People come up with all sorts of ideological reasons to try to explain conflict – “religion” is a favourite (Islam now, Christianity at various periods in the past), or nationalism, inequality, tyrannical government, whatever the bee may be in your particular bonnet. The truth is that these are mere excuses, evasions of the true causes of conflict which are ineradicable human characteristics – fear, or greed, or envy and thus the hatred which those emotions engender.
The search for a solution to conflict after the appalling destruction of two world wars led the West into a fatal error – the mistaken assumption that conflict was due to the failure of people of different races, nations, cultures and religions to recognise each others common humanity, and that the way to get them to recognise that common humanity was to force them to mix. So borders come down, populations move across frontiers, familiar places become unfamiliar, the locals find that they can no longer get the jobs/hospital beds/school places which they thought were theirs; if they object they are insulted or punished by ruling elites which they can’t remove because democracy is a sham. This error has a name – internationalism.
Since 9/11 the dangerous nature of the error has been obvious for it has fostered the establishment in our countries of a hideous and rapidly growing malignancy which – unless it is swiftly cut out – will do to western civilization what hideous malignancies do to the human body. Our masters are still wedded to the error and are still in denial – no doubt David Cameron is repolishing his “this has nothing to do with Islam” speech. But such denial becomes more and more difficult as the atrocities accumulate – and now Paris. There are signs aplenty that the post war consensus is beginning to come apart under the combined stress and strain of mass immigration and the Islamist terror which it brings with it; nationalist forces are rising on the continent and they may well destroy the EU, itself one of the more gross and destructive manifestations of internationalism.
The appalling destruction of two world wars led the West into a fatal error, but the communist East avoided the error and applied the correct formula for the avoidance of conflict – the separation of populations. Areas of Germany allocated for resettlement by Poles and Czechs were cleared of their German populations by a brutal process defended in the House of Commons by the Foreign Secretary, Sir Anthony Eden, as “necessary to achieve racial purity”. Thus it was that a Poland which, before the War, was only 60 % Polish and racked by ethnic dissension – Poles against Ukrainians, Poles against Lithuanians, Germans against Poles, everyone against Jews – is now 98% Polish and very obviously determined to remain so.
It is indeed in separation that conflict is to be avoided because populations which live apart in their own communities cannot threaten the identity or the interests of others. So, as someone once said, “strong fences make good neighbours”. And as someone else said, long before, “blessed are the peacemakers”.
By Frederick Dixon © 2015
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
Phillip Woodward
- Edit
A good article which brings to mind a good saying; Lies run in sprints. but the truth runs a marathon.
K. L. Anderson
- Edit
Yes indeed, strong fences make good neighbors. Here is my take. “Non-assimilation offers a solution in the Middle East and everywhere”
https://civilizingthebeast.blogspot.com/2015/11/non-assimilation-offers-solution-in.html
Stefan
- Edit
It would seem to be an antidote to the one world government pushers, who think one size fits all.
Stefan
- Edit
Yes invest in fence suppliers as I think there will be a large demand for good quality security fencing.
I have tried to argue with certain liberal types that isolation/separation might be better than constant intervention/interference that has got us to a situation of being slaughtered on the streets.
Tony L
- Edit
Except that the ruling Russians exported their population into the Crimea, Ukraine and Lithuania.
.
Russia now has a lot of demographic/geopolitical similarities with Germany of the 1930s.
.
Of course, being a nuclear state, Russia has achieved the annexation of Crimea without war, whereas Germany wasn’t able to annex the bit of land which separated it from Prussia
Byrhtnoth
- Edit
Although Tony L is right about Russia exporting it’s population to the Crimea, Ukraine and Lithuania this is not typical of how the Soviet Union dealt with nationalities within it’s borders. On the whole the principle of nation’s right to self determination was implemented, with every ethnic group being allotted a territory and given limited political autonomy along with support for indigenous cultures. In this respect the Soviet Union was continuing the policy of the Tsars who resolved the endless religious and ethnic strife in the Caucasus by separating the various ethnic groups into self governing territories, even going so far as to forcibly relocate members of certain ethnic groups. It has been pointed out that one of the enduring consequences of Communism and it’s approach to nationalities is that it turned Eastern Europe into an ethnic museum insulated from the leveling effect of globalization manifested in the West. The fact that someone like David Duke advocates the same nationalities policy is not really a paradox because there is nothing inherently left wing or right wing about it. Rather, it should be regarded as an accommodation to human nature while promoting true diversity in the world.
.
There are some in nationalist circles who compare the EU to the Soviet Union, but they are wrong to do so. The ultimate aim of the EU and the globalist overlords who created it is to eliminate the English, Swedish, French, etc as a people through mass migration, while at the same time whittling away at their political autonomy with the ultimate aim of replacing their nation states with smaller administrative units with no relation to current political boundaries, and with limited political autonomy. Naturally such a diabolical plan has provoked a nationalist backlash and created a large audience for Western Spring.
Andrew
- Edit
Overheard recently; 2 Polish guys chatting in a bar in north London: “blimey, mate, I thought 40 years of Comminism & being ordered around by Moscow was bad enough, but it’s a “walk in the park” compared to what Brussels & the European Union is doing to us all”
Actually this isn’t a joke, I really heard this!