By Max Musson:
Since before the general election there has been much talk in Conservative, government and establishment circles and within the mass media generally about terrorism, and the need to counter terrorist activity and extremism in our society. Recently on Independent Television (ITV) the Home Secretary Theresa May spoke to Susanna Reid about the need to counter extremism and those who seek to ‘divide’ our nation, stating, “we are one nation, we will be governing for one nation and as one nation”.
During his general election campaign Ed Miliband, still the Labour leader at that time, also spoke of his desire that Britain should be ‘one nation’, and this stated aim among the government and the wider political establishment is obviously absurd given their record of forcing multiracialism and multiculturalism down the throats of the electorate and given their assertion that we are a “pluralistic society”. Absurd as it seems, Theresa May actually used these two contradictory phrases during the course of that ITV interview with Susanna Reid: that Britain is at the same time, both a “pluralistic society” and “one nation”.
It is indeed astounding that individuals who have spent their entire careers in politics cannot see the folly of creating, against the will of our indigenous people, a society composed of many sub-divisions, representing many disparate racial, ethnic and religious groups, many with mutually contradictory aspirations, and then trying to govern the resulting abomination as if it is “one nation”. It is the equivalent of a livestock farmer assembling a random selection of sheep, goats, cattle, horses, pigs, dogs, cats and chickens, and then declaring a ‘one species’ programme of animal husbandry!
By their own actions, permitting uncontrolled mass immigration for decades on end, the Conservatives’ and the wider establishment’s ‘one nation’ concept has been rendered obsolete.
If we refer to an etymological dictionary for a definition of the word ‘nation’, we find the following: from Latin nationem (nominative natio) “birth, origin; breed, stock, kind, species; race of people, tribe”, a “large group of people with common ancestry”. Therefore, while multiracial and multicultural societies can be created – ‘pluralistic societies’ – these cannot by definition become synonymous with the concept of a ‘nation’ and can only exist in places where nationhood has effectively ceased to exist.
So absurdly self-contradictory are the concepts of multiracialism, multiculturalism and pluralism on the one hand, with the concept of nationhood on the other, that no rational person, and no-one other than someone who is mentally handicapped or somehow deluded, could seriously regard them as compatible. Those therefore like Theresa May, who advocate this conceptual oxymoron are in reality proposing that we indigenous British, forego our nationhood and to paraphrase the Home Secretary, embrace the concept that ‘we are no longer a nation, will be governed in the interests of no nation, and as if we are no nation’.
By Max Musson © 2015
# # # #
Stefan
- Edit
‘we are no longer a nation, will be governed in the interests of no nation, and as if we are no nation’.
That sounds exactly like their plan!
Though I would add that it is in somebodies interests that this happens.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
May she Rest in Peace – very soon!
Max Musson
- Edit
Her early retirement would be enough for me!
Richard James
- Edit
I’m waiting for Goldstein to appear and explain that the Party only exist in our minds and so this doublethink from Theresa May can be both true and false at the same time .
Albert
- Edit
Since the end of WW2 The Cultural Marxist and Zionist decided to destroy European Nationalism forever…by importing millions of immigrants mostly Third World…and Muslims, At the same time The Cultural Marxist are in every part of British Society…They run The Arts, Media, Schools, Local Government, Border Control.
While these Traitors are still in control…it will never end until this Country becomes Third World…..
But one thing for sure…Once Islam takes this Country The Cultural Marxist will be the first to be put up against the wall.
Michael
- Edit
Such is the Conservative and Unionist Party’s decline that this brain-dead and utterly gormless woman is seriously reckoned to be a good potential ‘leader’ of that vile, anti-British party. Still, at least they are not the ‘nasty party’ she once castigated them in a puerile conference speech as being!
heechee
- Edit
I agree Michael it was puerile to single them out as the nasty party, all of them are nasty parties.
But they are still a nasty party, albeit in a different way now. Still their policies have much the same effect as the “old nasty party” on the lives of ordinary folk. Gone is the pretense of selling the national assets to the people, now it’s privatise the services/assets directly into the hands of the big corporations to hollow them out or suck them dry..
And no need to create mass unemployment to produce low wages when a steady tidal wave of immigrants can take the blame.
Three bodies, one head, our main political parties are a reverse Hydra.
MsBridgit
- Edit
We are not ONE nation anymore we are a potpourri of every nation on earth, and it is beginning to show.
Byrhtnoth
- Edit
This ‘society composed of many sub-divisions, representing many disparate racial, ethnic and religious groups, many with mutually contradictory aspirations’ is, in the eyes of the establishment, merely a collection of economic units to be deployed where they can be most efficiently exploited. Everything is now evaluated for it’s economic utility and racial, ethnic and religeous divisions are expected to die out as citizens adapt to the role of consumers and producers in a uniform global system. The new man is now ‘homo economicus’.
Max Musson
- Edit
Yes, that is the plan, but as history shows, racial, ethnic and religious divisions and inter-group tensions are exacerbated in a multiracial/multicultural setting.
Ian
- Edit
Balkanization
Richard Edmonds
- Edit
WE are told that inflation is now running at zero per-cent. But today we learn (today’s
Daily Express) that the average house price has risen by 21,000 pounds in the last twelve
months: a rise of 10 % over the year. Clearly this dreadful increase in the price of a
roof over one’s head is driven by Immigration – a policy of housing the rest of the world
in our country.
As Charles Moore, the former editor of the Daily Telegraph, wrote in his article (9. May
2015) on the General Election: “It is truly scandalous that millions of the younger
generation cannot hope to buy the sort of house which their parents could afford.”
____________________________________________________________
TiglathUK
- Edit
She bangs on about British Values of tolerance. This tolerance historically was never mindless or total; it was always conditional. When the (white) Romans invaded (and later raped Boadicea’s daughters) the indigenous Britons tried to repel them and killed 60,000 Romans! Our famous British tolerance only extends to our own kinsmen, when they slowly integrated with us, possible only as they were of common stock and similar in thinking and values. Pakistanis are not my kinsmen, or ever will be and can never integrate with us without destroying us.
Meanwhile she will not lift her finger to stop the little Ulster Baker ‘Asher’ from getting prosecuted and sued for politely declining to bake a gay marriage themed cake for two militant homosexuals. Her government is hugely INTOLERANT!
Rerevisionist
- Edit
Nicely researched and worded. Hear hear!