By Max Musson:
In a move that some observers have likened to the enactment of the so called ‘Nuremberg Laws’ by National Socialist Germany in 1935, the Israeli cabinet have by a 14 to 7 majority, approved a controversial bill that officially defines Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people.
The new legislation is designed to reserve “national rights” for Jews only and to deny such rights to minority groups; Arab Muslims and Christians, who currently comprise 20% of Israel’s population. It asserts Israel’s Jewish character as a fundamental facet of the state and seeks to institutionalise Jewish law as the basis for all future Israeli legislation.
The bill, which still requires the Knesset’s approval to become a law, comes as tensions between Israelis and Palestinians rise sharply, and friction within Israel’s Arab minority grows.
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has argued that the law is necessary because people are challenging the notion of Israel as a Jewish homeland.
“There are many who are challenging Israel’s character as the national state of the Jewish people. The Palestinians refuse to recognise this and there is also opposition from within”, he said.
Netanyahu reportedly confirmed that Israeli Jews would enjoy rights that will be denied to minority groups. He said that while all could enjoy equal civil rights, “there are national rights only for the Jewish people – a flag, anthem, the right of every Jew to immigrate to Israel and other national symbols.”
Furthermore, referring to Palestinian freedom fighters Netanyahu said, “It cannot be that those who harm Israel, those who call for the destruction of the state of Israel, will enjoy rights like social security”.
Some critics have condemned the proposed measures as racist, however nationalists will appreciate the desire of Jews to retain Israel as an ethnic homeland although we can’t help but comment upon the clear double standard demonstrated by Zionist Jews in the Diaspora, who prominently campaign in favour of the abolition of national identity and the acceptance of multiculturalism where the nations of Europe and the West are concerned, but who simultaneously defend the right of Jews to maintain the state of Israel as an ethnic homeland.
Regular readers of this forum will recall an earlier article in which the state of Israel has demonstrated that providing the political will exists, and contrary to what leftist and ethnic minority rights groups in this country may claim, nations can successfully adopt policies of ethnic or racial nationalism, including compulsory repatriation.
By Max Musson © 2014
# # # #
A Swain
- Edit
Yes, indeed and when the United Nations and international opinion goes against the Israeli ruling eiite, they effectively stick up two fingers at the world.
This Israeli approach is what the indigenous peoples of Europe must do in order to preserve and retain that which is exclusively theirs’ by right of racial lineage and territorial inheritance, and anyone whether non-White or White Marxist traitor who breaks that law must be rounded up, charged with anti-White hate crime(s) primarly with Treason and the advocation of White Genocide – crimes that will carry the penalty of life imprisonment and/or the stripping of citizenship, and permanent deportation of themselves and families.
Max Musson
- Edit
I agree with your main premise, however I prefer to think that those found guilty of crimes against the nation will spend a suitably long period of punitive labour in the service of our nation, or if their crimes are bad enough will face the same fate as befell Peter Anthony Allen, at Walton Prison in Liverpool on 13th August 1964. As for the families of traitors, I see no just reason to punish people for the sins of their relatives.
.
Interestingly, it was Jewish Labour MP Sydney Silverman, who introduced a private member’s bill to the Commons to suspend the death penalty in 1965, which led to the passing of the Murder (Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1965, and it was Labour MP Jack Straw, a man of partial Jewish ancestry, who while as Home Secretary introduced the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 abolishing the death penalty for the crime of Treason. Jack Straw was named by Labour MP Tam Dalyell in 2003 as part of “a cabal of Jewish advisers” surrounding Tony Blair. He is described by the Jewish Chronicle as not being ‘halachically Jewish’ because his Jewish ancestry is through a great-grandmother on his mother’s father’s side, however according to that same Jewish Chronicle article, in a speech given in 1995, Straw said: “I come from Jewish stock although I’m Christian now”, [https://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/how-jewish-is/how-jewish-jack-straw].
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
It’s a relief to read an article that whilst pinpointing Jewish hypocrisy doesn’t criticise the Jews for Racism in enacting their version of the ‘Nuremberg Laws’. Many racial patriots try to make a cheap debating point by lambasting Jews and Coloured people, such as Mrs. Alibhai-Brown, for their implicit “Racism”, as though Racism were an evil in itself. By attacking the hypocrisy behind Jewish and Coloured Racism the commentator often falls into the Marxist trap of implying that if only we all put aside our racial differences and rejected Racism all would be hunky dory while on the contrary, by embracing our racial differences we’re better placed to understand one another.
Another interesting point that came out of the article was that despite the non-Jewish population of Israel making up 20% of the total, the Jews are firmly in charge. This gives us Britons grounds for hope while the Coloured proportion of Great Britain is considerably less. Why then are the Jews in Israel full of self-confidence whilst the British people are demoralised and defeatist. The difference, I would suggest, is that we’ve foolishly adopted a universalist religion which undermines our racial cohesion whilst the Jews have a tribal religion.
Max Musson
- Edit
That last point you make is so very true and I’m kicking myself that I missed it. Well done Mike!
Shaun
- Edit
Many Jews (in the West) are clearly hypocrites, but I think a lot of nationalists overate them as a political force. Jewish power is centred within the banks, the government, and the media, and — it must be said — they also have a lot of power in the corporate world. They’re still, however, a tiny portion of the population in each of the nations they live in: the main problem we have is the growing non-White population that is going to swamp us if we don’t do something as a race to prevent that.
Being a very, very, very racist people, Jews can’t help themselves when it comes to their version of the 14 words, so they will express this tendency through the institutions that govern Israel. Laugh as they do it. They’re turning the White sheeple left against them. To be honest, British nationalists shouldn’t even care what goes on Israel but that’s another story…..
I have to repeat this: Jewish power is a big illusion. They only have power because the host nations allow them to have it. We are the dominant force in the Western world, we just need to see it….
George
- Edit
“They’re turning the White sheeple left against them. To be honest, British nationalists shouldn’t even care what goes on Israel but that’s another story….”
No, we should care a lot more because it’s them exposing themselves in the biggest way possible. To paraphrase David Jones there is a lot more on the left who are anti-zionist than the right. Why ‘turn the other cheek’ to the International Jewish elite when their prime focus is stopping Nationalism. As shown by The Daily Stormer with #OperationJewWife and #FreeGarronHelm when the focus is on them then all their logic and plans come to none as hysterical irrationality takes over.
The Mosleyite approach of ‘It’s not our issue’ does not work in a world of instant communication where graphic atrocities can be communicated Worldwide by the internet. Even when the BBC and Guardian try their best to cover up the worst of Israels’ behaviour they cannot turn the tide of opposition to Zionism. When millions are shocked at seeing childrens’ limbs blown off by Israeli bombs, bought or paid for by Western Governments how are they going to react when some British Nationalist organisation is going on about ‘Ban the Burkhas’ and ‘Islamic Caliphate’ when these Muslim organisations have only as much power as the Jewish elite gives them.
In the next 10-20 years Israel and it’s Zionist sponsors are going to unleash more subversion, destruction and takeover than they have done in the past 70 years. If we are ignore it then we are going to look like one of the same. How are we going to be ‘Zion neutral’ when the BBC with it’s ‘no go’ policy on Israel (https://twitter.com/maxkeiser/status/496024502237941760) and the Zionist owned press invest so much in attacking British Nationalist parties. Then we add political lobbies and their influence in International Capitalism and Finance. They do not oppose British Nationalism because they are such humanitarianism nor is the marginalisation of Europeans their only goal. Genuine Nationalist parties remove the means of International Capitalist and Financers to be make ginormous profits and their religous goals of the ‘Greater Israel’ and rebuilding the third temple which rests upon the third holiest site in Islam. They can’t do that when Nationalists are in power.
You need passion and an honest, consistent worldview like Jobbik have done and not be bloated by some straight jacket approach.
Shaun
- Edit
I can see what you’re saying, but if British nationalists go down the ”Zionism is racism” trap, then where does that leave us? As you said, the left appose Zionism because they dislike all nationalism. In my opinion, there is no profit to made from critiquing the extreme ethnocentricity of the Jews when we want what they want in Israel: a homogenous homeland.
Let the left attack Israel (I hope they do), but we should concentrate on our own nation.
We need to build a sense of legitimate ethnocentrism amongst our own kin, and if we juxtapose that with rambling on about the ”racism of Israel”, we will look like hypocrites.
”In the next 10-20 years Israel and it’s Zionist sponsors are going to unleash more subversion, destruction and takeover than they have done in the past 70 years.”
Will they?
Shouldn’t the nationalist movements in each White nation stop them?
George
- Edit
“I can see what you’re saying, but if British nationalists go down the ”Zionism is racism” trap, then where does that leave us?”
That’s if you come at it from the David Duke approach which is good for educating people. However, there is a more energetic approach which is better suited to a party or movement.
Whiny arguments like “but in Israel they don’t have diversity wam wam” of course have no use. You must be utterly and ruthlessly direct in your confrontations and political trolling. Steal the energy of the left, multiply it then turn it round to completely destroy our opposition.
1) You are exceedingly direct and confrontational in your propaganda asking:
– “Oh, Mr Blair/Mr Cameron, what has Diversity done for the Palestinian people?”
– “Ms May, you appear to be the most regular speaker at Conservative Friends of Israel meetings espousing your support for Israel. On a completely different note well done for going so far in politics”
– “Why does the British Board of Jewish Deputies not speak out against Israel’s anti-immigration policies yet attacks anti-immigration parties in the UK. May I ask where is their allegiance?”
Most importantly:
– “If you want to see the effect that Mass Immigration – look at Palestine”
Say if someone says “Your Racists”, you can reply “How can I be a racist? I support mass immigration for Israel!”. When they reply “Your just a Nazi then” you can expand it and point out that they are openly linking mass immigration to destruction despite their support for it. The accuser won’t change their views but other people who are typically apathetic will join the dots and recognise the humongous hypocrisy of it all.
2) Troll them hard by openly advocating for mass immigration to Israel. For example:
– “Politicians have been misguided. The Multicultural, Multiracial social experiment was not meant for Europe but for the land of Israel”
– “There is a severe lack of racial diversity in Hebrew schools”
– “We will change our position and support multiculturalism once we see how it works in the chosen land for the chosen people”
Of course you are not being genuine, you are trolling and that trolling causes them to respond which breaks their cover. Their power structure will then become hysterical as you are in affect calling for their demise but not breaking any hate speech laws. How hard is it going to backfire on them if they imprison people for advocating Multiculturalism Israel! They are going to be lining up to say “The Jewish Community is shocked by this”, “We oppose these disgusting views” etc. People will then say “how about the disgusting views on supporting immigration to Britain!” Their mask falls big time and everyone can get involved doing so.
While it may sound pretty autistic it takes advantage of
1) You are using the energy of the left:
Multicultural rhetoric is given a positive boost in our society by default. In our society when propagating from the right your are faced with many ‘blocks’. However, if you are propagating from the left then if you are attacked by lefties they will then be attacking the very position they support.
2) Your message is positive and humourous:
People are not bothered about a negative message but a positive one makes people interested and more motivated. When people are intrigued they learn more. Nationalist Headlines of “Another Muslim Rape Gang!”, “BME crime rate 87% higher than”. Most people are just going to say “yawn” and go and watch Easternders, gossip mags as the mentality of the modern day White Man and Woman is escapism. However, once the European Man and Woman get interested and motivated into something then “Uh oh!” they are in the pooh.
3) It causes a reaction:
Humour and hypocrisy causes people to react and innevitabily bring their 2 cents to the table. It causes debates amongst . It cleans out the ideological chaff (not the members but the political position) like EDL/Liberty GB/Britiain First who brown nose Zionists in the hope they will be nice enough to provide us Europeans with a future. Brown nosing Zionists is pathetic when they are our biggest enemy, their ideology is morally bankrupt and any support for the concept of ‘right to rule’ will not get us anywhere. The demographic situation of Europeans will eventually mimmic that of the Palestinians so why support the group that is bringing both our peoples’ demise?
Their hysteria will see them responding how mass immigration is a ‘shaoh’, ‘Multicultural fascist Nazi’s’. The gentile left are then going to recognise that the supposedly anti-racist diaspora are in fact the biggest racists of all.
Even if many on the left run a Gentile general ‘Anti-Nationalist’ movement the glue that sticks them together is gone. At the moment they use the media, their heavy presence in the two party system and organisational abilities to form these Anti-Nationalist groups. The activities of which are de facto decided at through international organisations and congresses with the backing of very rich individuals. Without that tribal power system Anti-Nationalism and Anti-Racism movement boils down to a mass of individualistic gentiles who themselves will argue and split over what is the best approach. Nationalist groups have formed, fracture, split over many decades just that way and gentile Anti-Nationalist groups will do the same.
In short you rattle their cage and the whole political landscape to politically educate and pave the way for Anti-Zionism to be the bedrock of British Nationalism just as Jobbik has done in Hungary to great success.
Shaun
- Edit
I can’t argue with your points. Pointing out the base hypocrisy of the Diaspora Zionists is a very good approach. I think, with memes, it’s best to follow the most direct strategy: keep it simple, stupid.
Yes … if you can manage to have some online debate with some Reds about how Israel should be multicultural, why not? The Anti-Racist Hitler video has done some good work in this area. Flipping arguments on their head are always a good idea!
There is a problem: these left-wing nuts would have no problem with Israel being multicultural, even if it destroyed the Jewish people, like it’s doing to our people! They don’t see race, remember; these people will die for their programming! I suppose you’re not arguing with them, so the audience might see your point, and that might have a positive effect with some of them.
I can see what you’re saying about the pro-Zionist nationalist movements. These people should understand that they will always be called the R-word no matter how much the they try to appease the Jews. Look at Jared Taylor, he is pro-Jewish, and the Zio-media still call him a Nazi. But then … who cares if people call you a racist or a Nazi? The sheeple won’t like you, but who cares what they think?
At the moment, we haven’t got the means to communicate our message to the White masses. Our people, at a mass level, are herd-like lemmings, and they’ve been scientifically programmed to reject radical nationalist beliefs; so we have to work with what we have, and accept that our movement is only going to be effective if the tiny portion of the White race that is capable of seeing through all this bullshit punches way, way, way above its weight.
If they do, then we will get more members — or, in reality, we’ll be able to reach a significant portion of that 5% of non-sheeple types that we need! That’s what Western Spring are trying to do. None the less, good luck with your on-line debate — it all helps!
Rerevisionist
- Edit
Slightly off-topic, but part of the whole Jewish industry of presentation of the world’s history…
… Puzzling over people why says Jew funded Hitler, it struck me that Hitler may well have been funded, because he was MODERATE. There must have been many Germans who hated Jews for siding against Germany in WW1. There must presumably have been many Germans who favoured vicious and effective action against Jews. It’s difficult to judge – no doubt such opinions would have been burnt and removed after 1945. But worth rethinking.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
Possibly true, maybe they thought if they paid the piper they could call the tune?
In the way that we have stooges now?
Shaun
- Edit
Jews (or Corporate America) only ”funded” Hitler after he came to power, so they could secure their business interests. Up until that point, the NS had many financial difficulties that Hitler and co relieved through small loans and a very generous activist base.
BritishActivism
- Edit
Following on a little bit from some of the above comments, one thing which I have never given all that much thought to are all the various pros and cons of Israel actually being torn down (or “de-legitimised”) as being a homeland for the Jewish people.
.
A lot of the more hardcore nationalist sites (and I suppose a lot of far-left liberal sites) condemn Israel for their activities – such as their often cited ‘Jewish supremacist’ positions, their reluctance to be overwhelmed with Palestinians and the lengths they go to in order to try and keep control over the place.
.
For nationalists, the double standards / hypocrisy are of course a gift. This annoyance is particularly justified when it is the same said group of people who are often found at the forefront of undermining and generally making our efforts to ‘do likewise’ almost impossible. I think it is that aspect what irritates many of us the most.
.
However the rights and wrongs of Israel and their actions are not the points I wish to question here.
.
The question is more centred around what the consequences would be for us (and the wider world) if they were forced to abandon Israel as a ‘going concern’.
.
For example, would this, in part, only further deny us the ‘equivalence aspect’ of seeking to achieve a homeland for our people? I realise we have a right to state our case no matter what, but the ‘sauce for the goose’ aspect is somewhat useful at the moment.
.
If they were forced to enjoy the ‘rich vibrancy’ that is coming to the rest of us, would it particularly change what has already been put into motion in Europe and the Occident, particularly considering that we are not likely to see a nationalist government or a ‘Jewish aware’ wider populace rise up – and given that many of the rich and powerful will still have their hands on the levers?
.
Where would all the Jews go to? Would they not just head West (rather than into Islamic nations surrounding them!) to both extol their revenge on those who have destroyed their ‘dream’ – and thus ultimately create even more subversive mischief upon us by their sheer presence in our lands in greater numbers than they are now?
.
More generally, would the whole mechanism with them not just start again – from scratch – where they manipulate world events in such a way that they again slowly agitate and make conditions which allows them to establish another chunk of land, probably at the expense of many more lives (arguably like the second world war, the crafting of the Balfour declaration, moving and shaking in high places)?
.
Would it really be in our interests to put ourselves in such a position, particularly if we are not “in control” with nationalistic governance or a nationalistically aware populace?(Something which I think is pretty slim to be fair).
.
It is easy for folk to bang on about Jews and Israel, and believe me, I appreciate why they do so….but I do not see much thought being given about the consequences of the place falling apart and them being given no legitimacy to continue their people.
.
It is not good enough to say “we don’t care where they go!” or “we will be in control, so we can deal with them and cast them out of our lands!” (to where, if they don’t have Israel?)…or…’it’s not our problem’…etc…because given the way these people operate I suspect it would be our problem at some point, in one way or another.
.
However, rather than spend our time focussing on them and their antics, I think time would be better spent creating a ‘shield wall’ for all eventualities and focusing on our own plans.
.
Unfortunately, those plans are not a certainty that can be carried forth forever and ever amen. Those familiar with the famous “Fable of the Ducks and the Hens” will appreciate those concerns on this particular matter.
.
I believe the Jews have been kicked out of at least 100 nations throughout history, yet, like the fable of the ducks and the hens, many generations pass and they unwittingly fall into the same traps all over again.
Max Musson
- Edit
You make a very good point BA.
Eric
- Edit
“clear double standard demonstrated by Zionist Jews in the Diaspora”
If this hypocrisy is pointed out to a Zionist, he will simply say that unlike other peoples, Jews need an ethnic homeland to protect them from persecution, since other races as a whole aren’t persecuted like they were by the ‘Nazis’ etc.
maladieaucrepuscule
- Edit
“Ultra-Zionists Protest Miscegenation”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v47lNHJAYP4 @4:40
In Israel. The time-coded caption = sheer chutzpah. One example of many.
Bulan Sabriel
- Edit
What is wrong with defining Israel as a Jewish state, while maintaining full rights for all citizens? Comparing this to the Nuremberg laws is an obscene lie. It isn’t an argumenet but an act of political onanisn where you gratify yourself with nothingness. It is a bs and you know it.
As for the video in the end, it shows the opposite of what you claim. It is part of a 30 minute Israel Broadcast Authority piece on Swedish Jews standign up to the antisemitic conspiracy of Swedish Socialists and the Muslims they import to persecute Jews. Spectre was the Swedish government’s response. She is an America imported to Sweden to silence Jews.
If you were adults, you would applaud Israel and follow their lead. Grow up, or watch your nations commit suicide as you spit at Jews.
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Bulan, It appears that your logic is as much in ‘a twist’ as your ‘knickers’ are over this issue.
.
That article does not attack Israel for enacting ethnocentric policies but in fact points to Israel as an example of a country that has done that very thing despite criticism from the ‘international community’. If you had read the article from an objective standpoint and followed the link to the linked article (https://www.westernspring.co.uk/repatriation/) you might have realised this.
.
Criticism within my ‘Sauce for the Goose’ article is reserved for those Diaspora Jews who support the maintenance of Israel as an ethnic state while simultaneously using their considerable influence to campaign in favour of mass non-White immigration and in such a way as to deny the White host nations among whom they live the right to similarly protect our national interests. It is the hypocrisy of this double-standard that we criticise.
.
Yes, wouldn’t it be great if we could copy Israel and pass legislation establishing Britain and the other nations of Europe as ‘homelands’ where we Europeans would have primacy of place and where our people would be protected from the genocidal policies of others? Perhaps you could employ your energies towards persuading your ethnic/religious brethren in Britain and the rest of Europe that this would be a great idea and then there would be no reason for anyone here to criticise Jews at all.