The fall of the Left/Liberal consensus has long been anticipated by those on our side of politics; the Left is devoid of ideas and originality, all of its nostrums have been tested to destruction and the consequences – societal breakdown – are all around us. The empty husk waits only for a fresh, strong, breeze to blow it out of the positions of power and influence which it still occupies by sheer inertia. Alex Kurtagic once forecast that we might not realise that the great change had come about until afterwards, and perhaps that’s how it always is with great but slow change which has little perceivable impact on the everyday life of people.
Janet Daley, whose articles in the Telegraph I always read with interest, wrote about the Trump candidacy the other day. She very obviously dislikes Mr. Trump, which is fair enough – I doubt if many of us would care to spend much time in his company – but she surprised me with her rejection, not of his person but of his politics. She went on to endorse in glowing terms the centrist, establishment candidate, Rubio. On reflection I realised that Janet’s views had not changed with the passage of time; it is the political atmosphere which has changed around her and left her behind, and she has only just realised it.
Janet Daley would probably describe herself as a “conservative”, which in the post-sixties world has come to mean one who is not really conservative at all but actually a classical liberal – as liberal on social matters as on economic. Donald Trump, on the other hand, has managed to hit what one commentator has described as “the sweet spot” – maximising public support by combining populist economic policies with socially conservative ones. It is that sweet spot, that populist combination, which has led to him being described as a “national socialist” – needless to say he is not the kind of national socialist who stamps around in jack boots (at least I hope not) but he is the kind who puts his own people first, realising that a nation needs to be safe – its borders protected from foreign intrusion and its economy from unfair foreign competition. Not only has Trump been described as a national socialist but very interestingly, and perhaps as a direct consequence, he is said to be the most left wing of the remaining Republican contenders, capable of picking up White voters from Bernie Sanders should he lose the Democratic nomination to Mrs. Clinton.
So has the sea change happened? It certainly seems as if in the United States the days of interchangeable centrist candidates (how did Bush differ from Clinton on anything that matters ?) may be passing. What about elsewhere? The EU, a centrist establishment project if ever there were one, is creaking alarmingly under the stresses and strains of its doomed Euro currency and a suicidal immigration policy. Out of the mess, new forces rise both on the ultra Right and on the far Left and it is those forces which will find themselves picking up the pieces if and when the EU project falls apart. Even here in the UK, we see a pale reflection of the continental sea change in the rise of Farage and Corbyn – much more significantly, in the referendum we now have a chance not only to unshackle ourselves from a corpse, but to dig a grave for the remains.
It is, though, an oddity of Britain, and particularly of England, that we have always rather prided ourselves on being a mild and moderate people, not given to continental or American excess and avoiding all trace of extremism in our politics. That means that if and when we throw off the shackles of the EU and recover control of our borders, most people will be satisfied; there will be little appetite to go further by reversing the dispossession of our people from so much of our country, the appetite will rather be for integration and assimilation. In that appetite lies a very great danger for our racial and cultural identity and that is why we as racial nationalists, profoundly though we must hope for our country’s liberation from the EU, must never slacken in our determination to recover every inch of our country for ourselves alone. No “mild and moderate” for us!
By Frederick Dixon © 2016
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
Antony Milne
- Edit
Janet Daley also understood and commented on the changing cultural and political environment that has given encouragement to Trump and other populist groups in Europe. Other commentators in the press have expressed similar comments, and are on the whole sympathetic. This is a significant development in itself. Opinion on immigration was generally restrained until the dam broke in about 2005. Then comment became more open, because the problem was becoming more obvious. The kind of hard-hitting articles that Leo McKinstry, for example, makes for the Daily Express I used to write myself in the 1990s in a defunct magazine called Spearhead, edited by the late John Tyndall. Some of these can be seen on the Internet under my alternative spelling Anthony Milne. I also used to belong to the London Swinton Circle (an anti-Euro group, which later included immigration in its concerns), and Derek Turner’s Right Now organization, whose publication I was once a contributing editor.
Good luck and good wishes.
Heather
- Edit
The last paragraph is very apt because even if a “leave” vote is successful it isn’t the end of the problem. It is just one of the many problems we face, leaving will help but it won’t be a cure all.
The fox will still be in the hen house.
I can’t imagine we will see a rush to reverse the decades of destruction. We will still have crippling political correctness, quotas, cheerleaders for minority groups, among other things.
I can’t imagine either that the establishment will cease to pour in people from around the globe.
They just won’t be able to hide behind whatever EU directive they care to quote.
Ms Bridgit
- Edit
Only until full chaos is created in Europe will we see the motive behind it.
Stefan
- Edit
True but I think we have a good idea of the motives already.
rerevisionist
- Edit
Googling ‘Anthony Milne’ yields list of Spearhead articles; for example, ‘Institutionalised Lying’, a review of a book by Anthony Browne called ‘Do We Need Mass Immigration?’ it’s a good review, going through, one by one, the lies that are and have been told the media about immigration. But you have not mentioned the reason, namely the Jewish desite and impulse to damage whites.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Delighted to see Antony Milne back on board. I remember him when he first attended a meeting of ‘The Spinning Top Club’, at a time when it was chaired by Jonathan Bowden. Unless I’m mistaken it was I who introduced him to ‘Spearhead’. At the time Mr. Milne was a member of the National Secular Society and I found it encouraging that someone with his independence of mind should be so supportive and obviously so highly regarded by John Tyndall.
frederick dixon
- Edit
Once we are out of the EU and able to control immigration from the continent, there is an appreciable danger that the government will feel that it can be more relaxed about immigration from elsewhere. Some such immigration might be very welcome – there was an opinion poll the other day which showed considerable support in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK for a freedom of movement area embracing those four countries. On the other hand, there are one or two eurosceptic Tories who talk about Brexit potentially making it easier for their Black and Asian constituents to bring their relatives into the country
BUT don’t let that last sentence put anyone off voting for Brexit – liberating ourselves from a bloc with a population of half a billion, all of whom have the right to live here, is an absolute and indispensable prerequisite to recovering our country. As Donald Trump has said “a country which doesn’t control its borders is not a country”.
rerevisionist
- Edit
Michael, hi! I’d suggest you be not impressed by Mr Milne. the various secularist/ rationalist groups were and are little more than jewish fronts – happy to attack Christianity, happy to say nothing about Judaism, which makes Christianity look sane and moderate.
Nationalist4UK (@Nationalist4UK)
- Edit
If Donald Trump becomes president, will he help the Europeans that are in distress because of unwanted 3rd world immigration and corrupt governments?
Max Musson
- Edit
Many nationalists are trumpeting their support for Trump based upon accepting his campaign rhetoric at face value. However those of us that are a little older will know that it is not what a politician promises in order to win your vote that counts, it is what that politician does once elected. It is therefore too early to decide what kind of a man Donald Trump is, the proof of the pudding will be in the eating, as they say.
.
Those of us that are a little older will remember the campaign pledges of Richard Nixon and of Ronald Regan, both of whom posed as ‘right-wing’ candidates during the hustings, but both of whom, implemented leftist leaning, pro-NWO policies once elected.
Stefan
- Edit
I have little faith in Trump having seen his antics in the past & the people he courted.
But if he puts a well aimed boot up the Republican Party, so much the better.
As for Hillary I better not say what I think of her…
Antony Milne
- Edit
I have a disc of excerpts from speeches of US presidents. There is one in which Reagan truly sings the praises of a non-discriminatory, socially mobile multicultural America.