It is now more than two years since the British people voted decisively to leave the European Union and during that time Prime Minister Theresa May and her ministers have at every step and turn been frustrated in their attempts to negotiate a mutually beneficial deal that would allow the UK to continue to trade freely with the member states of the European Union, while at the same time being free to govern ourselves.
Many political commentators from the liberal-left, the spokespeople for pro-EU pressure groups, political parties and other organisations, claim that the EU is a democratic institution which has protected the freedom and democracy of the peoples of Europe for the last seventy years. Indeed the Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union goes so far as to state of the EU:
“The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities.”
These are lofty sounding words, but we should not allow ourselves to be misled by them, for while the European Union professes to support and promote ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’, their relentless and insistent micro-management of our affairs during our membership of the EU and their actions in terms of their response to the British government’s attempts to negotiate our freedom from their tyranny, tell a very different story.
What we see in the pantomime that has resulted from our government’s attempts negotiate with the EU is nothing but intransigence and unremitting hostility demonstrating the intention of the EU to punish and humiliate our nation for having the temerity to desire freedom from their bureaucratic tyranny. Where is respect for human dignity in the way in which they have denigrated, abused and humiliated Theresa May and made her beg for every minute concession?
It must be clear now to everyone who voted in the 2016 referendum, irrespective of how we may have voted, that the EU demands ‘compliance’ where they speak of ‘freedom’ and practices ‘coercion’ when they speak of democracy.
What has been totally lacking in their approach to the negotiations is any respect for the freedom of a member state to desire something other than a rigidly enforced political union, nor any acknowledgement of the rights of member states to negotiate something other than a ‘one-size-fits-all’ bureaucratic straight jacket. Furthermore, while this may have come as a surprise to some, Western Spring have argued all along that the primary reason why it is desirable for us to leave the EU has nothing to do with trade or the economy, nor any of the social policies of the EU, but the fundamental lack of democracy evident in the constitution of the European Union.
If when the architects of the EU drew up the constitution of the EU, democracy had been their aim, they would possibly have used the British parliamentary system, the ‘Mother of all parliaments’ as their model. Or possibly they might have used the constitution of the largest democracy, the constitution of the USA, as their model? However that was not what they did.
The constitution of the EU was modelled on that of the Soviet Union, the largest authoritarian state and the nemesis of all of the world’s democracies at the time. That this is so makes it screamingly obvious the architects of the EU must have been motivated by a covert intention to create not a democracy, but an authoritarian state along the lines of a European Soviet Socialist Republic.
Three governmental chambers characterised the Soviet Union: the Central Committee of the Communist Party; the Politburo; and the Grand Soviet. The counterparts to these three institutions within the EU are: the Council/Council of Ministers; the European Commission; and the European Parliament. Furthermore the relationship between the three institutions in each case — their powers and responsibilities — is almost identical. In both instances, the sole elected body has no legislative powers, no ability to initiate legislation and is solely allowed to rubber-stamp the legislation devised and put before it by self-perpetuating, largely self-appointed and unelected bureaucrats.
Let us all now resolve to re-establish our democracy within the British Isles and to return the right of self-determination to our people by pressing our elected politicians and our government for a speedy withdrawal from the European Union. Not a half-in, half-out compromise in which we are forever shackled to the EU, but a clean break which protects the integrity of the United Kingdom and which makes us once again masters of our own destiny.
Critics of Brexit attempt to reduce the argument to a matter of mere economics and try to frighten us with predictions of dire financial consequences if we leave the EU, however we lived as a free and independent island nation for thousands of years before joining the EU and we can do so again. The eyes of generations past are upon us and we carry with us the yearning expectations of those yet to come, and we must not let them down. We must fight to defend our freedom, our democracy and our right to self-determination, whatever the cost may be!
By Max Musson © 2018
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
Dan E
- Edit
From the very beginning of Teresa May’s appointment as Prime Minister, I have said that the haste that Cameron was kicked out and she was put in was to engineer this very outcome. Cameron went because they needed to stop him from invoking Article 50, in fact I Memed this a couple of times on Facebook. The period since her taking office has been spent by an army of civil servants drawing up this Treacherous document. The really amzing thing about this is how so many of our establishment are so willing to go along with this betrayal of this country and its people. I have always said that this kind of thing happens when you don’t really notice that, the people who are in charge have absolutely no allegiance to this country.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
As Max Musson so rightly points out, the EU purports to be…
“founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities”…
while in reality it is none of those things.
Any regular reader of Western Spring will know only too well that the EU was established to perpetuate the role of international finance in the wake of the allied victory in the Second World War. Indeed even now the 90 year old Ursula Haverbeck is languishing in a German prison for no greater crime than publicly doubting the truth of Jewish fairy tales on German TV.
But, along with these other high blown, one might say “flyblown”, weasel words, we might take a closer look at the concept of “Democracy” itself. If there was any vestige of truth in Dr. Johnson’s claim that “patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel” it must apply all the more so to democracy.
No thinking person could suggest that 51% of the people are automatically right on any given issue just because they hold the majority opinion. On the contrary, in these days of media manipulation and the demonisation of any genuine, dissenting opinion the opposite is more likely to be true.
The idea of “Equality” is another self-evident absurdity since society is by nature bound to be hierarchical and couldn’t function in any other way.
It is high time that we ditched all such hangover concepts from the French Revolution and gave the public something they can respond to by the way of courageous leadership.
Stephen Ambartzakis
- Edit
Speak to the people of Greece about the “Values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights” from the self-serving, despicable globalist that run the EU. The bullying of Britain is a ham-fisted, Teutonic attempt to frighten all the member states into compliance with their globalist goals, they failed to do this by force of arms between 1939 and 1945 and are now attempting to do it by economic pressure. If, and when, Britain leaves this bloc believe me the consequences to the EU’s (mainly Germany’s) economy will be 10 times worse than anything that could possibly happen to Britain. Was it Churchill who said that “the Hun is either at your feet or at your throat”Tell them to take a long walk off of a short pier
Valerian
- Edit
Michael rejects the liberal idea of democracy based on simple majority votes of the electorate because they are ignorant and easily deceived. Surely this is the thinking behind the European Union which is a soft tyranny led by technocrats who know what is best for us. If the a simple majority of votes does not make the verdict ‘automatically right’ then why should we respect the will of the people as demonstrated by a 52% majority who voted for leaving the European Union in the referendum? Is it not the remainers who say that this majority is made up of ignorant prejudiced people and that their decision can be overturned by the truly enlightened minority?
Alec Suchi
- Edit
Voting to leave the European Union was an unexpected reversal for those seeking to establish a new world order based on the principles of universal values in place of traditional values which have served society for millennia. Institutions such as the EU and the United Nations are those very institutions which seek to impose a progressive/ liberal agenda enabled through mass immigration and the promotion of “diversity”, multiculturalism, multi-racialism, feminism, homosexuality and transgenderism. Many people took the opportunity to vote against the establishment and the vested interests it represents when voting to leave. Many conflated membership of the European Union with the post -war mass immigration which had detrimentally transformed our society beyond recognition.
The economic arguments are of secondary importance for many who are deeply committed to leave and also for the political commissars who are fanatically determined to ignore the result of the Referendum.
A government determined to leave the EU and in the United Kingdom’s relatively strong position would have made its intentions clear from the beginning. That is securing a clear break, without being members of the Custom’s Union or Single Market, or bound by the European Court of Justice.Continued Payments would have seized especially if the EU would undoubtedly prove intransigent.The freedom of movement would have ended immediately.
The European Project will start to unravel, whatever betrayal the people of the UK will face. The Visegrad countries of Hungary. Poland, Czech Republic and Slovakia are resisting many of the Eu’s demands and Italy is acting more in its own national interests following recent elections. Greece continues to feel resentful at the way the EU had undermined its sovereignty.
We live in interesting times!
John Stephens
- Edit
The “Unelected” include a Jewish parliament embedded within the E.U.
This alone tells any thinking person, that the old saying: “To find out who truly rules over you, understand who you cannot critisize”, is truth in essence.