

Awkward trade-offs still seem to be possible: “We’ll give you more welfare, make polygamy legal, and turn a blind eye to creeping sharia, if you let us use your votes for our pet Leftist projects.” A case of ripping up the ship’s decks to keep the engines going!

The hell that the Left hoped to create for the Right has now metastasized into a hell for all, and an antechamber to the still greater hell that is to come. The Leftist must increasingly realize that his two-stage plan only ever had one stage that worked, and that the second stage – the cultural genocide of the Third World masses – is a dead letter. Now where does that leave us?

By Colin Liddell © 2014

# # # #

27 thoughts on “The Failure of the Cultural Death Camps

  1. I used to think years ago that the moslems would westernise & assimilate but now I see even the most western of them still stick to their core beliefs & are incompatible with the West.
    Their children often have a more stronger moslem identity.
    Once their numbers went above 2%, they felt confident enough to start agitating & have gone into most walks of life.
    I have heard people say how they were talking to a moslem about something & the mask slipped for a moment, revealing a harder edge than they realised before.

    1. I honestly don’t think the Marxist/Trotskyite suckers presently in charge have a clue about what they’ve unleashed upon themselves, their own progeny and their own racial kinfolk. They will still cling to the dogma of DIEversity and tolerance even whilst their miserable throats are being slit from ear to ear and there is no one of their own kin left to save them from the dusky hordes of anti-White race haters hell bend on White Genocide. Of course, the same spineless Lefty outfit will be dealt with last by the dusky hordes as they’ll be needed onside whilst they ALL engage the greater non-Leftist indigenous population in a fight to the death.

      Below, I relate an incident which myself and a friend experienced at the hands of ‘DIEversity’.

      Whilst spending a day out at a local park a few years back, me and a friend had a run-in with some Muslim women who were listening in to our conversation regarding the number of non-Whites present in the park that day of which my friend enquired as to what cultures they belonged to. I enlightened her as to which were Hindu, Sikh and Muslim. She then remarked on the number of children each set of non-White couples/adults had in tow. The average appeared to be 4 and above.

      Our conversation as it happened was being listened into by a nearby group of Muslim females of whom one or possibly two were the mothers. It was one of the daughters who commenced a verbal barrage upon me and my friend. My friend kept silent leaving me to deal with the barrage and deal with it, I certainly did holding nothing back letting them know in no uncertain terms that they did not belong on British indigenous territory and that they were invaders and nothing short of it. Whilst this exchange was going on, a few White passers-by stopped and hung about in the background as if ready to intervene should the Muslim agitators dare to get violent (we are not exactly young things, you see!). Presently, a man in Islamic garb strolled past our seat and muttered something about tolerance.

      I ordered him to sit in the middle of me and my friend because I wished to educate him about what Islam and Mohammed are really all about as well as the true meaning of ‘tolerance’ since he was the outlier alien invading my homeland, not the other way about. Instead of taking up my challenge, he scarpered double quick.

      In the meantime my friend was becoming increasingly petrified and asked me to move away further up the walkway which I did in such a way as not to make it look like we were running scared, but instead by taking out my camera and strolling along taking photos of the ducks in the lake. Along the way, we sat down on an empty bench. We began to notice the Muslim females casually following us making it look like they were simply strolling along. They gathered at a park exit next to a tree to our rear and the daughters proceeded to climb up it whilst the older females handed them glass bottles they found lying about, for flinging at me and my friend.

      People saw what was happening and called the police. Two police cars tore up and one officer approached up to the seat we were sat on whilst the Muslims were still up the tree to the rear, but had temporarily refrained from bottle flinging. Of course, the previously thrown bottles were visible some yards behind us and all the Police could suggest was that we leave the park instead of closing in on the criminal Muslims and arresting them for endangering life and committing a breach of the peace.

      Yes, we have to blame the political establishment for our ongoing dire circumstances – no one else.

      So that we can commence taking our country back and thus turning the tide against the colonizers, I’ve said time and time again, the traitorous elite comprising successive governments past and present MUST, each and every one of the guilty amongst them, be arrested and charged with the crime of Genocide against the indigenous peoples as well as the many additional crimes of Treason, Sedition, Subversion and misuse/misappropriation of Taxpayers’ contributions, in other words, Embezzlement.

      The sooner we get on with the task in hand, the better.

      1. Well you’re braver than I am!
        But it confirms this idea I had that the hijab wearers are often the cultural spearhead to force islam on the rest of us, to be “in our face”.
        It shows the bias of the authorities too, if it was a park full of white people being beastly to moslems then there is no doubt who’d being getting arrested.
        I agree that everyone in the establishment pretty much is guilty & should be disenfranchised of their ill gotten gains.

  2. The author is right: the Elites — especially Jews — are terrified of Islam, and so they should be!

    I think it is correct to say that most of the mosques in this country are funded by Saudi Arabia, and that country, due to the Wahhabi brand of Islam it teaches, has a universalist-jihadist agenda. They may one day make the elite pay.

    I think the Muslims will be a problem in the future, but we must also remember they are only the symptoms and not the cause. I think they should be deported; but that’s it.

    Nevertheless, I do think the UK’s Muslim community has awful karma. The grooming gangs are a strong subculture amongst the UK’s Muslim communities and one day — in one way or another! — they are going to have to pay for what they have done… cause and effect?

    As for terrorism, I think most people who visit Western Spring are sapient enough to realize American-Israeli foreign policy is responsible for huge suffering back in the Muslim’s homelands! Some Muslims are angry for a reason.

    Also, most of us here know the truth: Muslims didn’t do 9/11.

    I heard one time that 48% of young English people believe that Islam is incompatible with Western values. We don’t have any values any longer, so I question what these young English people really believe. I reckon they don’t like multiracial societies, but use religion as a guise for race….

    Funnily enough, I do like certain aspect of Islam like the discipline, etc.

  3. Well written article and a lot of good points.

    I do think the Jews do as they want with Islam and probably created it in the first place though – as a non-White militant religion to take advantage of passive White Christians.

    The religion is strict but it is keeping a lot of base people in line ,whose instincts are towards decadence. It’s a racial issue. The birth rate in Iran has collapsed and Pakistani men consume more homosexual porn than any other people on the planet according to the statistics on their google searches.

    I would like to think that Islam will never succumb to the rot, as Muslims are useful in countering the Hebrew inflicted culture which really is a death camp, making Islam by far the lesser of evils.

    1. I don’t think the Jews created Islam! I could be wrong, but I have read several times that Muhammad was AGAINST the Jews. Also, the Middle Eastern nations offer the most resistance to Zio-globalism on the planet.

      The globalists are concerned about Islam. Saudi Arabia, for example, isn’t a reliable ally for the West and it is pumping out a plethora of Sunni-based extremist ideologues into Britain’s mosques every week.

      The Sunni part of Islam is known to be the most anti-western, but they are sponsored by the West when they attach Shia strongholds like Syria, Iran, Hezbollah and Southern Iraq. It is quite confusing.

      We in the West should support the Shia regimes and see the Sunnis for what they often are: capricious puppets of the Zio-Order. The problem isn’t with Islamic teachings; it is often how the state influences the masses. There are many Muslim sheeple too.

      If left unchecked I think it is safe to say that Islam will take over the country. They have massive birth rates and their religion covers both the spiritual and the political. Sharia law is a complete system and covers all areas of life; it stands to reason, in the valueless-Marxist West, the Muslims aren’t going to want to join into our ”culture”.

      I don’t believe in assimilation; so I’m happy, in a multiracial context, for them to keep out of my way. They think I’m a decedent infidel — fine, leave MY country.

      If they one day kick off, however, they will have a vast amount of young men to support them from all parts of Africa and the Middle East. The elites would be among the first targeted; so I reckon they are more than a little frightened of them. Good.

      1. “It is quite confusing.”
        There maybe an element of divide & rule going on.
        It’s all ready evident that the bulk of moslems are not going to adopt western ways to any major degree.
        I have often said that a standing army has been imported into this country who have no allegiance to us.
        I guess the elites think they will be protected by the police & what’s left of the armed forces but we will want them dead too.
        It has been a plan for years that the government etc would hole up in bunkers if nuclear war came & the rest of us would be left to fend for ourselves.
        They have never had our best interests at heart only their own.
        I think we have a culture & perfectly good values but the left etc keep denying that & promoting rot.

  4. I think this piece is superb.

    Sadly, although it makes one feel better to know that those who have plotted our downfall will themselves reap some of the whirlwind from the wind they have sown, it isn’t going to save us. The only thing that might is, while we are still the majority, to throw out the plotters at every opportunity.

    Don’t buy their newspapers and other media (you know who they are), don’t support their shops and businesses and never vote for any of the main political parties.

  5. EU should ‘undermine national homogeneity’ says UN migration chief
    (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395)
    “The EU should ‘do its best to undermine’ the ‘homogeneity’ of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said.” In my opinion, the strings attached to Peter Sutherland lead to the nest.

  6. Colin Liddell:”Quote:Now where does that leave us?”

    With the opportunity to push our cause as the only viable solution. I do not believe the European people, in any great numbers, will accept Islam, But to combat the growing influence of Islam in our lands change is inevitable.
    The weakness of the leftists agenda, evident by it’s continual concessions to Islam, is already alienating more of our people. As Islam is a greedy religion it will demand even more!.

    1. I can think of another greedy religion too!
      Yes I hope change is inevitable, hopefully in our favour, there will be no going back to the good old days as they never really existed.
      But to a future as our country should be.

  7. I have to be the first to disagree with this article. I don’t believe the ‘Marxist’ elite have made any kind of miscalculation at all. We wrongly assume that those truly in charge ultimately desire peace – albeit by means of tyrrany in the short term. What they actually desire is the ‘clash of civilisations’ – Muslim vs Christian. Europe is to be a battleground, not a Marxist utopia.
    .
    I won’t quote Albert Pike’s letter predicting 3 World Wars, with the 3rd being a clash of the Zionist West and the Islamic World (because it may be a fake) but it makes perfect intuitive sense to me that if we are ultimately ruled by International Financiers (which I believe we are) then they would profit most from conflict and not from peace.

    1. I’m inclined to agree if the result is to be the destruction of white culture in Europe & the resulting mess just to be slaves.

  8. Last man standing has been a gaping void in the nationalist narrative from the get-go.

    The late Larry Auster (no nationalist he) opined that the architects elected to ride the tiger rather than take a chance on whitey.

    There’s no disputing the left are making hay with Islam, so who knows how it’s going to pan out?

    Add to this heady mix the inherent fault lines in the tectonic plates of capitalism’s unholy alliance with cultural Marxism and its anybody’s guess what shape the phoenix will look like.

    Another bloody great elephant in this narrative is what is to be the fate of whites – and in what time frame?

  9. Great article. Though I think that the non-white foot soldiers, including moslims, that have been imported to attack and replace us, will in the end become just the new consumers. Our internationalist elites dont mind what the prevailing religious beliefs are, just so long as the believers keep CONSUMING and SPENDING.

    1. I have noticed a lot of non moslem Asians being imported too, just to muddy the waters further, to aid the destruction of our nation.

  10. Good article with many excellent points.

    You have to remember too that the plan was that the left thought they alone would benefit from the votes of the grateful newcomers. If you bring people in unchecked, house them and feed them and allow them to keep on doing what they always did, you must surely get their gratitude and their vote.

    Unfortunately the plan has begun to fail. The muslims in the Britain are increasingly not voting for white leftists, but for leftists of their own kind and persuasion. Even though the Labour government bolstered their plan in the UK by allowing postal votes where none were needed (but could be collected, unmarked, by a community elder who would then undertake the onerous task of completing them with the correct ticks) will see a rise in muslim candidates.

    There are also western people who parade themselves as islamic converts in order to get votes, but in time this will fail too. Muslims are not always tolerant, just as many groups are so minded, of other ethnicities. Even if a western person, duly converted, gets the votes of the muslim ‘communities’ (they rarely are part of the greater community, sadly) then the only way these new-muslims can hope to keep the votes is doing exactly what the muslims want. There isn’t much give and take going on here.

    The growth of the number of muslim children (and the claims of muslims that they will ‘outbreed’ to native population, despite the cousin-cousin marrying and the inevitable genetic issues and handicaps) will create problems down the line. While there are British schools who have whole classes that are almost all muslim and mostly boys too, the teachers are often white females who may well believe they are doing good for the welfare of the British nation. In time, these women will find the task intolerable and will need to be replaced. Islamist males will come forward, and then the islamist line can be taught in schools and all the while being funded by taxpaying whites who still, strangely, support the ideals of the left.

    But there won’t be the jobs for the growing muslim male population. There are only so many retail jobs (in muslim owned businesses) and only so much business for taxi drivers. These young people will be bored and get angry, and they will want an income and they will want submissive women.

    The prospect doesn’t look good at the moment.

    In the meantime, the left will continue to berate the white population of Britain that it isn’t trying hard enough to like the muslim newcomers, that it isn’t integrating properly. At the same time the police will surrender areas to muslim law (effectively ‘no go’ areas of towns and cities) and new laws passed that restrict the native, mostly white, population but no one else.

    The media will continue to spew out state propaganda and cover up wrongdoings by muslim gangs in the faint hope that when trouble breaks out, the troublemakers will remember the kindness of the elites and the left and the media and spare them. But when white women have to cover their hair in public, when white women learn that a good muslim woman’s testimony is only worth half that of a man’s, when girls are subject to FGM at a young age then the wails of the left will be that they never knew it would happen.

    And all the pleading and begging however won’t change the march of Sharia law and with it the oppression of gays and the crushing of Christian values.

    The left will weep and wail long as it finds out what a terrible mistake it and their fellow reds in Europe have made.

    1. I think a lot of the leftist idiots are useful idiots & the overall plan is a breakdown of the country & society.
      They’ll be thrown to the wolves as much as we are.

    2. The funny thing is this: take the racial element out Islam and I agree with many parts of it. The left will hate it — ha!

      You’ve also made some good points about how the Muslims function as voters. The truth: they vote for tribal interests.

      I remember seeing a video on You Tube a couple of years ago. It was Antony Lester, a Zio-nation wrecker responsible for importing the Ugandan Asians and orchestrating the Cultural Marxist Race-Relations Act, addressing a group of Muslims.

      He told them that he ”loathed Islamophobia” and seemed to make it clear he was allied with them against the government. Anyway, this creature — a man of unspeakable evil — revealed something: how the Muslims think.

      Basically, they were upset about the Iraq War. I was too for different reasons — fair enough! The Labour Party responded by telling the Muslim community leaders that they would guarantee them more anti-hate law legislation if they retained their support for the Cultural Marxists — sorry, the Labor Party.

      They went along with it. They wanted White people to be criminalized if they resisted the Muslim colonization of their nation more than they wanted to prevent millions of Arab men, women and children being killed by the Zio-American army.

      That shows they have no collective morals. They think racially; but they were only concerned, in reality, with getting ”da White man’s goodies in England”.

      What can you say to a people who think like that? Selfishness is one thing; but taking a few pieces of silver as compensation for the mass killing of your co-ethnics is just plain wrong. Read between the lines; these people have major weaknesses.

      As for the strategies the left have adopted with these people you only have to look at Greece. Many of the Zio-funded leftist movements in Greece are populated by liberal, egalitarian and tolerant Muslims. They are the ones who want to fight — and have often fought — Golden Dawn.

      The elites think the Muslims will fight for them if the Whites decided to go baddarse on them. I’m sorry, do these people really think they are intelligent — haven’t they heard how Saddam Hussian, General Pinochet and many, many others were built up and then they turned on the hands that fed them?

  11. ‘The plan was that the Muslims, after serving their function, would be exposed to empowered Western women, broadband porn, supermarkets, sneering satire, and droves of atheistic teachers and professors who would make their childish Islamic certainties disappear in a puff of smug logic.’

    .

    I’d like to see evidence of a leftist admitting this, of course it would be a politician or some leader of a ‘progressive’ organisation who would need to do so, and they won’t.

    .

    The racial element can’t be forgotten though, in my mind mass Arab/Muslim immigration was just a by-product, a stage in many other stages, before them the left were intent on flooding, take Britain for example, with insane numbers of blacks and Indians, Arabs and Pakistanis, who bring Islam with them, are just one more part of the plan, yes the left apparently didn’t count on the fanaticism of their religious beliefs, but ultimately let’s not pretend that the main, overriding goal of the left has been the ethnic cleansing of the white race in Europe, hence why they didn’t start with Islamic nations, they started with whoever they could, blacks or Indians, it didn’t matter as long as they were non-white.

    .

    I don’t think the left who brought about this madness were that bothered in the long run whether Muslims became westernised and leftist ideologically, perhaps in their minds that was an ideal outcome, but I don’t think it was seen as an outcome that MUST occur, I think as long as the main goal was achieved, that being the outbreeding and mongrelisation of the white race in Europe, particularly Northern, Central and North West Europe, then their ultimate aim would have been achieved, sure they might now face a possible future of a Muslim majority diametrically opposed to so many of the things they brought about, but why should they care? Their job is almost done, white people are becoming minorities, they are being turned into a mongrel people, why should the leftists care? They are becoming older and older, able to stay tucked away in their white enclaves long enough to die before the fruits of their labour turn man eaters.

  12. Here’s my pieces of the jig-saw I see at present, in no particular order.

    Western politics has been hi-jacked by a convergence of Right and Left.

    There’s been a coup. Capitalism (Globalism) and Communism (Cultural Marxism) has joined hands. Islam is definitely in the mix.

    Cultural Marxism (social control) comprises of – and is also known as – Neoliberalism – Communism – Cultural Marxism – Political Correctness – Multiculturalism – Fascism – faux Conservatism – faux Socialism – faux Labour – EU – UN – Immigration.

    Traditional Conservatism has been outlawed.

    Global Capitalism (Money Making) comprises of – Elites of all stripes – Bankers – Media – Politicians of all stripes.

    Globalism is the New World Economic Order and comprises of – and is also known as – Multiculturalism – Immigration – world capitalism – transnational corporations – neo- liberalism (economics) – NWO – world government – world bank -IMF – central banks – United Nations – EU and a plethora of NGO’s.

    The same old pass through the revolving door of each camp, Elites of all stripes – Bankers – Media – Politicians of all stripes.

    It all adds up to a New World Order is being created, and it is this creation we are all witnessing and discussing. Are all sovereign nations of the world signed up to the project? I plainly don’t know. Looks like all sovereign nations are not going to join willingly, Russia, China, India, Brazil and others no doubt will have other ideas.

    In my last post I pointed out there are some aspects of this NWO that are rarely (if at all) discussed by the nationalist bloggerati, for here’s another major component we barely speak about and if we do is usually greeted with howls of derision or tin foil hats are donned.

    It is plain to me there is a religious content to the NWO, which to the architects is just as important or perhaps even moreso. But is seldom discussed among nationalists.

    To sum up. The inconsistencies all mixed up in this NWO recipe are plain for all to see and impossible to foretell – other than there is going to be a lot of pain.

    1. I recommend the book ‘Revolution from Above’ by Kerry Bolon, published by Arktos. It shows that really it’s all about money. Communism, liberalism and cultural-Marxism are just tools of the big business elites to eradicate cultures, traditions, national borders and religions to speed up their money making mission.

  13. I cannot agree with Colin that ‘internationalist, leftist elites’ have ruled the west since world war II. Internationalists certainly, but to anyone who understands the difference between socialism and liberalism, it is clear that these elites are not really leftists or Marxists. As Heordreedenn has pointed out elsewhere in Western Spring, Comrade Stalin would have taken a dim view of ‘Gay Pride and transgendered liberation’. Also the fact that Peter Sutherland is an ardent advocate of multiculturalism should challenge the idea that there is something Marxist about it.
    .
    Colin is right that these internationalist LIBERALS have used Third World immigrants as a weapon to attack nationalists and conservatives. For example Fredrik Reinfeldt the Swedesh Moderate Party leader and prime minister once said that he intended to let in even more immigrants to punish Sweden Democrat voters. Then there is Andrew Neather, the former Labour speech writer who told the Evening Standard that during the meetings he attended with Labour ministers in 2001 he got the impression that mass immigration was intended to ‘rub the Right’s nose in diversity’.

    1. But maybe it’s Marxism in the sense of the “Frankfurt school”?
      In other words it’s meant to cause revolution by rotting all the structures of a stable society that doesn’t want revolution until one is achieved.
      Whether that then ushers in a utopian workers paradise is questionable at best.
      Maybe some of the dupes believe that, I don’t.
      I think it will deliver a bunch of ignorant slaves into the hands of the real power elite.

Comments are closed.